Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
I'll play devils advocate on this and ask a few questions.
If I am in my car and I get swarmed by a mob and they start banging on my windows trying to get at me and or my family, fearing for my life I run through them to flee, is this what that law is protecting?
If you protest in an area but you decide to create some carnage, is that what this is going after?
My guess would be that it is to protect peoples possession's and well being? I can see it easily being misconstrued and the race card played.
Regarding your first question: are you swarmed by a mob, or are you trying to drive your car through a mob of people who were there when you got there? Sounds like a pretty specific scenario...If I was driving up the road and came across a protest, I would turn the F around. Like the whole "Stand your ground" law, this legislation if accurately described, could lead to people thinking they're entitled to / protected if they plow through a crowd.
I have never once defended people rioting or looting which I infer you mean when you say "carnage", I'm in favor of prosecuting anyone who loots or destroys property to the fullest extent of the law. There is a difference between protesting and rioting, I trust you agree with me on that.
With all that being said:
Who decides when a protest becomes an unlawful assembly? The penalties being suggested are pretty serious and can have some long lasting repercussions. To me it feels like they're trying to deter people from protesting, which is as much our right as the freedom of speech, which I thought we all cared about.
I'm waiting for conservatives to start fretting as much about the 1st amendment as they do about the 2nd, and it just isn't happening... did you see how the Brooklyn Center police treated the reporters in the last week?
I'm waiting for conservative to start caring as much about these matters as they do a fucking Dr Seuss book.
I'm not holding my breath.
Conservatives do care about the 1st amendment. See "capitol storming", lol.
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey.
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case.
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now.
0
Options
mickeyrat
up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,798
Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
I'll play devils advocate on this and ask a few questions.
If I am in my car and I get swarmed by a mob and they start banging on my windows trying to get at me and or my family, fearing for my life I run through them to flee, is this what that law is protecting?
If you protest in an area but you decide to create some carnage, is that what this is going after?
My guess would be that it is to protect peoples possession's and well being? I can see it easily being misconstrued and the race card played.
Regarding your first question: are you swarmed by a mob, or are you trying to drive your car through a mob of people who were there when you got there? Sounds like a pretty specific scenario...If I was driving up the road and came across a protest, I would turn the F around. Like the whole "Stand your ground" law, this legislation if accurately described, could lead to people thinking they're entitled to / protected if they plow through a crowd.
I have never once defended people rioting or looting which I infer you mean when you say "carnage", I'm in favor of prosecuting anyone who loots or destroys property to the fullest extent of the law. There is a difference between protesting and rioting, I trust you agree with me on that.
With all that being said:
Who decides when a protest becomes an unlawful assembly? The penalties being suggested are pretty serious and can have some long lasting repercussions. To me it feels like they're trying to deter people from protesting, which is as much our right as the freedom of speech, which I thought we all cared about.
I'm waiting for conservatives to start fretting as much about the 1st amendment as they do about the 2nd, and it just isn't happening... did you see how the Brooklyn Center police treated the reporters in the last week?
I'm waiting for conservative to start caring as much about these matters as they do a fucking Dr Seuss book.
I'm not holding my breath.
Conservatives do care about the 1st amendment. See "capitol storming", lol.
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey.
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case.
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
I'll play devils advocate on this and ask a few questions.
If I am in my car and I get swarmed by a mob and they start banging on my windows trying to get at me and or my family, fearing for my life I run through them to flee, is this what that law is protecting?
If you protest in an area but you decide to create some carnage, is that what this is going after?
My guess would be that it is to protect peoples possession's and well being? I can see it easily being misconstrued and the race card played.
Regarding your first question: are you swarmed by a mob, or are you trying to drive your car through a mob of people who were there when you got there? Sounds like a pretty specific scenario...If I was driving up the road and came across a protest, I would turn the F around. Like the whole "Stand your ground" law, this legislation if accurately described, could lead to people thinking they're entitled to / protected if they plow through a crowd.
I have never once defended people rioting or looting which I infer you mean when you say "carnage", I'm in favor of prosecuting anyone who loots or destroys property to the fullest extent of the law. There is a difference between protesting and rioting, I trust you agree with me on that.
