*** The Third Impeachment of Convicted Felon, Donald J Trump Thread***

The Juggler

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2028

mace1229 said:

Do we really need a new thread on trump?

The first two impeachments have had their own threads, why would it be different for the third?

mace1229

The Juggler said:

mace1229 said:

Do we really need a new thread on trump?

The first two impeachments have had their own threads, why would it be different for the third?

Because the top 3 threads are currently all trump. I think we have enough option to discuss him without adding new threads.
People get snotty when someone opens a second thread on a topic with posts like this"use the search function next time." But 15 threads on trump is good.
Just seems a little much to me, that's all.

As you can see I prefer not to follow multiple threads on the same subject.

The Juggler

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2028

mace1229 said:

The Juggler said:

mace1229 said:

Do we really need a new thread on trump?

The first two impeachments have had their own threads, why would it be different for the third?

Because the top 3 threads are currently all trump. I think we have enough option to discuss him without adding new threads.
People get snotty when someone opens a second thread on a topic with posts like this"use the search function next time." But 15 threads on trump is good.
Just seems a little much to me, that's all.

As you can see I prefer not to follow multiple threads on the same subject.

So there is one more thread than usual about him. 

The Juggler

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2028

Actually, yeah @Mace maybe you have a point. Maybe I'll just make my other thread the impeachment thread moving forward since there is a third one out there.
 @Kat you wanna merge this with my other Trump thread?

SVRDhand13

NO THIRD IMPEACHMENT

He got away with it all.  A vote for Trump in 2024 was a vote against law and order.  And now the Jan 6 domestic terrorists are roaming the streets again while Nazis feel empowered.  I hope during my lifetime Americans will look back at disgust at the current climate of our country.  

mickeyrat

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2027

SVRDhand13 said:

He got away with it all.  A vote for Trump in 2024 was a vote against law and order.  And now the Jan 6 domestic terrorists are roaming the streets again while Nazis feel empowered.  I hope during my lifetime Americans will look back at disgust at the current climate of our country.  

with restored rights to guns for the felons....

Halifax2TheMax

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2027

mickeyrat said:

SVRDhand13 said:

He got away with it all.  A vote for Trump in 2024 was a vote against law and order.  And now the Jan 6 domestic terrorists are roaming the streets again while Nazis feel empowered.  I hope during my lifetime Americans will look back at disgust at the current climate of our country.  

with restored rights to guns for the felons....

Ready made brown shirts.

battle1

mace1229 said:

Do we really need a new thread on trump?

Rather ridiculous indeed.  They can't get enough.  

The Juggler

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2028

Closing the old one and keep this thread open. Make your selection battle! You're new to impeachment threads. Welcome!

battle1

The Juggler said:

Closing the old one and keep this thread open. Make your selection battle! You're new to impeachment threads. Welcome!

I vote Option 6-  I DONT CARE

The Juggler

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2028

battle1 said:

The Juggler said:

Closing the old one and keep this thread open. Make your selection battle! You're new to impeachment threads. Welcome!

I vote Option 6-  I DONT CARE

Hmmm.....you're two posts this afternoon suggest something else entirely, but sure!

battle1

The Juggler said:

battle1 said:

The Juggler said:

Closing the old one and keep this thread open. Make your selection battle! You're new to impeachment threads. Welcome!

I vote Option 6-  I DONT CARE

Hmmm.....you're two posts this afternoon suggest something else entirely, but sure!

This should be classic...  And what exactly do my two posts suggest now?  Please, enlighten me.  

The Juggler

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2028

battle1 said:

The Juggler said:

battle1 said:

The Juggler said:

Closing the old one and keep this thread open. Make your selection battle! You're new to impeachment threads. Welcome!

I vote Option 6-  I DONT CARE

Hmmm.....you're two posts this afternoon suggest something else entirely, but sure!

This should be classic...  And what exactly do my two posts suggest now?  Please, enlighten me.  

Well it appears to be 3 posts now. 

