I don't think he wanted to win. I've said that before. I think he wanted to lose closely and not concede so he could blame it on a rigged system and then go and start a cable news channel or something.
Well, maybe he wanted to win but didn't really want the job because deep down he knows he has no business being in this position.
I just remember him meeting Obama with a look of bewilderment on his face, like a man just starting to realize what just happened.
and right after, he said "I had no idea the scope of this job".
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
If this is all he has for a Friday in the White House:
MORNING: • 10:30AM: President Trump signs the Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy Executive Order AFTERNOON: • 1:30PM: President Trump delivers remarks at National Rifle Association Leadership Forum
What was a Friday like at Trump Tower? Hookers and blow?
If this is all he has for a Friday in the White House:
MORNING: • 10:30AM: President Trump signs the Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy Executive Order AFTERNOON: • 1:30PM: President Trump delivers remarks at National Rifle Association Leadership Forum
What was a Friday like at Trump Tower? Hookers and blow?
I trust you'll be busy ignoring me and the 200k+ people protesting in the DC streets tomorrow about your administration's baffling stand on proven science.
Climate Change is real and it's a crisis.
If it's all too much for you, feel free to retire. Play as much golf as you want.
I don't think he wanted to win. I've said that before. I think he wanted to lose closely and not concede so he could blame it on a rigged system and then go and start a cable news channel or something.
Well, maybe he wanted to win but didn't really want the job because deep down he knows he has no business being in this position.
I couldn't agree more.
So I'll just lie down and wait for the dream Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me
After 8 years of complaints about ObamaCare, after speaking the phrase "repeal and replace" approximately one gazillion times, despite having an unprecedented level of control across the three branches of government, the Republicans have failed yet again to unite on a healthcare bill!!
I trust you'll be busy ignoring me and the 200k+ people protesting in the DC streets tomorrow about your administration's baffling stand on proven science.
Climate Change is real and it's a crisis.
If it's all too much for you, feel free to retire. Play as much golf as you want.
Ugh you like liberals will believe anything. There is no such thing as climate change. It's all just a liberal plot to....
Raise your taxes Take away your guns Abort your babies Legalize gay marriage Create more government Open the borders Legalize Marijuana Allow trannies in the military And on and on and on
After 8 years of complaints about ObamaCare, after speaking the phrase "repeal and replace" approximately one gazillion times, despite having an unprecedented level of control across the three branches of government, the Republicans have failed yet again to unite on a healthcare bill!!
You failed to mention the brilliance of the house voting, actually voting, to repeal 40+ times, knowing full well they didn't have a plan and the senate wouldn't go along. Sad, so sad.
Trade minister courts China for softwood as US announces duties on Canadian lumber 'China's curiosity about Canada right now is a lot bigger than softwood lumber,' says expert
Trump's anti-Canadian trade tirades could soften the ambivalence many Canadians feel about deepening economic co-operation with China, he said.
"Trump has accentuated the necessity for Canada to look for other kinds of markets, not because the United States isn't important, but because the United States is now seen as unpredictable and unstable."
BS, how do you feel about all this? I take you as a free trade kind of guy.
I am a free trade guy but Canada does subsidize it's softwood industry which is then able to sell it cheaper to the US. That isn't exactly "fair trade" from the US point of view so Trump isn't wrong to want this remedied for his country. Same thing goes with the dairy industry. The softwood dispute has been around for decades upon decades...I did a project on it in grade 10 Economics which was over 25 years ago!
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
When the right begins to acknowledge they've made a major error in judgement... I'd assume these types of comments will go away and talks between the divided parties might begin to take a more constructive tone; however, until the right can agree to admit to the fact they've propped up a f**king idiot to run the country they share with the left... I think these comments are fair.
Despite the mountain of evidence which grows daily proving without a doubt that Trump is fraudulent as a president... Trumpsters still get on here and flaunt their choice. The realization they need to experience is not happening fast enough for them for one of two reasons: they so badly want to enjoy the success of a Republican Party victory they are blind to the gross shortcomings of the orange man... or they are too stupid to understand how the orange man is unraveling their country.
It is amazing how after all this time you still don't get what happened in the election. Remarkable really.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
Who said that was in jest? The right wasted countless hours and dollars investigating emails & Benghazi only to come up with nothing. The entire purpose was to slander Clinton, which the voters on the right were too blind to acknowledge.
This rift you speak of is not of the left's design. The right brought this upon themselves and I will remind them at every opportunity how they were played for a bunch of rubes. Anyone who voted for Trump because emails is a useful idiot and should be treated as such.
