I'm not convinced Bernie would have won either. America isn't ready for that kind of progress yet.
Yeah, we aren't ready to Venezuela just yet.
Stop being an idiot.
And read up on the Scandinavian countries.
I have read up on Scandinavian countries, plus I have actually been to them too. I have no interest in having more of my labor stolen to subsidize the third world invasion.
Idiot huh? Ok internet tough guy.
Why would you voluntarily visit a socialist paradise? Was it for work? Were you kidnapped?
If you really want to see your libertarian utopia, perhaps you should stick to vacationing in third countries.
Because prior to Europe being flooded with "refugees" there were some other attractions.
You are deranged.
From someone that can't face reality.
You're the one who wants to live in some libertarian utopia that doesn't exist anywhere in the world.
I'm not convinced Bernie would have won either. America isn't ready for that kind of progress yet.
Yeah, we aren't ready to Venezuela just yet.
Stop being an idiot.
And read up on the Scandinavian countries.
I have read up on Scandinavian countries, plus I have actually been to them too. I have no interest in having more of my labor stolen to subsidize the third world invasion.
Idiot huh? Ok internet tough guy.
Why would you voluntarily visit a socialist paradise? Was it for work? Were you kidnapped?
If you really want to see your libertarian utopia, perhaps you should stick to vacationing in third countries.
Because prior to Europe being flooded with "refugees" there were some other attractions.
Hey BS can you please tell orange bafoon that the election is over he won and ask him where did all the Russian influence came from he still doesn't know ...
"The White House clearly only wanted one person to see these documents, and that person was our chairman," Schiff said on CNN's "New Day," referring to Nunes' coordination with White House staff to review documents showing top Trump aides were picked up in "incidental" collection by US intelligence.
"I want the full committees to be able to see that, and we're meeting resistance," Schiff said. "If these documents are so damning or so indicating of the President, as he suggests, why are they opposing efforts to provide them to the full committee? I think that's a question worthy of the White House answering."
Schiff's accusation marks a turn from just one day ago, when he said that the White House promised to show its intelligence to the other members of the House intelligence committee. Some lawmakers even said they might travel to the White House as early as Tuesday afternoon to review the intelligence, but as of Wednesday morning, Schiff and Nunes were the only lawmakers to have seen the intelligence reports.
The intelligence reports at the White House are at the center of two weeks of chaos that led top Democrats to call on Nunes to recuse himself from the House Russia investigation and, later, formed the core of Trump's argument that former national security adviser Susan Rice was responsible for surveillance against him.
Hey BS, get on the phone and tell your boy Trump to come clean. He's been making scurrilous accusations and has the ability to clear everything up. Come on, prove us all wrong.
I was listening to Noam Chomsky being interviewed on Democracy Now this morning, and even at 88 years old, his mind is as sharp as ever (even if his speaking is slower and a bit sloppier than it used to be).
"JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Noam Chomsky, I’d like to ask you about something that’s been in the news a lot lately. Obviously, all the cable channels, that’s all they talk about these days, is the whole situation of Russia’s supposed intervention in American elections. For a country that’s intervened in so many governments and so many elections around the world, that’s kind of a strange topic. But I know you’ve referred to this as a joke. Could you give us your view on what’s happening and why there’s so much emphasis on this particular issue?
NOAM CHOMSKY: It’s a pretty remarkable fact that—first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn’t just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn’t like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in the case of Russia alone—it’s the least of it—the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it’s considered—it’s turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world.
So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trump’s programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That’s—the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just can’t believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, "Sure, that’s just what they ought to be doing."
So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. That’s not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, of course, because the Democrats feel that that’s the reason, somehow, that they lost the election. Interesting that James Comey this week said he is investigating Trump campaign collusion with Russia, when it was Comey himself who could have—might well have been partly responsible for Hillary Clinton’s defeat, when he said that he was investigating her, while, we now have learned, at the same time he was investigating Donald Trump, but never actually said that.
