SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States)

1111214161749

Comments

  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 39,020
    I would never want to be accused of a crime in this country, never mind facing a jury of my peers who get their information from Facebook, memes, Twitter and are unable to critically think. Then upon conviction, have the focus be on punishment till the end of your life with no hope of rehabilitation or forgiveness. Granted, some crimes are reprehensible and unforgivable but the million plus who are incarcerated? All of those?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • nicknyr15nicknyr15 Posts: 8,439
    I would never want to be accused of a crime in this country, never mind facing a jury of my peers who get their information from Facebook, memes, Twitter and are unable to critically think. Then upon conviction, have the focus be on punishment till the end of your life with no hope of rehabilitation or forgiveness. Granted, some crimes are reprehensible and unforgivable but the million plus who are incarcerated? All of those?
    Serving jury duty over 10 years ago made me come to this exact conclusion. Nobody wanted to be there and most of them would have said guilty or not guilty just to get out on a timely fashion. Just like that! No thought, no feelings, no critical thinking. Just me me me. It really scared the fuck out of me. 
  • cblock4lifecblock4life Posts: 1,720
    The innocence project is a good place to start if anyone is interested in learning more.  
  • OnWis97OnWis97 Posts: 5,140
    OnWis97 said:
    The Texas shooting is horrific, but something maybe worse flew almost completely under the radar this week. The extremist court ruled that evidence is not enough of a basis to force a state court to grant an appeal. The defendant received incompetent counsel. Too bad, can’t force the states to look at evidence to determine if the defendant deserves a retrial, and will likely be executed. Nice free country this is.

    The six are basically giving the middle finger to us. They can do whatever they want, give the states extraordinary power, even to kill a person, just because they have six on the court.

    “Under Justice Thomas’s majority opinion, federal courts may still conduct habeas proceedings when a criminal defendant alleges that they received inadequate assistance of counsel twice, but the federal court may not consider any evidence that wasn’t presented in earlier proceedings. As Thomas writes, “if a prisoner has ‘failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in State court proceedings,’ a federal court ‘shall not hold an evidentiary hearing on the claim’ unless the prisoner satisfies one of two narrow exceptions” that are not present in Jones’s case.

    https://www.vox.com/2022/5/23/23138100/supreme-court-barry-jones-shinn-ramirez

    There is nothing more difficult than having a conviction overturned (or even considered) regardless of how obvious someone's innocence may be. If I get brought in for spitting on the street, I'm not saying a word without a lawyer.

    I recommend Rectify by Lara Bazelon for anyone that wants to learn about 1) how easy it can be for people to be wrongfully convicted and 2) how difficult it is to right those wrongs. It's my absolute last straw for my former support of the death penalty and a big part of the reason that I've abandoned most of my former "tough on crime" philosophy.
    If you mean Rectify that was on tv you’re right.  Totally worth watching.  

    My advice also, ask for a lawyer as soon as you sit down. Don’t listen to one word they’ve got to say because it’s all bullshit.  
    I read the book I linked. I'm unaware of anything on TV.

    From the book, my takeaway was that police/prosecters/etc. are so focused on getting someone and so focused on thinking they have the right person, that they get tunnel vision and it impact the way they proceed. Most of it is their humanness (as opposed to actual corruption and intentionally locking up an innocent person; though that happens to). One of several ways this happens is with confessions. Sleep/food-deprived people confess after like 18 hours because their brains are now mush and telling the cop what they want to hear will stop the current madness. Innocent people confess way more than you'd think.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
  • cblock4lifecblock4life Posts: 1,720
    OnWis97 said:
    OnWis97 said:
    The Texas shooting is horrific, but something maybe worse flew almost completely under the radar this week. The extremist court ruled that evidence is not enough of a basis to force a state court to grant an appeal. The defendant received incompetent counsel. Too bad, can’t force the states to look at evidence to determine if the defendant deserves a retrial, and will likely be executed. Nice free country this is.

    The six are basically giving the middle finger to us. They can do whatever they want, give the states extraordinary power, even to kill a person, just because they have six on the court.