With all that being said:
Who decides when a protest becomes an unlawful assembly? The penalties being suggested are pretty serious and can have some long lasting repercussions. To me it feels like they're trying to deter people from protesting, which is as much our right as the freedom of speech, which I thought we all cared about.
I'm waiting for conservatives to start fretting as much about the 1st amendment as they do about the 2nd, and it just isn't happening... did you see how the Brooklyn Center police treated the reporters in the last week?
I'm waiting for conservative to start caring as much about these matters as they do a fucking Dr Seuss book.
I'm not holding my breath.
Conservatives do care about the 1st amendment. See "capitol storming", lol.
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey.
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case.
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now.
unfortunately when these laws are written regarding peaceful assembly/protest, it is very subjective when the police are allowed to step in. all they have to do is say they felt it getting out of hand/hostile, and boom, assembly turns into a riot.
Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
I'll play devils advocate on this and ask a few questions.
If I am in my car and I get swarmed by a mob and they start banging on my windows trying to get at me and or my family, fearing for my life I run through them to flee, is this what that law is protecting?
If you protest in an area but you decide to create some carnage, is that what this is going after?
My guess would be that it is to protect peoples possession's and well being? I can see it easily being misconstrued and the race card played.
Regarding your first question: are you swarmed by a mob, or are you trying to drive your car through a mob of people who were there when you got there? Sounds like a pretty specific scenario...If I was driving up the road and came across a protest, I would turn the F around. Like the whole "Stand your ground" law, this legislation if accurately described, could lead to people thinking they're entitled to / protected if they plow through a crowd.
I have never once defended people rioting or looting which I infer you mean when you say "carnage", I'm in favor of prosecuting anyone who loots or destroys property to the fullest extent of the law. There is a difference between protesting and rioting, I trust you agree with me on that.
With all that being said:
Who decides when a protest becomes an unlawful assembly? The penalties being suggested are pretty serious and can have some long lasting repercussions. To me it feels like they're trying to deter people from protesting, which is as much our right as the freedom of speech, which I thought we all cared about.
I'm waiting for conservatives to start fretting as much about the 1st amendment as they do about the 2nd, and it just isn't happening... did you see how the Brooklyn Center police treated the reporters in the last week?
I'm waiting for conservative to start caring as much about these matters as they do a fucking Dr Seuss book.
I'm not holding my breath.
Conservatives do care about the 1st amendment. See "capitol storming", lol. - you mean when they stormed the capitol building and assaulted police, damaged the building and smeared feces on the walls in an effort to overthrow our democracy? That was carnage bro, lol
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey. - see my "stand your ground" comment above
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case. - we're on the same page here
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now. - the entire country is on edge - it's literally their duty to uphold the law regardless of circumstances
Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
I'll play devils advocate on this and ask a few questions.
If I am in my car and I get swarmed by a mob and they start banging on my windows trying to get at me and or my family, fearing for my life I run through them to flee, is this what that law is protecting?
If you protest in an area but you decide to create some carnage, is that what this is going after?
My guess would be that it is to protect peoples possession's and well being? I can see it easily being misconstrued and the race card played.
Regarding your first question: are you swarmed by a mob, or are you trying to drive your car through a mob of people who were there when you got there? Sounds like a pretty specific scenario...If I was driving up the road and came across a protest, I would turn the F around. Like the whole "Stand your ground" law, this legislation if accurately described, could lead to people thinking they're entitled to / protected if they plow through a crowd.
I have never once defended people rioting or looting which I infer you mean when you say "carnage", I'm in favor of prosecuting anyone who loots or destroys property to the fullest extent of the law. There is a difference between protesting and rioting, I trust you agree with me on that.
With all that being said:
Who decides when a protest becomes an unlawful assembly? The penalties being suggested are pretty serious and can have some long lasting repercussions. To me it feels like they're trying to deter people from protesting, which is as much our right as the freedom of speech, which I thought we all cared about.
