Clinton on Fox

13567…11

Comments

  • lalalalaaaaaaaa
    lalalalaaaaaaaa Posts: 2,445
    blackredyellow wrote:
    Yes, and the ones where this administration kept going for a couple years, even though they now say they went to war in Iraq to help the people there. I guess they didn't care too much during the first couple years if the sanctions were that bad.

    Bush 2 has no interest in helping Iraqis. Niether did Clinton, nor Bush 1, nor Reagan.
  • chopitdown
    chopitdown Posts: 2,222
    i love how the topic is now turning to "i did more than them" to catch bin laden... to steal a great line... do or do not there is no try. They both have failed at catching him. I don't get extra points for trying really hard in my job; roy williams didnt get to use the 40 points they almost put up on Seattle. Once again we have a bunch of babies saying i did more...they both have failed at catching him; THAT is the thing to remember.

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/26/rice.clinton.ap/index.html
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    chopitdown wrote:
    i love how the topic is now turning to "i did more than them" to catch bin laden... to steal a great line... do or do not there is no try. They both have failed at catching him. I don't get extra points for trying really hard in my job; roy williams didnt get to use the 40 points they almost put up on Seattle. Once again we have a bunch of babies saying i did more...they both have failed at catching him; THAT is the thing to remember.

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/26/rice.clinton.ap/index.html


    well put dude. that is the truth.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Hope&Anger wrote:
    You mean like letting bin Laden go in Tora Bora? And calling the Special Forces off bin Laden a couple of years ago? And most recently letting Musharraf's government enter into an agreement not to pursue bin Laden -- or any member of al-Qaeda -- in the Pakistani territories he's most likely to be hiding?

    And let's not forget that when Clinton lobbed bombs targeting bin Laden, right-wing Republican hacks accused him of "wagging the dog." Oh, and Clinton hired Richard Clarke and took him seriously. Bush basically demoted him.

    C'mon. Get real.

    it doesnt matter. Neither of them could catch him. "who did more" is a worthless argument.
  • chopitdown
    chopitdown Posts: 2,222
    jlew24asu wrote:
    it doesnt matter. Neither of them could catch him. "who did more" is a worthless argument.

    it just goes to reinforce the wussification of america. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23347
    everyone is a winner, rather, everyone is a participant and we don't have winners and losers we have people who tried and get rewarded for it.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    chopitdown wrote:
    it just goes to reinforce the wussification of america. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23347
    everyone is a winner, rather, everyone is a participant and we don't have winners and losers we have people who tried and get rewarded for it.


    I wouldnt go that far
  • Jammin909
    Jammin909 Posts: 888
    chopitdown wrote:
    it just goes to reinforce the wussification of america. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23347
    everyone is a winner, rather, everyone is a participant and we don't have winners and losers we have people who tried and get rewarded for it.

    I saw an interview with a Californian administrator a couple years ago who banned tag at recess for the same reasons as it unnecessarily ostracized the kid who was "it".
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • chopitdown
    chopitdown Posts: 2,222
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I wouldnt go that far

    well, that's ok. I think it may be a bit over the top, but i thought it applied a bit.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    PaperPlates wrote:
    Clinton was just as bad a president as Bush is, just in different ways and for different reasons. When throwing Clinton out there as your parties "best foot forward" is all you have, your party is truly desparate.

    Clinton is not our parties "best foot forward". There are some shooting stars in the Democratic Party. Think of former Virginia (the mother of all Red states) Governor Mark Warner. He left office with an approval rating of OVER 80%. John Edwards is going to come back and I think be a front runner in '08, I hope so at least, even I am not a huge Hillary fan. Then lets not forget about the biggest shooting star, Senator Obama.

    I would take those three any day of Rudy/Bloomberg/Condi

    McCain though, my jury is still out on him...
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ledvedderman wrote:
    Clinton is not our parties "best foot forward". There are some shooting stars in the Democratic Party. Think of former Virginia (the mother of all Red states) Governor Mark Warner. He left office with an approval rating of OVER 80%. John Edwards is going to come back and I think be a front runner in '08, I hope so at least, even I am not a huge Hillary fan. Then lets not forget about the biggest shooting star, Senator Obama.

