Team Mueller (and Their Report)

1568101122

Comments

  • dignindignin Posts: 7,584
    CM189191 said:
    Barr said Mueller report would be available within a week 6 days ago.  Clocks ticking mf, let's see it!
    Thursday morning.
  • KatKat There's a lot to be said for nowhere.Posts: 3,783
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    "Well, as far as I know, music makes people happy. I know it makes me happy." -- Fats Domino
  • dignindignin Posts: 7,584
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,620
    How for the best and prepare for the worse


    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • KatKat There's a lot to be said for nowhere.Posts: 3,783
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 

    "Well, as far as I know, music makes people happy. I know it makes me happy." -- Fats Domino
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,620
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,620
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • dignindignin Posts: 7,584
    CM189191 said:
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,620
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
    I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.  

    Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...

    Barr referred to the report as self redacting.  As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.


    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,620
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • dignindignin Posts: 7,584
    CM189191 said:
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
    I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.  

    Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...

    Barr referred to the report as self redacting.  As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.


    Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,620
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
    I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.  

    Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...

    Barr referred to the report as self redacting.  As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.


    Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
    Don't get me wrong.  I'm a little skeptical too.  I wanted to see the whole report, unredacted, yesterday.

    However, it's looking more and more like quite a few members of Congress are getting wrapped up in this investigation.  

    I don't want Nunes, turtle, et al, to see the report either.  At least not until it's entered as evidence in their respective trials. 
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • dignindignin Posts: 7,584
    CM189191 said:
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
    I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.  

    Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...

    Barr referred to the report as self redacting.  As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.


    Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
      

    I don't want Nunes, turtle, et al, to see the report either.  At least not until it's entered as evidence in their respective trials. 
    If there is any justice in this world.
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 New JerseyPosts: 20,356
    edited April 18
    It's so quiet in here.
    Post edited by mcgruff10 on
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon In My PlacePosts: 19,533
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    12/29/19
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 21,746
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    It takes a minimum of 26 days to read 448 pages.

    14 ongoing investigations.
    09/15/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/29/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield, MA; 08/18/08, O2 London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA;

    "If you're looking down on someone, it better be to extend them a hand to lift them up."

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 21,828
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    So are you of the thought that now that he’s been exonerated the nation should just let everything go ? You do believe he’s been cleared no ?
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 New JerseyPosts: 20,356
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon In My PlacePosts: 19,533
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    12/29/19
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 21,746
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    09/15/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/29/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield, MA; 08/18/08, O2 London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA;

    "If you're looking down on someone, it better be to extend them a hand to lift them up."

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon In My PlacePosts: 19,533
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    yeah, and?
    12/29/19
  • RoleModelsinBlood31RoleModelsinBlood31 Austin TXPosts: 4,928
    I’m outraged!
    I'm like an opening band for your mom.
  • KatKat There's a lot to be said for nowhere.Posts: 3,783
    So Manafort giving campaign information to Kalimnik(sp) about campaign plans and battleground states, etc., isn't conspiracy with Russia? How does that work exactly?

    "Well, as far as I know, music makes people happy. I know it makes me happy." -- Fats Domino
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 21,828
    I’m outraged!
    What happened? 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • tbergstbergs Posts: 6,089
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    People are waiting for direction on their reaction from Hannity and Tapper.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • tbergstbergs Posts: 6,089
    I’m outraged!
    What happened? 
    He has TDS.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 21,746
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    yeah, and?
    Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor." 
    09/15/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/29/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield, MA; 08/18/08, O2 London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA;

    "If you're looking down on someone, it better be to extend them a hand to lift them up."

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • OnWis97OnWis97 St. Paul, MNPosts: 1,928
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    yeah, and?
    Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor." 
    I don't think so.
    1995 Milwaukee
    1998 Alpine, Alpine
    2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston
    2004 Boston, Boston
    2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)
    2011 Alpine, Alpine
    2013 Wrigley
    2014 St. Paul
    2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley
    2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 New JerseyPosts: 20,356
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    yeah, and?
    Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor." 
    Just stop. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • njnancynjnancy Northern New JerseyPosts: 4,952
    Mueller wrote in his report that the investigation was hampered by repeated lying by witnesses and lack of cooperation by the President, esp in his lack of candor in his written answers (30 I don't recall as answers) and he needed to meet with Trump but that was not allowed by his lawyers and Mueller decided that it would take too long to fight subpoenas through the courts - it would considerably delay the report. So there were many important questions that were never answered leaving Mueller without Trump's answers in person which, as is evidenced by our communication on social media, is a much better way to assess information, truthfulness and intonation. 

    They also refused to answer written questions about conspiracy (collusion is not a legal term). 

    So he laid out what he had and believed it was going to Congress. He did not direct Barr to make a decision, nor was it appropriate for Barr to do so. 

    This is the second lie that Barr spun in his news conference this morning - the White House was fully cooperative. 
Sign In or Register to comment.