Halifax2TheMax

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2027

Well, there aren’t any more pressing issues, that’s for sure.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DElKFBgSRY2/?igsh=MTR2eXp2dHdoNndncQ==

Halifax2TheMax

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2027

Yea, I don’t know much about it. I might have used it to pay for a hamburder or cofeve once. I really don’t know.

Top Democrat on Oversight panel calls for Trump conflict-of-interest investigation

Rep. Gerry Connolly (Virginia), the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, is asking its Republican chairman, Rep. James Comer (Kentucky), to help investigate “grave conflicts of interest” surrounding President Donald Trump.

Connolly made the request to Comer in a letter Tuesday that repeatedly invokes the presidential ethics reforms that Comer pushed for under the previous president, Democrat Joe Biden. The letter was shared exclusively with The Washington Post. Comer previously led an impeachment investigation into Biden and his family that sputtered out last year amid a lack of evidence.

“Ethical governance is not a partisan goal — it is a shared responsibility,” Connolly wrote to Comer. “I urge you to demonstrate the Committee’s commitment to ethical governance and to ensure that no administration, no matter how powerful, is above the law.”

Connolly pointed to a few examples of what he said were conflicts of interest in the new administration that are “proliferating wildly.” The examples included the multiple cryptocurrency ventures that bear Trump’s name, including the lucrative token that he launched three days before taking office.

Trump seemed to shrug off concerns about the coin during a news conference Tuesday at the White House. Asked if he would continue selling products that personally enrich him as president, Trump said he did not “know much about [the coin] other than I launched it” and that he heard it was “very successful.”

Halifax2TheMax

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2027

Does this remind you of anyone? Anyone at all? Particularly the first full quote in the first full paragraph? I’ll spot you the first letter of the acronym as I refer to the piece of shit I’m thinking of, “C”. Also, think of the descriptions in the third paragraph, second full sentence. Who does that remind you of? Anyone? Now connect the dots between this post and my post in the Russia thread. 2013 was 12 years ago, another dot.

Halifax2TheMax

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2027

Fuck civilians, right? Taking a page out of Putin on the ritz’s and Bibi’s book. This will definitely help us to win friends and influence people. Way to go, tough guy.

Trump moves to close Pentagon office focused on curbing civilian deaths

Officials are drafting a proposal to defund and potentially “disestablish” the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence, though Congress would have to approve doing so.

The Trump administration is moving to abolish a Pentagon office responsible for promoting civilian safety in battlefield operations, suggesting that incoming Defense Department leaders may attempt to loosen restrictions on U.S. military operations worldwide.

In the days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, his transition team provided Pentagon officials with a set of orders outlining early priorities for his second term, including a desire to review and potentially abolish the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence, said a U.S. defense official. The office, housed within the Department of the Army, helps the military to limit unintended civilian deaths.

As a result of that order, the Army has begun drafting a proposal to defund and potentially “disestablish” the office, according to five people familiar with the discussions and an internal document reviewed by The Washington Post. All spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the nascent plan. The document, issued Monday and signed by Army staff director Lt. Gen. Laura A. Potter, requires senior Army leader review no later than Feb. 21.

Shuttering the office, which was established under a 2023 law, would require congressional approval. It was not immediately clear whether the Trump administration would seek to reallocate some of the center’s functions elsewhere.

As is routine in a new administration, the [Defense Department] Agency Review Team tasked the Army to review its programs and responsibilities,” an Army spokeswoman, Cynthia O. Smith, said in a statement. “The Army continues to fund and support the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence” as the Pentagon department tasked with hosting it.

Spokespeople for Trump’s acting defense secretary, Robert G. Salesses, could not be reached immediately for comment.

The early moves suggest the Trump Pentagon may distance itself from a host of measures established under President Joe Biden to prioritize the safety of noncombatants in conflict zones. Trump’s nominee for defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, who has promised to make the U.S. military more lethal, has complained about overly restrictive rules of engagement and said that service members “fight lawyers as much as we fight bad guys.”

Hegseth, a former National Guard soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, used his perch as a Fox News host to advocate during Trump’s first presidential term for lenient treatment of troops accused in war crimes cases. Trump pardoned two of those soldiers and intervened on behalf of a Navy SEAL. He also suggested shortly before being tapped for the Pentagon role in November that he had told troops under his command in Iraq they could ignore rules of engagement communicated to them.

