DONALD J. TRUMP & JD VANCE 2024

Gern Blansten

I'm no expert on that but I know I have seen three years retroactive...maybe they have changed that though.

SPEEDY MCCREADY

Gern Blansten said:

I'm no expert on that but I know I have seen three years retroactive...maybe they have changed that though.

Ok.
You can claim up to a years back pay, minus a 5 month waiting period, for the period you were 1st disabled and the the time you put in your application.
You can claim your full back pay amount for the pending time between your application and your approval. 

Looks like I stand corrected. And what's funny, I have talked to more than a few lawyers about this whole situation. The 5 month waiting period, the retroactive back pay, the amount of time I can be compensated for as far as retroactive pay, etc. etc. 

And each and every one of those lawyers has different answers. Hahahaha

But as of today, in the article I just read, YES if this goes on for another year, then I would be granted much more than just 12 months worth of retro pay. 

SPEEDY MCCREADY

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

Poncier

OnWis97 said:

That's going to cost him a cabinet position.

Secretary of Parasites will have to go to Rubio instead.

Gern Blansten

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

You would sure think so...makes you wonder if they are just hoping people will give up. Kind of the same strategy for insurance companies rejecting claims hoping that the insured just gets tired of the fight.

SPEEDY MCCREADY

Gern Blansten said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

You would sure think so...makes you wonder if they are just hoping people will give up. Kind of the same strategy for insurance companies rejecting claims hoping that the insured just gets tired of the fight.

You and I both know, it's a no brainer. They want you to get tired fighting, or they want you to drop dead. Its absolutely disgusting. 

Gern Blansten

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

Gern Blansten said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

You would sure think so...makes you wonder if they are just hoping people will give up. Kind of the same strategy for insurance companies rejecting claims hoping that the insured just gets tired of the fight.

You and I both know, it's a no brainer. They want you to get tired fighting, or they want you to drop dead. Its absolutely disgusting. 

I can understand a certain degree of skepticism since money is on the line but yeah the best proof would be medical records. If a doctor signs off on it that should put a lot of weight toward the approval.

SPEEDY MCCREADY

Gern Blansten said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

Gern Blansten said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

You would sure think so...makes you wonder if they are just hoping people will give up. Kind of the same strategy for insurance companies rejecting claims hoping that the insured just gets tired of the fight.

You and I both know, it's a no brainer. They want you to get tired fighting, or they want you to drop dead. Its absolutely disgusting. 

I can understand a certain degree of skepticism since money is on the line but yeah the best proof would be medical records. If a doctor signs off on it that should put a lot of weight toward the approval.

Disability is based on a number of factors along with ones medical situation. Work history, age, education, is one capable of performing the job he has had the last 10-15 years, is one young enough to be "trained" so that he or she can work in another field, and a couple others. But one would think that the medical condition one has, would speak for itself. 

Gern Blansten

brianlux

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

Excellent questions.  I asked them myself, several times, and all I ever got was either, "They want to weed out fakers" or "They don't want to have to pay out money."  Never a satisfactory answer.

Halifax2TheMax

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

Gern Blansten said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

You would sure think so...makes you wonder if they are just hoping people will give up. Kind of the same strategy for insurance companies rejecting claims hoping that the insured just gets tired of the fight.

You and I both know, it's a no brainer. They want you to get tired fighting, or they want you to drop dead. Its absolutely disgusting. 

Death panels do exist.

SPEEDY MCCREADY

Halifax2TheMax said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

Gern Blansten said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

You would sure think so...makes you wonder if they are just hoping people will give up. Kind of the same strategy for insurance companies rejecting claims hoping that the insured just gets tired of the fight.

You and I both know, it's a no brainer. They want you to get tired fighting, or they want you to drop dead. Its absolutely disgusting. 

Death panels do exist.

Did you just go Sarah Palin on me?

Halifax2TheMax

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

Gern Blansten said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

You would sure think so...makes you wonder if they are just hoping people will give up. Kind of the same strategy for insurance companies rejecting claims hoping that the insured just gets tired of the fight.

You and I both know, it's a no brainer. They want you to get tired fighting, or they want you to drop dead. Its absolutely disgusting. 

Death panels do exist.

Did you just go Sarah Palin on me?

I wouldn’t do that to you but now that you mention it, maybe she was on to something?

Regardless, I hope you and the misses get relief soon, it whatever form it comes in. Sounds like a bureaucratic nightmare. You should ask the person you deal with that question as it relates to your medical history and why it’s not valid or whatever they’re saying about a “second opinion.” Crazy.

SPEEDY MCCREADY

Halifax2TheMax said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

Gern Blansten said:

SPEEDY MCCREADY said:

One thing that baffles me about the whole disability situation? 

