Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez
Comments
-
PJ_Soul said:I don't think she cares about polling either way. She specifically ran for office to make big waves. That is what she is doing. She has zero intention of curbing her radicalism in order to fit in. Her stated intention is to do the exact opposite of that. And that attitude will likely continue to serve her well in the long run. I will be surprised if we're not still hearing her name 20 and 30 years from now, whatever her future wins and losses may be.
What are the "big waves" you see her making, out of curiosity?'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
PJ_Soul said:Okay... but I have to say it: What if someone truly thinks that someone they're talking with is buying into a false narrative? This obviously is going to be true at least some of the time. If you treat that idea as though it's dismissive or lazy or whatever, isn't that equally dismissive to that person, who just might be right? I realize that anyone, whether they are actually buying in or not, is going to be offended by the suggestion... But that doesn't mean it might not still be true, and it's kind of a point impossible not to make at times. Sometimes something is hugely explained by the fact that people are buying into a false narrative. It shouldn't be taboo to suggest it, whether they happen to be right or wrong. Anyone accused of it can obviously deny it (not that they'll know if it's true or not) and feel annoyed that they've been accused of it, but I don't think it's a crazy or lazy suggestion to be making even if it's not true.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0
-
PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:I'm not buying into any fucking narrative. I followed her on twitter for a while, but got tired of her. I read about her comments to the media, and she's snarky as fuck and I think it comes across as unprofessional. I don't give a shit if "that's how the other side does it". I don't agree with it when anyone does it, regardless of affiliation.
she reminds me of friends of mine when they first got into law school. all of a sudden they proclaimed themselves the knowers of all information and they were going to save the world and everyone else was a fucking idiot. eventually they came around and went back to being normal people, but fuck if they weren't pompous assholes for a while.I don't think you're her target audience TBH. I think she is playing the long game, and is focused on people her age. Millennials and Gen Z and beyond. I don't think she expects to get most of her support from Gen X (although she has mine - I love her. I think government needs more young radicals now, hell at this point I'd even welcome anarchists, lol. I don't think we desperately need more "professionalism" in the context you're saying. But I would say I'm in a minority about this point within my own generation).But also, I disagree that her attitude is pompous or arrogant. I think that is plain old genuine passion, excitement, drive, confidence, etc etc. It saddens me a little when people see that from a young woman and decide on negative labels like that. I think they are misinterpreting her.
and even if we disagreed on that, my take on her has zero to do with her being a "young woman". i'd say the same thing if it were beto or pete acting like that.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
benjs said:PJ_Soul said:I don't think she cares about polling either way. She specifically ran for office to make big waves. That is what she is doing. She has zero intention of curbing her radicalism in order to fit in. Her stated intention is to do the exact opposite of that. And that attitude will likely continue to serve her well in the long run. I will be surprised if we're not still hearing her name 20 and 30 years from now, whatever her future wins and losses may be.
What are the "big waves" you see her making, out of curiosity?
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I’d rather have AOC in Congress less than a full term, inexperienced, young, brash, pompous, polarizing, etc. than Lindsey fucking Graham, who after decades on the hill and as a former Air Force lawyer, publicly encourages criminals to ignore senate subpoenas. Imagine what that POS is doing in private? But Oooooo, AOC clapped back at Joe Biden, ooooooooo.
We love eating our own.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:I’d rather have AOC in Congress less than a full term, inexperienced, young, brash, pompous, polarizing, etc. than Lindsey fucking Graham, who after decades on the hill and as a former Air Force lawyer, publicly encourages criminals to ignore senate subpoenas. Imagine what that POS is doing in private? But Oooooo, AOC clapped back at Joe Biden, ooooooooo.
We love eating our own.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:I’d rather have AOC in Congress less than a full term, inexperienced, young, brash, pompous, polarizing, etc. than Lindsey fucking Graham, who after decades on the hill and as a former Air Force lawyer, publicly encourages criminals to ignore senate subpoenas. Imagine what that POS is doing in private? But Oooooo, AOC clapped back at Joe Biden, ooooooooo.
We love eating our own.