People familiar with the effort the shut down the office said that even if Congress blocks its closure, military and administration officials could act to zero out its budget, fire or reassign personnel, or take other steps to render the office functional on paper but practically inert.

The center’s roots lie in the thousands of civilian deaths that occurred in decades of U.S. counterinsurgent operations following the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States. During Trump’s first presidency, as civilian deaths surged during the air war against the Islamic State, chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. oversaw a review of the military’s handling of civilian protection, setting in motion a process that led to the center’s establishment.

Under a follow-on plan established during the Biden administration, the Pentagon assigned specialists to military operations centers worldwide to advise commanders, incorporate civilian harm reduction into training exercises, refine data collection and improve the military’s response when deaths occur.

The Center of Excellence, staffed by about 30 people with backgrounds in targeting, intelligence, civil affairs or humanitarian organizations, was established to share best practices across the military and assist commanders and battlefield personnel in integrating new information into their battle plans. It has an annual budget of $7 million.

“If we want to protect our troops, we should continue to focus on these efforts rather than unwind them. Protecting civilians in conflict is both a moral and national security imperative,” Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colorado), an Army veteran who was involved in legislation that established the center, said in a statement. “I am ready to talk and work with anyone about why these efforts are important for national security and the safety of our troops.”

A former Pentagon official who worked closely with the center was surprised to hear about the effort to shutter the office, which they said, had been welcomed by commands and Army leadership.

Officials who have worked in the Center of Excellence and on other aspects of the Pentagon’s system for improving its record on civilian harm have sought to counter the perception that it imposes constraints on military commanders as they target adversaries or establishes punitive measures for personnel carrying out such missions.

Rather, they described the system, which includes more than 150 people across Defense Department offices and combatant commands, as a tool that provides commanders more information as they conduct operations, informing targeters or military planners about patterns of life in a particular area, identifying cultural sites and averting unintended deaths before they occur.

“This certainly doesn’t prevent you from ‘taking the gloves off,’” a senior defense official said. “But what it means is, when you ‘put the gloves on’ … you’ll hit what you want to hit, and not what you don’t.”

Officials who work on civilian harm issues said in the lead-up to Trump’s inauguration that they were hopeful the system would find support under the new administration.

“This is an additional capability that we give to the force,” the senior defense official said. “This is all about avoiding unintended effects, and winning wars.”

The Defense Department’s focus on reducing civilian harm also prioritizes rooting out what the military calls “confirmation bias,” or favoring information that aligns with existing beliefs.

Military officials said confirmation bias contributed to a botched 2021 strike in Kabul that killed 10 civilians as U.S. forces withdrew from Afghanistan. The incident fueled lawmakers’ demands for corrective measures to prevent such tragedies. The department concluded that confirmation bias also played a role in the death of a civilian in a separate strike in Syria in 2023.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/01/23/trump-pentagon-civilian-deaths/

HughFreakingDillon

NO THIRD IMPEACHMENT

why even care about the debt ceiling every year? they're entire plan is to just shut government down anyway. 

mickeyrat

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2027

mace1229 said:

Do we really need a new thread on trump?

apparently we do. I expect you made the same inquiry in shecky's thread?

F Me In The Brain

THIRD IMPEACHMENT IN 2028

mace1229 said:

The Juggler said:

mace1229 said:

Do we really need a new thread on trump?

The first two impeachments have had their own threads, why would it be different for the third?

Because the top 3 threads are currently all trump. I think we have enough option to discuss him without adding new threads.
People get snotty when someone opens a second thread on a topic with posts like this"use the search function next time." But 15 threads on trump is good.
Just seems a little much to me, that's all.

As you can see I prefer not to follow multiple threads on the same subject.

The top 3 threads on AMT being about Trump, especially with the number of fans being based in USA, should be no shocker.  Top 10 could be about the One Clown to Rule Them All.
Top 20.

He is the lightning rod in politics right now.  
Juat put back into power and working to undo much of what the last 4 years were based on.