Facemeltor has been pretty reliable and The Sphere is the new “it” place so it’s totally reasonable for them to want to give it a try. Of course none of this is worth betting the montage payment on but that’s why it’s a rumor thread.
1996: Randall's Island 2 1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2 2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel 2005: Atlantic City 1 2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Newark (EV) 2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4 2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2 2011: Toronto 1 2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore 2015: Central Park 2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD) 2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF) 2020: MSG | Asbury Park2021: Asbury Park 2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville 2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore
I think in 2025, they'll do Mexico, some Canada shows, I guess Europe and maybe I think they'll do a few southeast shows in US, like Atlanta, Florida maybe new Orleans.
I think in 2025, they'll do Mexico, some Canada shows, I guess Europe and maybe I think they'll do a few southeast shows in US, like Atlanta, Florida maybe new Orleans.
Calgary seems like a perfect destination for PJ35 / Pearl Jam Week shows. It's a great location, and the nearby Banff National Park is a very attractive destination.
Whatever happened to the Climate Pledge Arena residency talk? I seem to remember a discussion about them doing like a monthly gig there like Billy Joel did at MSG. Was I hallucinating or was that once a discussion/idea for them?
Austin, TX - 9/16/95 ~ Charleston, SC - 10/5/96 ~ Dallas, TX - 7/5/98 ~ San Antonio, TX - 4/5/03 ~ Denver, CO - 7/2/06 ~ EV - LA #2 - 4/13/08 ~ Austin, TX - 10/4/09 ~ Los Angeles, CA #1 - 11/23/13 ~ Los Angeles, CA #2 - 11/24/13 ~ Seattle, WA - 12/6/13 ~ NYC #1 - 5/1/16 ~ Boston, MA #1 - 8/5/16 ~ Boston, MA #2 - 8/7/16 ~ Boston, MA #1 - 9/2/18 ~ Boston, MA #2 - 9/4/18 ~ Louisville, KY - 9/17/22 ~ Ft. Worth, TX #1 - 9/13/23 ~ Ft. Worth, TX #2 - 9/15/23 ~ Austin, Texas #1 - 9/18/23 ~ Austin, Texas #2 - 9/19/23 ~ NYC #2 - 9/4/24 ~ Boston, MA #1 - 9/15/24 ~ Boston, MA #2 - 9/17/24
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
The Sphere isn’t a gimmick. It’s a purpose built venue meaning from a production standpoint the band can immensely reduce their overhead by avoiding the need for a PA system, lighting rig, and a stage. Coupled with cutting edge technology and a sound system capable of satisfying their needs it becomes an attractive business case where logistically it’s feasible to leave the equipment parked for a month and return as required and everyone involved be it band crew and audience can easily travel and be accommodated.
The Sphere has become the perfect venue for bands that have spent careers not perfecting a visual production. What draws fans into the light show experience/ shows I’ve been to (for bands that have spent a career perfecting their production) is not necessarily the screens but lights, lasers and other props that are designed to work beat for beat with specific songs. Sure I’ve never seen a 200 foot screen, but not sure how many cyclone tunnels I can watch there on YT. And the bands all look tiny there. Even microscopic.
Fans here are wishlisting album shows, are not considering it takes specialized equipment to produce a sphere video, can’t be cheap. Movies are shown there for eighty bucks. That’s a lot for such a large capacity for a movie.
So if producing videos there are expensive, and they want to alternate setlists, then how? Same videos for different songs? If they are going there to provide a cutting edge experience, seems step one is minimizing that experience to keep tickets under $500…because it is expensive and time consuming to produce. seems this is what their leader wants so it very well may happen, but a shame considering they’ve spent a career doing their live experience differently, and their indifference to touring causes them to skip so many cities.
Aside from Facemeltor's one comment months ago, every other comment or wish is just piggybacking off him. Nobody else has chimed in with a Sphere rumor on their own. So pages of Sphere talk is not very credible IMO.
Aside from Facemeltor's one comment months ago, every other comment or wish is just piggybacking off him. Nobody else has chimed in with a Sphere rumor on their own. So pages of Sphere talk is not very credible IMO.
Facemeltor was pretty spot on this Tour?
Agreed, my point was not that Facemelter is credible or not cause he is! I was just pointing out he is the only one saying it, that's all. The rest of the chatter is based off only him. It would be cool if someone else could confirm besides him.
Aside from Facemeltor's one comment months ago, every other comment or wish is just piggybacking off him. Nobody else has chimed in with a Sphere rumor on their own. So pages of Sphere talk is not very credible IMO.
Facemeltor was pretty spot on this Tour?
Agreed, my point was not that Facemelter is credible or not cause he is! I was just pointing out he is the only one saying it, that's all. The rest of the chatter is based off only him. It would be cool if someone else could confirm besides him.
