let the dialogue begin!

Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
edited December 2006 in A Moving Train
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6167695.stm

What a wonderful start. Bakerasaurous, O'Connerasauras, and all the rest of those irrelevant, self-absorbed losers have got to be happy that we are finally starting to reach a consensus. How GOOD does this make us all feel? MMM...I am SO glad we are FINALLY trying to understand one another.

Iran defends Holocaust conference
Iran's foreign minister has rejected criticism of a two-day conference being held in Iran to examine whether the Holocaust actually happened.
Manouchehr Mottaki told participants the event did not seek to confirm or deny the Holocaust, but rather to allow people to "express their views freely".

Israel's prime minister has condemned the gathering as "a sick phenomenon".

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has questioned the scale of the Holocaust, in which six million Jews died.

According to the foreign ministry in Tehran, 67 researchers from 30 countries are attending the conference in Iran, which is home to 25,000 Jews.


Its main aim is to create an opportunity for thinkers who cannot express their views freely in Europe about the Holocaust
Manouchehr Mottaki
Iranian foreign minister


Participants include a number of well-known "revisionist" Western academics. American David Duke, a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, is to present a paper.

But a number of Jewish rabbis are also there. One, British Rabbi Ahron Cohen, said he had come to the conference to put the "Orthodox Jewish viewpoint" across.

"We certainly say there was a Holocaust, we lived through the Holocaust. But in no way can it be used as a justification for perpetrating unjust acts against the Palestinians," he said.

'Express views freely'

Opening the conference, Mr Mottaki said the aim of the conference was "not to deny or confirm the Holocaust".

"Its main aim is to create an opportunity for thinkers who cannot express their views freely in Europe about the Holocaust," he said.


CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS
Australian Fredrick Toeben , jailed in Germany for incitement and insulting the memory of the dead
Frenchman Robert Faurisson , convicted in France under Holocaust denial laws
Frenchman Georges Thiel , convicted in France under Holocaust denial laws
American David Duke , a former KKK leader and white supremacist

Mr Mottaki dismissed foreign criticism as "predictable", telling delegates there was "no logical reason" to oppose the conference.
In a recorded address broadcast to the nation, President Ahmadinejad questioned why the West would not allow "any investigation" into the Holocaust.

Mr Ahmadinejad has repeatedly downplayed the extent of the Holocaust, describing it as a myth used to justify the existence of Israel and oppression of the Palestinians. He has called for Israel to be dismantled.

But in a number of European countries - including Germany, Austria and France - it is illegal to deny the Holocaust. An Austrian court jailed Briton David Irving for three years on charges of Holocaust denial.

'Negative impression'

Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert condemned the conference as "a sick phenomenon that shows the depths of hatred of the fundamentalist Iranian regime".

Norbert Lammert, president of the German parliament, sent a letter to Mr Ahmadinejad criticising the event.


"I condemn any attempt to offer anti-Semitic propaganda a public forum under the pretext of scientific freedom and objectivity," he wrote.
A number of prominent Holocaust historians are attending a rival gathering taking place in Berlin, backed by the German government, in protest at the Tehran conference.

The US state department last week described the Iranian event as "yet another disgraceful act on this particular subject by the regime in Tehran".

Iran knows this conference is going to cause outrage abroad but it says it wants to test the limits of the West's commitment to freedom of speech, says the BBC's correspondent in Tehran, Frances Harrison.

Iran is drawing a parallel with the Danish cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad, which provoked outrage in the Islamic world but were defended by Western liberals, she says.

Iran's one Jewish MP, Morris Motamed, told the BBC he opposed the conference.

