Isn't taping people without consent illegal? Strange that a lawyer would tape his clients. I'm sure all the good lawyers are cringing ...
Not in New York State. And remember, Team Trump Treason has bragged about “having recordings” Particularly in the instance of when Comey related what Team Trump Treason asked him to do before he fired him. Doh!
That's interesting. I just assumed a lawyer would not tape his/her client. I don't want my divorce lawyer taping me...I expect everything I tell him to stay between him and me...
When your client is Team Trump Treason with a history of fucking people over and throwing them under the bus, as well as pretending to be people they’re not and secretly recording them? Yea, not bad to have an insurance policy if you’re doing dirty shit for Team Trump Treason.
Those are very good points. The whole thing gets sleazier by the day...
Thank you for contacting me to share your concerns regarding President Donald Trump’s fitness to lead the nation. I certainly appreciate your taking the time to make me aware of your concerns for this important matter.
Throughout the course of Donald Trump’s Presidency, I have been continuously troubled by the statements and actions made by him and his administration. This current administration has promoted ideals and policies that encourage hatred and division within our country, damage our economy, put our national security at risk, and tear away at our democratic norms.
Presently, Special Counsel Robert Mueller and Congressional committees are extremely involved and advancing in investigating the Trump Administration’s actions both before and after the inauguration. The concerning developments of this investigation, in conjunction with President Trump’s actions, are textbook examples of why our Founders created a system of checks and balances; now, it is up to Congress to ensure that system works. I continue to urge House Republicans – who have been complicit in this President’s attempts to undermine our nation’s values and security – to bring legislation to the Floor to protect Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation. In order to allow for these inquiries to continue, we must recognize that now is not the time to consider the articles of impeachment.
Thank you again for sharing your thoughts with me, I will be sure to continue to keep your views in mind. I encourage you to visit my website at www.yourussenator.house.gov. While there, you can sign up for my newsletter, the Senate Herald, access my voting record, and get information about important public issues. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
With kindest regards, I am
Sincerely yours,
Your US Senator
names have been changed to protect the innocent....
I'm pretty sure I contacted his office about this about 2 months in.
Maybe somebody should take baron and ship him to Slovakia so Team trump Treason might understand how it feels. Oh wait, let’s send him and Melania back. Oh wait, neither of them are capable of compassion and I’m sure they’d be relieved. Brilliant brilliance in all its brilliancy.
Anybody in here dare to defend this shit??? Heartless bastards
They shouldn't have committed the misdemeanor they did?
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Man, people are obsessed with Trump. Both the good (or what some people may perceive as "good") and the bad. I click on the "participated" tab on this website and it says like "100 new posts" everyday. And it's reasonable to believe it's like that all around the 'net. And workplace lunch rooms. And college dorms. Hell, I bet there's kids at recess talking about him. To quote the man himself, "sad."
People tend to talk about disasters
No shit. You expect people not to be focused on someone who is actively harming the world and corroding democracy (as it stands) on a literal daily basis?
I know. It's just sad that Trump surly has always been an "any attention is good attention" type of guy and now he has the world's attention every moment of every day.
You're surprised at the outrage? Really? You can't see how shitty this situation is?
His time will eventually pass.
And then he will be forced to live as 'a joke' for his remaining years (or months if he persists with his KFC training regime).
Someone: Mr. Trump, you know the left-leaning rock band Pearl Jam? Trump: Losers. Someone: Well anyway, on their website, there's people that hate you but talk about you all day every day. Trump: Tremendous.
lol, it'd be an honour to be called a loser by the big loser himself.
Lol, no doubt. I love it when horrible, rotten people have a bad opinion about me - I take it as a compliment, haha.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
Then why the correction by the White House 2 days after being reported by Maddow? It’s not like putin on the ritz’s answer wasn’t being reported on the same day the question was asked. So the White House press office made an “honest” mistake on the most controversial question asked during that press conference?
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
if noone had indeed noticed this do you think the WH would of corrected it , i don't trust this administartion at all they will try anything and see what they can get away with ...Example kids being separated from parents if no one had reported on that issue do yoiu believe this administartion would of stopped it ? i say no way the only reason Baffoon walkd it back was because of the backlash .....
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
Then why the correction by the White House 2 days after being reported by Maddow? It’s not like putin on the ritz’s answer wasn’t being reported on the same day the question was asked. So the White House press office made an “honest” mistake on the most controversial question asked during that press conference?
Pure incompetence. That is hardly difficult to believe with these idiots, right?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
if noone had indeed noticed this do you think the WH would of corrected it , i don't trust this administartion at all they will try anything and see what they can get away with ...Example kids being separated from parents if no one had reported on that issue do yoiu believe this administartion would of stopped it ? i say no way the only reason Baffoon walkd it back was because of the backlash .....
No, they wouldn't have corrected it... I don't think they even would have fucking noticed it themselves though, lol.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
Then why the correction by the White House 2 days after being reported by Maddow? It’s not like putin on the ritz’s answer wasn’t being reported on the same day the question was asked. So the White House press office made an “honest” mistake on the most controversial question asked during that press conference?
Pure incompetence. That is hardly difficult to believe with these idiots, right?
I go back and forth on this. What is malice and what is idiocy? All I know is if it isn’t malice, there are certainly people in this administration acting with malice, thrilled that the public can’t tell which it actually is. Not a great place to be.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Another blank subpoena completed and another dot about to be connected. Team Mueller is getting closer and closer to the center. Is that center rich and chewy or putrid and poisonous? Time will tell.