Until we have more than that for anything else it will dominate rumor chatter
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
The Sphere isn’t a gimmick. It’s a purpose built venue meaning from a production standpoint the band can immensely reduce their overhead by avoiding the need for a PA system, lighting rig, and a stage. Coupled with cutting edge technology and a sound system capable of satisfying their needs it becomes an attractive business case where logistically it’s feasible to leave the equipment parked for a month and return as required and everyone involved be it band crew and audience can easily travel and be accommodated.
The Sphere has become the perfect venue for bands that have spent careers not perfecting a visual production. What draws fans into the light show experience/ shows I’ve been to (for bands that have spent a career perfecting their production) is not necessarily the screens but lights, lasers and other props that are designed to work beat for beat with specific songs. Sure I’ve never seen a 200 foot screen, but not sure how many cyclone tunnels I can watch there on YT. And the bands all look tiny there. Even microscopic.
Fans here are wishlisting album shows, are not considering it takes specialized equipment to produce a sphere video, can’t be cheap. Movies are shown there for eighty bucks. That’s a lot for such a large capacity for a movie.
So if producing videos there are expensive, and they want to alternate setlists, then how? Same videos for different songs? If they are going there to provide a cutting edge experience, seems step one is minimizing that experience to keep tickets under $500…because it is expensive and time consuming to produce. seems this is what their leader wants so it very well may happen, but a shame considering they’ve spent a career doing their live experience differently, and their indifference to touring causes them to skip so many cities.
Yes to pretty much all of this. If Pearl Jam were to play Sphere, you'd be looking at a very standardized set. If there were going to be a full-album performance, it would be the same album every night, like U2 did with Achtung Baby. This is not really how Pearl Jam operates (although, of course, they could change their tune, no pun intended). Another thing to keep in mind is that Pearl Jam doesn't really rehearse a lot. Wishing for them to do a residency where they play five different full albums in a short span of time-- they're never going to put the time in to prep for that.
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
It's not a gimmick. The screen is amazing and is so high resolution it can do anything and make it feel like your anywhere. In addition the venue is built for music. It's not a sports centre and music is the after thought. It was designed for music. I've never heard a concert sound as good as the U2 I saw at the sphere. It was amazing.
If bands had the choice of touring spheres or stadiums/arenas it would be a no contest
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
It's not a gimmick. The screen is amazing and is so high resolution it can do anything and make it feel like your anywhere. In addition the venue is built for music. It's not a sports centre and music is the after thought. It was designed for music. I've never heard a concert sound as good as the U2 I saw at the sphere. It was amazing.
If bands had the choice of touring spheres or stadiums/arenas it would be a no contest
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
It's not a gimmick. The screen is amazing and is so high resolution it can do anything and make it feel like your anywhere. In addition the venue is built for music. It's not a sports centre and music is the after thought. It was designed for music. I've never heard a concert sound as good as the U2 I saw at the sphere. It was amazing.
If bands had the choice of touring spheres or stadiums/arenas it would be a no contest
But what if I'm old and new things frighten me?
"A smart monkey doesn't monkey around with another monkey's monkey" - Darwin's Theory
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
The screen is amazing and is so high resolution it can do anything and make it feel like your anywhere.
Sounds like an advertising campaign.
At work, I sit in front of a high-resolution screen all day long. When I go to a concert, I want to see the band. For real. Sure, it was cool to see a Mike McCready solo so gigantic. But after five minutes I realized how much the screen behind the band distracted me from what was actually happening on stage. Even in good seats close to the stage, where you don't need a screen, it begs for your attention. They can sell the thing straight away for all I care.
At a Pearl Jam concert, I don't need to feel like I can be anywhere. I'm at a fucking Pearl Jam concert. And that's exactly where I want to be.
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
The screen is amazing and is so high resolution it can do anything and make it feel like your anywhere.
Sounds like an advertising campaign.
At work, I sit in front of a high-resolution screen all day long. When I go to a concert, I want to see the band. For real. Sure, it was cool to see a Mike McCready solo so gigantic. But after five minutes I realized how much the screen behind the band distracted me from what was actually happening on stage. Even in good seats close to the stage, where you don't need a screen, it begs for your attention. They can sell the thing straight away for all I care.
At a Pearl Jam concert, I don't need to feel like I can be anywhere. I'm at a fucking Pearl Jam concert. And that's exactly where I want to be.
As a one off Id be game for the immersive experience but I do hear what you say here and its genuinely impossible to disagree with any of it
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
The screen is amazing and is so high resolution it can do anything and make it feel like your anywhere.
Sounds like an advertising campaign.
At work, I sit in front of a high-resolution screen all day long. When I go to a concert, I want to see the band. For real. Sure, it was cool to see a Mike McCready solo so gigantic. But after five minutes I realized how much the screen behind the band distracted me from what was actually happening on stage. Even in good seats close to the stage, where you don't need a screen, it begs for your attention. They can sell the thing straight away for all I care.
