** KAMALA HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT -PART DEUX **

mickeyrat

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

i saw a truck drive past my house a few minutes ago flying a trump flag and one of those don't tread on me flags.


has anybody here gotten tread upon this week?

i am trying to understand why these people feel so oppressed.

There’s a couple of houses in my neighborhood that fly that flag! It’s a stupid flag just like all of those flags. 

Flags trigger sensitive liberals. So do big trucks. Neighborhoods should be a safe space. 

Would you approve of tampons in all port-o-potty’s?

I approve anything that can make folks express themselves and feel comfortable in what they believe and I want all humans to enjoy the freedoms I do and have the rights that most of us here enjoy! And who’s coming to get their guns? Talk about paranoid 

Outside of abortions on demand, what freedoms do the Democrats propose?

Have you looked into taxes on “Unrealized Value”? Let’s say you bought a piece of property for 200k 20 years ago. Kamala wants the IRS to determine a current value, maybe they think it’s $5 million today, Even though you’re not selling the property Kamala wants to collect taxes on that $4.8 million in unrealized gain. What if you can’t pay? You either have to sell it to pay or the government will seize the property. That’s your freedom party!!!!

Are you drunk 😂😂😂 lay off the bourbon in the afternoon sun! You’ve spewing that KH has no policies in place and today she’s making me sell my house or she’s taking my house 😂 

Well you think Trump is deporting you….

I hold a USA passport I’m not worried about him deporting me I’m worried about the folks that are here contributing to our economy that should have a path to residency just like when Regan passed the amnesty bill! And Republicans & Democrats had a border bill ready please tell us who killed it? I’m all ears 

The bill only closed the border if the daily average reached 5000 a day! 5000 X 365 = 1,825,000 a year!
It added money for technology and staff to just process more immigrants. How does that solve the crisis? It was bi-partisan because it was loaded with extra nonsense.

Trump didn’t need a border bill to secure the border. Biden doesn’t need a bill, Kamala, as Border Czar, doesn’t need a bill. They can close it with an executive order. They chose to let 10 million + in. They chose to do nothing, that’s why the American people have no confidence in Democrats on the border.

right. he needed a once a century global health crisis.

gimmesometruth27

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

i saw a truck drive past my house a few minutes ago flying a trump flag and one of those don't tread on me flags.


has anybody here gotten tread upon this week?

i am trying to understand why these people feel so oppressed.

There’s a couple of houses in my neighborhood that fly that flag! It’s a stupid flag just like all of those flags. 

Flags trigger sensitive liberals. So do big trucks. Neighborhoods should be a safe space. 

Would you approve of tampons in all port-o-potty’s?

I approve anything that can make folks express themselves and feel comfortable in what they believe and I want all humans to enjoy the freedoms I do and have the rights that most of us here enjoy! And who’s coming to get their guns? Talk about paranoid 

Outside of abortions on demand, what freedoms do the Democrats propose?

Have you looked into taxes on “Unrealized Value”? Let’s say you bought a piece of property for 200k 20 years ago. Kamala wants the IRS to determine a current value, maybe they think it’s $5 million today, Even though you’re not selling the property Kamala wants to collect taxes on that $4.8 million in unrealized gain. What if you can’t pay? You either have to sell it to pay or the government will seize the property. That’s your freedom party!!!!

show me a single democrat wanting abortions on demand. this is just a stupid talking point from fox news.

gimmesometruth27

teskeinc said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

teskeinc said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

teskeinc said:

Genius move by Republicans though. The DNC convention was out of the news cycle before any attendees boarded a plane Friday.

Do those 6% of voters just not vote? Do they go with who their candidate endorsed? Hoping RFK plays a role in a Trump cabinet? Do Democrats think they will come back to vote Kamala after she blew him off and was shit on by the party? 

Some of those swing states were decided by razor thin margins in 2020. If Trump wins close, this potentially was the deciding factor. 

Massive mistake by Dems to not reach out to RFK Jr.

Dems don’t need cray-cray in their party nor that kind of weird.

They need votes. I don’t know much about him, I did hear a short interview about the food industry. If you can get past his voice he actually is very knowledgeable about what is wrong and the corruption in the governing bodies of our food.

Anyone who has spent time in Europe, you know the difference of how you feel after you eat compared to the US. 

Both parties need a guy like that to go after the poison of processed foods and all the additives that are only approved in the US that literally poisons us and our kids.

rfk junior will not have the desired effect for trump. just watch.

Where do his voters go? 

They’ll vote for the party they voted in the last election (which was probably Trump anyway), or they’ll stay home. This won’t be as big of a swing as you think. 

its telling that maga believes that rfk jr will be trump's ace in the hole.

this is ignoring the reality that trump is really unpopular. as is rfk jr. neither of them can win a popular vote in the swing states, and they will not do it together.