Come up with nothing? Benghazi was a symptom of a full failure in policy. That absolute failure and the need to cover it up was put on display for all to see. It was not slander to credit Clinton with a terrible foreign policy blunder of her choosing nor was it slander to reveal how she and the administration intended to avoid all responsibility for that policy. That is what benghazi was about...but at this point what difference does it make?
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
When the right begins to acknowledge they've made a major error in judgement... I'd assume these types of comments will go away and talks between the divided parties might begin to take a more constructive tone; however, until the right can agree to admit to the fact they've propped up a f**king idiot to run the country they share with the left... I think these comments are fair.
Despite the mountain of evidence which grows daily proving without a doubt that Trump is fraudulent as a president... Trumpsters still get on here and flaunt their choice. The realization they need to experience is not happening fast enough for them for one of two reasons: they so badly want to enjoy the success of a Republican Party victory they are blind to the gross shortcomings of the orange man... or they are too stupid to understand how the orange man is unraveling their country.
It is amazing how after all this time you still don't get what happened in the election. Remarkable really.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
Who said that was in jest? The right wasted countless hours and dollars investigating emails & Benghazi only to come up with nothing. The entire purpose was to slander Clinton, which the voters on the right were too blind to acknowledge.
This rift you speak of is not of the left's design. The right brought this upon themselves and I will remind them at every opportunity how they were played for a bunch of rubes. Anyone who voted for Trump because emails is a useful idiot and should be treated as such.
Come up with nothing? Benghazi was a symptom of a full failure in policy. That absolute failure and the need to cover it up was put on display for all to see. It was not slander to credit Clinton with a terrible foreign policy blunder of her choosing nor was it slander to reveal how she and the administration intended to avoid all responsibility for that policy. That is what benghazi was about...but at this point what difference does it make?
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
When the right begins to acknowledge they've made a major error in judgement... I'd assume these types of comments will go away and talks between the divided parties might begin to take a more constructive tone; however, until the right can agree to admit to the fact they've propped up a f**king idiot to run the country they share with the left... I think these comments are fair.
Despite the mountain of evidence which grows daily proving without a doubt that Trump is fraudulent as a president... Trumpsters still get on here and flaunt their choice. The realization they need to experience is not happening fast enough for them for one of two reasons: they so badly want to enjoy the success of a Republican Party victory they are blind to the gross shortcomings of the orange man... or they are too stupid to understand how the orange man is unraveling their country.
It is amazing how after all this time you still don't get what happened in the election. Remarkable really.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
Who said that was in jest? The right wasted countless hours and dollars investigating emails & Benghazi only to come up with nothing. The entire purpose was to slander Clinton, which the voters on the right were too blind to acknowledge.
This rift you speak of is not of the left's design. The right brought this upon themselves and I will remind them at every opportunity how they were played for a bunch of rubes. Anyone who voted for Trump because emails is a useful idiot and should be treated as such.
Come up with nothing? Benghazi was a symptom of a full failure in policy. That absolute failure and the need to cover it up was put on display for all to see. It was not slander to credit Clinton with a terrible foreign policy blunder of her choosing nor was it slander to reveal how she and the administration intended to avoid all responsibility for that policy. That is what benghazi was about...but at this point what difference does it make?
The fantasy is strong with this one! LOL
My bad. I guess you were a big "liberate Libya with a light footprint" guy.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
When the right begins to acknowledge they've made a major error in judgement... I'd assume these types of comments will go away and talks between the divided parties might begin to take a more constructive tone; however, until the right can agree to admit to the fact they've propped up a f**king idiot to run the country they share with the left... I think these comments are fair.
Despite the mountain of evidence which grows daily proving without a doubt that Trump is fraudulent as a president... Trumpsters still get on here and flaunt their choice. The realization they need to experience is not happening fast enough for them for one of two reasons: they so badly want to enjoy the success of a Republican Party victory they are blind to the gross shortcomings of the orange man... or they are too stupid to understand how the orange man is unraveling their country.
It is amazing how after all this time you still don't get what happened in the election. Remarkable really.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
Who said that was in jest? The right wasted countless hours and dollars investigating emails & Benghazi only to come up with nothing. The entire purpose was to slander Clinton, which the voters on the right were too blind to acknowledge.
This rift you speak of is not of the left's design. The right brought this upon themselves and I will remind them at every opportunity how they were played for a bunch of rubes. Anyone who voted for Trump because emails is a useful idiot and should be treated as such.
Come up with nothing? Benghazi was a symptom of a full failure in policy. That absolute failure and the need to cover it up was put on display for all to see. It was not slander to credit Clinton with a terrible foreign policy blunder of her choosing nor was it slander to reveal how she and the administration intended to avoid all responsibility for that policy. That is what benghazi was about...but at this point what difference does it make?
