Donald Trump
Options
Comments
-
Pelosi be allmickeyrat said:Pelosi told Fox News afterward that she had destroyed the speech “because it was the courteous thing to do considering the alternatives.” She also said she was "trying to find one page with truth on it" but "couldn't."
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Well, I was not surprised one bit by the way her whole party has treated him since day one never even giving him a chance. I would have liked to seen it be more cordial of a interaction , but that is not one of his strong suits obviously. Hopefully these politicians can now get back to work and be done with all the non sense and be helpful to the President in keeping America Great.cincybearcat said:
What did you think of baby trump refusing to shake Pelosi's hand?lindamarie73 said:Can Nancy Pelosi Have served up on a platter anymore the assurance of a 2020 Victory for President Trump ???That tearing up the speech stunt last night might as well have been her tearing up her whole career...I am still laughing about it. I cannot wait to hear what she has to say today when the President gets acquitted....Will she take anymore bait??? Happy days are here to stay....0 -
Interesting as you shrug off his childish moments and play up hers. How’s it feel being a pawn?lindamarie73 said:
Well, I was not surprised one bit by the way her whole party has treated him since day one never even giving him a chance. I would have liked to seen it be more cordial of a interaction , but that is not one of his strong suits obviously. Hopefully these politicians can now get back to work and be done with all the non sense and be helpful to the President in keeping America Great.cincybearcat said:
What did you think of baby trump refusing to shake Pelosi's hand?lindamarie73 said:Can Nancy Pelosi Have served up on a platter anymore the assurance of a 2020 Victory for President Trump ???That tearing up the speech stunt last night might as well have been her tearing up her whole career...I am still laughing about it. I cannot wait to hear what she has to say today when the President gets acquitted....Will she take anymore bait??? Happy days are here to stay....hippiemom = goodness0 -
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.
0 -
except it was a copy given to her. not the original.......PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
lol, this would be a funny bit for Trump's next concert.PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I do not see any distinction, but I would be willing to bet it was an official certified copy, which could be construed as of equal value as the original. I’m not a lawyer, but it would be hilarious if she got penalized for this!mickeyrat said:
except it was a copy given to her. not the original.......PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.0 -
What I really appreciate about this is that this is the kind of stuff the Trump Heads pop their heads in to almost feel like they've made a point.PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.0 -
Lol @ “Trump Heads”Jearlpam0925 said:
What I really appreciate about this is that this is the kind of stuff the Trump Heads pop their heads in to almost feel like they've made a point.PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.0 -
As hilarious as Team Trump Treason being held accountable for abuse of power and extorting a foreign leader for campaign interference. Maybe write your Congress person and ask them to file an impeachment claim in the house?PJPOWER said:
I do not see any distinction, but I would be willing to bet it was an official certified copy, which could be construed as of equal value as the original. I’m not a lawyer, but it would be hilarious if she got penalized for this!mickeyrat said:
except it was a copy given to her. not the original.......PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Well that doesn’t sound very funny at all there #PTAPE, but I’ll get right on that!Halifax2TheMax said:
As hilarious as Team Trump Treason being held accountable for abuse of power and extorting a foreign leader for campaign interference. Maybe write your Congress person and ask them to file an impeachment claim in the house?PJPOWER said:
I do not see any distinction, but I would be willing to bet it was an official certified copy, which could be construed as of equal value as the original. I’m not a lawyer, but it would be hilarious if she got penalized for this!mickeyrat said:
except it was a copy given to her. not the original.......PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.Post edited by PJPOWER on0 -
lol yeah like this administration & Baffoon haven’t done the same please , how about you mention the none handshake from the idiot in chief ...PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
Is it illegal to refuse a handshake? I mean, it’s flu season and Nancy looked like she was the walking dead.josevolution said:
lol yeah like this administration & Baffoon haven’t done the same please , how about you mention the none handshake from the idiot in chief ...PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.0 -
