***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***
Comments
-
tempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on it, you are correct.josevolution said:tempo_n_groove said:I'm surprised this thread isn't buzzing w activity? Nothing monumental in the first day?
You must be watching some other hearings , you know what you come off as someone who’s just hoping that this idiot is not guilty of shaking down a foreign president yet the evidence is right there at the tip of your nose ...tempo_n_groove said:I'm surprised this thread isn't buzzing w activity? Nothing monumental in the first day?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
2018The whistleblower. HILARIOUSBristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
2018
what 3rd person? it is corroborated by everybodytempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on it, you are correct. The third person/hearsay evidence isn't the strongest right now. The conversation that Taylor had w Sondland when actually mentioning the term "Quid Pro Quo" has to, I'm sure it will, be questioned and talked about from every angle until exhausted. Dig up more on that and I change my prediction.josevolution said:tempo_n_groove said:I'm surprised this thread isn't buzzing w activity? Nothing monumental in the first day?
You must be watching some other hearings , you know what you come off as someone who’s just hoping that this idiot is not guilty of shaking down a foreign president yet the evidence is right there at the tip of your nose ...tempo_n_groove said:I'm surprised this thread isn't buzzing w activity? Nothing monumental in the first day?
I've already made my prediction that Trump gets impeached but not convicted and he will win a second term.
0 -
2018Let's see how the tee-R's treat this professional on Friday.
The spinspin is re-donk.
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
2018anyone know the schedule, like how long this is expected to last before a vote happens?Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
-
much of taylors testimony centers on what he was told by others. i.e. indirect knowledge.Smellyman said:
what 3rd person? it is corroborated by everybodytempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on it, you are correct. The third person/hearsay evidence isn't the strongest right now. The conversation that Taylor had w Sondland when actually mentioning the term "Quid Pro Quo" has to, I'm sure it will, be questioned and talked about from every angle until exhausted. Dig up more on that and I change my prediction.josevolution said:tempo_n_groove said:I'm surprised this thread isn't buzzing w activity? Nothing monumental in the first day?
You must be watching some other hearings , you know what you come off as someone who’s just hoping that this idiot is not guilty of shaking down a foreign president yet the evidence is right there at the tip of your nose ...tempo_n_groove said:I'm surprised this thread isn't buzzing w activity? Nothing monumental in the first day?
I've already made my prediction that Trump gets impeached but not convicted and he will win a second term.
Post edited by mickeyrat on_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Basically, it's career diplomats complaining they weren't consulted or included. (Irregular - what makes it irregular? Because that's not the way it's always been done? Who says that's the right or only way? They're all appointed. These guys weren't elected either. The President appoints them and decides how and when to use them. Sorry you're being marginalized. Happens to people on jobs all the time when a new CEO arrives. Boo hoo. Go find a real job.). Not saying their concerns aren't valid. But, no more or less valid than when an employee raises a concern, but doesn't have full view into the CEO's plans and strategies (and not I'm not saying those are well thought out in this situation, but how are you or I or Talyor to know since we're as in the know as he was lol).
This is honestly a waste of everyone's time. We have a Government shut down looming and this is what Pelosi thinks is important? The airing of Career DC people's grievances with an Administration that doesn't give a shit about the protocols of the politically entrenched.
Vote him out next November.
And BTW - when the next Democratic President is elected, don't complain when the Republicans demand conversations with international leaders are released and some disgruntled person who isn't kept as informed as they were previously comes forward with concerns they want aired. This is all a joke and will be funny when it escalates the other way in 4 or 8 or 12 years.
And before you say it - I'm fine if he's removed other than it will finally be the Constitutional Crisis the libs are all crying about. I'm excited for our next President Nikki Haley. 4 years sooner would be fine by me. Will be funny to see the Libs rationalize their gender baiting then.Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.0 -
2018The strongman tactics (the rallies, the dictator "friends" he has, the lies, the capitalization on hate, and just general belligerence) are really what he should be impeached for.
There are actual assaults that have taken place at his arena shows. Imma say that again, ASSAULTS. Riling MF'ers up to the point of violence (or Disturbing the peace) is literally a misdemeanor. There's video of every one of those "gigs" of his talkin about the press being the enemy of the people and singling out individual members of Congress for daily death threat targeting by a bunch of morons.
The staccato delivery of this fuck is dangerous. Combine that with his instability, and his organized crime mentality, and his little twitler fingers...