I'm waiting for conservatives to start fretting as much about the 1st amendment as they do about the 2nd, and it just isn't happening... did you see how the Brooklyn Center police treated the reporters in the last week?
I'm waiting for conservative to start caring as much about these matters as they do a fucking Dr Seuss book.
I'm not holding my breath.
Conservatives do care about the 1st amendment. See "capitol storming", lol.
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey.
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case.
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now.
unfortunately when these laws are written regarding peaceful assembly/protest, it is very subjective when the police are allowed to step in. all they have to do is say they felt it getting out of hand/hostile, and boom, assembly turns into a riot.
Or do what NYC did and let them run free in the streets.
The local business' all bordered up their buildings because police were told NOT to intervene.
The protesters currently are at odds with the very people that are supposed to be keeping the peace. Talk about a conundrum.
Civil leaders should be talking to both protestor and police brass and beat cops. It doesn't appear that this happens in a positive fashion at all and people just want their pictures taken. Am I wrong on that?
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Same.
I imagine there were a lot of disappointed people last night.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Same.
I imagine there were a lot of disappointed people last night.
Tucker was trying to fill that void as best he could though. Lots of couch potatoes getting their fill of white rage last night.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
I'll play devils advocate on this and ask a few questions.
If I am in my car and I get swarmed by a mob and they start banging on my windows trying to get at me and or my family, fearing for my life I run through them to flee, is this what that law is protecting?
If you protest in an area but you decide to create some carnage, is that what this is going after?
My guess would be that it is to protect peoples possession's and well being? I can see it easily being misconstrued and the race card played.
Regarding your first question: are you swarmed by a mob, or are you trying to drive your car through a mob of people who were there when you got there? Sounds like a pretty specific scenario...If I was driving up the road and came across a protest, I would turn the F around. Like the whole "Stand your ground" law, this legislation if accurately described, could lead to people thinking they're entitled to / protected if they plow through a crowd.
I have never once defended people rioting or looting which I infer you mean when you say "carnage", I'm in favor of prosecuting anyone who loots or destroys property to the fullest extent of the law. There is a difference between protesting and rioting, I trust you agree with me on that.
With all that being said:
Who decides when a protest becomes an unlawful assembly? The penalties being suggested are pretty serious and can have some long lasting repercussions. To me it feels like they're trying to deter people from protesting, which is as much our right as the freedom of speech, which I thought we all cared about.
I'm waiting for conservatives to start fretting as much about the 1st amendment as they do about the 2nd, and it just isn't happening... did you see how the Brooklyn Center police treated the reporters in the last week?
I'm waiting for conservative to start caring as much about these matters as they do a fucking Dr Seuss book.
I'm not holding my breath.
Conservatives do care about the 1st amendment. See "capitol storming", lol.
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey.
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case.
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now.
yeah well, they fit a description.
Wow. They fit a description? Is that ok when it’s they other way around? Shit.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I don’t think anyone here wanted that. I do believe there are some far right loonies who would have loved to see it though. That’s for sure. I think it’s huge to get the conviction AND have legitimate peaceful demonstrations through the night. A very good sign.
Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
I'll play devils advocate on this and ask a few questions.
If I am in my car and I get swarmed by a mob and they start banging on my windows trying to get at me and or my family, fearing for my life I run through them to flee, is this what that law is protecting?
If you protest in an area but you decide to create some carnage, is that what this is going after?
My guess would be that it is to protect peoples possession's and well being? I can see it easily being misconstrued and the race card played.
Regarding your first question: are you swarmed by a mob, or are you trying to drive your car through a mob of people who were there when you got there? Sounds like a pretty specific scenario...If I was driving up the road and came across a protest, I would turn the F around. Like the whole "Stand your ground" law, this legislation if accurately described, could lead to people thinking they're entitled to / protected if they plow through a crowd.
I have never once defended people rioting or looting which I infer you mean when you say "carnage", I'm in favor of prosecuting anyone who loots or destroys property to the fullest extent of the law. There is a difference between protesting and rioting, I trust you agree with me on that.
