Donald Trump

BS44325

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

Haaaa. You still going? Hilarious.

Care to answer the question? At least I didn’t run away and hide when things looked tough. So, you going to stick around and up for Team Trump Treason?

The silence is, in a way, deafening. Pass me some fruit from the poisonous tree, please.

Things have never looked tough. Not once. 

Go Beavers

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

BS44325

Go Beavers said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

All of it

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Go Beavers said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

All of it

Sorry, but that’s delusional and academic fraud as it’s clear you haven’t even read it and yet you promulgate talking points. Guess you haven’t read the Team Mueller report?

Go Beavers

Jason P said:

Looking at it from a glass is half full point of view, it’s good for the American political system that Trump is a dummy that was elected due to a horrible campaign strategy by Hillary Clinton’s team and that he isn’t in fact Dr. Evil and worked hand in hand with Russia to win the election.  

I wouldn’t draw that conclusion from today. Mueller wasn’t going to indict trump. I’d wait for the other investigation to play out and for more detail about trump campaign interactions with Russia

BS44325

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Go Beavers said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

All of it

Sorry, but that’s delusional and academic fraud as it’s clear you haven’t even read it and yet you promulgate talking points. Guess you haven’t read the Team Mueller report?

All of it

BS44325

Go Beavers said:

Jason P said:

Looking at it from a glass is half full point of view, it’s good for the American political system that Trump is a dummy that was elected due to a horrible campaign strategy by Hillary Clinton’s team and that he isn’t in fact Dr. Evil and worked hand in hand with Russia to win the election.  

I wouldn’t draw that conclusion from today. Mueller wasn’t going to indict trump. I’d wait for the other investigation to play out and for more detail about trump campaign interactions with Russia

Ooooooh....interactions! Can’t wait.

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

Haaaa. You still going? Hilarious.

Care to answer the question? At least I didn’t run away and hide when things looked tough. So, you going to stick around and up for Team Trump Treason?

The silence is, in a way, deafening. Pass me some fruit from the poisonous tree, please.

Things have never looked tough. Not once. 

You still haven’t answered the question, who would you indict for the Steele Dossier and on what charges?

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Go Beavers said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

All of it

Sorry, but that’s delusional and academic fraud as it’s clear you haven’t even read it and yet you promulgate talking points. Guess you haven’t read the Team Mueller report?

All of it

So, professor, walk us through which charges or allegations are proven true and which haven’t been confirmed. Should be simple for you, no?

BS44325

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

Haaaa. You still going? Hilarious.

Care to answer the question? At least I didn’t run away and hide when things looked tough. So, you going to stick around and up for Team Trump Treason?

The silence is, in a way, deafening. Pass me some fruit from the poisonous tree, please.

Things have never looked tough. Not once. 

You still haven’t answered the question, who would you indict for the Steele Dossier and on what charges?

I would start with those who signed off on and/or presented it to the FISA court as a justification to obtain domestic spying warrants on American citizens. Make a false declaration to a judge is a big no-no. It was just reported today that DOJ National Security Division assitant attorney general Stuart Evans opposed the use of the dossier for obtaining a FISA warrant due to the bias of it’s author and the fact it was unverified. Page and Stzrok pushed back on that and text messages revealed that this argument went all the way to the White House who interestingly enough previously denied ever being involved in the FISA warrant discussion. So let’s start with that. Judges were misled. Let’s indict those who misled them and see who rats out whom.

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

The appointment of a special counsel was triggered by the firing of James Comey. Please stick to the facts. Which, if the following were true, 

“There was no collusion.”

”I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”

“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”

“Very legal, very cool.”

Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.

Why would you fire the director of the FBI?

ps: Team Trump Treason never “sat down and talked to anyone.”
 

BS44325

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Go Beavers said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

All of it

Sorry, but that’s delusional and academic fraud as it’s clear you haven’t even read it and yet you promulgate talking points. Guess you haven’t read the Team Mueller report?

All of it

So, professor, walk us through which charges or allegations are proven true and which haven’t been confirmed. Should be simple for you, no?

None have been proven true. None have been confirmed. Very simple. You lost Halifax. It’s over. Your glorious pee tape doesn’t exist. 

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Go Beavers said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

All of it

Sorry, but that’s delusional and academic fraud as it’s clear you haven’t even read it and yet you promulgate talking points. Guess you haven’t read the Team Mueller report?

All of it

So, professor, walk us through which charges or allegations are proven true and which haven’t been confirmed. Should be simple for you, no?

None have been proven true. None have been confirmed. Very simple. You lost Halifax. It’s over. Your glorious pee tape doesn’t exist. 

How many allegations were made in the Steele Dossier, professor? The PTape was but one? Care to answer? Who should be indicted for the Steele Dossier and why?
 

BS44325

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

The appointment of a special counsel was triggered by the firing of James Comey. Please stick to the facts. Which, if the following were true, 

“There was no collusion.”

”I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”

“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”

“Very legal, very cool.”

Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.

Why would you fire the director of the FBI?

ps: Team Trump Treason never “sat down and talked to anyone.”
 

