probably ought to change the title of this thread, though.
You'll be 200 by the time the drought reaches Cowboy level.
if you’re going to keep going to that well, I will too….
Brady was a system QB. Give me Aikman.
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
The Patriots should go back to the red uniforms and helmets from the 1980’s because their team is almost identical to those lowly 80’s teams.
Fun fact: between 1980 & 1989 they only had 2 seasons where they finished below .500. In 7 of those 10 years they finished no worse than tied for 2nd in the division.
They weren't world beaters by any means, but they weren't the dregs of the league either, they were middle of the pack or better.
The Patriots should go back to the red uniforms and helmets from the 1980’s because their team is almost identical to those lowly 80’s teams.
Fun fact: between 1980 & 1989 they only had 2 seasons where they finished below .500. In 7 of those 10 years they finished no worse than tied for 2nd in the division.
They weren't world beaters by any means, but they weren't the dregs of the league either, they were middle of the pack or better.
A: They wore those uni's once already this season, week 2 against Miami. (and looked spectacular). 2. The lowly teams were actually the early 90's. First half of decade prior to arrivals of Parcells and then Bledsoe. 1990: 1-15 1991: 6-10 1992: 2-14 1993: 5-11 (first year for Parcells, Bledsoe and the blue uniforms) Since then, only 4 losing seasons out of the next 29. (this will make it 5 of 30). As Merkin Baller pointed out, the 80's Patriots were pretty good, a lot of the late 70's talent left over to start the decade (that team should have won a Superb Owl, thank you for nothing Ben Dreith).
The Patriots should go back to the red uniforms and helmets from the 1980’s because their team is almost identical to those lowly 80’s teams.
Fun fact: between 1980 & 1989 they only had 2 seasons where they finished below .500. In 7 of those 10 years they finished no worse than tied for 2nd in the division.
They weren't world beaters by any means, but they weren't the dregs of the league either, they were middle of the pack or better.
A: They wore those uni's once already this season, week 2 against Miami. (and looked spectacular). 2. The lowly teams were actually the early 90's. First half of decade prior to arrivals of Parcells and then Bledsoe. 1990: 1-15 1991: 6-10 1992: 2-14 1993: 5-11 (first year for Parcells, Bledsoe and the blue uniforms) Since then, only 4 losing seasons out of the next 29. (this will make it 5 of 30). As Merkin Baller pointed out, the 80's Patriots were pretty good, a lot of the late 70's talent left over to start the decade (that team should have won a Superb Owl, thank you for nothing Ben Dreith).
Take it a step further... from 1974 - 1988 they had 2 seasons below .500.
The myth that they were bottom feeders for decades before Parcells arrived is just that, a myth. It was literally 4 seasons of being the bottom of the barrel.
The Patriots should go back to the red uniforms and helmets from the 1980’s because their team is almost identical to those lowly 80’s teams.
Fun fact: between 1980 & 1989 they only had 2 seasons where they finished below .500. In 7 of those 10 years they finished no worse than tied for 2nd in the division.
They weren't world beaters by any means, but they weren't the dregs of the league either, they were middle of the pack or better.
A: They wore those uni's once already this season, week 2 against Miami. (and looked spectacular). 2. The lowly teams were actually the early 90's. First half of decade prior to arrivals of Parcells and then Bledsoe. 1990: 1-15 1991: 6-10 1992: 2-14 1993: 5-11 (first year for Parcells, Bledsoe and the blue uniforms) Since then, only 4 losing seasons out of the next 29. (this will make it 5 of 30). As Merkin Baller pointed out, the 80's Patriots were pretty good, a lot of the late 70's talent left over to start the decade (that team should have won a Superb Owl, thank you for nothing Ben Dreith).
Take it a step further... from 1974 - 1988 they had 2 seasons below .500.
The myth that they were bottom feeders for decades before Parcells arrived is just that, a myth. It was literally 4 seasons of being the bottom of the barrel.