With all that being said:
Who decides when a protest becomes an unlawful assembly? The penalties being suggested are pretty serious and can have some long lasting repercussions. To me it feels like they're trying to deter people from protesting, which is as much our right as the freedom of speech, which I thought we all cared about.
I'm waiting for conservatives to start fretting as much about the 1st amendment as they do about the 2nd, and it just isn't happening... did you see how the Brooklyn Center police treated the reporters in the last week?
I'm waiting for conservative to start caring as much about these matters as they do a fucking Dr Seuss book.
I'm not holding my breath.
Conservatives do care about the 1st amendment. See "capitol storming", lol.
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey.
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case.
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now.
yeah well, they fit a description.
Wow. They fit a description? Is that ok when it’s they other way around? Shit.
that's the point. the general excuse used for harassing POC is that "they fit a description". turnabout is fair play, as Gorilla Monsoon used to say.
Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
I'll play devils advocate on this and ask a few questions.
If I am in my car and I get swarmed by a mob and they start banging on my windows trying to get at me and or my family, fearing for my life I run through them to flee, is this what that law is protecting?
If you protest in an area but you decide to create some carnage, is that what this is going after?
My guess would be that it is to protect peoples possession's and well being? I can see it easily being misconstrued and the race card played.
Regarding your first question: are you swarmed by a mob, or are you trying to drive your car through a mob of people who were there when you got there? Sounds like a pretty specific scenario...If I was driving up the road and came across a protest, I would turn the F around. Like the whole "Stand your ground" law, this legislation if accurately described, could lead to people thinking they're entitled to / protected if they plow through a crowd.
I have never once defended people rioting or looting which I infer you mean when you say "carnage", I'm in favor of prosecuting anyone who loots or destroys property to the fullest extent of the law. There is a difference between protesting and rioting, I trust you agree with me on that.
With all that being said:
Who decides when a protest becomes an unlawful assembly? The penalties being suggested are pretty serious and can have some long lasting repercussions. To me it feels like they're trying to deter people from protesting, which is as much our right as the freedom of speech, which I thought we all cared about.
I'm waiting for conservatives to start fretting as much about the 1st amendment as they do about the 2nd, and it just isn't happening... did you see how the Brooklyn Center police treated the reporters in the last week?
I'm waiting for conservative to start caring as much about these matters as they do a fucking Dr Seuss book.
I'm not holding my breath.
Conservatives do care about the 1st amendment. See "capitol storming", lol.
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey.
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case.
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now.
yeah well, they fit a description.
Wow. They fit a description? Is that ok when it’s they other way around? Shit.
that's the point. the general excuse used for harassing POC is that "they fit a description". turnabout is fair play, as Gorilla Monsoon used to say.
After I typed that I figured it was said on purpose to prove a point. My apologies. I took it literally upon first read. @mickeyrat.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I don't think anyone here wanted riots/looting. I certainly didn't I also don't think those who just looted in the summer were really trying to advance any cause, but saw an excuse for a new TV and some new shoes. It would not have surprised me if those same people used another excuse to do it again. I'm glad I was wrong.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Cute. Claim ignorance. Or is it “plausible deniability?”
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Cute. Claim ignorance. Or is it “plausible deniability?”
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Cute. Claim ignorance. Or is it “plausible deniability?”
i don't recall seeing anyone like that either.
Obviously. Just assuming based on opposing opinions.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Cute. Claim ignorance. Or is it “plausible deniability?”
i don't recall seeing anyone like that either.
Obviously. Just assuming based on opposing opinions.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Cute. Claim ignorance. Or is it “plausible deniability?”
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I don't think anyone here wanted riots/looting. I certainly didn't I also don't think those who just looted in the summer were really trying to advance any cause, but saw an excuse for a new TV and some new shoes. It would not have surprised me if those same people used another excuse to do it again. I'm glad I was wrong.
Can you explain your post in the Police Abuse thread then? Why would you posit such a thing? Why did you select LA and the NBA's Lakers? A white cop convicted of murdering a black man and you posit that "there will be celebration in the form of riots, like when the Lakers win." Why that city, why that team, why that sport? Why now (moments before or just after the verdict is read)? A few people don't seem to understand, particularly those that "don't read everything on the AMT." I think I understand but feel free to convince me otherwise because you didn't post "I'm glad it didn't happen" until after it was referenced.