These Democratic members of Congress better start convincing some Rs to defect as opposed to trying to reason with them in public.
Louie Gohmert and John Ratfuck ain't coming around yo.
Quick.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
2018everybody knows itBristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
2018
lol your hilarious, how about your hero Baffoon stop blocking people from testifying! You can’t handle the truth that this idiot tried shaking down a foreign country to help him with his re-election campaign, go ahead keep believing this thug you call presidential!EdsonNascimento said:Basically, it's career diplomats complaining they weren't consulted or included. (Irregular - what makes it irregular? Because that's not the way it's always been done? Who says that's the right or only way? They're all appointed. These guys weren't elected either. The President appoints them and decides how and when to use them. Sorry you're being marginalized. Happens to people on jobs all the time when a new CEO arrives. Boo hoo. Go find a real job.). Not saying their concerns aren't valid. But, no more or less valid than when an employee raises a concern, but doesn't have full view into the CEO's plans and strategies (and not I'm not saying those are well thought out in this situation, but how are you or I or Talyor to know since we're as in the know as he was lol).
This is honestly a waste of everyone's time. We have a Government shut down looming and this is what Pelosi thinks is important? The airing of Career DC people's grievances with an Administration that doesn't give a shit about the protocols of the politically entrenched.
Vote him out next November.
And BTW - when the next Democratic President is elected, don't complain when the Republicans demand conversations with international leaders are released and some disgruntled person who isn't kept as informed as they were previously comes forward with concerns they want aired. This is all a joke and will be funny when it escalates the other way in 4 or 8 or 12 years.
And before you say it - I'm fine if he's removed other than it will finally be the Constitutional Crisis the libs are all crying about. I'm excited for our next President Nikki Haley. 4 years sooner would be fine by me. Will be funny to see the Libs rationalize their gender baiting then.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
2018
We have a better chance at President Pelosi.EdsonNascimento said:Basically, it's career diplomats complaining they weren't consulted or included. (Irregular - what makes it irregular? Because that's not the way it's always been done? Who says that's the right or only way? They're all appointed. These guys weren't elected either. The President appoints them and decides how and when to use them. Sorry you're being marginalized. Happens to people on jobs all the time when a new CEO arrives. Boo hoo. Go find a real job.). Not saying their concerns aren't valid. But, no more or less valid than when an employee raises a concern, but doesn't have full view into the CEO's plans and strategies (and not I'm not saying those are well thought out in this situation, but how are you or I or Talyor to know since we're as in the know as he was lol).
This is honestly a waste of everyone's time. We have a Government shut down looming and this is what Pelosi thinks is important? The airing of Career DC people's grievances with an Administration that doesn't give a shit about the protocols of the politically entrenched.
Vote him out next November.
And BTW - when the next Democratic President is elected, don't complain when the Republicans demand conversations with international leaders are released and some disgruntled person who isn't kept as informed as they were previously comes forward with concerns they want aired. This is all a joke and will be funny when it escalates the other way in 4 or 8 or 12 years.
And before you say it - I'm fine if he's removed other than it will finally be the Constitutional Crisis the libs are all crying about. I'm excited for our next President Nikki Haley. 4 years sooner would be fine by me. Will be funny to see the Libs rationalize their gender baiting then.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
EdsonNascimento said:Basically, it's career diplomats complaining they weren't consulted or included. (Irregular - what makes it irregular? Because that's not the way it's always been done? Who says that's the right or only way? They're all appointed. These guys weren't elected either. The President appoints them and decides how and when to use them. Sorry you're being marginalized. Happens to people on jobs all the time when a new CEO arrives. Boo hoo. Go find a real job.). Not saying their concerns aren't valid. But, no more or less valid than when an employee raises a concern, but doesn't have full view into the CEO's plans and strategies (and not I'm not saying those are well thought out in this situation, but how are you or I or Talyor to know since we're as in the know as he was lol).
This is honestly a waste of everyone's time. We have a Government shut down looming and this is what Pelosi thinks is important? The airing of Career DC people's grievances with an Administration that doesn't give a shit about the protocols of the politically entrenched.
Vote him out next November.
And BTW - when the next Democratic President is elected, don't complain when the Republicans demand conversations with international leaders are released and some disgruntled person who isn't kept as informed as they were previously comes forward with concerns they want aired. This is all a joke and will be funny when it escalates the other way in 4 or 8 or 12 years.