And yes, i'd agree I'd much prefer her over many of the high profile republicans, including LG.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
(FTR, I didn't mean you are starting to look like the definition of insanity HFD, lol. I was talking big picture. Big picture I think Halifax is 100% right, and the US left really is eating its own (and the Canadian left is starting to do the same), just like it did in 2016. It's insanity because 2016 didn't teach them a damned thing, apparently, and to keep repeating the same thing with bad results... that's the insane part. I do think this has a lot to do with the oft-mentioned purity politics. ).
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Meh, both parties "eat their own" when it comes primary time. remember all the mud slinging during the republican primary? and it was way harsher than anything democrats do/say to each other, in my opinion.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0
-
HughFreakingDillon said:Meh, both parties "eat their own" when it comes primary time. remember all the mud slinging during the republican primary? and it was way harsher than anything democrats do/say to each other, in my opinion.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:Halifax2TheMax said:I’d rather have AOC in Congress less than a full term, inexperienced, young, brash, pompous, polarizing, etc. than Lindsey fucking Graham, who after decades on the hill and as a former Air Force lawyer, publicly encourages criminals to ignore senate subpoenas. Imagine what that POS is doing in private? But Oooooo, AOC clapped back at Joe Biden, ooooooooo.
We love eating our own.
And yes, i'd agree I'd much prefer her over many of the high profile republicans, including LG.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
tempo_n_groove said:dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:AOC who? I forget about her and then this thread gets bumped so I check in and it’s much ado about a Twitter spat. Welcome to junior high. But the question is, is she representing her constituents and will she face a primary and get re-elected?
She won't accomplish anything but beat her chest come election time.
Most of her constituents say she blew it with the Amazon thing.
Poll numbers are bad.
google search
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.amny.com/amp/news/politics/aoc-approval-rating-1.29633086
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:HughFreakingDillon said:Halifax2TheMax said:I’d rather have AOC in Congress less than a full term, inexperienced, young, brash, pompous, polarizing, etc. than Lindsey fucking Graham, who after decades on the hill and as a former Air Force lawyer, publicly encourages criminals to ignore senate subpoenas. Imagine what that POS is doing in private? But Oooooo, AOC clapped back at Joe Biden, ooooooooo.
We love eating our own.
And yes, i'd agree I'd much prefer her over many of the high profile republicans, including LG.
This is a matter of opinion at this point so take it with a grain of salt, but suppose that you were to superimpose the population of America onto this lovely diagram of the political spectrum. Now, picture where in the political spectrum AOC's positions will yield her votes and respect. How wide of a range is that? What percentage of the population is within that subset of the spectrum?
Next, pretend that AOC were to take a principled yet pragmatic stance where she showed openness to compromise recognizing that the direction is right, even if the progress is insufficient for the end goal. How wide of a range is her spectrum now? What would you imagine the impact to the extreme left wing cohort would be in that situation?
My theory is that a willingness to compromise will expose AOC to a further-centered cohort of population voters currently inaccessible to her, as well a further-centered cohort of political voters currently inaccessible to her, with negligible lack of support from what I suspect to be a smaller cohort than we think (which is likely since extremes are typically the loudest, not the largest).
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:AOC who? I forget about her and then this thread gets bumped so I check in and it’s much ado about a Twitter spat. Welcome to junior high. But the question is, is she representing her constituents and will she face a primary and get re-elected?
She won't accomplish anything but beat her chest come election time.
Most of her constituents say she blew it with the Amazon thing.
Poll numbers are bad.
google search
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.amny.com/amp/news/politics/aoc-approval-rating-1.29633086
So Sienna poll and Quinnac poll... All these polls. I guess we can pick the ones we like to construct our arguments, lol.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:AOC who? I forget about her and then this thread gets bumped so I check in and it’s much ado about a Twitter spat. Welcome to junior high. But the question is, is she representing her constituents and will she face a primary and get re-elected?
She won't accomplish anything but beat her chest come election time.
Most of her constituents say she blew it with the Amazon thing.