    “Under Justice Thomas’s majority opinion, federal courts may still conduct habeas proceedings when a criminal defendant alleges that they received inadequate assistance of counsel twice, but the federal court may not consider any evidence that wasn’t presented in earlier proceedings. As Thomas writes, “if a prisoner has ‘failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in State court proceedings,’ a federal court ‘shall not hold an evidentiary hearing on the claim’ unless the prisoner satisfies one of two narrow exceptions” that are not present in Jones’s case.

    https://www.vox.com/2022/5/23/23138100/supreme-court-barry-jones-shinn-ramirez

    There is nothing more difficult than having a conviction overturned (or even considered) regardless of how obvious someone's innocence may be. If I get brought in for spitting on the street, I'm not saying a word without a lawyer.

    I recommend Rectify by Lara Bazelon for anyone that wants to learn about 1) how easy it can be for people to be wrongfully convicted and 2) how difficult it is to right those wrongs. It's my absolute last straw for my former support of the death penalty and a big part of the reason that I've abandoned most of my former "tough on crime" philosophy.
    If you mean Rectify that was on tv you’re right.  Totally worth watching.  

    My advice also, ask for a lawyer as soon as you sit down. Don’t listen to one word they’ve got to say because it’s all bullshit.  
    I read the book I linked. I'm unaware of anything on TV.

    From the book, my takeaway was that police/prosecters/etc. are so focused on getting someone and so focused on thinking they have the right person, that they get tunnel vision and it impact the way they proceed. Most of it is their humanness (as opposed to actual corruption and intentionally locking up an innocent person; though that happens to). One of several ways this happens is with confessions. Sleep/food-deprived people confess after like 18 hours because their brains are now mush and telling the cop what they want to hear will stop the current madness. Innocent people confess way more than you'd think.
    You’re absolutely correct about everything above and it’ sounds like it’s the same Rectify 

    Another good watch is The Night Of.  
  • benjsbenjs Posts: 9,144
    OnWis97 said:
    OnWis97 said:
    The Texas shooting is horrific, but something maybe worse flew almost completely under the radar this week. The extremist court ruled that evidence is not enough of a basis to force a state court to grant an appeal. The defendant received incompetent counsel. Too bad, can’t force the states to look at evidence to determine if the defendant deserves a retrial, and will likely be executed. Nice free country this is.

    The six are basically giving the middle finger to us. They can do whatever they want, give the states extraordinary power, even to kill a person, just because they have six on the court.

    “Under Justice Thomas’s majority opinion, federal courts may still conduct habeas proceedings when a criminal defendant alleges that they received inadequate assistance of counsel twice, but the federal court may not consider any evidence that wasn’t presented in earlier proceedings. As Thomas writes, “if a prisoner has ‘failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in State court proceedings,’ a federal court ‘shall not hold an evidentiary hearing on the claim’ unless the prisoner satisfies one of two narrow exceptions” that are not present in Jones’s case.

    https://www.vox.com/2022/5/23/23138100/supreme-court-barry-jones-shinn-ramirez

    There is nothing more difficult than having a conviction overturned (or even considered) regardless of how obvious someone's innocence may be. If I get brought in for spitting on the street, I'm not saying a word without a lawyer.

    I recommend Rectify by Lara Bazelon for anyone that wants to learn about 1) how easy it can be for people to be wrongfully convicted and 2) how difficult it is to right those wrongs. It's my absolute last straw for my former support of the death penalty and a big part of the reason that I've abandoned most of my former "tough on crime" philosophy.
    If you mean Rectify that was on tv you’re right.  Totally worth watching.  

    My advice also, ask for a lawyer as soon as you sit down. Don’t listen to one word they’ve got to say because it’s all bullshit.  
    I read the book I linked. I'm unaware of anything on TV.

    From the book, my takeaway was that police/prosecters/etc. are so focused on getting someone and so focused on thinking they have the right person, that they get tunnel vision and it impact the way they proceed. Most of it is their humanness (as opposed to actual corruption and intentionally locking up an innocent person; though that happens to). One of several ways this happens is with confessions. Sleep/food-deprived people confess after like 18 hours because their brains are now mush and telling the cop what they want to hear will stop the current madness. Innocent people confess way more than you'd think.
    You’re absolutely correct about everything above and it’ sounds like it’s the same Rectify 

    Another good watch is The Night Of.  
    Agreed on The Night Of. Peter Moffat just did another miniseries called 61st Street, very well done.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/21/politics/supreme-court-religious-schools/index.html

    the further eroson of the separation of church and state. 
    new album "Cigarettes" out Spring 2025!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Posts: 20,273
    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/21/politics/supreme-court-religious-schools/index.html

    the further eroson of the separation of church and state. 
    This one doesn't bother me as much...the argument being that if you can use a voucher for a non-religious private school you should also be able to use a voucher for a religious school.