And before you say it - I'm fine if he's removed other than it will finally be the Constitutional Crisis the libs are all crying about. I'm excited for our next President Nikki Haley. 4 years sooner would be fine by me. Will be funny to see the Libs rationalize their gender baiting then.
Todays republicans
Trump + bribery = no problem
Obama + tan suit = shit my pants0 -
-
Too many big words for Eric.ikiT said:0 -
irregular= parallel but contradictory to long standing foreign policy and how it is implemented for personal gain.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
You seem to have forgotten the withholding of aid after being passed by Congress, thus subverting the will of the people and abusing his power. That Team Trump Treason eventually released it, after the whistle blower filed his complaint, is irrelevant to what will be an article of impeachment. That and the ten obstruction of justice charges in the Team Mueller report, five of which may become another article of impeachment. I look forward to repub pukes defending Team Trump Treason at trial. Key witnesses refusing to testify, why is that?EdsonNascimento said:Basically, it's career diplomats complaining they weren't consulted or included. (Irregular - what makes it irregular? Because that's not the way it's always been done? Who says that's the right or only way? They're all appointed. These guys weren't elected either. The President appoints them and decides how and when to use them. Sorry you're being marginalized. Happens to people on jobs all the time when a new CEO arrives. Boo hoo. Go find a real job.). Not saying their concerns aren't valid. But, no more or less valid than when an employee raises a concern, but doesn't have full view into the CEO's plans and strategies (and not I'm not saying those are well thought out in this situation, but how are you or I or Talyor to know since we're as in the know as he was lol).
This is honestly a waste of everyone's time. We have a Government shut down looming and this is what Pelosi thinks is important? The airing of Career DC people's grievances with an Administration that doesn't give a shit about the protocols of the politically entrenched.
Vote him out next November.
And BTW - when the next Democratic President is elected, don't complain when the Republicans demand conversations with international leaders are released and some disgruntled person who isn't kept as informed as they were previously comes forward with concerns they want aired. This is all a joke and will be funny when it escalates the other way in 4 or 8 or 12 years.
And before you say it - I'm fine if he's removed other than it will finally be the Constitutional Crisis the libs are all crying about. I'm excited for our next President Nikki Haley. 4 years sooner would be fine by me. Will be funny to see the Libs rationalize their gender baiting then.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
yesterday was pretty damning for dump. many people watched it on the networks and not the regular cable news outlets. the american people saw first hand the buffoonery of the republican defense strategy.
"was it as bad as it could have been?" is not a defense."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
2018
Fox news called it a win for republicans and a disaster for democrats. LOLgimmesometruth27 said:yesterday was pretty damning for dump. many people watched it on the networks and not the regular cable news outlets. the american people saw first hand the buffoonery of the republican defense strategy.
"was it as bad as it could have been?" is not a defense.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
of course they did. i expect nothing else from fox. they are through the looking glass where black is white and white is black.HughFreakingDillon said:
Fox news called it a win for republicans and a disaster for democrats. LOLgimmesometruth27 said:yesterday was pretty damning for dump. many people watched it on the networks and not the regular cable news outlets. the american people saw first hand the buffoonery of the republican defense strategy.
"was it as bad as it could have been?" is not a defense.
i did hear that chris wallace actually said it was bad for the administration though."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on it, you are correct. The third person/hearsay evidence isn't the strongest right now. The conversation that Taylor had w Sondland when actually mentioning the term "Quid Pro Quo" has to, I'm sure it will, be questioned and talked about from every angle until exhausted. Dig up more on that and I change my prediction.josevolution said:tempo_n_groove said:I'm surprised this thread isn't buzzing w activity? Nothing monumental in the first day?
You must be watching some other hearings , you know what you come off as someone who’s just hoping that this idiot is not guilty of shaking down a foreign president yet the evidence is right there at the tip of your nose ...tempo_n_groove said:I'm surprised this thread isn't buzzing w activity? Nothing monumental in the first day?
I've already made my prediction that Trump gets impeached but not convicted and he will win a second term.
This 'third person/hearsay evidence' narrative is tired.
Every person who has first person knowledge and has been called to testify has been blocked by the White House under this total immunity garbage.
Eventually the law will have it's way, and these people will be compelled to testify.
Then you will get your first hand testimony, and I think a circular firing squad to boot.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help