2 shitty candidates endorsing each other does not make one candidate better. it makes them both more shitty.

If neither of them can win the popular vote in a swing state it wouldn’t be considered a swing state!!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

 i could post this meme after about 70% of your posts. all you do is make baseless, exaggerated claims about democrats that you have taken right from fox news. a 5 year old could regurgitate things they hear on tv.

josevolution

https://www.threads.net/@annemurata/post/C_HIXWrS8bE/?xmt=AQGzVLC_265w_Zq0xA6-YD4l42snoNxE0E0JR4yKHJB8wg

Beyoncé is in board it’s just a matter of time till TS gets on the blue train! 

gimmesometruth27

pjl44

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

Tim Simmons said:

Oh, It’s only for people whose net worth is $100m or more. 

#1 They also said the 80,000 new IRS agents were only going to audit those making $400k or more but that wasn’t true

#2 Regardless of the net worth, is that something that you would approve of? Should Vedder get a 10 million tax bill because his property value increased? Even if he’s not selling? How is that right? (By the way there are less than 10,000 people worth 100 million in the US) you think they really are making policies for them?

Personally, I don’t think it’s gonna get enacted anyway. 

But yes. If you have over $100 million, you can afford some extra taxes nbd still live SUPER INCREDIBLY well.

but you need to be forthright. It’s not about the plan, it’s about the government being involved in your life at all. It’s not about who pays what, it’s about paying the government at all. 

Every time I start getting close to my first Democrat vote for President they're like "ok we wanna add 4 Supreme Court Justices, tax unrealized capital gains, and use taxpayer money to pay off student loan debt" and I immediately go into convulsions 

mickeyrat

pjl44 said:

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

Tim Simmons said:

Oh, It’s only for people whose net worth is $100m or more. 

#1 They also said the 80,000 new IRS agents were only going to audit those making $400k or more but that wasn’t true

#2 Regardless of the net worth, is that something that you would approve of? Should Vedder get a 10 million tax bill because his property value increased? Even if he’s not selling? How is that right? (By the way there are less than 10,000 people worth 100 million in the US) you think they really are making policies for them?

Personally, I don’t think it’s gonna get enacted anyway. 

But yes. If you have over $100 million, you can afford some extra taxes nbd still live SUPER INCREDIBLY well.

but you need to be forthright. It’s not about the plan, it’s about the government being involved in your life at all. It’s not about who pays what, it’s about paying the government at all. 

Every time I start getting close to my first Democrat vote for President they're like "ok we wanna add 4 Supreme Court Justices, tax unrealized capital gains, and use taxpayer money to pay off student loan debt" and I immediately go into convulsions 

13 scotus justices would equal the number of districts in the system though..

gimmesometruth27

mickeyrat said:

pjl44 said:

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

Tim Simmons said:

Oh, It’s only for people whose net worth is $100m or more. 

#1 They also said the 80,000 new IRS agents were only going to audit those making $400k or more but that wasn’t true

#2 Regardless of the net worth, is that something that you would approve of? Should Vedder get a 10 million tax bill because his property value increased? Even if he’s not selling? How is that right? (By the way there are less than 10,000 people worth 100 million in the US) you think they really are making policies for them?

Personally, I don’t think it’s gonna get enacted anyway. 

But yes. If you have over $100 million, you can afford some extra taxes nbd still live SUPER INCREDIBLY well.

but you need to be forthright. It’s not about the plan, it’s about the government being involved in your life at all. It’s not about who pays what, it’s about paying the government at all. 

Every time I start getting close to my first Democrat vote for President they're like "ok we wanna add 4 Supreme Court Justices, tax unrealized capital gains, and use taxpayer money to pay off student loan debt" and I immediately go into convulsions 

13 scotus justices would equal the number of districts in the system though..

exactly. this should be the way.

Gern Blansten

pjl44 said:

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

Tim Simmons said:

Oh, It’s only for people whose net worth is $100m or more. 

#1 They also said the 80,000 new IRS agents were only going to audit those making $400k or more but that wasn’t true

#2 Regardless of the net worth, is that something that you would approve of? Should Vedder get a 10 million tax bill because his property value increased? Even if he’s not selling? How is that right? (By the way there are less than 10,000 people worth 100 million in the US) you think they really are making policies for them?

Personally, I don’t think it’s gonna get enacted anyway. 

But yes. If you have over $100 million, you can afford some extra taxes nbd still live SUPER INCREDIBLY well.

but you need to be forthright. It’s not about the plan, it’s about the government being involved in your life at all. It’s not about who pays what, it’s about paying the government at all. 

