Is it just me...or does OBL sound like the typical Lib?
Purple Hawk
Posts: 1,300
*** NOTE...I'm not saying you libs hate America and want the terrorists to win *eye roll*...i'm just saying...the content of OBL's message is something i expect from the ten club newsletter 
from the Great one
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: All right, some of the details of the Bin Laden tape, the supposed Bin Laden tape, have been released. Now, this is a hoot. In the first place, there is no specific threat to the United States in the tape, unless there is one in code. But there's no promise that we're going to get hit again. There may be some code in there, but nothing direct. But it is amazing, folks, it is a liberal rant. He blames the US for global warming. He blames US corporate interests for corrupting the political process, because our politicians have to run out and raise so much money in order to run for president. He excoriates the Democrats. Now I understand why some people were saying earlier that this tape could not be good for Democrats, because what he apparently says on this tape, this Bin Laden look-alike -- I'm sorry, I refuse to believe it's Bin Laden. It's just me. If I'm wrong, when we find out, I will be glad to admit it. I don't have to do it very often, so I'm used to it, but I'm going to tell you this: He excoriates the Democrats, he lets it known, lets it be known, that he favors what they promise. He said, "You Democrats won the election in November because the American people want this war in Iraq over. But what have you done? You have continued to authorize billions and billions of dollars for the war. You are failing in your mission to the American people," and on and on with things like this.
He's blaming the United States for global warming and stealing the world's resources. It is a liberal rant. It's everything you would hear out of San Francisco. It's what you would hear from a major college campus, take your pick of a professor. It's on the Senate floor. It's anything you would hear out of the mouth of an average elected Democrat. It's stunning. I can't wait to get a hold of the actual transcript of this thing, because it's obviously in a language -- (speaking gobbly gook) -- and it would be worthless to play that because we can't understand it. We're going to get the transcript of this. It may not happen until Monday, but I was watching the Drive-Bys. Jim Miklaszewski on PMSNBC was going through a brief summary of the transcript. He was focused on how this is not going to help the Democrats. Well, what do you think? Whose side are they on anyway? Why is this a surprise? The Democrats in this country are invested in defeat, they own defeat. They're cementing that investment today and yesterday, and they'll do so next week when the Petraeus report comes out. How can anybody assume they're on anybody's side but Bin Laden's? "Rush, you can't say it like that." Why not? This is like back in the old Nicaragua days.
Let's review this, because I don't care what intentions are. I care about end results. So we've got a budding little Soviet client state down there, Nicaragua, run by Daniel Ortega, who, by the way, is back in power down there. However, I don't know what shape his government's in after Hurricane Felix went in there. But regardless, you remember the Contra wars? Reagan was trying to do everything he could to get some money down there to the Contras, the so-called freedom fighters, the modern equivalent of our Founding Fathers, trying to defeat this Soviet beachhead being established. The Democrats in Congress voted down every funding effort, which is what led to the Iran-Contra scandal and so forth. But that's the point. Any attempt to fund, the Democrats were constantly voting it down. Then after a number of votes, Ortega would get on a plane and go to the Soviet Union and he'd come back with a big aid package from the Soviet Union and he'd start bragging about it, and the Democrats in Congress: "You can't embarrass us this way," and they'd send people like George Miller from California and Kerry went down there a couple times, to scold the guy: "You can't do this."
So people started saying, "You know what? You guys are actually voting with the communists, the Sandinista government down in Nicaragua." "You challenge our patriotism?" "Well, sir, you may not be voting for them, but what would be the difference if you were? The result of your actions is you are supporting the establishment of a Soviet beachhead in Nicaragua." By the way, they still speak glowingly of Castro. They're not threatened at all or bothered by Hugo Chavez. So it's the same situation here with the Iraq situation. They may cringe and they may react at allegations that they're on the side of the terrorists, but how are their votes and their statements to be interpreted any other way? We certainly can't claim that they're on our side, not when the side we're on is victory. They are clearly not for victory. They have no interest in it, total defeat. So this Bin Laden tape makes it clear that he is on the Democrat side and he excoriates them for not doing what they were elected to do.