"Holding this conference after having a competition of cartoons about the Holocaust has put a lot of pressure on Jews all over the world and it can give nations and governments a very negative impression of Iran," he said.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6167695.stm

Published: 2006/12/11 18:12:48 GMT
And you ask me what I want this year
And I try to make this kind and clear
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
And desire and love and empty things
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    Yeah Iran's great. Nice to know that these guys are going for the bomb. Also nice to note how this conference meshes and the nuclear ambitions mesh so well with the wipe Israel off the map rhetoric. Gotta love it.
  • Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    dayan wrote:
    Yeah Iran's great. Nice to know that these guys are going for the bomb. Also nice to note how this conference meshes and the nuclear ambitions mesh so well with the wipe Israel off the map rhetoric. Gotta love it.

    What an arrogant response! We must listen to the other side. We can't let our arrogance blind us. This awful, angry, discourse is not constructive. we must LISTEN.

    Of course, we should have no expectations that they listen to us...but to solve the problem, we need to address our exploitive ways. We must address how we are the sick, twisted, autocratic hegemony. But putting our point of view out there...that is shoving democracy down the world's throats.

    Sorry Dayan, many are offended by your reply.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • yosi1yosi1 Posts: 3,272
    What an arrogant response! We must listen to the other side. We can't let our arrogance blind us. This awful, angry, discourse is not constructive. we must LISTEN.

    Of course, we should have no expectations that they listen to us...but to solve the problem, we need to address our exploitive ways. We must address how we are the sick, twisted, autocratic hegemony. But putting our point of view out there...that is shoving democracy down the world's throats.

    Sorry Dayan, many are offended by your reply.

    What are you talking about?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane.
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    Leaving the tone of my post aside, I don't see what you could have been offended by in my post. I was just saying that I personally am scared shitless of a country that is trying to build nuclear weapons while simultaneously holding conferences to deny history's most horrific genocide and talking about carrying out a new genocide against Jews of Israel. I don't see what's offensive in that.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    dayan wrote:
    Leaving the tone of my post aside, I don't see what you could have been offended by in my post. I was just saying that I personally am scared shitless of a country that is trying to build nuclear weapons while simultaneously holding conferences to deny history's most horrific genocide and talking about carrying out a new genocide against Jews of Israel. I don't see what's offensive in that.

    he was making a poor attempt at satire. it ended up mere charicature.
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    my bad...I get it now, and I'm right there with you
  • Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    he was making a poor attempt at satire. it ended up mere charicature.

    Trust me, a majority of posters here were offended by his (and my) post. And I mean, I can get that. Focusing on what world leaders are saying and doing is so much more offensive than paying attention to has-been actors/producers/comedians and freaking out at what talk show hosts are saying.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    All this promotion of free speech gives me the warm fuzzies ...
  • Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    All this promotion of free speech gives me the warm fuzzies ...


    See...you get it. Me too. I just feel really good that we are finally talking.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • Free speech is so important. It's pretty disturbing that some countries do not hold it as sacred as the U.S.

    Even the most vile and disgusting speech, so long as it does not directly promote violence or personal injury, should be tolerated. I cannot see how denying the holocaust's numbers does this.

    I agree that around 6 million jews died during the holocaust. Nonetheless, no topic should be off-limits in educated circles. If a person has information they believe supports their position, then let her speak.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    Free speech is so important. It's pretty disturbing that some countries do not hold it as sacred as the U.S.

    Even the most vile and disgusting speech, so long as it does not directly promote violence or personal injury, should be tolerated. I cannot see how denying the holocaust's numbers does this.

    I agree that around 6 million jews died during the holocaust. Nonetheless, no topic should be off-limits in educated circles. If a person has information they believe supports their position, then let her speak.

    Do you actually mean that? Is so, then everyone's views should be freely heard ... Tea and crumpets with the local skinheads, anyone?
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    Yeah, I don't think that Holocaust deniers should be forcibly silenced. They should just be ignored, and or reviled. Also denying the genocides of the past is the first step to perpetrating the genocides of the future...especially in this case.
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    dayan wrote:
    Yeah, I don't think that Holocaust deniers should be forcibly silenced. They should just be ignored, and or reviled. Also denying the genocides of the past is the first step to perpetrating the genocides of the future...especially in this case.