Every time I start getting close to my first Democrat vote for President they're like "ok we wanna add 4 Supreme Court Justices, tax unrealized capital gains, and use taxpayer money to pay off student loan debt" and I immediately go into convulsions 

They aren't taxing Unrealized gains... Christ 

Tim Simmons

pjl44 said:

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

Tim Simmons said:

Oh, It’s only for people whose net worth is $100m or more. 

#1 They also said the 80,000 new IRS agents were only going to audit those making $400k or more but that wasn’t true

#2 Regardless of the net worth, is that something that you would approve of? Should Vedder get a 10 million tax bill because his property value increased? Even if he’s not selling? How is that right? (By the way there are less than 10,000 people worth 100 million in the US) you think they really are making policies for them?

Personally, I don’t think it’s gonna get enacted anyway. 

But yes. If you have over $100 million, you can afford some extra taxes nbd still live SUPER INCREDIBLY well.

but you need to be forthright. It’s not about the plan, it’s about the government being involved in your life at all. It’s not about who pays what, it’s about paying the government at all. 

Every time I start getting close to my first Democrat vote for President they're like "ok we wanna add 4 Supreme Court Justices, tax unrealized capital gains, and use taxpayer money to pay off student loan debt" and I immediately go into convulsions 

TBH, I don’t think you’re actually that close.  

Tim Simmons

Look, any election that involves Donald Trump as a candidate ultimately becomes a referendum on the character of the candidates. If you can look past the behavior and character qualities of Trump, then there wasn’t ever really a question of choice. 

And that’s fine. Everyone has a choice. Ultimately it says more about the character of the voter than the candidate. 

pjl44

Gern Blansten said:

pjl44 said:

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

Tim Simmons said:

Oh, It’s only for people whose net worth is $100m or more. 

#1 They also said the 80,000 new IRS agents were only going to audit those making $400k or more but that wasn’t true

#2 Regardless of the net worth, is that something that you would approve of? Should Vedder get a 10 million tax bill because his property value increased? Even if he’s not selling? How is that right? (By the way there are less than 10,000 people worth 100 million in the US) you think they really are making policies for them?

Personally, I don’t think it’s gonna get enacted anyway. 

But yes. If you have over $100 million, you can afford some extra taxes nbd still live SUPER INCREDIBLY well.

but you need to be forthright. It’s not about the plan, it’s about the government being involved in your life at all. It’s not about who pays what, it’s about paying the government at all. 

Every time I start getting close to my first Democrat vote for President they're like "ok we wanna add 4 Supreme Court Justices, tax unrealized capital gains, and use taxpayer money to pay off student loan debt" and I immediately go into convulsions 

They aren't taxing Unrealized gains... Christ 

What are they proposing? Or what's the proper term?

pjl44

Tim Simmons said:

pjl44 said:

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

Tim Simmons said:

Oh, It’s only for people whose net worth is $100m or more. 

#1 They also said the 80,000 new IRS agents were only going to audit those making $400k or more but that wasn’t true

#2 Regardless of the net worth, is that something that you would approve of? Should Vedder get a 10 million tax bill because his property value increased? Even if he’s not selling? How is that right? (By the way there are less than 10,000 people worth 100 million in the US) you think they really are making policies for them?

Personally, I don’t think it’s gonna get enacted anyway. 

But yes. If you have over $100 million, you can afford some extra taxes nbd still live SUPER INCREDIBLY well.

but you need to be forthright. It’s not about the plan, it’s about the government being involved in your life at all. It’s not about who pays what, it’s about paying the government at all. 

Every time I start getting close to my first Democrat vote for President they're like "ok we wanna add 4 Supreme Court Justices, tax unrealized capital gains, and use taxpayer money to pay off student loan debt" and I immediately go into convulsions 

TBH, I don’t think you’re actually that close.  

Maybe not close enough for you but you're talking to a right of center conservatarian who's just dying for a steady-handed moderate from wherever

pjl44

Tim Simmons said:

Look, any election that involves Donald Trump as a candidate ultimately becomes a referendum on the character of the candidates. If you can look past the behavior and character qualities of Trump, then there wasn’t ever really a question of choice. 

And that’s fine. Everyone has a choice. Ultimately it says more about the character of the voter than the candidate. 

If the voter doesn't respect the perspective of the person passing judgment it's just a fart in the wind

Tim Simmons

Democrat politics is at worst center left. They make some concessions to pull in the far left vote, but they are basic as fuck. Extra Justices have been shot down by Biden. Unrealized gains doesn’t have much traction because despite Telekinesis insistence, communism isn’t a real thing in America and democrats like capitalism because like most people they like making money and benefit from people making money. You’re better off voting D this year. It’s closer to the center than you think. 

pjl44

Tim Simmons said:

Democrat politics is at worst center left. They make some concessions to pull in the far left vote, but they are basic as fuck. Extra Justices have been shot down by Biden. Unrealized gains doesn’t have much traction because despite Telekinesis insistence, communism isn’t a real thing in America and democrats like capitalism because like most people they like making money and benefit from people making money. You’re better off voting D this year. It’s closer to the center than you think. 