    The problem was allowing vouchers to begin with.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/21/politics/supreme-court-religious-schools/index.html

    the further eroson of the separation of church and state. 
    This one doesn't bother me as much...the argument being that if you can use a voucher for a non-religious private school you should also be able to use a voucher for a religious school.

    The problem was allowing vouchers to begin with.
    I do agree with that, but it just seems these back doors are being used to further the re-indoctrination of youth on public funds. 
    new album "Cigarettes" out Spring 2025!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 15,940
    I haven’t read the rulings, but to me a school is a school.  I get one school may have a religious focus in some aspects (so science may be different), but on the whole I would guess the private religious schools provide a great education overall in line with non-religious based schools.  

    To me this is not about separation of church and state but really is more of a question of why one school can get funding and another cannot.  If a good school happens to be part of the catholic diocese, and can’t get vouchers like an equally good private school next door, then there is a question of whether there is religious freedom.  You are punishing religion in this case.  

    I hate rulings on party lines like this.  It makes me think that (on both sides) the law is not being evaluated but personal opinions and activism is involved.  
  • private schools shouldn't get public funds. full stop. religious or not. 
    new album "Cigarettes" out Spring 2025!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,445
    Seems like the wrong path was to ever offer vouchers for private school. Screw that. Provide public school. If parents want different, pay for it.

    Tax payers $ leaving the public school system for a for private school is not good IMO 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,675
    I haven’t read the rulings, but to me a school is a school.  I get one school may have a religious focus in some aspects (so science may be different), but on the whole I would guess the private religious schools provide a great education overall in line with non-religious based schools.  

    To me this is not about separation of church and state but really is more of a question of why one school can get funding and another cannot.  If a good school happens to be part of the catholic diocese, and can’t get vouchers like an equally good private school next door, then there is a question of whether there is religious freedom.  You are punishing religion in this case.  

    I hate rulings on party lines like this.  It makes me think that (on both sides) the law is not being evaluated but personal opinions and activism is involved.  
    Well the argument is straightforward.. the gov't should not be providing tax payer dollars for religious education.  This case shows a tension between two bedrock principles: right to free exercise and the separation of church and state.  The court's conservative justices favor one provision over the other.  The liberal justices did the opposite.  
  • Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Posts: 20,273
    Seems like the wrong path was to ever offer vouchers for private school. Screw that. Provide public school. If parents want different, pay for it.

    Tax payers $ leaving the public school system for a for private school is not good IMO 
    Totally agree. This whole voucher bullshit was meant to weaken public schools. I'm sure it was thought up by some rich douchebag that couldn't stand the fact that his real estate taxes were high because of school funding which cut into their tuition payments for private school.

    The whole idea creates increased costs for public schools by increasing the per student cost of infrastructure and other costs.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,445
    Seems like the wrong path was to ever offer vouchers for private school. Screw that. Provide public school. If parents want different, pay for it.

    Tax payers $ leaving the public school system for a for private school is not good IMO 
    Totally agree. This whole voucher bullshit was meant to weaken public schools. I'm sure it was thought up by some rich douchebag that couldn't stand the fact that his real estate taxes were high because of school funding which cut into their tuition payments for private school.

    The whole idea creates increased costs for public schools by increasing the per student cost of infrastructure and other costs.
    I can understand the good thought behind it...allow parents to send their kids to a different school if their public school is shit and not have to foot the entire bill....but of course, it seems the bad outweighs the good on this one. 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,675
    Seems like the wrong path was to ever offer vouchers for private school. Screw that. Provide public school. If parents want different, pay for it.

    Tax payers $ leaving the public school system for a for private school is not good IMO 
    Totally agree. This whole voucher bullshit was meant to weaken public schools. I'm sure it was thought up by some rich douchebag that couldn't stand the fact that his real estate taxes were high because of school funding which cut into their tuition payments for private school.

    The whole idea creates increased costs for public schools by increasing the per student cost of infrastructure and other costs.
    No, the issue with Maine is that there are some rural districts without public education.  So they created a program to provide funding for private schools that were available, but excluded religious schools.  So it was not a simple question.  
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,950
    edited June 2022
    The SCOTUS has become everything it was meant to combat. It is completely broken. The entire thing should be torn down, the justices dismissed, and the entire process of establishing it needs to be rewritten from scratch so that the SCOTUS is non-partisan, and the justices can actually make decisions they way they are sworn to. If that isn't done, the SCOTUS is just a contributor to America's scary decline.

