Donald Trump

1284228432845284728482954

Comments

  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited August 2022
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 
    Why? The civil war stuff? Far right is openly talking about it and they've already attempted to thwart the certification of the last election, and they are currently running for local and state levels of government to tip the scales of future elections....is it not far fetched to think they might try something else?
    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,769
    I would think some of the people who thought they were ready to take up arms for tfg have had second thoughts after seeing what’s happened to some of the 1/6 participants. He played those people for fools. 

    I am concerned about localized violence in some parts of the country. I’m not at all however, worried about a civil war. Not at this point. 
  • Cropduster-80
    Cropduster-80 Posts: 2,034
    edited August 2022
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 
    They said trump would beat Clinton… he did
    they said they were going to storm the capital… they did 

    they said there is a civil war coming

    they said a lot of other stuff too that seemed crazy at the time. They did it all 

    im just listening to them 
    Post edited by Cropduster-80 on
  • DewieCox
    DewieCox Posts: 11,432
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 
    No, just Tucker Carlson. 
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,105
    Some folks really haven’t been paying attention since at least before Charlottesville unless you think our intelligence services are Fucker Carlson adherents when they claimed the greatest terrorism threat to the US currently is domestic terrorists in the form of white supremacy and white nationalism. Hey, but 1/6 was a tourist visit, right?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 
    They said trump would beat Clinton… he did
    they said they were going to storm the capital… they did 

    they said there is a civil war coming

    they said a lot of other stuff too that seemed crazy at the time. They did it all 

    im just listening to them 
    the "theys" in these scenarios are all from a wide cross section of people, not one group. Michael Moore, for example, falls into group number 1. 

    civil war is a far, far cry from a few thousand people storming the capitol. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,852
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Where are the protests and violence today? Is there a news blackout? Surely 35% of the country is marching to war,  singing the Grapes of Wrath. 
    Bad things happening take time. Wait until he's arrested and charged with a crime, remanded to home confinement with an ankle monitor and surrenders his passport(s). Remember the Bundy Ranch?
    I remember 10 guys holed up.  They didn't get close to taking over the country.

    Yeah these guys were a real threat to the US govt.  A drone could have wiped them out if the govt were inclined to do so.  Their power came from the knowledge that the the govt wouldn't harm them unless in defense. Seriously,  you think they couldn't have been eliminated in ten minutes?
    Stop and think about what a drone strike on US  citizens, on US soil, in the absence of due process would result in. For just a minute. Guess you don’t think that would be a “bad thing?” Good lord is this country fucked.
    I do know.  Again,  that's my point.  Bundy and crew knew that too.  But if we really were having a "civil war", they would be wiped out. These guys are cos players and only the morons don't know how they have zero chance against the govt.  

    You guys are making my point about how all this talk is fanciful.  

    I was on a plane to Chicago yesterday and was picked up by the ceo of one of our suppliers.  He's a legging R.  He don't give a crap about Trump or this.  I asked him these same questions and his attitude was as I suspected.  No way is he giving up anything for the idiot Trump. 


    Please consider your perspective. Your professional and likely personal circle of Rs are probably a hell of a lot more moderate than trumps base. The ones who will believe any lie, any, mouthed by any trump supporter.

    Two things to consider, seemingly unrelated, that make moderate Rs almost as dangerous as the base. 1, the dangerous rhetoric of Ted Cruz, encouraging violence against democrats. Not saying he will be successful, but there have been far too many psychos weaponized by this right wing rhetoric since trump emerged. When will “reasonable moderates” stand up in unison and declare they are leaving the party after Jan six (and Cruz’ violent rhetoric) and the continued violence against Americans that plenty of powerful Rs currently espouse.

