Home› A Moving Train

Armed gunmer storm U.N. compound in Gazza

binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
edited July 2006 in A Moving Train
according to wire stories, Armed gunmen have stormed U.N. compound in Gazza.

Developing...
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    fan-fucking-tastic.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    Reported that U.N. officials are firing weapons in the air at random as gunmen storm the compound firing!

    This is insane!!
  • rightonduderightondude Posts: 745
    It's a sneaky little party then. Can you hear those strings being pulled and twanged?
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Too bad this wasn't the UN compound in New York! The UN is a fucking joke.
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    The U.N. is beyond joke status. It is pathetic!
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    69charger wrote:
    Too bad this wasn't the UN compound in New York! The UN is a fucking joke.

    The U.N is a fucking joke because countries like the U.S have prevented it from operating. The power of automatic veto needs to be withdrawn so that countries like the U.S will not be allowed to continue vetoing such things as a two state solution in the middle east.
  • Vedderlution_BabyVedderlution_Baby Posts: 2,535
    Byrnzie wrote:
    The U.N is a fucking joke as long because countries like the U.S have prevented it from operating. The power of automatic veto needs to be withdrawn so that countries like the U.S will not be allowed to continue vetoing such things as a two state solution in the middle east.

    Good point.
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    Byrnzie wrote:
    The U.N is a fucking joke as long because countries like the U.S have prevented it from operating. The power of automatic veto needs to be withdrawn so that countries like the U.S will not be allowed to continue vetoing such things as a two state solution in the middle east.

    HAHAHAH. now that's some funny ass shit right there!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHA :D
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    binauralsounds wrote:
    HAHAHAH. now that's some funny ass shit right there!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHA :D

    You must be smoking some good shit if you think that was funny!! For example, the U.N recently voted for a ceasefire in the current middle East crises. This resolution was vetoed by the U.S. I don't see anything funny in that. In fact I think it's fucking sickening.
  • DarkStarDarkStar Posts: 734
    i saw a young David Beckham fan throwing stones into the UN compund in Gaza on MSNBC and Fox News.

    ds
    And no one sings me lullabyes
    And no one makes me close my eyes
    So I throw the windows wide
    And call to you across the sky....
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    Byrnzie wrote:
    You must be smoking some good shit if you think that was funny!! For example, the U.N recently voted for a ceasefire in the current middle East crises. This resolution was vetoed by the U.S. I don't see anything funny in that. In fact I think it's fucking sickening.

    I am glad they vetoed it. Those cease fires and U.N. resolutions have REALY worked well over the past years over there!!!
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    binauralsounds wrote:
    I am glad they vetoed it. Those cease fires and U.N. resolutions have REALY worked well over the past years over there!!!

    You just proved my point. Check out what those resolutions were and who vetoed them:

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2000.htm

    Perhaps you agree that resolutions condemning Aparthied in South Africa should have been vetoed by the U.S? And the modern day equivilent of apartheid taking place in the middle east is receiving the same support from the U.S as did the South African Apartheid regime. Some things never change!
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    Byrnzie wrote:
    You must be smoking some good shit if you think that was funny!! For example, the U.N recently voted for a ceasefire in the current middle East crises. This resolution was vetoed by the U.S. I don't see anything funny in that. In fact I think it's fucking sickening.

    so you're saying that if the UN voted for a ceasefire it would happen? Seriously, the UN is the most impotent organization in the world.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    chopitdown wrote:
    so you're saying that if the UN voted for a ceasefire it would happen? Seriously, the UN is the most impotent organization in the world.

    If the UN voted for a ceasefire and it was supported by the U.S, then of course it would happen. Israel is the 51st state of America. Britain is the 52nd.
  • rightonduderightondude Posts: 745
    Iraq was the US govt's excuse to trample the UN. And that they did. Another shining example from the land of the (cough) free... :(
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    Byrnzie wrote:
    If the UN voted for a ceasefire and it was supported by the U.S, then of course it would happen.

    if you think so.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • Jammin909Jammin909 Posts: 888
    binauralsounds wrote:
    Reported that U.N. officials are firing weapons in the air at random as gunmen storm the compound firing!

    This is insane!!