NOAM CHOMSKY: Well, you can understand why the Democratic Party managers want to try to find some blame for the fact—for the way they utterly mishandled the election and blew a perfect opportunity to win, handed it over to the opposition. But that’s hardly a justification for allowing the Trump policies to slide by quietly, many of them not only harmful to the population, but extremely destructive, like the climate change policies, and meanwhile focus on one thing that could become a step forward, if it was adjusted to move towards serious efforts to reduce growing and dangerous tensions right on the Russian border, where they could blow up. NATO maneuvers are taking place hundreds of yards from the Russian border. The Russian jet planes are buzzing American planes. This—something could get out of hand very easily. Both sides, meanwhile, are building up their military forces, adding—the U.S. is—one thing that the Russians are very much concerned about is the so-called anti-ballistic missile installation that the U.S. is establishing near the Russian border, allegedly to protect Europe from nonexistent Iranian missiles. Nobody seriously believes that. This is understood to be a first strike threat. These are serious issues. People like William Perry, who has a distinguished career and is a nuclear strategist and is no alarmist at all, is saying that we’re back to the—this is one of the worst moments of the Cold War, if not worse. That’s really serious. And efforts to try to calm that down would be very welcome. And we should bear in mind it’s the Russian border. It’s not the Mexican border. There’s no Warsaw Pact maneuvers going on in Mexico. And that’s a border that the Russians are quite reasonably sensitive about. They’ve practically been destroyed several times the last century right through that region."
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
is traitor the new label people are hoping sticks with him? ... good grief ...
i think the energy people have trying to demonize trump is better spent recognizing how the cuss someone like him got elected in the first place ... and why someone like Clinton could lose to a guy like that ... seriously, take a step back and try and be objective about this ... you will see that the crux of the issue is much larger than trump ... trump is merely a symbol of how royally fucked up the system and people really are ...
yes, the system is fucked up and corrupt. but that doesn't take away how royally unfit for the job he is and how much damage he is doing.
I think colluding with a foeign and unfriendly power to win the white house can be considered treasonous, don't you?
I'm not convinced Bernie would have won either. America isn't ready for that kind of progress yet.
Yeah, we aren't ready to Venezuela just yet.
Stop being an idiot.
And read up on the Scandinavian countries.
I have read up on Scandinavian countries, plus I have actually been to them too. I have no interest in having more of my labor stolen to subsidize the third world invasion.
Idiot huh? Ok internet tough guy.
Why would you voluntarily visit a socialist paradise? Was it for work? Were you kidnapped?
If you really want to see your libertarian utopia, perhaps you should stick to vacationing in third countries.
Because prior to Europe being flooded with "refugees" there were some other attractions.
You are deranged.
From someone that can't face reality.
You're the one who wants to live in some libertarian utopia that doesn't exist anywhere in the world.
The world is $100T in debt. The current system is going to fail.
I'm not convinced Bernie would have won either. America isn't ready for that kind of progress yet.
Yeah, we aren't ready to Venezuela just yet.
Stop being an idiot.
And read up on the Scandinavian countries.
I have read up on Scandinavian countries, plus I have actually been to them too. I have no interest in having more of my labor stolen to subsidize the third world invasion.
Idiot huh? Ok internet tough guy.
Why would you voluntarily visit a socialist paradise? Was it for work? Were you kidnapped?
If you really want to see your libertarian utopia, perhaps you should stick to vacationing in third countries.
Because prior to Europe being flooded with "refugees" there were some other attractions.
You are deranged.
From someone that can't face reality.
You're the one who wants to live in some libertarian utopia that doesn't exist anywhere in the world.
The world is $100T in debt. The current systwm is going to fail
is traitor the new label people are hoping sticks with him? ... good grief ...
i think the energy people have trying to demonize trump is better spent recognizing how the cuss someone like him got elected in the first place ... and why someone like Clinton could lose to a guy like that ... seriously, take a step back and try and be objective about this ... you will see that the crux of the issue is much larger than trump ... trump is merely a symbol of how royally fucked up the system and people really are ...
yes, the system is fucked up and corrupt. but that doesn't take away how royally unfit for the job he is and how much damage he is doing.