    2, trumps lawyer attacking the DOJ, openly saying they have nothing from the raid and this was an outrageous attack against a former president. This is giving the base even more power currently, and moderates have been complicit, at least according to polling and primaries. All that momentum supposedly gained by the hearings? Seemingly gone in a week. Who is to blame? A lot of that blame falls on moderates.


    these two are not alone, but I highlight as an example of how dangerous the base is. What makes moderates dangerous, perhaps professional colleagues of yours, is many of them will vote R no matter what, even in the face of this dishonest and violent rhetoric. The moderates are handing the extremists their power. If you have any doubts, consider how many primaries  election deniers have won this spring/summer.
  • Cropduster-80
    Cropduster-80 Posts: 2,034
    edited August 2022
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 
    They said trump would beat Clinton… he did
    they said they were going to storm the capital… they did 

    they said there is a civil war coming

    they said a lot of other stuff too that seemed crazy at the time. They did it all 

    im just listening to them 
    the "theys" in these scenarios are all from a wide cross section of people, not one group. Michael Moore, for example, falls into group number 1. 

    civil war is a far, far cry from a few thousand people storming the capitol. 
    Mainstream republicans are scared of them too.  However, whatever they start is going to force sides to be taken. They haven’t shown any indication they won’t go along with the fringe. They always do 

    it’s not that far fetched to see how it snowballs into 70 million people.

    WW1 started when everyone got dragged into a regional issue. Our civil war had people who couldn’t fight against their home states.  Look at Robert E Lee.  He was offered the Union job but couldn’t fight against Virginia.  I don’t think he was a true believer 

    might be a small risk, but the risk isn’t zero.  History is littered with empires that crumbled.  Every one does eventually no matter how improbable it seemed 
    Post edited by Cropduster-80 on
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,852
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 
    They said trump would beat Clinton… he did
    they said they were going to storm the capital… they did 

    they said there is a civil war coming

    they said a lot of other stuff too that seemed crazy at the time. They did it all 

    im just listening to them 
    the "theys" in these scenarios are all from a wide cross section of people, not one group. Michael Moore, for example, falls into group number 1. 

    civil war is a far, far cry from a few thousand people storming the capitol. 
    Mainstream republicans are scared of them too.  However, whatever they start is going to force sides to be taken. They haven’t shown any indication they won’t go along with the fringe. They always do 

    it’s not that far fetched to see how it snowballs into 70 million people.

    WW1 started when everyone got dragged into a regional issue. Our civil war had people who couldn’t fight against their home states.  Look at Robert E Lee.  He was offered the Union job but couldn’t fight against Virginia.  I don’t think he was a true believer 

    might be a small risk, but the risk isn’t zero 

    I’ve pushed the same thought with mr russ, moderates are almost as dangerous as the base, since there are clearly not enough of them to control the party, and moderates will likely vote R because trump and others know the simple talking points that keep them in line, and handing power to the extremists of the party.

    To Hugh’s point, I think plenty are forgetting the civil war can be bloodless. When there are moderates and independents willing to shrug their shoulders after trump, after all the crap they put the country through? We see that even on this liberal forum all the time. Rs control 25 states, are using gerrymandering to control certain swing states, they have a stranglehold on the courts, and are planning to use state legislatures to control the White House and all federal elections. How is this not a bloodless civil war?

    Where are the wave of 2018 voters who said 2017-2018 trumpism was disgusting and he needs to go? A lot of them returned to the Rs in 2020, and according to polls, a lot more will be voting R this year. After Jan 6? After Cruz threatening violence against American citizens? Really independents and moderates?

    as a footnote, Of the ten House Rs who voted to impeach just last year , as of this morning, 8 are gone. 
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    moderate R's will continue to vote R regionally, as they believe that is still a safe and ethical choice. 
    moderate R's will likely not vote trump if he's on the ticket in 2024. and he desperately needs them. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Cropduster-80
    Cropduster-80 Posts: 2,034
    edited August 2022
    moderate R's will continue to vote R regionally, as they believe that is still a safe and ethical choice. 
    moderate R's will likely not vote trump if he's on the ticket in 2024. and he desperately needs them. 
    I really really hope you are right 