The fantasy is strong with this one! LOL
My bad. I guess you were a big "liberate Libya with a light footprint" guy.
You paint everything with your own brush, you imagine that you can lend credibility to any conservative issue from your perch, it's just not happening. People who pay attention know exactly what was said by conservatives about Benghazi and Trump. Congressional conservatives spent all that time and capital for a general condemnation of Clinton's foreign policy failures? Damn, that's a pretty extreme way for the party of small government and fiscal responsibility to spend 20 million dollars!
I'm not going to bother with your assessment of the election and Trump supporters, it's laughable and I don't think you actually believe what you say.
Those Trump ties to Russia will be brilliantly disappearing from the headlines any day now, meanwhile the brilliant investigations of the brilliantati have concluded with no findings. 2018 will see major republican gains in the house and senate so it's 435-0 and 99-1, respectively, with Bernie being the exception. Trump makes America great again and is overwhelmingly re-elected in a electoral college sweep, after which the American people, and the world, demand that he serve for life.
All you need to understand Trump's base of support is in that CNN poll, about half way through the article. It speaks volumes and it's not complicated to understand. Well, maybe for some.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
When the right begins to acknowledge they've made a major error in judgement... I'd assume these types of comments will go away and talks between the divided parties might begin to take a more constructive tone; however, until the right can agree to admit to the fact they've propped up a f**king idiot to run the country they share with the left... I think these comments are fair.
Despite the mountain of evidence which grows daily proving without a doubt that Trump is fraudulent as a president... Trumpsters still get on here and flaunt their choice. The realization they need to experience is not happening fast enough for them for one of two reasons: they so badly want to enjoy the success of a Republican Party victory they are blind to the gross shortcomings of the orange man... or they are too stupid to understand how the orange man is unraveling their country.
It is amazing how after all this time you still don't get what happened in the election. Remarkable really.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
Who said that was in jest? The right wasted countless hours and dollars investigating emails & Benghazi only to come up with nothing. The entire purpose was to slander Clinton, which the voters on the right were too blind to acknowledge.
This rift you speak of is not of the left's design. The right brought this upon themselves and I will remind them at every opportunity how they were played for a bunch of rubes. Anyone who voted for Trump because emails is a useful idiot and should be treated as such.
Come up with nothing? Benghazi was a symptom of a full failure in policy. That absolute failure and the need to cover it up was put on display for all to see. It was not slander to credit Clinton with a terrible foreign policy blunder of her choosing nor was it slander to reveal how she and the administration intended to avoid all responsibility for that policy. That is what benghazi was about...but at this point what difference does it make?
The fantasy is strong with this one! LOL
My bad. I guess you were a big "liberate Libya with a light footprint" guy.
You paint everything with your own brush, you imagine that you can lend credibility to any conservative issue from your perch, it's just not happening. People who pay attention know exactly what was said by conservatives about Benghazi and Trump. Congressional conservatives spent all that time and capital for a general condemnation of Clinton's foreign policy failures? Damn, that's a pretty extreme way for the party of small government and fiscal responsibility to spend 20 million dollars!
I'm not going to bother with your assessment of the election and Trump supporters, it's laughable and I don't think you actually believe what you say.
I don't imagine that I can lend credibility. The last thing anybody from the right side of the spectrum should attempt to do is move anyone on the AMT out of their bubble. It is not possible. The truth is that you don't want to know what Benghazi was about. You would prefer to say it was about nothing. No matter what I say your fingers will be in your ears while you shout "blah blah blah" so as not to hear. I am 100% aware of this. That being said it will not move me from what I know is the truth. Clinton pushed Obama to overthrow Gaddafi..."We came, we saw, he died". Obama/Clinton attempted a light footprint to help restore order. This light footprint included minimal to no security for diplomatic personal. They ran guns to what were likely islamic opposition groups in Syria from Libya while Islamist penetrated the new Libyan government and security apparatus. Obama tried to declare victory against Islamic terrorism in the run up to the 2012 election. Bengazhi was an orchestrated attack on the anniversary of 9/11 which resulted in the death of an ambassador and US personnel. Instead of owning this the Obama administration attempted to deflect by blaming a video so as not to ruin the election narrative. A filmmaker was arrested. The administration lied. Libya fell to islamists and became another ISIS hotspot. That is the story of Benghazi. A massive failure among a long list of foreign policy failures. Clinton bragged about the policy and then ran when it fell apart. Her lack of fitness to be commander in chief was on full display for all to see.
