It is astounding to me that anyone who considers themselves to be an American or a person of moral character and a conscience would be okay with this level of corruption, whether you voted for Team Trump Treason or not. @RoleModelsinBlood31 and anyone else that thinks I’m the sucker, come on, argue your defense of the below:
“Suckers.” Lol, says the guy so triggered since TDawg won that he posts a half dozen angry posts a day. That’s what I call a sucker.
A sucker is someone who falls for an obvious con, so I'm not sure how the act of being angry would make anyone a sucker (basic English comprehension and equally basic logic suggests there's no causal relationship there). If you elected Trump based on the belief that he would drain the swamp, and you fell for that obvious con - you are the definition of a sucker then. To be fair though, not everyone cares about rampant corruption. Sure beats a Clinton administration. /s
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
One silver lining is that now they don't have the option to jeopardize their valuable lives for this shithead in charge and whatever asinine opinions he has on next militaristic steps. War drums are already starting to beat in Venezuela after all, and Trump could probably use a deflection to shine a spotlight on.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
“Suckers.” Lol, says the guy so triggered since TDawg won that he posts a half dozen angry posts a day. That’s what I call a sucker.
A sucker is someone who falls for an obvious con, so I'm not sure how the act of being angry would make anyone a sucker (basic English comprehension and equally basic logic suggests there's no causal relationship there). If you elected Trump based on the belief that he would drain the swamp, and you fell for that obvious con - you are the definition of a sucker then. To be fair though, not everyone cares about rampant corruption. Sure beats a Clinton administration. /s
Trump supporter found a new word and flung it around a bit lol.
At least his vocabulary was expanding. Likely comes across as a genius in his circles. At least that would explain the confidence level lol.
“Suckers.” Lol, says the guy so triggered since TDawg won that he posts a half dozen angry posts a day. That’s what I call a sucker.
A sucker is someone who falls for an obvious con, so I'm not sure how the act of being angry would make anyone a sucker (basic English comprehension and equally basic logic suggests there's no causal relationship there). If you elected Trump based on the belief that he would drain the swamp, and you fell for that obvious con - you are the definition of a sucker then. To be fair though, not everyone cares about rampant corruption. Sure beats a Clinton administration. /s
But on the other hand, Trump's an entertainer that wants any attention he can get. Looking at it from that perspective, Trump probably loves knowing that he's on the mind of folks like Halifax nearly every moment of the day.
“Suckers.” Lol, says the guy so triggered since TDawg won that he posts a half dozen angry posts a day. That’s what I call a sucker.
A sucker is someone who falls for an obvious con, so I'm not sure how the act of being angry would make anyone a sucker (basic English comprehension and equally basic logic suggests there's no causal relationship there). If you elected Trump based on the belief that he would drain the swamp, and you fell for that obvious con - you are the definition of a sucker then. To be fair though, not everyone cares about rampant corruption. Sure beats a Clinton administration. /s
But on the other hand, Trump's an entertainer that wants any attention he can get. Looking at it from that perspective, Trump probably loves knowing that he's on the mind of folks like Halifax nearly every moment of the day.
I was just speaking to the people who nominated Trump based on a promise to remove money from politics. There are certainly others who voted based on other priorities, and I don't think it's fair to call them 'suckers' in each and every case at this point in time.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
“Suckers.” Lol, says the guy so triggered since TDawg won that he posts a half dozen angry posts a day. That’s what I call a sucker.
A sucker is someone who falls for an obvious con, so I'm not sure how the act of being angry would make anyone a sucker (basic English comprehension and equally basic logic suggests there's no causal relationship there). If you elected Trump based on the belief that he would drain the swamp, and you fell for that obvious con - you are the definition of a sucker then. To be fair though, not everyone cares about rampant corruption. Sure beats a Clinton administration. /s
But on the other hand, Trump's an entertainer that wants any attention he can get. Looking at it from that perspective, Trump probably loves knowing that he's on the mind of folks like Halifax nearly every moment of the day.
And why shouldn't Team Trump Treason be on my mind everyday? He's a giant piece of shit that is doing irreparable harm to the US, the world and civilization in general, some of which directly impacts my life (tax policy, climate change denial) others that don't but rip at my moral compass (separating kids from their parents at the border, “shithole countries,” “good people on both sides," anti-gay EOs, etc.) all while being corrupt, self serving and a complete douchnozzle. Its not like the Hillary and Obama haters didn't do the same but only because they wanted their team to win so bad and didn't deal in a world of reality. I won't rest until he's out of office, in prison or both. Whatever happened to the "Moral Majority" anyway? Amazing the rot of the US.
