Whats interesting is a lot of this is crap thats not good for you.
expanding our garden footprint this year, started last year with 2 4x4 raised beds, one 12 inch high the other 18 inches. deciding now just what size and how they'll lay out then what to plant.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Whats interesting is a lot of this is crap thats not good for you.
This was my discovery last year. Had my first cholesterol test, it was fairly high, opted to revamp my diet to get it under control. Now I walk into a grocery store and it feels like 90% of the place is there to shorten my lifespan. It's pretty crazy that the food industry evolved in this way.
Proof positive that happy days are here again. So, so very, so very much winning!
Consumer confidence plummets to lowest level since January 2021
WashingtonCNN —
America’s economic mood continues to deteriorate as President Donald Trump carries on with his sweeping economic agenda.
Consumer confidence slid 7.2 points this month to a reading of 92.9, the Conference Board said Tuesday in its latest survey, reaching its lowest level since January 2021 and extending a decline that began in December, after the US presidential election. March’s decline was similar to February’s, underscoring the growing pessimism among US consumers.
Not only are Americans expecting higher inflation this year, but more of them are also predicting that the economy will slip into a recession, the Conference Board survey showed. That toxic combination of weakening growth and accelerating inflation resembles “stagflation,” and Federal Reserve officials also see the US economy trending in that direction.
Americans’ expectations “for income, business, and labor market conditions” in the coming year fell sharply this month, the survey showed, declining 9.6 points to 65.2, the lowest level in 12 years. Meanwhile, the share of respondents expecting a recession in the next 12 months held steady in March at a nine-month high.
Trump’s trade spat with foreign countries, a key tenet of his economic agenda, has been both baffling and contentious: Earlier this month after imposing 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, those duties were quickly delayed for another month after complaints from business leaders; then, after the European Union retaliated to Trump’s metal tariffs, the president continued to up the ante by threatening a mega 200% tariff on European alcohol.
And upcoming tariffs aimed at matching those that foreign countries impose on the United States — so-called reciprocal tariffs slated for April 2 — might be watered down.
That frenetic back-and-forth has evoked high levels of uncertainty among American consumers, businesses and investors, which is making it difficult to plan ahead, according to various surveys. It’s also stoking fears that the economy could be barreling toward stagflation.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Whats interesting is a lot of this is crap thats not good for you.
expanding our garden footprint this year, started last year with 2 4x4 raised beds, one 12 inch high the other 18 inches. deciding now just what size and how they'll lay out then what to plant.
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
"Most of us are three bad months away from being homeless. None of us are three good months away from being billionaires. You should know which side to be on."
🎯
1993: 11/22 Little Rock
1996; 9/28 New York
1997: 11/14 Oakland, 11/15 Oakland
1998: 7/5 Dallas, 7/7 Albuquerque, 7/8 Phoenix, 7/10 San Diego, 7/11 Las Vegas
2000: 10/17 Dallas
2003: 4/3 OKC
2012: 11/17 Tulsa(EV), 11/18 Tulsa(EV)
2013: 11/16 OKC
2014: 10/8 Tulsa 2022: 9/20 OKC 2023: 9/13 Ft Worth, 9/15 Ft Worth
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
You don't understand the difference between civil vs criminal and detained vs convicted? The point is that US prison system isn't a direct comparison.
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
You don't understand the difference between civil vs criminal and detained vs convicted? The point is that US prison system isn't a direct comparison.
I built prisons for 15 years. I understand who we place in them and again I do not have a problem with it. If they are here illegally then isn't that considered breaking the law and criminal? I don't see how they are civil cases.
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
You don't understand the difference between civil vs criminal and detained vs convicted? The point is that US prison system isn't a direct comparison.
I built prisons for 15 years. I understand who we place in them and again I do not have a problem with it. If they are here illegally then isn't that considered breaking the law and criminal? I don't see how they are civil cases.
If you read the article you posted, it said it right there.
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
You don't understand the difference between civil vs criminal and detained vs convicted? The point is that US prison system isn't a direct comparison.
I built prisons for 15 years. I understand who we place in them and again I do not have a problem with it. If they are here illegally then isn't that considered breaking the law and criminal? I don't see how they are civil cases.
because it breaks a civil code and not a criminal code?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
You don't understand the difference between civil vs criminal and detained vs convicted? The point is that US prison system isn't a direct comparison.
I built prisons for 15 years. I understand who we place in them and again I do not have a problem with it. If they are here illegally then isn't that considered breaking the law and criminal? I don't see how they are civil cases.
because it breaks a civil code and not a criminal code?
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
You don't understand the difference between civil vs criminal and detained vs convicted? The point is that US prison system isn't a direct comparison.
I built prisons for 15 years. I understand who we place in them and again I do not have a problem with it. If they are here illegally then isn't that considered breaking the law and criminal? I don't see how they are civil cases.
If you read the article you posted, it said it right there.
If you enter illegally it becomes criminal and is not civil. Having a whole facility full of 'Civil" immigration crimes is a little hard for me to believe. The odds of that are pretty slim.
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
You don't understand the difference between civil vs criminal and detained vs convicted? The point is that US prison system isn't a direct comparison.
I built prisons for 15 years. I understand who we place in them and again I do not have a problem with it. If they are here illegally then isn't that considered breaking the law and criminal? I don't see how they are civil cases.
because it breaks a civil code and not a criminal code?
I have a problem with that, prison work was always a privilege and not guaranteed, also a way for cheap labor to be used. There are plenty of watch groups so it's not abused like Shawshank.
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
Yes but that work was being done for hte benefit of society, not the benefit of a private company.
Just read the article. They wanted the company to pay the inmates that cleaned and made food. Thats silly.