Poll numbers are bad.
google search
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.amny.com/amp/news/politics/aoc-approval-rating-1.29633086
So Sienna poll and Quinnac poll... All these polls. I guess we can pick the ones we like to construct our arguments, lol.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:AOC who? I forget about her and then this thread gets bumped so I check in and it’s much ado about a Twitter spat. Welcome to junior high. But the question is, is she representing her constituents and will she face a primary and get re-elected?
She won't accomplish anything but beat her chest come election time.
Most of her constituents say she blew it with the Amazon thing.
Poll numbers are bad.
google search
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.amny.com/amp/news/politics/aoc-approval-rating-1.29633086
So Sienna poll and Quinnac poll... All these polls. I guess we can pick the ones we like to construct our arguments, lol.
In April 52% supports her. I guess that is a majority? Half? I was actually shocked it was that high.
0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:Okay... but I have to say it: What if someone truly thinks that someone they're talking with is buying into a false narrative? This obviously is going to be true at least some of the time. If you treat that idea as though it's dismissive or lazy or whatever, isn't that equally dismissive to that person, who just might be right? I realize that anyone, whether they are actually buying in or not, is going to be offended by the suggestion... But that doesn't mean it might not still be true, and it's kind of a point impossible not to make at times. Sometimes something is hugely explained by the fact that people are buying into a false narrative. It shouldn't be taboo to suggest it, whether they happen to be right or wrong. Anyone accused of it can obviously deny it (not that they'll know if it's true or not) and feel annoyed that they've been accused of it, but I don't think it's a crazy or lazy suggestion to be making even if it's not true.
And for the record, it was you who engaged me. As usual you can't get simple facts straight.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:AOC who? I forget about her and then this thread gets bumped so I check in and it’s much ado about a Twitter spat. Welcome to junior high. But the question is, is she representing her constituents and will she face a primary and get re-elected?
She won't accomplish anything but beat her chest come election time.
Most of her constituents say she blew it with the Amazon thing.
Poll numbers are bad.
google search
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.amny.com/amp/news/politics/aoc-approval-rating-1.29633086
So Sienna poll and Quinnac poll... All these polls. I guess we can pick the ones we like to construct our arguments, lol.
In April 52% supports her. I guess that is a majority? Half? I was actually shocked it was that high.
I was more curious to see the polling from her district where you say they thought she blew the Amazon deal (which as proven before she didn't). Can you do that Google search for me too?0 -
dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:AOC who? I forget about her and then this thread gets bumped so I check in and it’s much ado about a Twitter spat. Welcome to junior high. But the question is, is she representing her constituents and will she face a primary and get re-elected?
She won't accomplish anything but beat her chest come election time.
Most of her constituents say she blew it with the Amazon thing.
Poll numbers are bad.
google search
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.amny.com/amp/news/politics/aoc-approval-rating-1.29633086
So Sienna poll and Quinnac poll... All these polls. I guess we can pick the ones we like to construct our arguments, lol.
In April 52% supports her. I guess that is a majority? Half? I was actually shocked it was that high.
I was more curious to see the polling from her district where you say they thought she blew the Amazon deal (which as proven before she didn't). Can you do that Google search for me too?
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:dignin said:tempo_n_groove said:oftenreading said:tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:AOC who? I forget about her and then this thread gets bumped so I check in and it’s much ado about a Twitter spat. Welcome to junior high. But the question is, is she representing her constituents and will she face a primary and get re-elected?
She won't accomplish anything but beat her chest come election time.
Most of her constituents say she blew it with the Amazon thing.
Poll numbers are bad.
google search
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.amny.com/amp/news/politics/aoc-approval-rating-1.29633086
So Sienna poll and Quinnac poll... All these polls. I guess we can pick the ones we like to construct our arguments, lol.
In April 52% supports her. I guess that is a majority? Half? I was actually shocked it was that high.
I was more curious to see the polling from her district where you say they thought she blew the Amazon deal (which as proven before she didn't). Can you do that Google search for me too?
2nd, I know she had nothing to do with losing amazon but her constituents are upset about it... Look above.
Read the article Hoss.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help