    Where is this info coming from? Do you have a site?
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    chopitdown wrote:
    so you're saying that if the UN voted for a ceasefire it would happen? Seriously, the UN is the most impotent organization in the world.

    There is no rationalizing with most on here with regards to the U.N. once again, it's all Americas fault. These people have an agenda and it's very clear.
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    Jammin909 wrote:
    Where is this info coming from? Do you have a site?

    It's been all of the cable news channels. It's supposedly over now. Security forces got it under control!
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Byrnzie wrote:
    The U.N is a fucking joke because countries like the U.S have prevented it from operating. The power of automatic veto needs to be withdrawn so that countries like the U.S will not be allowed to continue vetoing such things as a two state solution in the middle east.


    hahahahahahahah
    Priceless.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • Jammin909Jammin909 Posts: 888
    binauralsounds wrote:
    It's been all of the cable news channels. It's supposedly over now. Security forces got it under control!

    Ahh alright. I was searching online but didnt find anything, ill have to wait for the article later.
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    binauralsounds wrote:
    There is no rationalizing with most on here with regards to the U.N. once again, it's all Americas fault. These people have an agenda and it's very clear.

    i know, but i feel i have to say something every once in a while... however futile it is
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    Byrnzie wrote:
    If the UN voted for a ceasefire and it was supported by the U.S, then of course it would happen. Israel is the 51st state of America. Britain is the 52nd.

    No it wouldn't, because some militant group would break said ceasefire, as has happened so many times in the past.

    Sorry, I must agree with the "UN is ineffectual" side on this one. Maybe if the UN wasn't simply used by Middle Eastern nations as an organized means to harass Israel, the latter and its American ally would take it a little more seriously. It runs both ways, as usual.
  • thankyougrandmathankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    reborncareerist wrote:
    No it wouldn't, because some militant group would break said ceasefire, as has happened so many times in the past.

    Sorry, I must agree with the "UN is ineffectual" side on this one. Maybe if the UN wasn't simply used by Middle Eastern nations as an organized means to harass Israel, the latter and its American ally would take it a little more seriously. It runs both ways, as usual.

    They need a ceasefire to calm all this down, pick up the injured and set up a discussion frame, but it's not in the agenda....
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    thankyougrandma wrote:
    They need a ceasefire to calm all this down, pick up the injured and set up a discussion frame, but it's not in the agenda....

    How many times have cease fires worked there? How many times has there been discussions?
    You'll wake up one day.
  • thankyougrandmathankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    binauralsounds wrote:
    How many times have cease fires worked there? How many times has there been discussions?
    You'll wake up one day.

    no i hope i'll never wake up and being one of those who believe killing children is ok, i hope i'll never wake up in your world...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    thankyougrandma wrote:
    They need a ceasefire to calm all this down, pick up the injured and set up a discussion frame, but it's not in the agenda....

    Said ceasefire won't happen until Hizbollah make some concessions as well ... Pretty simple, but everyone seems to think that the U.S. and Israel need to do all the work, which is not realistic.
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    thankyougrandma wrote:
    no i hope i'll never wake up and being one of those who believe killing children is ok, i hope i'll never wake up in your world...

    once again, you've dodged the question and started on your rampage. again, please address the issue of how many times discussions and cease fires have worked there!!!!
  • thankyougrandmathankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    binauralsounds wrote:
    once again, you've failed to dodge the question and start on your rampage. again, please address the issue of how many times discussions and cease fires have worked there!!!!

    i have not failed to dodge, i have dodge it, cause it's irrelevant, go back in 1968 if you want, i'm talking about now, Hezbollah representative said he'd agree to an unconditional cease fire, Israel are refusing it, even for humanitarian measure, they refuse, keep defending them...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    thankyougrandma wrote:
    i have not failed to dodge, i have dodge it, cause it's irrelevant, go back in 1968 if you want, i'm talking about now, Hezbollah representative said he'd agree to an unconditional cease fire, Israel are refusing it, even for humanitarian measure, they refuse, keep defending them...

    :rolleyes:

    they want a cease fire now huh? really? hmmm... I believe that! SO THEY CAN REARM!

    I guess the wonderful hezbollah leader forgot the last u.n. worthless resolution that required hezbollah disarm.

    oh, but he wants a cease fire.
Sign In or Register to comment.