    I’ve toyed with the thought of hoping trump gets the nomination for that reason.  However it’s a huge gamble 

    kind of reminds me of Kansas though.  When it’s just abortion and a direct vote you’ve got 60 percent supporting pro choice.  If it’s a legislation thing, it’s 60 percent voting for republicans who will outlaw it. Kansas showed one thing.  A Democratic position can pass only when republicans don’t have to actually vote for a democrat.   It’s easier to vote for a position than it is to vote for a different party 
    Post edited by Cropduster-80 on
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,370
    gift article of the search.....


    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,370
    cue halifax......

     
    Trump says he took the Fifth Amendment in NY investigation
    By MICHAEL BALSAMO, MICHAEL R. SISAK and MICHELLE L. PRICE
    14 mins ago

    NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment and wouldn't answer questions under oath in the New York attorney general's long-running civil investigation into his business dealings, the former president said in a statement Wednesday.

    Trump arrived at state Attorney General Letitia James' offices in a motorcade shortly before 9 a.m., announcing more than an hour later that he "declined to answer the questions under the rights and privileges afforded to every citizen under the United States Constitution.”

    “I once asked, ‘If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?' Now I know the answer to that question,” the statement said. “When your family, your company, and all the people in your orbit have become the targets of an unfounded politically motivated Witch Hunt supported by lawyers, prosecutors and the Fake News Media, you have no choice.”


    continues......



    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 
    They said trump would beat Clinton… he did
    they said they were going to storm the capital… they did 

    they said there is a civil war coming

    they said a lot of other stuff too that seemed crazy at the time. They did it all 

    im just listening to them 
    the "theys" in these scenarios are all from a wide cross section of people, not one group. Michael Moore, for example, falls into group number 1. 

    civil war is a far, far cry from a few thousand people storming the capitol. 
    Mainstream republicans are scared of them too.  However, whatever they start is going to force sides to be taken. They haven’t shown any indication they won’t go along with the fringe. They always do 

    it’s not that far fetched to see how it snowballs into 70 million people.

    WW1 started when everyone got dragged into a regional issue. Our civil war had people who couldn’t fight against their home states.  Look at Robert E Lee.  He was offered the Union job but couldn’t fight against Virginia.  I don’t think he was a true believer 

    might be a small risk, but the risk isn’t zero.  History is littered with empires that crumbled.  Every one does eventually no matter how improbable it seemed 
    The civil war was regional.  The political affiliation today is rural v urban.  I really don't think that are good analogies. 
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,072
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 

    Rachel Maddcow?
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,177
    moderate R's will continue to vote R regionally, as they believe that is still a safe and ethical choice. 
    moderate R's will likely not vote trump if he's on the ticket in 2024. and he desperately needs them. 
    I really really hope you are right 

    I’ve toyed with the thought of hoping trump gets the nomination for that reason.  However it’s a huge gamble 

    kind of reminds me of Kansas though.  When it’s just abortion and a direct vote you’ve got 60 percent supporting pro choice.  If it’s a legislation thing, it’s 60 percent voting for republicans who will outlaw it. Kansas showed one thing.  A Democratic position can pass only when republicans don’t have to actually vote for a democrat.   It’s easier to vote for a position than it is to vote for a different party 
    I'm going to be surprised if he is the nominee. Even if he says he is running soon I think he will bow out about a year from now. He will only do that to raise money and stoke his ego.

    The GOP does not want that fucker to run. He'll leave before the other potential nominees have to start trashing him.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,610
    static111 said:
    is there a liberal version of tucker carlson people on this forum have been watching that I'm not aware of? my lord. 

    Rachel Maddcow?
    Not at all. 

    She can be just as biased without being as dishonest and hyperbolic.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
    2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    Urbanites vs Farmers!! 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,177
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
This discussion has been closed.