Now, if I'm a Democrat and this tape comes out and I accept the fact that this is actually Bin Laden, which of course they will, and I got this guy who blew up 3,000 Americans and would like to do it as often as he could, sidling up to me being critical because I'm not doing my job to do what he wants accomplished, which is us out of Iraq, how would I feel? Would I be the slightest bit embarrassed? If I'm Jack Murtha, if I'm Dingy Harry, if I'm Nancy Pelosi, or Dick Durbin, Chuck Schumer, am I embarrassed at all that Osama Bin Laden is on my side? I would think that I would be. I don't think that is what gets through their thick skulls. They'll come out with the requisite piece that the only difference between him and a bag of manure is the bag, whatever they're going to say. But to people paying attention, folks, there can be no mistaking it. Osama Bin Laden expects the Democrat Party of this country to do his bidding and excoriates them for failing in this latest tape of his.
from the Great one
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: All right, some of the details of the Bin Laden tape, the supposed Bin Laden tape, have been released. Now, this is a hoot. In the first place, there is no specific threat to the United States in the tape, unless there is one in code. But there's no promise that we're going to get hit again. There may be some code in there, but nothing direct. But it is amazing, folks, it is a liberal rant. He blames the US for global warming. He blames US corporate interests for corrupting the political process, because our politicians have to run out and raise so much money in order to run for president. He excoriates the Democrats. Now I understand why some people were saying earlier that this tape could not be good for Democrats, because what he apparently says on this tape, this Bin Laden look-alike -- I'm sorry, I refuse to believe it's Bin Laden. It's just me. If I'm wrong, when we find out, I will be glad to admit it. I don't have to do it very often, so I'm used to it, but I'm going to tell you this: He excoriates the Democrats, he lets it known, lets it be known, that he favors what they promise. He said, "You Democrats won the election in November because the American people want this war in Iraq over. But what have you done? You have continued to authorize billions and billions of dollars for the war. You are failing in your mission to the American people," and on and on with things like this.
He's blaming the United States for global warming and stealing the world's resources. It is a liberal rant. It's everything you would hear out of San Francisco. It's what you would hear from a major college campus, take your pick of a professor. It's on the Senate floor. It's anything you would hear out of the mouth of an average elected Democrat. It's stunning. I can't wait to get a hold of the actual transcript of this thing, because it's obviously in a language -- (speaking gobbly gook) -- and it would be worthless to play that because we can't understand it. We're going to get the transcript of this. It may not happen until Monday, but I was watching the Drive-Bys. Jim Miklaszewski on PMSNBC was going through a brief summary of the transcript. He was focused on how this is not going to help the Democrats. Well, what do you think? Whose side are they on anyway? Why is this a surprise? The Democrats in this country are invested in defeat, they own defeat. They're cementing that investment today and yesterday, and they'll do so next week when the Petraeus report comes out. How can anybody assume they're on anybody's side but Bin Laden's? "Rush, you can't say it like that." Why not? This is like back in the old Nicaragua days.
Let's review this, because I don't care what intentions are. I care about end results. So we've got a budding little Soviet client state down there, Nicaragua, run by Daniel Ortega, who, by the way, is back in power down there. However, I don't know what shape his government's in after Hurricane Felix went in there. But regardless, you remember the Contra wars? Reagan was trying to do everything he could to get some money down there to the Contras, the so-called freedom fighters, the modern equivalent of our Founding Fathers, trying to defeat this Soviet beachhead being established. The Democrats in Congress voted down every funding effort, which is what led to the Iran-Contra scandal and so forth. But that's the point. Any attempt to fund, the Democrats were constantly voting it down. Then after a number of votes, Ortega would get on a plane and go to the Soviet Union and he'd come back with a big aid package from the Soviet Union and he'd start bragging about it, and the Democrats in Congress: "You can't embarrass us this way," and they'd send people like George Miller from California and Kerry went down there a couple times, to scold the guy: "You can't do this."
So people started saying, "You know what? You guys are actually voting with the communists, the Sandinista government down in Nicaragua." "You challenge our patriotism?" "Well, sir, you may not be voting for them, but what would be the difference if you were? The result of your actions is you are supporting the establishment of a Soviet beachhead in Nicaragua." By the way, they still speak glowingly of Castro. They're not threatened at all or bothered by Hugo Chavez. So it's the same situation here with the Iraq situation. They may cringe and they may react at allegations that they're on the side of the terrorists, but how are their votes and their statements to be interpreted any other way? We certainly can't claim that they're on our side, not when the side we're on is victory. They are clearly not for victory. They have no interest in it, total defeat. So this Bin Laden tape makes it clear that he is on the Democrat side and he excoriates them for not doing what they were elected to do.