You choose not to see it. You choose not to see why the status quo was unacceptable regardless of the alternative. You choose not to understand the election of Trump.
Trump's White House daily briefing email states, in big bold headlines, "100 days of historic accomplishments." What historic accomplishments? Exercising the nuclear option to get your Supreme Court nominee confirmed? Failing to bring the bill overturning the ACA to a vote not once but twice? Bombing an empty runway, falsely claiming an aircraft carrier battle group is rushing to the scene and dropping a really big, beautiful, beautiful bomb? Publically claiming the job is harder than you thought? Signing more EOs than your predecessor after bragging about how hard you were going to work on legislation? Colluding with a foreign power to undermine our democracy? Brilliantly historic, forever to bask in the brilliancy or your historic brilliance.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
When the right begins to acknowledge they've made a major error in judgement... I'd assume these types of comments will go away and talks between the divided parties might begin to take a more constructive tone; however, until the right can agree to admit to the fact they've propped up a f**king idiot to run the country they share with the left... I think these comments are fair.
Despite the mountain of evidence which grows daily proving without a doubt that Trump is fraudulent as a president... Trumpsters still get on here and flaunt their choice. The realization they need to experience is not happening fast enough for them for one of two reasons: they so badly want to enjoy the success of a Republican Party victory they are blind to the gross shortcomings of the orange man... or they are too stupid to understand how the orange man is unraveling their country.
It is amazing how after all this time you still don't get what happened in the election. Remarkable really.
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
Who said that was in jest? The right wasted countless hours and dollars investigating emails & Benghazi only to come up with nothing. The entire purpose was to slander Clinton, which the voters on the right were too blind to acknowledge.
This rift you speak of is not of the left's design. The right brought this upon themselves and I will remind them at every opportunity how they were played for a bunch of rubes. Anyone who voted for Trump because emails is a useful idiot and should be treated as such.
Come up with nothing? Benghazi was a symptom of a full failure in policy. That absolute failure and the need to cover it up was put on display for all to see. It was not slander to credit Clinton with a terrible foreign policy blunder of her choosing nor was it slander to reveal how she and the administration intended to avoid all responsibility for that policy. That is what benghazi was about...but at this point what difference does it make?
The fantasy is strong with this one! LOL
My bad. I guess you were a big "liberate Libya with a light footprint" guy.
You paint everything with your own brush, you imagine that you can lend credibility to any conservative issue from your perch, it's just not happening. People who pay attention know exactly what was said by conservatives about Benghazi and Trump. Congressional conservatives spent all that time and capital for a general condemnation of Clinton's foreign policy failures? Damn, that's a pretty extreme way for the party of small government and fiscal responsibility to spend 20 million dollars!
I'm not going to bother with your assessment of the election and Trump supporters, it's laughable and I don't think you actually believe what you say.
I don't imagine that I can lend credibility. The last thing anybody from the right side of the spectrum should attempt to do is move anyone on the AMT out of their bubble. It is not possible. The truth is that you don't want to know what Benghazi was about. You would prefer to say it was about nothing. No matter what I say your fingers will be in your ears while you shout "blah blah blah" so as not to hear. I am 100% aware of this. That being said it will not move me from what I know is the truth. Clinton pushed Obama to overthrow Gaddafi..."We came, we saw, he died". Obama/Clinton attempted a light footprint to help restore order. This light footprint included minimal to no security for diplomatic personal. They ran guns to what were likely islamic opposition groups in Syria from Libya while Islamist penetrated the new Libyan government and security apparatus. Obama tried to declare victory against Islamic terrorism in the run up to the 2012 election. Bengazhi was an orchestrated attack on the anniversary of 9/11 which resulted in the death of an ambassador and US personnel. Instead of owning this the Obama administration attempted to deflect by blaming a video so as not to ruin the election narrative. A filmmaker was arrested. The administration lied. Libya fell to islamists and became another ISIS hotspot. That is the story of Benghazi. A massive failure among a long list of foreign policy failures. Clinton bragged about the policy and then ran when it fell apart. Her lack of fitness to be commander in chief was on full display for all to see.
You choose not to see it. You choose not to see why the status quo was unacceptable regardless of the alternative. You choose not to understand the election of Trump.
I essentially agree with that summary of what happened, but the reality of the situation in total doesn't have much to do with the partisan witch hunt that Republicans staged for the benefit of the party's deplorables. I think you are clinging to a system of intellectual justification that is being abandoned by folks like George Will. The things you say are not untrue, they are just unrelated to the motivations of your party and base.