And on the other hand, I have yet to see a response to defend Team Trump Treason and all the investigations and corruptions link that I posted. In fact, crickets. Silence = complicit and they must be okay with it all. Good to know.
Because,
“There was no collusion.”
”I don’t know any Russians.” ”I have nothing to hide.” ”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.” ”We do everything by the book.”
“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”
“Very legal, very cool.”
Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
And on the other hand, I have yet to see a response to defend Team Trump Treason and all the investigations and corruptions link that I posted. In fact, crickets. Silence = complicit and they must be okay with it all. Good to know.
How many people here disagree with this though? You'll post a link to an article about something negative about Trump, and then you're like "Haha! Suckers!" and I wonder who are you talking to? Should I get the email addresses of racist Trump-voters throughout America and forward your message to them to let them know they're suckers? Because otherwise, it seems like everyone on this forum, even those that have voted for Trump, would agree with most of your stances against Trump.
You and people like you actually have caused me to have a bit of sympathy for Trump supporters that truly have been "duped." There's people that voted for Trump because they're republican and will always vote for the republican . There's people that voted for Trump because they hate Hillary Clinton. There's people that voted for Trump because he's a character and they somehow became fans. There's people that voted for Trump because yes, they are racist and Trump fans the flames of racism. But there are also some people that are like farmers or coal workers or whatever that were flat-out duped. And it's bad enough when you've been duped. But it's worse when pompous assholes who likely aren't even directly negatively-affected by Trump's actions talk down their noses at them.
And on the other hand, I have yet to see a response to defend Team Trump Treason and all the investigations and corruptions link that I posted. In fact, crickets. Silence = complicit and they must be okay with it all. Good to know.
How many people here disagree with this though? You'll post a link to an article about something negative about Trump, and then you're like "Haha! Suckers!" and I wonder who are you talking to? Should I get the email addresses of racist Trump-voters throughout America and forward your message to them to let them know they're suckers? Because otherwise, it seems like everyone on this forum, even those that have voted for Trump, would agree with most of your stances against Trump.
You and people like you actually have caused me to have a bit of sympathy for Trump supporters that truly have been "duped." There's people that voted for Trump because they're republican and will always vote for the republican . There's people that voted for Trump because they hate Hillary Clinton. There's people that voted for Trump because he's a character and they somehow became fans. There's people that voted for Trump because yes, they are racist and Trump fans the flames of racism. But there are also some people that are like farmers or coal workers or whatever that were flat-out duped. And it's bad enough when you've been duped. But it's worse when pompous assholes who likely aren't even directly negatively-affected by Trump's actions talk down their noses at them.
It’s one thing to be duped, it’s a completely different thing to continue to support Team Trump Treason after all the shit he’s pulled on top of the on average 8-15 outright lies and mistruths uttered per day for two years. Those folks deserve to be looked down our noses at.
The silent majority lurks and there’s a few posters on here who will pull the lever for Team Trump Treason. Again and maybe even twice or three times. Feel free to email a link to the RNC, they’ll respond after their finished prepping for Team Mueller’s indictments.
I think every single week for the past 2 months the ball was going to drop "this Friday". Eventually it will actually be true, but until then I'll always assume it isn't.
Sure, but there have been several indictments already, though usually not when expected. I don’t think the expectation was for the report today.
some folks here stated quite differently.
Someone posted a link about whether the report would be released this week, based on a news report. I don’t recall anyone necessarily expecting it. Some people did think there would be more indictments.
yes, i read your post as 'indictments', not as 'report'. i don't think anyone was expecting the report either.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
It's actually hard to say whether that's gerrymandered or not. There are no high population centers in that area that are being avoided. it's all red there until you get Toledo. Districts are created out of population, not area. IN other words you could re-draw that in lots of different ways and it's probably red any way you slice it.
How many states or countries, excluding shoreline borders, look like that?
Its not always the specific district you are viewing, but what that districts allows to occur elsewhere in the state.
Either way, Ohio redistricted in 2010 which enabled a slightly red state to have a good chance to limit the Democrat seats to 4 out of 16
And they are getting sued:
" Ohioans who had voted as Democrats in past elections were “packed” into four irregularly shaped, barely contiguous districts, reducing their political power throughout the state. This resulted in unusually large margins of victory for Democrats in all four districts
As a result of the new map, Republican candidates earned 51 percent of the statewide vote in 2012, but secured 75 percent of the state’s congressional seats"
Haha, I work on this stuff in PA. Dude above you wants to say it's not gerrymandered? I don't need to know anything else and I can tell you that is probably one of the worst in the country since PA was redrawn. It looks like a fucking mallard. And of course it works by population, there's no need to have a district that looks like that other than it was done on purpose. This is called Drawing Around The Black & Brown People.
