Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
Very similar to last year when they ended the season on that 69 game winning streak where they played Atlanta, Brooklyn and the Knicks 23 times each and suddenly they were seen as the team to beat in the east then the Celts pantsed them.
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
*show me every other winning teams' records*
Alright, alright, alright!
Tom O. "I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
*show me every other winning teams' records*
Cmon... The ones that matter and the ones I think will be in the finals are Raptors and they have a 17-13 record.
The Celtics without Kyrie aren't going anywhere though... I might choose my pick to the Bucks because of that.
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
*show me every other winning teams' records*
Cmon... The ones that matter and the ones I think will be in the finals are Raptors and they have a 17-13 record.
The Celtics without Kyrie aren't going anywhere though... I might choose my pick to the Bucks because of that.
Kyrie has a knee sprain, he's not out for long.
This weekend we rock Portland
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,248
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,248
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
Very similar to last year when they ended the season on that 69 game winning streak where they played Atlanta, Brooklyn and the Knicks 23 times each and suddenly they were seen as the team to beat in the east then the Celts pantsed them.
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
Very similar to last year when they ended the season on that 69 game winning streak where they played Atlanta, Brooklyn and the Knicks 23 times each and suddenly they were seen as the team to beat in the east then the Celts pantsed them.
Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. Sorry.
Which is better than 12-15. And Celts are 3-0 against their current projected first round opponent.
This weekend we rock Portland
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,248
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
Very similar to last year when they ended the season on that 69 game winning streak where they played Atlanta, Brooklyn and the Knicks 23 times each and suddenly they were seen as the team to beat in the east then the Celts pantsed them.
Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. Sorry.
Which is better than 12-15. And Celts are 3-0 against their current projected first round opponent.
45% vs 44% winning percentage. Statistical dead heat, folks. That argument is put to rest.
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,248
Also @tempo_n_groove, you made me curious so I checked. They're 11-9 against +500 teams since Butler got here. So...yeah, I don't understand your argument.
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,248
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...
Watch any TNT, NBC or ESPN pre game/post game show and many of the pros are saying it so no links, sorry.
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...
Watch any TNT, NBC or ESPN pre game/post game show and many of the pros are saying it so no links, sorry.
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...
Watch any TNT, NBC or ESPN pre game/post game show and many of the pros are saying it so no links, sorry.
Yep. People are changing their tune now. You are correct. McGrady has changed his mind. I know he was one of the people that wasn't sold on them. https://youtu.be/m5E1r6mHFp0
Comments
Tom O.
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer
Tom O.
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer
I've noticed that too. No second chance shots.
Tom O.
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..
A jump shot and a better supporting cast.
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
Tom O.
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer
The Celtics without Kyrie aren't going anywhere though... I might choose my pick to the Bucks because of that.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
And Celts are 3-0 against their current projected first round opponent.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..