Ethiopian Airlines flight crashes, all 157 on board killed, including 18 Canadians
Comments
-
brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.hippiemom = goodness0
-
cincybearcat said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.0
-
oftenreading said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.Absolutely, I fly mostly Cathay and EVA between Hong Kong, Taipei and points around. I know the planes.I will say after living in Asia so long, flying US or Europe sucks balls. Asian airlines are a million times better. From schedules to customer service to food to everything. I hate flying anything else.0
-
PJ_Soul said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.Nice!cincybearcat said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
-
brianlux said:PJ_Soul said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.Nice!cincybearcat said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
benjs said:brianlux said:PJ_Soul said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.Nice!cincybearcat said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.I'm remaining calm and maintaining composure but if I ever meet Cincy I might have to..."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
-
brianlux said:benjs said:brianlux said:PJ_Soul said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.Nice!cincybearcat said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.I'm remaining calm and maintaining composure but if I ever meet Cincy I might have to...
hippiemom = goodness0 -
Lol. My friends make them too, all the time. My married couple friends joke all the time about how she is worth more dead than alive.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
cincybearcat said:brianlux said:benjs said:brianlux said:PJ_Soul said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.Nice!cincybearcat said:brianlux said:Smellyman said:Just to add I have become a anxiety ridden flyer as I get older, but the Airbus A350 is the go to if I can. Super quiet, super smooth like you're not even moving. I will fly that option every time if I could.I'm remaining calm and maintaining composure but if I ever meet Cincy I might have to...Not at all. You should hear all the times my wife has threatened to take out more life insurance policies on me. Good God, you'd think she believes I'm reckless or getting old!Oh yeah?"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
-
Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...Give Peas A Chance…0
-
Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
brianlux said:Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
That's why I have no interest in self-driving cars...things like cars, planes, trains and what not should remain offline. These corporations that push this technology will tell us we have nothing to worry about, of course, they will tell us this 2 days after a massive data breach...Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
That's why I have no interest in self-driving cars...things like cars, planes, trains and what not should remain offline. These corporations that push this technology will tell us we have nothing to worry about, of course, they will tell us this 2 days after a massive data breach...
I always thought it was crazy that there is wifi on a plane. If the avionics are run through a VPN I would think that they could still be hacked into.0 -
Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
That's why I have no interest in self-driving cars...things like cars, planes, trains and what not should remain offline. These corporations that push this technology will tell us we have nothing to worry about, of course, they will tell us this 2 days after a massive data breach...
For example, the way that Apple permits authentication to devices that law enforcement (or even Apple themselves) can't get into is by having a secure enclave which can only return a binary "correct" or "incorrect" based on a fingerprint scan or facial scan, which sends that signal to the phone, which is always looking for a "correct" prior to permitting entrance to the operating system. Because that enclave is not internet connected even, hacking is effectively not an option. This is why Apple users have to authenticate their fingerprints/faces on each device, which is an incredibly clever design.
Something like this could mitigate the risk of hacking, but I suspect it'll be really challenging to make it hacker-proof for self-driving cars because the car would need to receive instructions from the internet. That would keep it pretty susceptible.Post edited by benjs on'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
benjs said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
That's why I have no interest in self-driving cars...things like cars, planes, trains and what not should remain offline. These corporations that push this technology will tell us we have nothing to worry about, of course, they will tell us this 2 days after a massive data breach...
For example, the way that Apple permits authentication to devices that law enforcement (or even Apple themselves) can't get into is by having a secure enclave which can only return a binary "correct" or "incorrect" based on a fingerprint scan or facial scan, which sends that signal to the phone, which is always looking for a "correct" prior to permitting entrance to the operating system. Because that enclave is not internet connected even, hacking is effectively not an option. This is why Apple users have to authenticate their fingerprints/faces on each device, which is an incredibly clever design.
Something like this could mitigate the risk of hacking, but I suspect it'll be really challenging to make it hacker-proof for self-driving cars because the car would need to receive instructions from the internet. That would keep it pretty susceptible.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
brianlux said:benjs said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
That's why I have no interest in self-driving cars...things like cars, planes, trains and what not should remain offline. These corporations that push this technology will tell us we have nothing to worry about, of course, they will tell us this 2 days after a massive data breach...
For example, the way that Apple permits authentication to devices that law enforcement (or even Apple themselves) can't get into is by having a secure enclave which can only return a binary "correct" or "incorrect" based on a fingerprint scan or facial scan, which sends that signal to the phone, which is always looking for a "correct" prior to permitting entrance to the operating system. Because that enclave is not internet connected even, hacking is effectively not an option. This is why Apple users have to authenticate their fingerprints/faces on each device, which is an incredibly clever design.
Something like this could mitigate the risk of hacking, but I suspect it'll be really challenging to make it hacker-proof for self-driving cars because the car would need to receive instructions from the internet. That would keep it pretty susceptible.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
benjs said:brianlux said:benjs said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
That's why I have no interest in self-driving cars...things like cars, planes, trains and what not should remain offline. These corporations that push this technology will tell us we have nothing to worry about, of course, they will tell us this 2 days after a massive data breach...
For example, the way that Apple permits authentication to devices that law enforcement (or even Apple themselves) can't get into is by having a secure enclave which can only return a binary "correct" or "incorrect" based on a fingerprint scan or facial scan, which sends that signal to the phone, which is always looking for a "correct" prior to permitting entrance to the operating system. Because that enclave is not internet connected even, hacking is effectively not an option. This is why Apple users have to authenticate their fingerprints/faces on each device, which is an incredibly clever design.
Something like this could mitigate the risk of hacking, but I suspect it'll be really challenging to make it hacker-proof for self-driving cars because the car would need to receive instructions from the internet. That would keep it pretty susceptible.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
benjs said:brianlux said:benjs said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
That's why I have no interest in self-driving cars...things like cars, planes, trains and what not should remain offline. These corporations that push this technology will tell us we have nothing to worry about, of course, they will tell us this 2 days after a massive data breach...
For example, the way that Apple permits authentication to devices that law enforcement (or even Apple themselves) can't get into is by having a secure enclave which can only return a binary "correct" or "incorrect" based on a fingerprint scan or facial scan, which sends that signal to the phone, which is always looking for a "correct" prior to permitting entrance to the operating system. Because that enclave is not internet connected even, hacking is effectively not an option. This is why Apple users have to authenticate their fingerprints/faces on each device, which is an incredibly clever design.
Something like this could mitigate the risk of hacking, but I suspect it'll be really challenging to make it hacker-proof for self-driving cars because the car would need to receive instructions from the internet. That would keep it pretty susceptible."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
benjs said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Meltdown99 said:Wait until someone hacks in and takes one of these planes down...
That's why I have no interest in self-driving cars...things like cars, planes, trains and what not should remain offline. These corporations that push this technology will tell us we have nothing to worry about, of course, they will tell us this 2 days after a massive data breach...
For example, the way that Apple permits authentication to devices that law enforcement (or even Apple themselves) can't get into is by having a secure enclave which can only return a binary "correct" or "incorrect" based on a fingerprint scan or facial scan, which sends that signal to the phone, which is always looking for a "correct" prior to permitting entrance to the operating system. Because that enclave is not internet connected even, hacking is effectively not an option. This is why Apple users have to authenticate their fingerprints/faces on each device, which is an incredibly clever design.
Something like this could mitigate the risk of hacking, but I suspect it'll be really challenging to make it hacker-proof for self-driving cars because the car would need to receive instructions from the internet. That would keep it pretty susceptible.Give Peas A Chance…0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help