Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.
Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...
Barr referred to the report as self redacting. As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.
Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.
Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...
Barr referred to the report as self redacting. As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.
Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.
Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...
Barr referred to the report as self redacting. As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.
Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
Don't get me wrong. I'm a little skeptical too. I wanted to see the whole report, unredacted, yesterday.
However, it's looking more and more like quite a few members of Congress are getting wrapped up in this investigation.
I don't want Nunes, turtle, et al, to see the report either. At least not until it's entered as evidence in their respective trials.
Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.
Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...
Barr referred to the report as self redacting. As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.
Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
I don't want Nunes, turtle, et al, to see the report either. At least not until it's entered as evidence in their respective trials.
So Manafort giving campaign information to Kalimnik(sp) about campaign plans and battleground states, etc., isn't conspiracy with Russia? How does that work exactly?
Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list.
As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
yeah, and?
Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor."
Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list.
As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
yeah, and?
Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor."
I don't think so.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list.
As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
yeah, and?
Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor."
Mueller wrote in his report that the investigation was hampered by repeated lying by witnesses and lack of cooperation by the President, esp in his lack of candor in his written answers (30 I don't recall as answers) and he needed to meet with Trump but that was not allowed by his lawyers and Mueller decided that it would take too long to fight subpoenas through the courts - it would considerably delay the report. So there were many important questions that were never answered leaving Mueller without Trump's answers in person which, as is evidenced by our communication on social media, is a much better way to assess information, truthfulness and intonation.
They also refused to answer written questions about conspiracy (collusion is not a legal term).
So he laid out what he had and believed it was going to Congress. He did not direct Barr to make a decision, nor was it appropriate for Barr to do so.
This is the second lie that Barr spun in his news conference this morning - the White House was fully cooperative.
Comments
Have a great week, everyone.
Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...
Barr referred to the report as self redacting. As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.
However, it's looking more and more like quite a few members of Congress are getting wrapped up in this investigation.
I don't want Nunes, turtle, et al, to see the report either. At least not until it's entered as evidence in their respective trials.
-EV 8/14/93
14 ongoing investigations.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
They also refused to answer written questions about conspiracy (collusion is not a legal term).
So he laid out what he had and believed it was going to Congress. He did not direct Barr to make a decision, nor was it appropriate for Barr to do so.
This is the second lie that Barr spun in his news conference this morning - the White House was fully cooperative.