why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
I don't think it is. I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic. If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so. But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
Not throwing literal "shit" at them. Or even throwing anything. I'm talking about going to where there's a group of people with the purpose of fucking with them. You're changing your tune though. Before you said you go there to "fight" with them. Now you post counterpoints. I see.
And look, I assume you just do that sort of trolling online so whatever. But you know there's people that take it further out on the streets. The people that fuck with Trump supporters, the people that shame women walking into an abortion clinic, the people that protest gay-pride rallies or military funerals. These are all people that are just trying to annoy and fuck with people that don't share their views.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
I don't think it is. I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic. If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so. But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.
It's sounds mad cray over there yo. Not sure why you'd even bother to engage them. I could understand reading some of it out of morbid curiosity. I've watched segments of Trump rallies for that reason. But I wouldn't actually go to one and try to talk some sense into anyone.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
I don't think it is. I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic. If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so. But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.
your comments on the previous page pointed to you, in my opinion, going there to intentionally start fights, not going there to discuss which inevitably turned into arguments. there's a difference.
I have never been there, nor do i have any desire to, so I can't comment on the folks that post there.
Flight Risk out NOW!
www.headstonesband.com
0
Options
Kat
There's a lot to be said for nowhere. Posts: 4,772
I'm looking forward to having a president who cares about mending our relationships with our allies and will work his/her butt off towards that end. Friends are very important and I don't want the next presidential term to have a pro-Russian president or be a Russian asset. I want a president who thinks about America every minute of every day. We have a lot of issues that need to be addressed and it's going to take a lot of hard work.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
I don't think it is. I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic. If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so. But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.
your comments on the previous page pointed to you, in my opinion, going there to intentionally start fights, not going there to discuss which inevitably turned into arguments. there's a difference.
I have never been there, nor do i have any desire to, so I can't comment on the folks that post there.
Fight is a euphemism. I can't actually start a fight. Contrast that with someone can actually throw shit at a person in the street. When it comes to posting online, I can't tell the difference between a fight, argument, counterpoint, etc. If you are cussing someone out, well that's closer to trolling I think.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
I don't think it is. I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic. If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so. But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.
your comments on the previous page pointed to you, in my opinion, going there to intentionally start fights, not going there to discuss which inevitably turned into arguments. there's a difference.
I have never been there, nor do i have any desire to, so I can't comment on the folks that post there.
Fight is a euphemism. I can't actually start a fight. Contrast that with someone can actually throw shit at a person in the street. When it comes to posting online, I can't tell the difference between a fight, argument, counterpoint, etc. If you are cussing someone out, well that's closer to trolling I think.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
Why yes it is. Surprised he doesn't just own it.
Hey I'm right here! Why speak indirectly? Trolling is baiting, I don't bait. I speak directly. As a contrast, one might say that you are trolling right now.
I'm looking forward to having a president who cares about mending our relationships with our allies and will work his/her butt off towards that end. Friends are very important and I don't want the next presidential term to have a pro-Russian president or be a Russian asset. I want a president who thinks about America every minute of every day. We have a lot of issues that need to be addressed and it's going to take a lot of hard work.
With all the misinformation on the internet now a days I think the days of the USA being the beacon of light are gone.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
Why yes it is. Surprised he doesn't just own it.
Hey I'm right here! Why speak indirectly? Trolling is baiting, I don't bait. I speak directly. As a contrast, one might say that you are trolling right now.
Sorry. Yes, going to a website to start arguments for fun is trolling. It is what it is. I kinda feel like they likely deserve it
hippiemom = goodness
0
Options
Kat
There's a lot to be said for nowhere. Posts: 4,772
I'm looking forward to having a president who cares about mending our relationships with our allies and will work his/her butt off towards that end. Friends are very important and I don't want the next presidential term to have a pro-Russian president or be a Russian asset. I want a president who thinks about America every minute of every day. We have a lot of issues that need to be addressed and it's going to take a lot of hard work.
With all the misinformation on the internet now a days I think the days of the USA being the beacon of light are gone.
Getting the thread back on topic here... Yes, that's possible so I think it'll be about our actions. Judge us by what we do, not what we say or what others say. Sound good?
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
Why yes it is. Surprised he doesn't just own it.
Hey I'm right here! Why speak indirectly? Trolling is baiting, I don't bait. I speak directly. As a contrast, one might say that you are trolling right now.