Didn’t mean to side track the thread…the most important thing is that they are bottom feeders now .
The Patriots should go back to the red uniforms and helmets from the 1980’s because their team is almost identical to those lowly 80’s teams.
Fun fact: between 1980 & 1989 they only had 2 seasons where they finished below .500. In 7 of those 10 years they finished no worse than tied for 2nd in the division.
They weren't world beaters by any means, but they weren't the dregs of the league either, they were middle of the pack or better.
A: They wore those uni's once already this season, week 2 against Miami. (and looked spectacular). 2. The lowly teams were actually the early 90's. First half of decade prior to arrivals of Parcells and then Bledsoe. 1990: 1-15 1991: 6-10 1992: 2-14 1993: 5-11 (first year for Parcells, Bledsoe and the blue uniforms) Since then, only 4 losing seasons out of the next 29. (this will make it 5 of 30). As Merkin Baller pointed out, the 80's Patriots were pretty good, a lot of the late 70's talent left over to start the decade (that team should have won a Superb Owl, thank you for nothing Ben Dreith).
Take it a step further... from 1974 - 1988 they had 2 seasons below .500.
The myth that they were bottom feeders for decades before Parcells arrived is just that, a myth. It was literally 4 seasons of being the bottom of the barrel.
Didn’t mean to side track the thread…the most important thing is that they are bottom feeders now .
Tank for Caleb. (there's no good rhyme for this player)
The Patriots should go back to the red uniforms and helmets from the 1980’s because their team is almost identical to those lowly 80’s teams.
Fun fact: between 1980 & 1989 they only had 2 seasons where they finished below .500. In 7 of those 10 years they finished no worse than tied for 2nd in the division.
They weren't world beaters by any means, but they weren't the dregs of the league either, they were middle of the pack or better.
A: They wore those uni's once already this season, week 2 against Miami. (and looked spectacular). 2. The lowly teams were actually the early 90's. First half of decade prior to arrivals of Parcells and then Bledsoe. 1990: 1-15 1991: 6-10 1992: 2-14 1993: 5-11 (first year for Parcells, Bledsoe and the blue uniforms) Since then, only 4 losing seasons out of the next 29. (this will make it 5 of 30). As Merkin Baller pointed out, the 80's Patriots were pretty good, a lot of the late 70's talent left over to start the decade (that team should have won a Superb Owl, thank you for nothing Ben Dreith).
Take it a step further... from 1974 - 1988 they had 2 seasons below .500.
The myth that they were bottom feeders for decades before Parcells arrived is just that, a myth. It was literally 4 seasons of being the bottom of the barrel.
Didn’t mean to side track the thread…the most important thing is that they are bottom feeders now .
You can be certain your role as starting qb is probably over when they pull you for the final drive and throw in the back up cold. 😂
I don’t know if I have ever seen anything like that.
Sure appears like a lot of ppl have fallen off the old Pats bandwagon, don’t see much merch anymore. Good, the true fans are still here. Big changes coming.
That throw on the pick was brutal. I mean just brutal. You have your very tall TE behind the defense and you throw it low and short. WTF was he thinking/doing? You just lob a high ball in the end zone and it's an easy TD. Even Tony Eason or Hugh Millen could have made that throw.
Ridiculously stupid nickname aside, I agree. The guy is just shell shocked and can't compete. Zappe really no better. They better finish 2-15 and get either Williams or Harrison Jr. Do not, I repeat, DO NOT beat the Jets in week 18.
Ridiculously stupid nickname aside, I agree. The guy is just shell shocked and can't compete. Zappe really no better. They better finish 2-15 and get either Williams or Harrison Jr. Do not, I repeat, DO NOT beat the Jets in week 18.
Maybe they can forfeit one of those wins and go 1-16. Embarrassing.
People complain when they lose, they complain when they win... it's almost like people are going to complain no matter what happens. F that... I'll never get tired of Belichick owning Mike Tomlin.