It's sad and treasonous that you thought America wasn't great before Trump.lindamarie73 said:
Well, I was not surprised one bit by the way her whole party has treated him since day one never even giving him a chance. I would have liked to seen it be more cordial of a interaction , but that is not one of his strong suits obviously. Hopefully these politicians can now get back to work and be done with all the non sense and be helpful to the President in keeping America Great.cincybearcat said:
What did you think of baby trump refusing to shake Pelosi's hand?lindamarie73 said:Can Nancy Pelosi Have served up on a platter anymore the assurance of a 2020 Victory for President Trump ???That tearing up the speech stunt last night might as well have been her tearing up her whole career...I am still laughing about it. I cannot wait to hear what she has to say today when the President gets acquitted....Will she take anymore bait??? Happy days are here to stay....0 -
No it’s called common courtesy from a well mannered polite human but we are talking about an idiot without an ounce of decency in his flabby body that’s from not being taught right by decent parents! I guess you feel the same weren’t you taught to be a decent human?PJPOWER said:
Is it illegal to refuse a handshake? I mean, it’s flu season and Nancy looked like she was the walking dead.josevolution said:
lol yeah like this administration & Baffoon haven’t done the same please , how about you mention the none handshake from the idiot in chief ...PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
Na, I was taught to open doors for ladies and never refuse a handshake...I would have to think about it a bit and prep the hand sanitizer before shaking someone’s that looks as sick as Nancy, though. I’d still open the door for her though...I don’t think Trump or Nancy respect each other much, though, so whether or not they want to shake each other’s hands or give hugzies is their prerogative and doesn’t affect or trigger me in the least.josevolution said:
No it’s called common courtesy from a well mannered polite human but we are talking about an idiot without an ounce of decency in his flabby body that’s from not being taught right by decent parents! I guess you feel the same weren’t you taught to be a decent human?PJPOWER said:
Is it illegal to refuse a handshake? I mean, it’s flu season and Nancy looked like she was the walking dead.josevolution said:
lol yeah like this administration & Baffoon haven’t done the same please , how about you mention the none handshake from the idiot in chief ...PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.Post edited by PJPOWER on0 -
Still support a pig as your president? Still impeached for ever in the record books!lindamarie73 said:Can Nancy Pelosi Have served up on a platter anymore the assurance of a 2020 Victory for President Trump ???That tearing up the speech stunt last night might as well have been her tearing up her whole career...I am still laughing about it. I cannot wait to hear what she has to say today when the President gets acquitted....Will she take anymore bait??? Happy days are here to stay....jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
Lock her up!1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
For old times sakePJPOWER said:
Well that doesn’t sound very funny at all there #PTAPE, but I’ll get right on that!Halifax2TheMax said:
As hilarious as Team Trump Treason being held accountable for abuse of power and extorting a foreign leader for campaign interference. Maybe write your Congress person and ask them to file an impeachment claim in the house?PJPOWER said:
I do not see any distinction, but I would be willing to bet it was an official certified copy, which could be construed as of equal value as the original. I’m not a lawyer, but it would be hilarious if she got penalized for this!mickeyrat said:
except it was a copy given to her. not the original.......PJPOWER said:
Hey Nancy,mickeyrat said:Jason P said:
And ripping up the speech is the winner. At least that is the headlines. Didn't watch it.josevolution said:
Nothing , Democrats don’t have the balls to stage a walk out! What would Nancy do stay there? They could boycott it I guess but does she join them?Jason P said:What symbolic protest do you think Nancy is planning for the union address? Anyone think they will stage a walk out? Or stick with a traditional "wear X color" clothing?video on Twitter. screenshot here...
18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.“There was no collusion.”“I have nothing to hide.”“I don’t know any Russians.”“I’ll sit down and talk with anyone.”“We do everything by the book.”“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”“Very legal, very cool.”“Fully exonerated.”“Essentially no obstruction.”“Very friendly and totally appropriate.”“No quid pro quo.”“Imminent threat.”“I thought he was Israeli.”Follow the money from Russia with love and a PTape all the way to impeachment.
Psssst: he’s still impeached LOL!09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help