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
Then why the correction by the White House 2 days after being reported by Maddow? It’s not like putin on the ritz’s answer wasn’t being reported on the same day the question was asked. So the White House press office made an “honest” mistake on the most controversial question asked during that press conference?
Pure incompetence. That is hardly difficult to believe with these idiots, right?
Awfully convenient incompetence, if so.
But it’s sad that we would not be surprised by either incompetence or malice.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
Then why the correction by the White House 2 days after being reported by Maddow? It’s not like putin on the ritz’s answer wasn’t being reported on the same day the question was asked. So the White House press office made an “honest” mistake on the most controversial question asked during that press conference?
Pure incompetence. That is hardly difficult to believe with these idiots, right?
Awfully convenient incompetence, if so.
But it’s sad that we would not be surprised by either incompetence or malice.
Haha, well not really. Incompetence is happening constantly in the WH I believe - it was really only a matter of time that it affected something super noticeable like this, lol. There is no way ALL the ridiculous and/or evil things coming out of the WH are deliberate. At least a few of them are going to just be the accidental result of a bunch of morons running it.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
For the sake of sanity and truth, no, the White House did not edit the video of the Trump/Putin press conference. I hope Rachel is ashamed of herself for that blunder.
I would have posted the actual WaPo article refuting that rumour, but I've reached my free article limit for the month.
Are you familiar with “legal-insurrection.com?”
No. As I said, I would have posted the source article from the Washington Post but couldn't. I realized that this wasn't a good source, but the story is from WaPo so that's fine. That's why I mentioned it.
But I thought I saw where the White House issued a clarification of their claims of the tape being spliced or something? I'll try to find it and post it. My point is, is that I'd believe Maddow over a right wing blogger who posted all of 5 times Maddow was wrong. I don't have the time to check the 5 but if I had to guess, 4.5 of them would be BS. Further, the issues he's called her out on are so minimal in comparison to what Team Trump Treason spews everyday. Hows that denuclerixation of NK coming along, for example? Tough on Russia, maybe? Build a wall, perhaps? Consider the source is all I'm saying. WaPo might have run with this blogger's accuation prior to checking it. Purposeful obsfucation of issues/controversies is part of the Team Trump Treason playbook.
Fine, but I don't want to be paranoid here. I think it seems more likely that the WH didn't do that than it is that they did, and from what I've seen, and considering the question under scrutiny, with the info I've seen, I'm going occams razor on this one until I have reason to feel otherwise. I really don't feel that the WaPo would have run with a right wing blogger's accusation without checking it - I give them way more credit than that, especially when it's something that actually sides with Trump. That seems way less believable to me that the alternative.
It’s still not how it went down as reported by the WaPo and the insurrection blogger. The”White House updated their transcript” after it originally omitted the Putin on the ritz question and response.
Fine, but that isn't what Maddow reported. Hey, you know I'm not going to defend Trump, lol. But I always want to stay as balanced as I can (which really isn't very hard in this era of Trump. A balanced reaction to Trump means I get to loath him and his actions 99% of the time without bias, lol).
Maddow reported that the White House omitted the putin on the ritz question and answer in their official transcript and released video. Two days after she reported this the White House updated both. How was maddow’s Reporting wrong? Further, do you think the White House press operation made a mistake or purposefully omitted putin on the ritz’s reply? Further, had no one called them out, would they have corrected it and, conversely, if they hadn’t made a mistake, why would they correct it?
Moddow reported that the WH edited the PC deliberately to remove content. From what I've read about this and from the press conference that I saw, I do not think the WH purposefully omitted Putin's reply.
Then why the correction by the White House 2 days after being reported by Maddow? It’s not like putin on the ritz’s answer wasn’t being reported on the same day the question was asked. So the White House press office made an “honest” mistake on the most controversial question asked during that press conference?
Pure incompetence. That is hardly difficult to believe with these idiots, right?
Awfully convenient incompetence, if so.
But it’s sad that we would not be surprised by either incompetence or malice.
Haha, well not really. Incompetence is happening constantly in the WH I believe - it was really only a matter of time that it affected something super noticeable like this, lol. There is no way ALL the ridiculous and/or evil things coming out of the WH are deliberate. At least a few of them are going to just be the accidental result of a bunch of morons running it.
Yeah, no, I’m not buying it.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
But the thing is, why in the fuck would they do that deliberately?? Given all the shit that went down at the press conference, why in the world would they specifically bother to very badly attempt to edit that one part like that? I mean, everyone already knows Putin was pro-Trump. They actually erected billboards around Russia about it after he won, lol. It doesn't really make much sense, does it? Especially done in a way that is so easy to see? They're fucking incompetent, but not necessarily THAT incompetent....
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Comments
Those are very good points. The whole thing gets sleazier by the day...
names have been changed to protect the innocent....
I'm pretty sure I contacted his office about this about 2 months in.
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/26/uk/tommy-robinson-supporters-steve-bannon-sam-brownback-intl/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
SAD
Jesus Christ.
Ex-ICE head: Some parents may not see kids again - CNN Politics https://apple.news/AiJrR8jnlSnObwlnSUIx7QA
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Anybody in here dare to defend this shit??? Heartless bastards
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2018/jul/25/trump-putin-and-case-missing-question/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Special counsel Robert Mueller is eyeing President Trump's Twitter habit as part of broad obstruction investigation
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
WSJ: Top Trump Organization official subpoenaed to testify in Michael Cohen probe - CNN Politics https://apple.news/AhbtNL4RIR7S9uKW1f-T2hw
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
But it’s sad that we would not be surprised by either incompetence or malice.