Sorry. Yes, going to a website to start arguments for fun is trolling. It is what it is. I kinda feel like they likely deserve it
My arguments are on topic, relevant and contradict inaccurate information. I argue in the precise way that I argue on this site. The difference is that I'm the strong minority. That's not trolling in my book. So you're incorrect in your assessment.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
Why yes it is. Surprised he doesn't just own it.
Hey I'm right here! Why speak indirectly? Trolling is baiting, I don't bait. I speak directly. As a contrast, one might say that you are trolling right now.
Sorry. Yes, going to a website to start arguments for fun is trolling. It is what it is. I kinda feel like they likely deserve it
My arguments are on topic, relevant and contradict inaccurate information. I argue in the precise way that I argue on this site. The difference is that I'm the strong minority. That's not trolling in my book. So you're incorrect in your assessment.
Based on what you wrote, I don't think so. But it doesn't matter.
Back on topic as Kat says - trump is a twitter troll.
why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?
But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll?
read between the lines in my first question.
My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"
I'm so sorry you guys feel this way. And your analogy is "sad", unsupported. You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?
I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?
Why yes it is. Surprised he doesn't just own it.
Hey I'm right here! Why speak indirectly? Trolling is baiting, I don't bait. I speak directly. As a contrast, one might say that you are trolling right now.
Sorry. Yes, going to a website to start arguments for fun is trolling. It is what it is. I kinda feel like they likely deserve it
There is a difference between arguing and trolling. Someone might learn something from an argument.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
I keep seeing that statement...maybe its just from you over and over but I don;t remember.
"When you support a racist in any way shape or form that makes you a racist as well"
I disagree with this. So - if I help out an older relative who is racist by buying them groceries or something I'm racist? I really hate how people try to draw a line and make something Yes/No or Black/White (no pun intended) when there is a lot of gray.
I keep seeing that statement...maybe its just from you over and over but I don;t remember.
"When you support a racist in any way shape or form that makes you a racist as well"
I disagree with this. So - if I help out an older relative who is racist by buying them groceries or something I'm racist? I really hate how people try to draw a line and make something Yes/No or Black/White (no pun intended) when there is a lot of gray.
Yup that's me Borrowed and paraphrased from the Buddhists who say that when you support evil you are evil as well. Are there gray areas? Maybe I, for one, will not associate with anyone, family or otherwise, who is a known racist or anti-semite. No place for fear, hate, or ignorance in my life.
I keep seeing that statement...maybe its just from you over and over but I don;t remember.
"When you support a racist in any way shape or form that makes you a racist as well"
I disagree with this. So - if I help out an older relative who is racist by buying them groceries or something I'm racist? I really hate how people try to draw a line and make something Yes/No or Black/White (no pun intended) when there is a lot of gray.
Yup that's me Borrowed and paraphrased from the Buddhists who say that when you support evil you are evil as well. Are there gray areas? Maybe I, for one, will not associate with anyone, family or otherwise, who is a known racist or anti-semite. No place for fear, hate, or ignorance in my life.
Not something I’d search out, but if someone I knew said something racist I think we’d talk about it instead of me cutting them out of my life.
Comments
www.headstonesband.com
And look, I assume you just do that sort of trolling online so whatever. But you know there's people that take it further out on the streets. The people that fuck with Trump supporters, the people that shame women walking into an abortion clinic, the people that protest gay-pride rallies or military funerals. These are all people that are just trying to annoy and fuck with people that don't share their views.
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
I have never been there, nor do i have any desire to, so I can't comment on the folks that post there.
www.headstonesband.com
www.headstonesband.com
Yes, that's possible so I think it'll be about our actions. Judge us by what we do, not what we say or what others say. Sound good?
Back on topic as Kat says - trump is a twitter troll.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Bolton getting props for saying shit that we already knew
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
And in today's suprising presidential advisor is a white nationalist racist piece of shit news.....
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2019/11/12/stephen-millers-affinity-white-nationalism-revealed-leaked-emails
"When you support a racist in any way shape or form that makes you a racist as well"
I disagree with this. So - if I help out an older relative who is racist by buying them groceries or something I'm racist? I really hate how people try to draw a line and make something Yes/No or Black/White (no pun intended) when there is a lot of gray.
Borrowed and paraphrased from the Buddhists who say that when you support evil you are evil as well.
Are there gray areas? Maybe
I, for one, will not associate with anyone, family or otherwise, who is a known racist or anti-semite.
No place for fear, hate, or ignorance in my life.