& F tanking. Pittsburgh had a former #2 OAL pick @ QB last night and how did that work out for them?
And a hail mary on 4th and 2 with that much time left? What the fuck?
That play call was dumb. You're down 3, pick up the first down and you have 2 minutes to get like another 20 yards to tie the game.
I mean at 3rd and 2, they should have just run the ball. You'll hit the 2 minute warning either way, with a either first down or 4th and short with time to figure out the next play.
even at the time, I thought Tomlin should have taken a chip shot FG to get within “one score”, prior to a failed 4th down attempt.
and, as much as I hate to agree with the juggler, he’s right when he says ONLY the eagles seem to know how to execute the tush push.
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
People complain when they lose, they complain when they win... it's almost like people are going to complain no matter what happens. F that... I'll never get tired of Belichick owning Mike Tomlin.
& F tanking. Pittsburgh had a former #2 OAL pick @ QB last night and how did that work out for them?
I don't know when fans will realize that players are never going to tank. Most guys are playing for their next contract that will possibly be on another team. You think they give a shit about the draft pick next year and the team being good in 5 years??? Not a chance. Having said all that, great win for the Pats!! Bears with a nice lead for the #1 pick!!
The defense is missing it's 2 best players (Judon & Gonzalez) and still playing at a high level. The draft focus has to be heavily tilted to the offense. They need just about everything on that side of the ball.
Get zeppolie some receivers, an O line that will give him a little more time to throw or open holes for a running game to keep the D honest and the Pats would be just fine. Zepps got zip on the ball and can scramble but needs to learn to throw it away instead of throwing a pick. Tall order, I know, particularly with injuries. Oh, and a kicker. Need one of them too.
Comments
Brady was a system QB. Give me Aikman.
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
They weren't world beaters by any means, but they weren't the dregs of the league either, they were middle of the pack or better.
2. The lowly teams were actually the early 90's. First half of decade prior to arrivals of Parcells and then Bledsoe.
1990: 1-15
1991: 6-10
1992: 2-14
1993: 5-11 (first year for Parcells, Bledsoe and the blue uniforms)
Since then, only 4 losing seasons out of the next 29. (this will make it 5 of 30).
As Merkin Baller pointed out, the 80's Patriots were pretty good, a lot of the late 70's talent left over to start the decade (that team should have won a Superb Owl, thank you for nothing Ben Dreith).
The myth that they were bottom feeders for decades before Parcells arrived is just that, a myth. It was literally 4 seasons of being the bottom of the barrel.
They were better w/ Patricia as OC.
Go figure.
I mean just brutal.
You have your very tall TE behind the defense and you throw it low and short. WTF was he thinking/doing? You just lob a high ball in the end zone and it's an easy TD. Even Tony Eason or Hugh Millen could have made that throw.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Staring at the video
When I look at the television, I want to see me
Staring right back at me
We all wanna be big stars
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The guy is just shell shocked and can't compete.
Zappe really no better.
They better finish 2-15 and get either Williams or Harrison Jr.
Do not, I repeat, DO NOT beat the Jets in week 18.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Looks like we'll be drafting an interior lineman in the first round.
As long as they are in the top 3, they should be OK.
That Jets game might be a big one
& F tanking. Pittsburgh had a former #2 OAL pick @ QB last night and how did that work out for them?
And a hail mary on 4th and 2 with that much time left? What the fuck?
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
You're down 3, pick up the first down and you have 2 minutes to get like another 20 yards to tie the game.
I mean at 3rd and 2, they should have just run the ball. You'll hit the 2 minute warning either way, with a either first down or 4th and short with time to figure out the next play.
and, as much as I hate to agree with the juggler, he’s right when he says ONLY the eagles seem to know how to execute the tush push.
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
The draft focus has to be heavily tilted to the offense. They need just about everything on that side of the ball.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©