    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Posts: 20,273
    mrussel1 said:
    Seems like the wrong path was to ever offer vouchers for private school. Screw that. Provide public school. If parents want different, pay for it.

    Tax payers $ leaving the public school system for a for private school is not good IMO 
    Totally agree. This whole voucher bullshit was meant to weaken public schools. I'm sure it was thought up by some rich douchebag that couldn't stand the fact that his real estate taxes were high because of school funding which cut into their tuition payments for private school.

    The whole idea creates increased costs for public schools by increasing the per student cost of infrastructure and other costs.
    No, the issue with Maine is that there are some rural districts without public education.  So they created a program to provide funding for private schools that were available, but excluded religious schools.  So it was not a simple question.  
    My comment was related more to vouchers overall rather than Maine...I should have pointed that out. The Maine argument makes sense if public schools weren't available. 
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,675
    mrussel1 said:
    Seems like the wrong path was to ever offer vouchers for private school. Screw that. Provide public school. If parents want different, pay for it.

    Tax payers $ leaving the public school system for a for private school is not good IMO 
    Totally agree. This whole voucher bullshit was meant to weaken public schools. I'm sure it was thought up by some rich douchebag that couldn't stand the fact that his real estate taxes were high because of school funding which cut into their tuition payments for private school.

    The whole idea creates increased costs for public schools by increasing the per student cost of infrastructure and other costs.
    No, the issue with Maine is that there are some rural districts without public education.  So they created a program to provide funding for private schools that were available, but excluded religious schools.  So it was not a simple question.  
    My comment was related more to vouchers overall rather than Maine...I should have pointed that out. The Maine argument makes sense if public schools weren't available. 
    Yes I agree that vouchers are an issue.  I don't like taking money from public education.  
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,445
    PJ_Soul said:
    The SCOTUS has become everything it was meant to combat. It is completely broken. The entire thing should be torn down, the justices dismissed, and the entire process of establishing it needs to be rewritten from scratch so that the SCOTUS is non-partisan, and the justices can actually make decisions they way they are sworn to. If that isn't done, the SCOTUS is just a contributor to America's scary decline.

    I don't see anything from this decision that would show what you are saying.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,950
    PJ_Soul said:
    The SCOTUS has become everything it was meant to combat. It is completely broken. The entire thing should be torn down, the justices dismissed, and the entire process of establishing it needs to be rewritten from scratch so that the SCOTUS is non-partisan, and the justices can actually make decisions they way they are sworn to. If that isn't done, the SCOTUS is just a contributor to America's scary decline.

    I don't see anything from this decision that would show what you are saying.
    I wasn't even thinking about the decision you guys have been discussing - you mean the schools in Maine thing, right? I haven't really put any thought into that - haven't had time to read the details about it.
    My comment was a general one for the SCOTUS thread.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • BentleyspopBentleyspop Posts: 10,763

  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 Posts: 23,303
    when is ginni thomas going to receive a subpoena?

    if this was the husband of RBG the right would have their hair on fire over it.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,586
    when is ginni thomas going to receive a subpoena?

    if this was the husband of RBG the right would have their hair on fire over it.

    subpoena comes if they dont sit voluntarily. She claims she is willing..... its being worked out. See the Jan 6 Committee thread....
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 Posts: 23,303
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • dankinddankind Posts: 20,839
    Did anyone ever think that this would turn out to be the most extreme branch of US government? 

    Seriously, who picked SCOTUS as the HBIC in their grade school textbook branch triumvirate diagrams?
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,675
    dankind said:
    Did anyone ever think that this would turn out to be the most extreme branch of US government? 

    Seriously, who picked SCOTUS as the HBIC in their grade school textbook branch triumvirate diagrams?
    Back to the antebellum age.
  • nicknyr15nicknyr15 Posts: 8,439
    Sad day 
  • stuckinlinestuckinline Posts: 3,367
    edited June 2022
    It is a sad sad day for the United States.
  • MayDay10MayDay10 Posts: 11,727
    IMO, each presidential term should come with a Supreme Court nomination with some sort of safeguard that congress cannot simply block every attempt and they need to agree on something.  Its appalling that a 1-term president who lost the popular vote was able to select 40% of the court and shape our laws long-term.
Sign In or Register to comment.