At a Pearl Jam concert, I don't need to feel like I can be anywhere. I'm at a fucking Pearl Jam concert. And that's exactly where I want to be.
I totally agree with you in regards to the arena/stadium shows but cooking something up for the Sphere is a completely different thing
If I were given a choice between a real Pearl Jam tour in arenas and stadiums and a Sphere residency next year, I’d take the tour. If I were given a choice between a Sphere residency or no NA tour at all (as in 2015, 2017 and 2019) I’m taking the Sphere.
Although I have to admit that if Tool does it too I'm only going to one and it's probably Tool
Given the choice... and no offense to pearl jam... I'm with you. Tool it is. Their use of visuals on this last tour was out of this world.... I'm sure they could really use the sphere to it's full potential like no one else...
I'll I ask is that they leave sober out of the set unless they're going to put together new production for the screen... i've seen that one song enough... lol.
Houston, Texas... Believe it or not, there are 7 million people here... must be a couple of fans who'd love to see you play.
Although I have to admit that if Tool does it too I'm only going to one and it's probably Tool
Given the choice... and no offense to pearl jam... I'm with you. Tool it is. Their use of visuals on this last tour was out of this world.... I'm sure they could really use the sphere to it's full potential like no one else...
I'll I ask is that they leave sober out of the set unless they're going to put together new production for the screen... i've seen that one song enough... lol.
I definitely do NOT need to be immersed in their Undertow-era visual world
Yup. Sphere is a gimmick; really hope they avoid it
The screen is amazing and is so high resolution it can do anything and make it feel like your anywhere.
Sounds like an advertising campaign.
At work, I sit in front of a high-resolution screen all day long. When I go to a concert, I want to see the band. For real. Sure, it was cool to see a Mike McCready solo so gigantic. But after five minutes I realized how much the screen behind the band distracted me from what was actually happening on stage. Even in good seats close to the stage, where you don't need a screen, it begs for your attention. They can sell the thing straight away for all I care.
At a Pearl Jam concert, I don't need to feel like I can be anywhere. I'm at a fucking Pearl Jam concert. And that's exactly where I want to be.
You can see the band, and better than you can in most arena's stadium because it's more like amphitheatre seating, where all the seats face the stage (not face where the sports would be playing), plus is has a GA floor which was an amazing place to take it all in.
I really think some of you should experience it before knocking it. Even if they didn't use the screen at all, it's a better concert venue than any arena/stadium. The sound is amazing in there and the place was built for acoustics. The place was built for music. In addition because all the gear is built into the venue, there's no speaker stacks, scaffolding, frames, etc... U2 had a stage and 4 stands for lights and that was it. Probably the best sightlines of anymore show I'd been too. Nothing to obstruct it.
I'm not sure I'd go see PJ if they played there. Even with u2 it was buying tickets to additional dates after the reviews came back so positive.
Comments
(2000) Mansfield I, Mansfield II (2003) Montreal (2005) Montreal, Ottawa (2006) Albany (2008) Montreal I + II (EV) (2022) Québec City
and now my kids wanna tag along.......might need a mortgage to make it happen
www.headstonesband.com
Come to Atlantic Canada. Well, hopefully Pearl Jam makes the trip again to Atlantic Canada.
Vancouver / Toronto / somewhere in Quebec (don't know why it never seems to be montreal... i would live in montreal if my wife would let me)....
Anything else in Canada I think is a stretch at this point.
www.headstonesband.com
Fans here are wishlisting album shows, are not considering it takes specialized equipment to produce a sphere video, can’t be cheap. Movies are shown there for eighty bucks. That’s a lot for such a large capacity for a movie.
So if producing videos there are expensive, and they want to alternate setlists, then how? Same videos for different songs? If they are going there to provide a cutting edge experience, seems step one is minimizing that experience to keep tickets under $500…because it is expensive and time consuming to produce. seems this is what their leader wants so it very well may happen, but a shame considering they’ve spent a career doing their live experience differently, and their indifference to touring causes them to skip so many cities.
time will tell.
At work, I sit in front of a high-resolution screen all day long. When I go to a concert, I want to see the band. For real. Sure, it was cool to see a Mike McCready solo so gigantic. But after five minutes I realized how much the screen behind the band distracted me from what was actually happening on stage. Even in good seats close to the stage, where you don't need a screen, it begs for your attention. They can sell the thing straight away for all I care.
At a Pearl Jam concert, I don't need to feel like I can be anywhere. I'm at a fucking Pearl Jam concert. And that's exactly where I want to be.
I know. :( Wish they could come back to Atlantic Canada.
I'll I ask is that they leave sober out of the set unless they're going to put together new production for the screen... i've seen that one song enough... lol.