I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
Can you 2 get a room? Bouncing between threads like a couple of teenage theys.
I’m disinclined to listen to you after you feigned interest early today only to throw back my kid’s pronoun as an attempt at mockery.
Your kid is too young to pick their pronoun.
See, you really like to call out others, but I’d say you’re being ruder right now than I have been all day.
You could say it, but doesn't mean it's true. We all know Cincy here. He's with us all the time. He managed not to annoy a slew of people in his first 48 hours around.
Can you 2 get a room? Bouncing between threads like a couple of teenage theys.
I’m disinclined to listen to you after you feigned interest early today only to throw back my kid’s pronoun as an attempt at mockery.
Your kid is too young to pick their pronoun.
See, you really like to call out others, but I’d say you’re being ruder right now than I have been all day.
You could say it, but doesn't mean it's true. We all know Cincy here. He's with us all the time. He managed not to annoy a slew of people in his first 48 hours around.
Attacking someone’s parenting is pretty bad in my book, but to each their own.
Can you 2 get a room? Bouncing between threads like a couple of teenage theys.
I’m disinclined to listen to you after you feigned interest early today only to throw back my kid’s pronoun as an attempt at mockery.
Your kid is too young to pick their pronoun.
See, you really like to call out others, but I’d say you’re being ruder right now than I have been all day.
You could say it, but doesn't mean it's true. We all know Cincy here. He's with us all the time. He managed not to annoy a slew of people in his first 48 hours around.
Attacking someone’s parenting is pretty bad in my book, but to each their own.
Cincy doesn't just edit his post and pretend like it didn't happen. He stands by what he says, in my experience
Can you 2 get a room? Bouncing between threads like a couple of teenage theys.
I’m disinclined to listen to you after you feigned interest early today only to throw back my kid’s pronoun as an attempt at mockery.
Your kid is too young to pick their pronoun.
See, you really like to call out others, but I’d say you’re being ruder right now than I have been all day.
You could say it, but doesn't mean it's true. We all know Cincy here. He's with us all the time. He managed not to annoy a slew of people in his first 48 hours around.
Attacking someone’s parenting is pretty bad in my book, but to each their own.
Cincy doesn't just edit his post and pretend like it didn't happen. He stands by what he says, in my experience
Neither do I, I apologized, made it explicit that I edited the posts, and never denied making them. I’m a dick, but at least make accurate accusations.
Can you 2 get a room? Bouncing between threads like a couple of teenage theys.
I’m disinclined to listen to you after you feigned interest early today only to throw back my kid’s pronoun as an attempt at mockery.
Your kid is too young to pick their pronoun.
See, you really like to call out others, but I’d say you’re being ruder right now than I have been all day.
You could say it, but doesn't mean it's true. We all know Cincy here. He's with us all the time. He managed not to annoy a slew of people in his first 48 hours around.
Attacking someone’s parenting is pretty bad in my book, but to each their own.
Can you 2 get a room? Bouncing between threads like a couple of teenage theys.
I’m disinclined to listen to you after you feigned interest early today only to throw back my kid’s pronoun as an attempt at mockery.
Your kid is too young to pick their pronoun.
See, you really like to call out others, but I’d say you’re being ruder right now than I have been all day.
You could say it, but doesn't mean it's true. We all know Cincy here. He's with us all the time. He managed not to annoy a slew of people in his first 48 hours around.
Attacking someone’s parenting is pretty bad in my book, but to each their own.
Never did that so don’t try and pretend
You seem like a pretty smart person, so I’m gonna assume you’re just being cagey. I think you know what you were doing, but maybe not
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
You can't say "look at how good these nations looked like they were going to become (but never did) under communism!" as a declared success story and reason to pivot towards it and away from capitalism. A success story requires success to be a success story.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
You can't say "look at how good these nations looked like they were going to become (but never did) under communism!" as a declared success story and reason to pivot towards it and away from capitalism. A success story requires success to be a success story.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Where do you see communism's greatest success in history?