Shouldn't one's medical records speak for themselves? What changes as far as being approved, BASED ON MEDICAL RECORDS, once a lawyer has become involved? How is it that somebody can be denied, yet 6 months later be approved, once he pays a lawyer $7200? How did that lawyer and $7200 change that person's medical history? 

You would sure think so...makes you wonder if they are just hoping people will give up. Kind of the same strategy for insurance companies rejecting claims hoping that the insured just gets tired of the fight.

You and I both know, it's a no brainer. They want you to get tired fighting, or they want you to drop dead. Its absolutely disgusting. 

Death panels do exist.

Did you just go Sarah Palin on me?

I wouldn’t do that to you but now that you mention it, maybe she was on to something?

Regardless, I hope you and the misses get relief soon, it whatever form it comes in. Sounds like a bureaucratic nightmare. You should ask the person you deal with that question as it relates to your medical history and why it’s not valid or whatever they’re saying about a “second opinion.” Crazy.

I said to the young man just last week, over the phone. 

I spent the last 30 years driving a semi tractor trailer over the road coast to coast. In the last 3 years I have had 2 heart surgeries, I have suffered cardiac arrest, and during the latest heart surgery, my left arm was basically destroyed. The nerve damage I suffered is permanent, meaning the arm is basically useless. I can't lift anything over 5-10 lbs with the arm, and I certainly can't grab a steering wheel of a semi and drive 600 miles a day. Fact is I can't sit for more than 15-30 minutes at a time without pain and discomfort. I take all types of heart medication, and pain medication that leave me exhausted and taking 2 naps a day.  So you tell me, would you feel safe driving your family down Americas highways with me driving next to you? 

He simply said "No I wouldn't feel safe". 

And an office job is OUT OF THE QUESTION. I just can't sit for more than 15-30 minutes without losing my mind, the pain and discomfort is that bad. 

Lerxst1992

Man speedy that's insane they would deny based on that. And you have a physically demanding job. Hang in there and fight.

SPEEDY MCCREADY

Lerxst1992 said:

Man speedy that's insane they would deny based on that. And you have a physically demanding job. Hang in there and fight.

I know for a fact they denied a friend of a friend.....
Who had stage 4 cancer.
Not sure what type of cancer....BUT FUCK!!!!!!

mickeyrat

Talk about strange bedfellows. Over the years, there has been no love lost between Musk and Donald Trump. As recently as May, Trump was a vociferous and vocal proponent of the oil and gas industry. Remember the Mar-a-Lago get-together where he promised to end Biden’s green energy initiatives, including his electric vehicle policies, in exchange for $1 billion in campaign contributions?

Apparently Musk and Trump have mended some pretty tall fences. For his part, Musk has promised lots of cash to the pro-Trump America PAC. Maybe Trump didn’t get what he asked for from his oil and gas friends.

In exchange, Trump now thinks electric vehicles are “incredible.” What a shocker. At a rally in Georgia on Sunday, Trump told his supporters, “I’m for electric cars. I have to be because, you know, Elon endorsed me very strongly. So, I have no choice.”

pulled from essay by dan rather and team steady

Halifax2TheMax

mickeyrat said:

Talk about strange bedfellows. Over the years, there has been no love lost between Musk and Donald Trump. As recently as May, Trump was a vociferous and vocal proponent of the oil and gas industry. Remember the Mar-a-Lago get-together where he promised to end Biden’s green energy initiatives, including his electric vehicle policies, in exchange for $1 billion in campaign contributions?

Apparently Musk and Trump have mended some pretty tall fences. For his part, Musk has promised lots of cash to the pro-Trump America PAC. Maybe Trump didn’t get what he asked for from his oil and gas friends.

In exchange, Trump now thinks electric vehicles are “incredible.” What a shocker. At a rally in Georgia on Sunday, Trump told his supporters, “I’m for electric cars. I have to be because, you know, Elon endorsed me very strongly. So, I have no choice.”

pulled from essay by dan rather and team steady

Kaaaaaaamaaaala should ask POOTWH what he stands for.

mickeyrat

good mash up..

https://www.threads.net/@mcuban/post/C-ScL6fxtTk/?xmt=AQGzExhOtqW6czX1zHBvGii-45MaB2jsvgcNjoFfp_B_3A

Gern Blansten

mickeyrat said:

good mash up..

https://www.threads.net/@mcuban/post/C-ScL6fxtTk/?xmt=AQGzExhOtqW6czX1zHBvGii-45MaB2jsvgcNjoFfp_B_3A

hilarious...and just imagine the media reaction if Biden had gone on that moronic rant