It's actually hard to say whether that's gerrymandered or not. There are no high population centers in that area that are being avoided. it's all red there until you get Toledo. Districts are created out of population, not area. IN other words you could re-draw that in lots of different ways and it's probably red any way you slice it.
How many states or countries, excluding shoreline borders, look like that?
Its not always the specific district you are viewing, but what that districts allows to occur elsewhere in the state.
Either way, Ohio redistricted in 2010 which enabled a slightly red state to have a good chance to limit the Democrat seats to 4 out of 16
And they are getting sued:
" Ohioans who had voted as Democrats in past elections were “packed” into four irregularly shaped, barely contiguous districts, reducing their political power throughout the state. This resulted in unusually large margins of victory for Democrats in all four districts
As a result of the new map, Republican candidates earned 51 percent of the statewide vote in 2012, but secured 75 percent of the state’s congressional seats"
Haha, I work on this stuff in PA. Dude above you wants to say it's not gerrymandered? I don't need to know anything else and I can tell you that is probably one of the worst in the country since PA was redrawn. It looks like a fucking mallard. And of course it works by population, there's no need to have a district that looks like that other than it was done on purpose. This is called Drawing Around The Black & Brown People.
That would be a genius interpretation if there were actually a black and brown people in rural western Ohio. But there aren't. That's all farm country. There are no real cities west of Lorain until you get to Toledo, and south until Columbus. And what I said, for you those of you that struggle reading for comprehension is that that "it's hard to say if that is gerrymandered or not". You don't see the population concentration in the map. But sure you don't need to know anything else to make your decision, most importantly you don't need to see the population... I mean why would that be important to a statement as concrete as yours?
Comments
https://apple.news/A7DNmbG_KRYujZrEPbKPsjQ
Always good for a laugh.
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/trump-administration-conflicts/
If you elected Trump based on the belief that he would drain the swamp, and you fell for that obvious con - you are the definition of a sucker then. To be fair though, not everyone cares about rampant corruption. Sure beats a Clinton administration. /s
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/2019/03/09/brett-kavanaugh-said-congress-should-hold-presidents-accountable-william-barr-agreed/
What a timely article...
More hate
More ignorance
When you support evil in any way, shape, or form that makes you evil as well.
Namaste'
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
At least his vocabulary was expanding. Likely comes across as a genius in his circles. At least that would explain the confidence level lol.
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
And why shouldn't Team Trump Treason be on my mind everyday? He's a giant piece of shit that is doing irreparable harm to the US, the world and civilization in general, some of which directly impacts my life (tax policy, climate change denial) others that don't but rip at my moral compass (separating kids from their parents at the border, “shithole countries,” “good people on both sides," anti-gay EOs, etc.) all while being corrupt, self serving and a complete douchnozzle. Its not like the Hillary and Obama haters didn't do the same but only because they wanted their team to win so bad and didn't deal in a world of reality. I won't rest until he's out of office, in prison or both. Whatever happened to the "Moral Majority" anyway? Amazing the rot of the US.
And on the other hand, I have yet to see a response to defend Team Trump Treason and all the investigations and corruptions link that I posted. In fact, crickets. Silence = complicit and they must be okay with it all. Good to know.
Because,
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”
You and people like you actually have caused me to have a bit of sympathy for Trump supporters that truly have been "duped." There's people that voted for Trump because they're republican and will always vote for the republican . There's people that voted for Trump because they hate Hillary Clinton. There's people that voted for Trump because he's a character and they somehow became fans. There's people that voted for Trump because yes, they are racist and Trump fans the flames of racism. But there are also some people that are like farmers or coal workers or whatever that were flat-out duped. And it's bad enough when you've been duped. But it's worse when pompous assholes who likely aren't even directly negatively-affected by Trump's actions talk down their noses at them.
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Sleaziest of sleaze, what an administration ha !
The silent majority lurks and there’s a few posters on here who will pull the lever for Team Trump Treason. Again and maybe even twice or three times. Feel free to email a link to the RNC, they’ll respond after their finished prepping for Team Mueller’s indictments.
-EV 8/14/93
In their own words: Nixon on Watergate, Trump on the Russia investigation
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/politics/trump-nixon-comparison/index.html