    For sure. I am actually with Corporate Whore, when he or she argues that such people should not be forceably silenced. However, its easy to forget about the responsibilities that come along with the right to free speech. The motives of Iran's government are not pure ... This is perverting free speech in the name of antagonism and hatred. Maybe offensive cartoons about Muslims are a lesser version of that as well ... Personally, I think there is a difference between satirical cartoons as a thought experiment and deliberate promulgation of hatred.
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    Agreed entirely. Also Iran is invoking free speech when that right isn't accorded to Iran's own citizens. I read recently, I think in the Wall Street Journal, that the Iranian government just arrested a labor leader for trying to organize a union for Tehran's bus drivers. They arrested him and then had his tongue sliced with razor blades. Not the people to be lecturing the West on moral behavior.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Trust me, a majority of posters here were offended by his (and my) post. And I mean, I can get that. Focusing on what world leaders are saying and doing is so much more offensive than paying attention to has-been actors/producers/comedians and freaking out at what talk show hosts are saying.

    i suppose you have statistical evidence of that? you have your blinding, unquestion hatred of liberals and so assume all your conclusions about them are correct. i dont think there is a person here who would say this conference is not misguided and offensive.
  • For sure. I am actually with Corporate Whore, when he or she argues that such people should not be forceably silenced. However, its easy to forget about the responsibilities that come along with the right to free speech. The motives of Iran's government are not pure ... This is perverting free speech in the name of antagonism and hatred. Maybe offensive cartoons about Muslims are a lesser version of that as well ... Personally, I think there is a difference between satirical cartoons as a thought experiment and deliberate promulgation of hatred.

    The European countries are so well educated that it is unnecessary for them to forcibly silence holocaust deniers.

    Additionally, these people are denying numbers, not that it happened, by and large. The numbers have changed over the years too. Still, their motives are clearly not pure, but that doesn't mean people with pure motives should be silenced.
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Do you actually mean that? Is so, then everyone's views should be freely heard ... Tea and crumpets with the local skinheads, anyone?

    yes, they should. and in fact, the supreme court has upheld this right and protected the rights of skinheads and the KKK to demonstrate. as it should.
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    Who said anything about hating liberals.
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    skinheads should have the right to their speech, and the rest of us have the right to say that skinheads are pieces of shit. Agreed?
  • Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    i suppose you have statistical evidence of that? you have your blinding, unquestion hatred of liberals and so assume all your conclusions about them are correct. i dont think there is a person here who would say this conference is not misguided and offensive.

    misguided and offensive. now those are some strong words. i'm not sure the UN security council would agree on those words...maybe given 3 months, they can work out the specific language.

    the point is...is that there is nothing to talk about with this guy.

    I know confrontation makes almost everyone uncomfortable, but if you don't think one is coming from this guy, sorry, you are the one with blinders on.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    I think this is great. They should talk about it, discuss it and debate it; in a civil, reasonable and mature manner. Nothing wrong with that at all.

    But the thing that cracks me up is this. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is desperately trying to expose some kind of hypocrisy in the "west" regarding free-speech, in the aftermath of the terrible and violent behavior of Muslims in reaction to the charicatures. All the while ignoring the violent history and pattern of Islam's intolerance towards any criticism or jabs at Islam and Muslims.

    He's desperately trying to illustrate that the west will react as violently and mindlessly as did those Muslims. But it hasn't happened and won't happen.

    Now what I want to see is, some more charicatures goofing on Islam and Mohammed. I'm interested to see how Muslims will react. Will it be the same violent and mindless reactions, again? Or will they finally understand that Muslims are not the only people on this planet who have a right criticize, create charicatures or satire/parody other religions and it's followers?



    "Trust me, a majority of posters here were offended by his (and my) post.