She said multiple times during the 2020 primary she was open to expanding the court and I haven't heard anything new to the contrary.

Whatever we want to call this I don't like it.
https://www.axios.com/2024/08/23/kamala-harris-unrealized-capital-gains-tax

By omission I assume we can mutually acknowledge this administration's unconstitutional efforts to use taxpayer money to pay off student loans which is obscene.

If we're saying "oh but none of these terrible ideas will actually pass" we're firmly in Trump territory where I have to assess which counterbalances will keep each candidate's worst impulses in check. Good times.

Tim Simmons

I’d rather them push for free college for all, or find a way to cap costs of college at private universities, but for the most part I don’t care about them relieving student debt. 

Tim Simmons

I’m just saying after 8 years, if you are still on the fence about Trump vs any Dem, you aren’t really on the fence. He is now a known quantity in terms of lack of moral character, lack of integrity, and lack of intelligence. If you weight one candidate against the other and still feel like it’s a toss up I don’t know what to tell you. 

I know I know orange man bad. Sometimes it’s really that fucking simple. 

Go Beavers

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

teskeinc said:

josevolution said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

i saw a truck drive past my house a few minutes ago flying a trump flag and one of those don't tread on me flags.


has anybody here gotten tread upon this week?

i am trying to understand why these people feel so oppressed.

There’s a couple of houses in my neighborhood that fly that flag! It’s a stupid flag just like all of those flags. 

Flags trigger sensitive liberals. So do big trucks. Neighborhoods should be a safe space. 

Would you approve of tampons in all port-o-potty’s?

I approve anything that can make folks express themselves and feel comfortable in what they believe and I want all humans to enjoy the freedoms I do and have the rights that most of us here enjoy! And who’s coming to get their guns? Talk about paranoid 

Outside of abortions on demand, what freedoms do the Democrats propose?

Have you looked into taxes on “Unrealized Value”? Let’s say you bought a piece of property for 200k 20 years ago. Kamala wants the IRS to determine a current value, maybe they think it’s $5 million today, Even though you’re not selling the property Kamala wants to collect taxes on that $4.8 million in unrealized gain. What if you can’t pay? You either have to sell it to pay or the government will seize the property. That’s your freedom party!!!!

Are you drunk 😂😂😂 lay off the bourbon in the afternoon sun! You’ve spewing that KH has no policies in place and today she’s making me sell my house or she’s taking my house 😂 

Well you think Trump is deporting you….

I hold a USA passport I’m not worried about him deporting me I’m worried about the folks that are here contributing to our economy that should have a path to residency just like when Regan passed the amnesty bill! And Republicans & Democrats had a border bill ready please tell us who killed it? I’m all ears 

The bill only closed the border if the daily average reached 5000 a day! 5000 X 365 = 1,825,000 a year!
It added money for technology and staff to just process more immigrants. How does that solve the crisis? It was bi-partisan because it was loaded with extra nonsense.

Trump didn’t need a border bill to secure the border. Biden doesn’t need a bill, Kamala, as Border Czar, doesn’t need a bill. They can close it with an executive order. They chose to let 10 million + in. They chose to do nothing, that’s why the American people have no confidence in Democrats on the border.

If the border is “closed”, that means illegals are being deported and expelled, correct? 

Go Beavers

pjl44 said:

Tim Simmons said:

pjl44 said:

Tim Simmons said:

teskeinc said:

Tim Simmons said:

Oh, It’s only for people whose net worth is $100m or more. 

#1 They also said the 80,000 new IRS agents were only going to audit those making $400k or more but that wasn’t true

#2 Regardless of the net worth, is that something that you would approve of? Should Vedder get a 10 million tax bill because his property value increased? Even if he’s not selling? How is that right? (By the way there are less than 10,000 people worth 100 million in the US) you think they really are making policies for them?

Personally, I don’t think it’s gonna get enacted anyway. 

But yes. If you have over $100 million, you can afford some extra taxes nbd still live SUPER INCREDIBLY well.

but you need to be forthright. It’s not about the plan, it’s about the government being involved in your life at all. It’s not about who pays what, it’s about paying the government at all. 

Every time I start getting close to my first Democrat vote for President they're like "ok we wanna add 4 Supreme Court Justices, tax unrealized capital gains, and use taxpayer money to pay off student loan debt" and I immediately go into convulsions 

TBH, I don’t think you’re actually that close.  

Maybe not close enough for you but you're talking to a right of center conservatarian who's just dying for a steady-handed moderate from wherever

Biden’s from Delaware and Obama’s from Chicago.