You fire the director of the FBI when he or she is doing a shitty job. He was too busy participating in coups in order to protect the FISA abuses of his upper brass instead of working to serve the citizenry. He lost the plot and lost the confidence of his employer.

BS44325

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Go Beavers said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

All of it

Sorry, but that’s delusional and academic fraud as it’s clear you haven’t even read it and yet you promulgate talking points. Guess you haven’t read the Team Mueller report?

All of it

So, professor, walk us through which charges or allegations are proven true and which haven’t been confirmed. Should be simple for you, no?

None have been proven true. None have been confirmed. Very simple. You lost Halifax. It’s over. Your glorious pee tape doesn’t exist. 

How many allegations were made in the Steele Dossier, professor? The PTape was but one? Care to answer? Who should be indicted for the Steele Dossier and why?
 

You always go into question mode when you’re losing.

mrussel1

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

The appointment of a special counsel was triggered by the firing of James Comey. Please stick to the facts. Which, if the following were true, 

“There was no collusion.”

”I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”

“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”

“Very legal, very cool.”

Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.

Why would you fire the director of the FBI?

ps: Team Trump Treason never “sat down and talked to anyone.”
 

You fire the director of the FBI when he or she is doing a shitty job. He was too busy participating in coups in order to protect the FISA abuses of his upper brass instead of working to serve the citizenry. He lost the plot and lost the confidence of his employer.

No assumptions baked into this statement.. sticking to the facts,  are ya?

BS44325

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

The appointment of a special counsel was triggered by the firing of James Comey. Please stick to the facts. Which, if the following were true, 

“There was no collusion.”

”I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”

“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”

“Very legal, very cool.”

Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.

Why would you fire the director of the FBI?

ps: Team Trump Treason never “sat down and talked to anyone.”
 

You fire the director of the FBI when he or she is doing a shitty job. He was too busy participating in coups in order to protect the FISA abuses of his upper brass instead of working to serve the citizenry. He lost the plot and lost the confidence of his employer.

No assumptions baked into this statement.. sticking to the facts,  are ya?

Yes. Facts that have been reported. Where it goes from here nobody knows. The IG is working on it.

Ledbetterman10

I like this idea of Mueller testifying to his report. Rather hear it from the horse's mouth than having it disseminated through others, or even worse, having to fucking read it. From CNN.com.....

Rep. David Cicilline, a Democrat from Rhode Island, vowed to "argue vociferously" to have special counsel Robert Mueller testify before the House Judiciary Committee.

Cicilline told CNN Mueller's testimony would be valuable because he'd able to "walk the country through the report, walk the country through the findings he made, the evidence he collected, the conclusions he came to."

"This is about safeguarding our democracy, about understanding an attack by a foreign adversary. We invested a lot into this investigation, resources of the people of this country, and I think we owe it to them they fully understand what this report concludes and what the conclusions of the special counsel were and I think it would be very helpful to have Mr. Mueller come before the committee and really walk through paragraph by paragraph and explain it to the American people," he said Friday night.

mrussel1

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

The appointment of a special counsel was triggered by the firing of James Comey. Please stick to the facts. Which, if the following were true, 

“There was no collusion.”

”I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”

“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”

“Very legal, very cool.”

Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.

Why would you fire the director of the FBI?

ps: Team Trump Treason never “sat down and talked to anyone.”
 

You fire the director of the FBI when he or she is doing a shitty job. He was too busy participating in coups in order to protect the FISA abuses of his upper brass instead of working to serve the citizenry. He lost the plot and lost the confidence of his employer.

No assumptions baked into this statement.. sticking to the facts,  are ya?

Yes. Facts that have been reported. Where it goes from here nobody knows. The IG is working on it.

So it's factual that Comey wad attempting a coup.  And his other motivation was to protect the brass.  These are factual statements.

Halifax2TheMax

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Go Beavers said:

BS44325 said:

OnWis97 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

OnWis97 said:

So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?  

More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?

I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle.  They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason.  Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.

McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.

Point out what in the dossier is fraudulent 

All of it

Sorry, but that’s delusional and academic fraud as it’s clear you haven’t even read it and yet you promulgate talking points. Guess you haven’t read the Team Mueller report?

All of it

So, professor, walk us through which charges or allegations are proven true and which haven’t been confirmed. Should be simple for you, no?

None have been proven true. None have been confirmed. Very simple. You lost Halifax. It’s over. Your glorious pee tape doesn’t exist. 

How many allegations were made in the Steele Dossier, professor? The PTape was but one? Care to answer? Who should be indicted for the Steele Dossier and why?
 

You always go into question mode when you’re losing.

You still haven’t answered some basic questions regarding your “statement of fact.” Academic fraud could get you fired professor. You’ve been challenged and you obfuscate. Again, which parts or allegations of the Steele Dossier haven’t been proven true and who would you indict and for what charges for the Steele Dossier. Surely you can answer two basic questions having read the Dossier. I’ll wait patiently but I won’t disappear.