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
Dude, you are WAY over-simplifying the issues here. To wit:
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense. 2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal. 3. They have not been held liable for these offenses. 4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case. 5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor? 6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
I read your points and still haven't changed my position. Detainees. Nice. They're prisoners, lol.
You don't understand the difference between civil vs criminal and detained vs convicted? The point is that US prison system isn't a direct comparison.
I built prisons for 15 years. I understand who we place in them and again I do not have a problem with it. If they are here illegally then isn't that considered breaking the law and criminal? I don't see how they are civil cases.
If you read the article you posted, it said it right there.
If you enter illegally it becomes criminal and is not civil. Having a whole facility full of 'Civil" immigration crimes is a little hard for me to believe. The odds of that are pretty slim.
The internet is your friend. You can disagree with it if you like, but don't argue like it isn't true. Re-entry can be criminal but the actual presence in the US is civil.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Where the hell is this great day of liberation? “Oh please, Mr. President, tell us what countries and which products at what percentage tariff, oh please, Mr. COOTWH, please? The suspense of your power is crushing our souls. Please, we beg of you, please tell us what and how much of your mighty power you’re going to release. Please!!??”
COOTWH is probably being fitted with a parachute so he can land on the orange house lawn to announce that he’s postponed the tariffs except for Yemen. Fucking putz.
How long before the real civil unrest starts? You know, the kind that results in COOTWH declaring martial law?
We’ve got tens of thousands of fired federal employees who will be losing unemployment benefits, if they can even apply and collect them, with mortgages and personal debt coming due, tens of thousands of college kids graduating into what is likely to be a jobless job market, competing with all those who were previously laid off, a shit ton of new retirees trying to file for and receive social security benefits and a percentage of the population still devastated by natural disasters and little to no relief in sight.
Almost seems like it’s all by design. I’m guessing July/August.
Comments
expanding our garden footprint this year, started last year with 2 4x4 raised beds, one 12 inch high the other 18 inches. deciding now just what size and how they'll lay out then what to plant.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
This was my discovery last year. Had my first cholesterol test, it was fairly high, opted to revamp my diet to get it under control. Now I walk into a grocery store and it feels like 90% of the place is there to shorten my lifespan. It's pretty crazy that the food industry evolved in this way.
Consumer confidence plummets to lowest level since January 2021
America’s economic mood continues to deteriorate as President Donald Trump carries on with his sweeping economic agenda.
Consumer confidence slid 7.2 points this month to a reading of 92.9, the Conference Board said Tuesday in its latest survey, reaching its lowest level since January 2021 and extending a decline that began in December, after the US presidential election. March’s decline was similar to February’s, underscoring the growing pessimism among US consumers.
Not only are Americans expecting higher inflation this year, but more of them are also predicting that the economy will slip into a recession, the Conference Board survey showed. That toxic combination of weakening growth and accelerating inflation resembles “stagflation,” and Federal Reserve officials also see the US economy trending in that direction.
Americans’ expectations “for income, business, and labor market conditions” in the coming year fell sharply this month, the survey showed, declining 9.6 points to 65.2, the lowest level in 12 years. Meanwhile, the share of respondents expecting a recession in the next 12 months held steady in March at a nine-month high.
Trump’s trade spat with foreign countries, a key tenet of his economic agenda, has been both baffling and contentious: Earlier this month after imposing 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, those duties were quickly delayed for another month after complaints from business leaders; then, after the European Union retaliated to Trump’s metal tariffs, the president continued to up the ante by threatening a mega 200% tariff on European alcohol.
And upcoming tariffs aimed at matching those that foreign countries impose on the United States — so-called reciprocal tariffs slated for April 2 — might be watered down.
That frenetic back-and-forth has evoked high levels of uncertainty among American consumers, businesses and investors, which is making it difficult to plan ahead, according to various surveys. It’s also stoking fears that the economy could be barreling toward stagflation.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/25/economy/us-consumer-confidence-march-recession/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The case could set a precedent that would require the company to pay detainees more at its other facilities across the country.
Read more: https://propub.li/4iGK2a9
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Let the inmates make $2 an hour.
"Most of us are three bad months away from being homeless. None of us are three good months away from being billionaires. You should know which side to be on."
🎯
1996; 9/28 New York
1997: 11/14 Oakland, 11/15 Oakland
1998: 7/5 Dallas, 7/7 Albuquerque, 7/8 Phoenix, 7/10 San Diego, 7/11 Las Vegas
2000: 10/17 Dallas
2003: 4/3 OKC
2012: 11/17 Tulsa(EV), 11/18 Tulsa(EV)
2013: 11/16 OKC
2014: 10/8 Tulsa
2022: 9/20 OKC
2023: 9/13 Ft Worth, 9/15 Ft Worth
Also the state prisons dont pay the inmates so why should the private prison dot hat?
1. These are immigration detainees, not "prisoners" in jail after being convicted of a criminal offense.
2. The offenses which these individuals are accused are civil in nature, not criminal.
3. They have not been held liable for these offenses.
4. They sued under state minimum wage rules, so the question is truly whether the Supremacy clause applies in this case.
5. Do the federal contracts require/include cleaning in the contracts and is that presumed to be by outside/wage earning individuals or is that truly the decision of the vendor?
6. The state does not use contractors/private companies for housing. Apples and oranges.
because it breaks a civil code and not a criminal code?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
This number was -2.8% just four days ago.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
COOTWH is probably being fitted with a parachute so he can land on the orange house lawn to announce that he’s postponed the tariffs except for Yemen. Fucking putz.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://x.com/Reuters/status/1907787409724682469?t=41_ZxPMm_1EG-HZ2-V0J_Q&s=19
Almost seems like it’s all by design. I’m guessing July/August.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©