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Im sure your household is communist, which is probably true for all of us.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Where do you see communism's greatest success in history?
The Bolshevik Revolution. Where do you see capitalism’s greatest success?
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Where do you see communism's greatest success in history?
The Bolshevik Revolution. Where do you see capitalism’s greatest success?
What? A bloody civil war is evidence of Communism's success? Where's your humanity?
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Where do you see communism's greatest success in history?
The Bolshevik Revolution. Where do you see capitalism’s greatest success?
Yeah but that led to six years of civil war. Me personally I think the 90's or the 40's.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Where do you see communism's greatest success in history?
The Bolshevik Revolution. Where do you see capitalism’s greatest success?
What? A bloody civil war is evidence of Communism's success? Where's your humanity?
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Where do you see communism's greatest success in history?
The Bolshevik Revolution. Where do you see capitalism’s greatest success?
And while you may think revolution is fun to study, my entire extended family was murdered thanks to the Soviet communist revolution. Wiped out and disappeared. So anyone who thinks the Red October was some great workers success never studied the history and effects on the peasants of the Ukraine and other surrounding countries. That government sickens me to this day.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Where do you see communism's greatest success in history?
The Bolshevik Revolution. Where do you see capitalism’s greatest success?
Yeah but that led to six years of civil war. Me personally I think the 90's or the 40's.
I'm going with the old cliche about about how I can't be contained by a label. Many issues require complicated solutions. Compromise doesn't mean giving up. It means everybody gets something, and the stuff you don't agree on, you leave off the table. We are a pluralistic country, e pluribus unum. This despotic power grab by the Republican party has wrecking our country, and now the response by the AOCs of the world is to do the same thing. Their version of despotism scares me just as much. Power in this country was meant to be shared.
e pluribus unum... damn straight.
I prefer “proletariat of the world, unite!”
No thanks. I came from working class. I worked hard to not put on a uniform everyday like my father.
Under communism, you won’t have to.
You're right, I won't live in a country where the state controls the resources.
Who said anything about a country?
Stfu. You post dumber shit every time you hit the keyboard. You claim to want a serious discussion but are incapable.
Now now. No temper tantrums. You told me you know economics, so you must know Marx.
I didn't study Marx academically. Im an executive at a financial services organization and we always know the macro conditions, credit quality, roll rates, delinquencies, NACO, Cecl rules and every other metric you can possibly fathom. But your worldwide proletariat comment is dumb. True Marxism has never succeeded in practice.
But capitalism has?
Compared to Marxism, feudalism, and every other system, you're damn right. Our mixed economy has pulled more people out of poverty than any other system. Look at the numbers. Tell me the economic system that's better than the mixed system we have used for the better part of a century.
Communism.
Now which country are you arguing has successfully implemented it?
That wasn’t your question.
Clever. So what economic system had been proven to be more successful via the successful implementation by a country?
That’s a trick question. Historical materialism and all...they’re all just steps on the evolution toward communism.
It's not a trick, it's a fact that communism has not been successfully implemented. Even in China, it is a shell of what Marxism was, and more closely aligned with state manipulated capitalism. The state takes advantage of the world's capitalism to prop up its economy. The world is moving away from communism, not towards it. I see no evidence of your statement being accurate.
Elsewhere you’ve dismissed my views because I’m not an expert, so I’ll simply point you to experts. Begin with Marx, Karl.
Marx, Karl is a only a philosopher, whose theories failed in real world applications.
I’m no quitter.
Where do you see communism's greatest success in history?
The Bolshevik Revolution. Where do you see capitalism’s greatest success?
And while you may think revolution is fun to study, my entire extended family was murdered thanks to the Soviet communist revolution. Wiped out and disappeared. So anyone who thinks the Red October was some great workers success never studied the history and effects on the peasants of the Ukraine and other surrounding countries. That government sickens me to this day.
Comments
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Me personally I think the 90's or the 40's.