And to the bolded, you mean like Umbrella Man, the identified white supremacist who started the looting by torching the auto parts store in what, until that moment, had been a peaceful protest against the killing of George Floyd?
The "excuses" are part of the problem and exhausting.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
They were too busy enjoying the hockey game last night to be worried about the Lakers.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Cute. Claim ignorance. Or is it “plausible deniability?”
i don't recall seeing anyone like that either.
Obviously. Just assuming based on opposing opinions.
Calling him out on his shit is all.
As I'm calling shit out. Sorry, does that bother you?
Hey conservatives, does this count as cancel culture? Or does cancel culture only apply to shitty celebrities facing consequences for their own stupidity?
Asking on behalf of our first amendment and 330M of my fellow countrymen.
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Cute. Claim ignorance. Or is it “plausible deniability?”
i don't recall seeing anyone like that either.
Obviously. Just assuming based on opposing opinions.
Calling him out on his shit is all.
As I'm calling shit out. Sorry, does that bother you?
The police and gun owners are the same in that they bear no responsibility, think they're doing everything right and want all the responsibility for change to be on the public and pro-gun control crowd, in effect, just comply. Upholding the law doesn't include violating constitutional rights.
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Happy to be wrong on that as well. Who the fuck would root for that to happen?
Some posters on here. Kyle Rittenhouse types.
I want names.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Pay attention to the postings and figure it out. Some folks on here get giddy, depending.
I don't read everything on AMT soI don't know.
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Cute. Claim ignorance. Or is it “plausible deniability?”
i don't recall seeing anyone like that either.
Obviously. Just assuming based on opposing opinions.
Calling him out on his shit is all.
As I'm calling shit out. Sorry, does that bother you?
Not if you follow through!
So that someone can flag it and cry to the mods that their (or their buddies’) racist feelings were hurt?
I mean, Halifax is not that bright, but you’ve gotta try harder than that if you want to read less from him....
Comments
First question. No, you can't "drive your car through a mob." Sometimes you can't just turn around though and there is when it gets dicey.
2nd question. Carnage is just that. You can protest and assemble, by all means do. You pick up a rock and throw it at someone, something? That is carnage. Enter a store to loot or steal? Carnage. It's a pretty easy thing to establish. If I catch you inside of a building trespassing, pretty much a closed case.
I defend police when I think it needs be. They are being constantly yelled at, for something that many of them have zero to do with. With one broad stroke the whole police force is labeled. You think I'm taking any shit from someone whom antagonizes or may want to do harm to me? No way. Those officers are on edge right now.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
www.headstonesband.com
The local business' all bordered up their buildings because police were told NOT to intervene.
The protesters currently are at odds with the very people that are supposed to be keeping the peace. Talk about a conundrum.
Civil leaders should be talking to both protestor and police brass and beat cops. It doesn't appear that this happens in a positive fashion at all and people just want their pictures taken. Am I wrong on that?
I'm still waiting for the Laker victory like rioting to happen.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I imagine there were a lot of disappointed people last night.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.headstonesband.com
I also don't think those who just looted in the summer were really trying to advance any cause, but saw an excuse for a new TV and some new shoes. It would not have surprised me if those same people used another excuse to do it again. I'm glad I was wrong.
You make a statement like that and don't have backup?
Name names please. I'd love to hear this.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
It was a bold statement Cotton, I was hoping for some pudding to eat w your proof though...
No bueno Danno
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.headstonesband.com
And to the bolded, you mean like Umbrella Man, the identified white supremacist who started the looting by torching the auto parts store in what, until that moment, had been a peaceful protest against the killing of George Floyd?
The "excuses" are part of the problem and exhausting.
And a murder conviction there will be celebration in the form of riots, like when the Lakers win
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I mean, Halifax is not that bright, but you’ve gotta try harder than that if you want to read less from him....