Now, if I'm a Democrat and this tape comes out and I accept the fact that this is actually Bin Laden, which of course they will, and I got this guy who blew up 3,000 Americans and would like to do it as often as he could, sidling up to me being critical because I'm not doing my job to do what he wants accomplished, which is us out of Iraq, how would I feel? Would I be the slightest bit embarrassed? If I'm Jack Murtha, if I'm Dingy Harry, if I'm Nancy Pelosi, or Dick Durbin, Chuck Schumer, am I embarrassed at all that Osama Bin Laden is on my side? I would think that I would be. I don't think that is what gets through their thick skulls. They'll come out with the requisite piece that the only difference between him and a bag of manure is the bag, whatever they're going to say. But to people paying attention, folks, there can be no mistaking it. Osama Bin Laden expects the Democrat Party of this country to do his bidding and excoriates them for failing in this latest tape of his.
And you ask me what I want this year
And I try to make this kind and clear
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
And desire and love and empty things
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
And I try to make this kind and clear
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
And desire and love and empty things
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
...oh yeah...same person
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
The only thing actually interesting was the "it's not obl" part. The rest just made me feel a bit more stupider. How do you actually listen to a man who basically says that half of your fellow countrymen are actually comparable to a mass murderer blinded by fanatism? And how can you sit and listen who assimilates contradiction, protest and criticism with terrorism?
Has anyone ever listened to some of the things he has said about the U.S. and why it's in the middle east ? At times, he's quite correct in what he says. At other times, not so much. But there is SOME truth to what says about the U.S.. By comparison, I have rarely found myself agreeing with Bush or Cheney.
anyhoo, I'm pretty sure I got an email from Moveon.org written by OBL...
as an aside, what's up with OBL using JUST FOR MEN 'Natural Jet Black' Color Gel For Mustache & Beard...
Its so fucking backwards I just have to laugh.
Besides the fucking obvoius, invading and occupying an Arab country has played right into the hands of the Jihadist movement/OBL/Tim Osman. Just what they needed to recruit more young impressionable Muslims to the cause. He couldn't have asked for anything more. Good work GWB.
On a side note...
My favorite part of the Rush Limbaugh experience is his daily rant against the anti war ppl for being weak and not "having the will to fight" blah blah blah then in the next segment proceeds to fill us in on his daily golf resort trips at his private country club in FLA. That a boy Rush, sacrificing every day I see.
It pays big money to schill for big corporations. Job well done Ass Cyst Man.
they say Muhammad started that trend
note the irony in which each side calls the other out for being so radical and determined in their cause
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Your man is stuffed with so much straw it's a fire hazard.
this is the most ridiculous and unsubstantiated conclusion i've ever read. lo and behold, a few things obl says echo universal liberal policies... you're right, dems should be humiliated by this.
so let's turn it around. are you at all embarrassed that the republican views on religion mirror those of OBL and iran in that they want a theocracy?
yeah, i didnt think so.
if you think he is to blame for 9-11,you're being duped.
if you think that there is any REAL opposition between democrats and republicans,you're being duped.
"I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
Emiliano Zapata
is a good book.
Nuclear fission
so that wasnt osama on the tape? who was it?
His twin brother, Yasama Bin Laden.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
it can't be osama bin laden. It's all to simple. If you rearrange all the letters in his name you can spell "Baa Mansion Led" Baa is clearly in reference to the sheep that follow the government and the head of our government lives in a big white house or a mansion. So really, it was GWB who is the head of all the sheep who can't think and lives in a big mansion. You act like it's so hard to comprehend; IT'S NOT. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills talking with you people.
find the truth yourself, its all out there. it can be found here..
http://www.youtube.com
http://www.video.google.com
Yes, and as a wise man once told me, it's on the internet so it's gotta be true.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
...I can't tell if you are serious
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
i'm not.
Keith Hernandez...
of course... only he could pull off facial hair like that!
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
It is never used in a way not intended to get a rise out of someone. It's always half joking, half jab. It's as if someone who is liberal minded is supposed to get offended by it but at the same time not fully take it seriously because it's so cutesy. Look at every post where someone uses it in the title or to start off a thread. You'll see a trend of very similar posts. They are not usually very 'deep' posts, and when debated the original poster usually has nothing to back up their point of view with. The original post is usually a copy and paste of a conservative article, and the original poster 9 times out of 10 can't defend anything they say. I can tell what kind of post is going to follow if someone uses the term "lib".
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
yea I hear ya. same way people refer to anyone who leans right (or even takes a second to hear the right point of view) as a neo-con
http://www.newsgroper.com/osama-bin-laden/2007/09/11/pearl-jam-fans-bit/