So the day after Swifts album? Might want bump that up a few weeks/months
Does it really make a difference? I think PJ albums just sell to the core audience at this point. I'm not sure they reach the masses or very casual listeners anymore. The people that buy PJ records are still going to buy PJ records, they people that don't, won't.
I suppose the only really big impact is that if you have a core audience and you release it at a time there's not much else coming out, you can often score a #1 album for your first week.
This is true, but as I described in more detail on another thread, it is a really tough trick to pull off now because of how the formula for the Billboard 200 works. Green Day sold 39,000 copies of Saviors in its first week-- roughly in line with what Pearl Jam can expect to sell in its first week-- and it ended up at No. 4 behind a No. 1 album that sold 1,000 copies but was streamed much more.
So the day after Swifts album? Might want bump that up a few weeks/months
Does it really make a difference? I think PJ albums just sell to the core audience at this point. I'm not sure they reach the masses or very casual listeners anymore. The people that buy PJ records are still going to buy PJ records, they people that don't, won't.
I suppose the only really big impact is that if you have a core audience and you release it at a time there's not much else coming out, you can often score a #1 album for your first week.
This is true, but as I described in more detail on another thread, it is a really tough trick to pull off now because of how the formula for the Billboard 200 works. Green Day sold 39,000 copies of Saviors in its first week-- roughly in line with what Pearl Jam can expect to sell in its first week-- and it ended up at No. 4 behind a No. 1 album that sold 1,000 copies but was streamed much more.
Maybe this is the "hidden link"/reason behind the newsletter links that took you to pre loading to streaming services. Bump up the streaming #s on Tues? Or maybe IDK what I'm talking about.
We don't know that Taylor doesn't guest on Dark Matter and vice versa.
Regardless, if this is how it plays out with the release date, it needs to be turned into a Barbenheimer situation. Lemons/lemonade.
Her tracklist came out and they're not mentioned
Well so much for that. Still advocating for Barbenheimer.
If there's any way to actually pull such a thing off, it would be an unbelievable boon for Pearl Jam. But what would the portmanteau be? Dark Poets Department?
So the day after Swifts album? Might want bump that up a few weeks/months
Does it really make a difference? I think PJ albums just sell to the core audience at this point. I'm not sure they reach the masses or very casual listeners anymore. The people that buy PJ records are still going to buy PJ records, they people that don't, won't.
I suppose the only really big impact is that if you have a core audience and you release it at a time there's not much else coming out, you can often score a #1 album for your first week.
This is true, but as I described in more detail on another thread, it is a really tough trick to pull off now because of how the formula for the Billboard 200 works. Green Day sold 39,000 copies of Saviors in its first week-- roughly in line with what Pearl Jam can expect to sell in its first week-- and it ended up at No. 4 behind a No. 1 album that sold 1,000 copies but was streamed much more.
Maybe this is the "hidden link"/reason behind the newsletter links that took you to pre loading to streaming services. Bump up the streaming #s on Tues? Or maybe IDK what I'm talking about.
No-- for one thing, Pearl Jam does not care at all about any of this. Second, Tuesday is only a single. Any streams would not count toward the chart placement of the album, which will still be unreleased as of Tuesday. And no Pearl Jam song could generate enough streams in a single day in 2024, barring some exogenous event, to get anywhere near any chart other than the rock or Triple-A chart.
We don't know that Taylor doesn't guest on Dark Matter and vice versa.
Regardless, if this is how it plays out with the release date, it needs to be turned into a Barbenheimer situation. Lemons/lemonade.
Her tracklist came out and they're not mentioned
Well so much for that. Still advocating for Barbenheimer.
If there's any way to actually pull such a thing off, it would be an unbelievable boon for Pearl Jam. But what would the portmanteau be? Dark Poets Department?
Dark Poets Matter
If anyone's getting two words in this arrangement, it's going to be Taylor. Tortured Poets Matter, maybe.
So the day after Swifts album? Might want bump that up a few weeks/months
Does it really make a difference? I think PJ albums just sell to the core audience at this point. I'm not sure they reach the masses or very casual listeners anymore. The people that buy PJ records are still going to buy PJ records, they people that don't, won't.
I suppose the only really big impact is that if you have a core audience and you release it at a time there's not much else coming out, you can often score a #1 album for your first week.
This is true, but as I described in more detail on another thread, it is a really tough trick to pull off now because of how the formula for the Billboard 200 works. Green Day sold 39,000 copies of Saviors in its first week-- roughly in line with what Pearl Jam can expect to sell in its first week-- and it ended up at No. 4 behind a No. 1 album that sold 1,000 copies but was streamed much more.
Maybe this is the "hidden link"/reason behind the newsletter links that took you to pre loading to streaming services. Bump up the streaming #s on Tues? Or maybe IDK what I'm talking about.
No-- for one thing, Pearl Jam does not care at all about any of this. Second, Tuesday is only a single. Any streams would not count toward the chart placement of the album, which will still be unreleased as of Tuesday. And no Pearl Jam song could generate enough streams in a single day in 2024, barring some exogenous event, to get anywhere near any chart other than the rock or Triple-A chart.
So the day after Swifts album? Might want bump that up a few weeks/months
Does it really make a difference? I think PJ albums just sell to the core audience at this point. I'm not sure they reach the masses or very casual listeners anymore. The people that buy PJ records are still going to buy PJ records, they people that don't, won't.
I suppose the only really big impact is that if you have a core audience and you release it at a time there's not much else coming out, you can often score a #1 album for your first week.
This is true, but as I described in more detail on another thread, it is a really tough trick to pull off now because of how the formula for the Billboard 200 works. Green Day sold 39,000 copies of Saviors in its first week-- roughly in line with what Pearl Jam can expect to sell in its first week-- and it ended up at No. 4 behind a No. 1 album that sold 1,000 copies but was streamed much more.
Maybe this is the "hidden link"/reason behind the newsletter links that took you to pre loading to streaming services. Bump up the streaming #s on Tues? Or maybe IDK what I'm talking about.
No-- for one thing, Pearl Jam does not care at all about any of this. Second, Tuesday is only a single. Any streams would not count toward the chart placement of the album, which will still be unreleased as of Tuesday. And no Pearl Jam song could generate enough streams in a single day in 2024, barring some exogenous event, to get anywhere near any chart other than the rock or Triple-A chart.
yahtzee
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018) The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
I have the 10C vinyl preordered, but now I'm wondering if the RSD version will be the one to try to snag instead.... I hope they give us a heads up on what it looks like.
I don't do vinyl just CDs but if I did I wouldn't get any colored variants for any other reason than those being the only copies available. Obviously each to their own and if bonus tracks were in the mix that would change the game but man has my relative disinterest saved me a lot of money in that regard 😂
Stars are suns to other people.
Wellington 1998 London 2007 Brisbane 2009 Stockholm 2012
Amsterdam 1 & 2 2014 EV Dublin 2017 Milan 2018 Padova 2018 Boston 2 2018 Auckland 1 & 2 2024
Comments
Or maybe IDK what I'm talking about.
I'm hoping there is a 10Club variant edition too.
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Wiki page has been updated. :(
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Jam
Wellington 1998
London 2007
Brisbane 2009
Stockholm 2012
EV Dublin 2017
Milan 2018
Padova 2018
Boston 2 2018
Auckland 1 & 2 2024
You can close this thread. Already a sticky posted! That was fun guys!