#47 Admin/Cabinet

1131415161719»

Comments

  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 38,713
    Yes, he was certainly a goner after that access Hollywood tape. No one ever recovers from bragging about grabbing women by the…

    and then the blue wave, that historic midterm winning the house, president trump got punished in 2018, no way he recovers.

    then Jan six. A resurrection. He’s getting impeached and removed forever!

    Then he got indicted 1,993 times. He is certainly not getting any more votes.

    then he lost that civil rape case. Yeah. He is done.

    and a convicted felon. 34 times. Certainly he is done.


    But we got the  Institute for Policy Integrity protecting us. 
     Proved my point. What an elitist comment 

    hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha
    yes, he got elected twice, lost once. I was talking about his policy failures. 

    yes, in normal times, any one of those would have sunk a president. we are in strange times. 

    protecting us? I don't know what point I proved or what makes it elitist when I just posted a statistic. Maybe you don't like facts?
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 38,713
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




  • Lerxst1992Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,150
    he's lost 93% of his court cases, and he continues to get blocked by the courts for all his stupid EO's. What the hell are you talking about?

    If you were to read the thread, you’d notice my original comment was about the 4.00pm ruling by  Roberts removing the lower courts demand the MD immigrant be returned to the states by midnight. Original reporting indicated that it was a “terse” opinion (at the time of my original comment) but that might not have been the best reporting. Reading more recent stories I’m not so sure Roberts will end up supporting the administration on this case

    then I had a back and forth with Matt, clarifying that the dems are in a stranglehold when it comes to the 2026 senate election. Important because that controls the supreme court. Further, “trump comes out ahead” is also, in context, regarding his political ability to come back from his tariff fiasco. It’s amazing how your comments always gets the context wrong. The context is the dems do not have the political power or strategy to take back the senate or Court, and trump is a master at political victories. Sure the lower courts love to rule against him. That means a heck of a lot in our power structure (sarcasm).

    But you’ll never ask to get yer facts right before attacking (or as you like to do, directly quoting me without quoting me…and also get the context wrong) . Always best to attack first and ask questions never. your insertion of “93%” is completely off topic with the mocking “sure comes out winning” is a complete misunderstanding of my comments. But you needed to get yer dig in. 93% is surely great , but it ain’t The Court, and the dems are lost when it comes to coming up with a path or message to get it back in our lifetime.
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 38,713
    I did read it. I read your "trump always comes out winning" as a generality on top of the specific ruling you were talking about. Not really sure all the added whining was necessary. 
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




Sign In or Register to comment.