Ted Nugent out of control

69charger

I don't think I am going to suprise anyone anyone by saying this:

Ted Nugent for President!

Just imagine...The first bowhunt from the Rose Garden.

Love it! Ted ROCKS!

Byrnzie

69charger wrote:

I don't think I am going to suprise anyone anyone by saying this:

Ted Nugent for President!

Just imagine...The first bowhunt from the Rose Garden.

Love it! Ted ROCKS!

Yeeeeeeeeeee haaaaaaaawww!

CorporateWhore

I didn't hear Nugent say anything supportive of the war. Did he? Doesn't he just support guns a lot? How is he a chickenhawk if he doesn't support the war (vietnam or Iraq) in the first place?

godpt3

CorporateWhore wrote:

Eh, how can I pick on you if you're not supporting Hillary. C'mon admit it. You'd love to see a female president! Gimme something to work with here.

I've got a name for you: Kathleen Sebelius. Time magazine called her one of the top governors in the country. And she's a democrat. From KANSAS!

godpt3

69charger wrote:

Just imagine...The first bowhunt from the Rose Garden.

Loincloth optional, of course

69charger

godpt3 wrote:

Loincloth optional, of course

Flaming Arrow Vetos!

Who the fuck wouldn't love some of that shit!

onelongsong

blackredyellow wrote:

I never said that Bush should have shot down any planes so I don't know what you are talking about it... I don't want to have anything both ways.

Besides Bush and Clinton ignoring (or maybe just being unaware of) the scope and capabilities of Al Qeada, I'm not blaming anyone... It's you that is placing blame.

Besides maybe paying more attention to the region as far as intelligence capabilities (more arabic speakers and intelligence on the ground there), there isn't much we could have done to prevent 9/11.

Even after what happened, I don't agree with pre-emptive strikes, and giving up freedoms and liberties even if it would prevent another attack. I love this country for our liberty and openness... I'd rather risk being attacked by a couple dozen nutjobs, then give up our freedoms.

edit: and I see that you ignored the first part of the my quote that you used in response to you repeatedly saying clinton did NOTHING after the first WTC bombing... par for the course I guess....

i agree with you for the most part. my point was that even if bush knew about the attacks; nothing could've been done. short of shooting down planes full of citizens which then would have had him on trial for murder. it was a no win situation. the inquisition is over. we don't jail people for what they might do or would like to do. we must wait until the crime is committed.
so it was a no win situation from the start. that's all i'm saying. if we started jailing people for thoughts the jails would be full of fiction writers who wrote down those thoughts.
you don't agree with pre-emptive strikes yet the only way the attack could have been stopped was with a pre-emptive strike. and i don't believe that would have stopped it because the attackers were already here.

i agreed with the first part of your quote so i omitted it. my argument there is that a few people were arrested but their organization was left to thrive. attacks still continued and we arrested soldiers when we should have been ferreting out the generals.

onelongsong

CorporateWhore wrote:

I didn't hear Nugent say anything supportive of the war. Did he? Doesn't he just support guns a lot? How is he a chickenhawk if he doesn't support the war (vietnam or Iraq) in the first place?

i've hunted with teddy and he is one of the nicest people you'd ever want to meet. although the media has put it's spin on what exactly he supports; he actually supports eating and living naturally. and for good reason. the food is much better; it regulates the animal population; and it gets people back to nature.
i haven't had to shoot a gun in almost 2 years but if you try to take away my guns you'll have a fight to the death. most gun owners feel that way. the criminals know they'll always have access to guns. they'd like to see guns banned because criminals prefer unarmed victims. organized crime is the biggest supporter and contributor to the anti-gun movement. teddy lives naturally and doesn't bother anyone. he takes only what he needs which is the way everyone should live.

DCGARDEN

PJ_Lukin wrote:

Coming this Fall, The God Bless America tour featuring
Ted Nugent, and Toby Keith!

Toby Keith is a lifelong Democrat. He gets judged incorrectly because he wrote a song in favor of attacking Afghanistan and because he spends a serious amount of time doing nice things for the troops.

godpt3

DCGARDEN wrote:

He gets judged incorrectly because he wrote a song in favor of attacking Afghanistan and because he spends a serious amount of time doing nice things for the troops.

and for bitching out the Dixie Chicks


*FUTK*

SweetHarmonics

wow, the Clinton reasoning is coming off as programmed responses, almost as if the propaganda machine has actually duped some folks

Also, the dude claiming masonry is obviously lying. No way they allow arguments that devoid of reasoning to pass in their highly-esteemed corridors.

hilarity all around in this one

onelongsong

SweetHarmonics wrote:

wow, the Clinton reasoning is coming off as programmed responses, almost as if the propaganda machine has actually duped some folks

Also, the dude claiming masonry is obviously lying. No way they allow arguments that devoid of reasoning to pass in their highly-esteemed corridors.

hilarity all around in this one

you're right. the masons are now defunked and that was just the pain killers talking. we no longer have the power to manipulate governments or pull strings. at this point in time; we're only a fraternity.

Ahnimus

Ted Nugent whining about blogger's statement:

"I've got dibs on Rush, as soon as it's legal and lawful to shoot him. Whoever wants Ted Nugent is welcome to him."

http://youtube.com/watch?v=GCS79Ppn5_c

Ted: "Obama, why don't you suck on my machine gun"

Hypocrisy? Yes

Jeanie

gue_barium wrote:

I didn't say cancer was a virus. I said cancer operates pretty much identically to the way HIV does.

No you didn't say it was a virus, you said that cancer and HIV were the same.

HIV is a virus, cancer is not. And I'm quite sure that more than a few medical experts would disagree with you. Cancer and HIV are not the same. They don't even start the same way.

My point being that you seem perfectly capable of posting what could be considered misinformation yourself. Just making the point.

Ahnimus

HIV and Cancer are not even close to "operating the same" way.

ledvedderman

onelongsong wrote:

if guns kill people; then pencils cause mispelling

Just so much wrong with this logic there is no good place to begin. Obviously keyboards cause misspelling too.

Zanne

suntzu98 wrote:

I upwhore hunting so don't misunderstand but think of how dumb that sounds.

"upwhore"? Assuming you meant abhor? *Trying to envision what an upwhore might look like* hmmmm....

gue_barium

Jeanie wrote:

No you didn't say it was a virus, you said that cancer and HIV were the same.

HIV is a virus, cancer is not. And I'm quite sure that more than a few medical experts would disagree with you. Cancer and HIV are not the same. They don't even start the same way.

My point being that you seem perfectly capable of posting what could be considered misinformation yourself. Just making the point.

I said cancer and AIDS was the same. Can anybody fucking read here?

gue_barium

Ahnimus wrote:

HIV and Cancer are not even close to "operating the same" way.

I left off my reading on this almost twenty years ago. The way I understood it then, when and if HIV takes hold at the DNA level, it essentially becomes a cancer in the body.

Skitch Patterson

gue_barium wrote:

I said cancer and AIDS was the same. Can anybody fucking read here?

Would it matter if they did? They would just attempt to twist what you say into something else entirely different anyways.