    I would take those three any day of Rudy/Bloomberg/Condi

    McCain though, my jury is still out on him...


    Edwards or hilary would be horrible. if I have to stare at the duchbag give me the double thumbs up again, I might puke. and hilary, she can only "effective", i use that term very loosly, run the country 3 weeks a month. (ever hear of PMS). bring it ladies.

    Obama, now he is a stand up guy. I like him.

    but its Rudy in 08.
  • chopitdown
    chopitdown Posts: 2,222
    Jammin909 wrote:
    I saw an interview with a Californian administrator a couple years ago who banned tag at recess for the same reasons as it unnecessarily ostracized the kid who was "it".

    i know, i think we are setting up some kids for a big reality experience when they get older...but that's another thread.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Edwards or hilary would be horrible. if I have to stare at the duchbag give me the double thumbs up again, I might puke. and hilary, she can only "effective", i use that term very loosly, run the country 3 weeks a month. (ever hear of PMS). bring it ladies.

    Obama, now he is a stand up guy. I like him.

    but its Rudy in 08.

    Edwards has a lot going for him. I think that one thing that will help him is the human element he has since he first came into the spotlight. People have learned about his son who died in an automobile accident, and then his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. That really connects with people. I know being a trial lawyer will hurt him, but if oil men can take over the White House, who can't. Get the bucket ready, you are going to see a lot of Edwards in the months/years to come. The thumbs up is coming back.

    Warner is the guy the GOB should fear more than anything, I think Hilary will end up pissing off the base before the primary. She should stay just where she is.

    I am quite one sided with my love for Obama, from my past of working with him. However, is '08 too soon for him? I don't know. Part of me wants him to run so there are less votes he has to cast in the Senate that could come back to bite him in the ass, but I think having him as a VP and more in the spotlight before he runs for President would be a great idea. Everyone, red and blue, would fall in love with this guy. I think Obama should be the fire extinguisher behind the glass case, only to be used when you really are in need
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    and the award for total fucking idiot of the century goes to....


    talk like that will get you banned.
  • hippiemom
    hippiemom Posts: 3,326
    jlew24asu wrote:
    and hilary, she can only "effective", i use that term very loosly, run the country 3 weeks a month. (ever hear of PMS). bring it ladies.
    The premenstrual period is when a woman's hormone levels are closest to typical male levels. In other words, it's the time when she's most like a man is all month long.

    Oh, and here's a news flash, genius .... 60 year old women don't get PMS :rolleyes:
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    hippiemom wrote:
    The premenstrual period is when a woman's hormone levels are closest to typical male levels. In other words, it's the time when she's most like a man is all month long.

    Oh, and here's a news flash, genius .... 60 year old women don't get PMS :rolleyes:


    I was waiting for you to come by. relax genius, it was a joke. and your right i should have mentioned her lack of ability to lead with the hot flashes from menopause. how about we lighten up around here
  • Milhouse VanHouten
    Milhouse VanHouten Posts: 755
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I was waiting for you to come by. relax genius, it was a joke. and your right i should have mentioned her lack of ability to lead with the hot flashes from menopause. how about we lighten up around here

    It would have been more recognizable as a joke if it had been "funny" or "humorous".
    "Of course it hurts. You're getting fucked by an elephant."
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Milhouse VanHouten wrote:
    It would have been more recognizable as a joke if it had been "funny" or "humorous".


    im sorry you dont find my taste in humor funny. wait no im not. move on.



    EDITED for typos.
  • Milhouse VanHouten
    Milhouse VanHouten Posts: 755
    jlew24asu wrote:
    im sorry you dont find my taste in humor funny. wait not im not. move on.

    "wait not im not."

    now that's funny.
    "Of course it hurts. You're getting fucked by an elephant."
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Milhouse VanHouten wrote:
    "wait not im not."

    now that's funny.


    hey I agree with you, typos can be funnny. you arent such a bad kid after all
  • fragileblake
    fragileblake Posts: 716
    lame, looks like fox had all the youtube links taken down in an effort to not further thier embarassment
    http://blakepnw.blogspot.com/

Categories