Loose Change....

1235»

Comments

  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118

    are you claiming that wtc 7 could have been purposefully taken down the same day of the tragedy by the authorities of nyc? if so, when would they have planted the explosives to bring it down? and why would they hide it from the public?


    I have no idea. thats why I dont believe it was taken down on purpose. so many things could have happened. my gut feeling is that the building came down becuase of the debris from WTC 1 & 2. its possible some of that debris collapsed into the major support columns on the building.
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    I have no idea. thats why I dont believe it was taken down on purpose. so many things could have happened. my gut feeling is that the building came down becuase of the debris from WTC 1 & 2. its possible some of that debris collapsed into the major support columns on the building.

    i think you should research some more on where wtc 7 was relative to falling debris and look at the documents and pictures assessing the damage; relative to wtc 3,4,5, and 6. im not sure if you have and that is why i keep on asking you to. it is pretty obvious how much of an anomoly it would be for wtc 7 to act as it did.

    im pretty sure NIST's document says the results will be out early 2007 for the investigation into wtc 7.

    until then, we'll keep on going with our gut feelings.
    you're a real hooker. im gonna slap you in public.
    ~Ron Burgundy
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    im pretty sure NIST's document says the results will be out early 2007 for the investigation into wtc 7.

    until then, we'll keep on going with our gut feelings.

    fair enough.
Sign In or Register to comment.