Donald Trump invites Rodrigo Duterte to Washington US president ‘enjoyed’ phone call with Philippines president, who is accused of overseeing the deaths of 7,000 people as part of his war on drugs
Reagan Adviser Slams Trump Rally Speech As 'Most Divisive Ever' From A President - HuffPost https://apple.news/ADI36aMe4SuGc9qE9Yd7VIQ This bafoon is the worst human to ever occupy the WH !
Donald Trump invites Rodrigo Duterte to Washington US president ‘enjoyed’ phone call with Philippines president, who is accused of overseeing the deaths of 7,000 people as part of his war on drugs
Though to be fair, "but her emails" hasn't been discussed by the right in any seriousness in AGES. It's almost exclusively used these days by the left, when mocking the right. This is absolutely a waste of time and energy, and furthers the rift between the two when such things said 'in jest' are said so frequently.
When the right begins to acknowledge they've made a major error in judgement... I'd assume these types of comments will go away and talks between the divided parties might begin to take a more constructive tone; however, until the right can agree to admit to the fact they've propped up a f**king idiot to run the country they share with the left... I think these comments are fair.
Despite the mountain of evidence which grows daily proving without a doubt that Trump is fraudulent as a president... Trumpsters still get on here and flaunt their choice. The realization they need to experience is not happening fast enough for them for one of two reasons: they so badly want to enjoy the success of a Republican Party victory they are blind to the gross shortcomings of the orange man... or they are too stupid to understand how the orange man is unraveling their country.
It is amazing how after all this time you still don't get what happened in the election. Remarkable really.
I do get what happened in the election. It's not that hard to understand.
Your spin is what is amazing. You give the general public- in particular Trump supporters- much too much credit. On the grand scale, this was not a profound mobilized movement on the part of a well-informed right wing voter base that felt they had become disenfranchised citizens.
It was the perfect storm of democrat arrogance, voter apathy, self interest and stupidity.
Not to mention long term spending & costs related to medical care for vets, mental & physical... veteran homelessness, etc... nation building & occupation... pollution (DOD is largest polluter in the country and likely the planet)... maybe we can turn Yuca Mountain into a National Park and charge a fee lol
The CIA black budget... NASA spending being used on the militarization of space... R&D spending which is mostly off the books...
I heard that same stat yesterday at the Climate March about the DOD being our largest polluter. I'm sure they are up near the top, but actually, the meat industry holds the dishonor of being the worst.
I have very little optimism for the future. Terrorism will be a constant and technology will continue to steal jobs further widening the gap between the poor and the wealthy. Not everyone wants to create code and fix robots.
Comments
-EV 8/14/93
MORNING:
• 10:30AM: President Trump signs the Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy Executive Order
AFTERNOON:
• 1:30PM: President Trump delivers remarks at National Rifle Association Leadership Forum
What was a Friday like at Trump Tower? Hookers and blow?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Climate Change is real and it's a crisis.
If it's all too much for you, feel free to retire. Play as much golf as you want.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me
There is no such thing as climate change.
It's all just a liberal plot to....
Raise your taxes
Take away your guns
Abort your babies
Legalize gay marriage
Create more government
Open the borders
Legalize Marijuana
Allow trannies in the military
And on and on and on
Ugh
Does anybody think there will be anti American sentiment in South Korea now that bafoon has put price on defense shield ..
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Stumpage!
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
LOL
People who pay attention know exactly what was said by conservatives about Benghazi and Trump.
Congressional conservatives spent all that time and capital for a general condemnation of Clinton's foreign policy failures? Damn, that's a pretty extreme way for the party of small government and fiscal responsibility to spend 20 million dollars!
I'm not going to bother with your assessment of the election and Trump supporters, it's laughable and I don't think you actually believe what you say.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
You choose not to see it. You choose not to see why the status quo was unacceptable regardless of the alternative. You choose not to understand the election of Trump.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I think you are clinging to a system of intellectual justification that is being abandoned by folks like George Will. The things you say are not untrue, they are just unrelated to the motivations of your party and base.
US president ‘enjoyed’ phone call with Philippines president, who is accused of overseeing the deaths of 7,000 people as part of his war on drugs
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/30/donald-trump-invites-rodrigo-duterte-to-washington
https://apple.news/ADI36aMe4SuGc9qE9Yd7VIQ
This bafoon is the worst human to ever occupy the WH !
Your spin is what is amazing. You give the general public- in particular Trump supporters- much too much credit. On the grand scale, this was not a profound mobilized movement on the part of a well-informed right wing voter base that felt they had become disenfranchised citizens.
It was the perfect storm of democrat arrogance, voter apathy, self interest and stupidity.