Clinton on Fox

Options
1…5678911»

Comments

  • YieldInHiding
    YieldInHiding Posts: 1,841
    jlew24asu wrote:
    while I don't disagree with you. throwing up a few missiles and calling it a day isn't the greatest response to being attacked on our own soil. that being said, bush failed to kill osama but at least succeeded in taking away a base of operations.

    We weren't attacked on our own soil unless you count the 1993 WTC bombing and by 98, I believe we captured most involved in that crime. Not to mention, at that time, we didn't know how far-reaching Al Qaida was, much less that Bin Laden was the mastermind and financeer.

    Having embassies bombed and flying planes into buildings in the biggest city in the U.S. killing innocent civilians are quite different. Clinton was battling the Republican congress in getting the appropriations to fight the "war on terror." In fact, we tried a number of times to get Bin Laden but he either left the area he was in before a strike could be made or CIA dragged their feet.

    Also, Clinton did take away a base of operations for Bin Laden. Remember Sudan?
    No longer overwhelmed it seems so simple now.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    YieldInHiding wrote:
    We weren't attacked on our own soil unless you count the 1993 WTC bombing and by 98, I believe we captured most involved in that crime. Not to mention, at that time, we didn't know how far-reaching Al Qaida was, much less that Bin Laden was the mastermind and financeer.

    Having embassies bombed and flying planes into buildings in the biggest city in the U.S. killing innocent civilians are quite different. Clinton was battling the Republican congress in getting the appropriations to fight the "war on terror." In fact, we tried a number of times to get Bin Laden but he either left the area he was in before a strike could be made or CIA dragged their feet.

    Also, Clinton did take away a base of operations for Bin Laden. Remember Sudan?

    yes that counts. and yes we did catch most involved thankfully. I would disagree that we didnt know bin laden was the main man. I'm not blaming Clinton for not getting bin laden. admittedly, he tried and failed. as did bush.

    look, im not trying to take sides, left or right. I try to call it like I see it. both presidents failed. which one did more to catch him? thats debatable. I really dont know. they both suck for giving up the chase until he was dead or in jail. it sucks that even politics can get in the way. that piece of shit needs to be dead.

    as far as sudan, basically clinton asked the government to kick him out of the country, not arrest him.

    http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm
  • YieldInHiding
    YieldInHiding Posts: 1,841
    jlew24asu wrote:

    as far as sudan, basically clinton asked the government to kick him out of the country, not arrest him.

    http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm


    Right, because there was no serious offer to extradite Bin Laden to the U.S.

    http://www.9-11commission.gov/staff_statements/staff_statement_5.pdf
    No longer overwhelmed it seems so simple now.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    YieldInHiding wrote:
    Right, because there was no serious offer to extradite Bin Laden to the U.S.

    http://www.9-11commission.gov/staff_statements/staff_statement_5.pdf

    if only one of those missiles would have hit him. ........from bush or clinton. I hope to see the day.
  • YieldInHiding
    YieldInHiding Posts: 1,841
    jlew24asu wrote:
    if only one of those missiles would have hit him. ........from bush or clinton. I hope to see the day.

    Agreed. We all do. Hopefully.
    No longer overwhelmed it seems so simple now.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    YieldInHiding wrote:
    Agreed. We all do. Hopefully.



    and btw, yield sucks. :) no code baby!!




    low blow lol
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    jlew24asu wrote:
    and btw, yield sucks. :) no code baby!!

    low blow lol

    Both are the two single worst albums of pearl jam's creation.

    Why wouldn't you have said Ten, Vitology or Versus?
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • YieldInHiding
    YieldInHiding Posts: 1,841
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Both are the two single worst albums of pearl jam's creation.

    Why wouldn't you have said Ten, Vitology or Versus?

    Wow...you're deranged. :)
    No longer overwhelmed it seems so simple now.
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    YieldInHiding wrote:
    Wow...you're deranged. :)

    I have a book of the best selling records of all time, guess what? Neither Yield nor No Code are in it.

    Guess which album is? Ten.

    No Code actually marked a drop in record sales for the band. Which I doubt they have recovered from. I personally stopped purchasing their albums after purchasing No Code and Yield.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Jam
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire

Categories