    I'd appreciate if you never include me in your "majority of posters" list and never assume you can speak for me. Quite frankily, I see no reason for anyone to be offended by anything dayan said. Absurd.
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    NMyTree wrote:
    I think this is great. They should talk about it, discuss it and debate it; in a civil, reasonable and mature manner. Nothing wrong with that at all.

    But the thing that cracks me up is this. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is desperately trying to expose some kind of hypocrisy in the "west" regarding free-speech, in the aftermath of the terrible and violent behavior of Muslims in reaction to the charicatures. All the while ignoring the violent history and pattern of Islam's intolerance towards any criticism or jabs at Islam and Muslims.

    He's desperately trying to illustrate that the west will react as violently and mindlessly as did those Muslims. But it hasn't happened and won't happen.

    Now what I want to see is, some more charicatures goofing on Islam and Mohammed. I'm interested to see how Muslims will react. Will it be the same violent and mindless reactions, again? Or will they finally understand that Muslims are not the only people on this planet who have a right criticize, create charicatures or satire/parody other religions and it's followers?



    "Trust me, a majority of posters here were offended by his (and my) post.

    I'd appreciate if you never include me in your "majority of posters" list and never assume you can speak for me. Quite frankily, I see no reason for anyone to be offended by anything dayan said. Absurd.

    Agreed ... He's waiting for us to riot, or launch a military raid ... And its simply not going to happen. Fool.
  • Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    NMyTree wrote:
    I think this is great. They should talk about it, discuss it and debate it; in a civil, reasonable and mature manner. Nothing wrong with that at all.

    .

    you think it's great, that we should discuss whether or not the halocaust happened?

    seriously? this is your serious opinion?

    This isn't high school civics class. it's reality unfolding.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    I've always kinda wanted to riot though. It just looks like so much fun. maybe we could just overturn a few cars and light some stuff on fire. not too many things, mind you, just a few things.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    misguided and offensive. now those are some strong words. i'm not sure the UN security council would agree on those words...maybe given 3 months, they can work out the specific language.

    the point is...is that there is nothing to talk about with this guy.

    I know confrontation makes almost everyone uncomfortable, but if you don't think one is coming from this guy, sorry, you are the one with blinders on.

    im well aware we've been on a collision course with iran. it was one of the chief reasons i opposed iraq. we dont have the resources now to handle iran. if we werent bogged down in iraq (a country which was NOT a serious threat to us) we might be able to do something about this. as it is, we're stuck with our thumbs up our asses.
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    dayan wrote:
    I've always kinda wanted to riot though. It just looks like so much fun. maybe we could just overturn a few cars and light some stuff on fire. not too many things, mind you, just a few things.

    Indeed ... But first? We must print off pictures of our leaders to wave around while we froth with righteous rage!
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    dayan wrote:
    I've always kinda wanted to riot though. It just looks like so much fun. maybe we could just overturn a few cars and light some stuff on fire. not too many things, mind you, just a few things.

    shit man, you dont need to have a holocaust conference for that. just come on down to columbus after the buckeyes win the national championship again ;)
  • yosi1yosi1 Posts: 3,272
    as it is, we're stuck with our thumbs up our asses.

    Where else would you want your thumbs?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane.
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    regarding confrontation, though, and I say this seriously, I don't see what is to be gained from talking with Iran. We've tried this before. Carter, Reagan, and Clinton all tried to talk to Iran and got nowhere, and right now frankly Iran is laughing at how we are totally unable or unwilling to touch them despite the fact that everyone knows they are backing the very same people we're currently fighting in Iraq, that they are behind Hezbollah who are currently trying to overthrow the government of Lebanon, and on and on. I mean Iran already sees itself in a clash of civilizations with us. they think they are at war with us, but we just refuse to acknowledge the reality of the situation. I really think confrontation is coming and we should make sure it happens on our terms.
  • Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    shit man, you dont need to have a holocaust conference for that. just come on down to columbus after the buckeyes win the national championship again ;)

    I was about to say, isn't Detroit good in some sport and have some chance at winning or losing? :)
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Sign In or Register to comment.