I think colluding with a foeign and unfriendly power to win the white house can be considered treasonous, don't you?
I'm not convinced Bernie would have won either. America isn't ready for that kind of progress yet.
Yeah, we aren't ready to Venezuela just yet.
Stop being an idiot.
And read up on the Scandinavian countries.
I have read up on Scandinavian countries, plus I have actually been to them too. I have no interest in having more of my labor stolen to subsidize the third world invasion.
Idiot huh? Ok internet tough guy.
Why would you voluntarily visit a socialist paradise? Was it for work? Were you kidnapped?
If you really want to see your libertarian utopia, perhaps you should stick to vacationing in third countries.
Because prior to Europe being flooded with "refugees" there were some other attractions.
You are deranged.
From someone that can't face reality.
You're the one who wants to live in some libertarian utopia that doesn't exist anywhere in the world.
The world is $100T in debt. The current systwm is going to fail
is traitor the new label people are hoping sticks with him? ... good grief ...
i think the energy people have trying to demonize trump is better spent recognizing how the cuss someone like him got elected in the first place ... and why someone like Clinton could lose to a guy like that ... seriously, take a step back and try and be objective about this ... you will see that the crux of the issue is much larger than trump ... trump is merely a symbol of how royally fucked up the system and people really are ...
yes, the system is fucked up and corrupt. but that doesn't take away how royally unfit for the job he is and how much damage he is doing.
I think colluding with a foeign and unfriendly power to win the white house can be considered treasonous, don't you?
I'm not convinced Bernie would have won either. America isn't ready for that kind of progress yet.
Yeah, we aren't ready to Venezuela just yet.
Stop being an idiot.
And read up on the Scandinavian countries.
I have read up on Scandinavian countries, plus I have actually been to them too. I have no interest in having more of my labor stolen to subsidize the third world invasion.
Idiot huh? Ok internet tough guy.
Why would you voluntarily visit a socialist paradise? Was it for work? Were you kidnapped?
If you really want to see your libertarian utopia, perhaps you should stick to vacationing in third countries.
Because prior to Europe being flooded with "refugees" there were some other attractions.
You are deranged.
From someone that can't face reality.
You're the one who wants to live in some libertarian utopia that doesn't exist anywhere in the world.
The world is $100T in debt. The current system is going to fail.
I see two dots, but they don't appear to be connected.
You may as well have said, "The sky is blue. Gonna rain tomorrow."
Comments
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/04/politics/donald-trump-dana-rohrabacher-putin/index.html
That Putin, hell of a guy, and a Wiley arm wrestler for a little guy. Who knew?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://thehill.com/opinion/juan-williams/326930-juan-williams-trumps-risk-of-impeachment-rises
https://www.google.com/amp/thehill.com/homenews/administration/327236-poll-trump-approval-score-worsens?amp
How do you like that asparagus? Enjoy. Less than 100 days in, too. Brilliant brilliance.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/neil-gorsuch-democratic-senator-richard-blumenthal-supreme-court-nominee-donald-trump-impeachment-a7666451.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/04/02/trump-investigators-ammunition-impeachment-latest-twitter-explosion.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"The White House clearly only wanted one person to see these documents, and that person was our chairman," Schiff said on CNN's "New Day," referring to Nunes' coordination with White House staff to review documents showing top Trump aides were picked up in "incidental" collection by US intelligence.
"I want the full committees to be able to see that, and we're meeting resistance," Schiff said. "If these documents are so damning or so indicating of the President, as he suggests, why are they opposing efforts to provide them to the full committee? I think that's a question worthy of the White House answering."
Schiff's accusation marks a turn from just one day ago, when he said that the White House promised to show its intelligence to the other members of the House intelligence committee. Some lawmakers even said they might travel to the White House as early as Tuesday afternoon to review the intelligence, but as of Wednesday morning, Schiff and Nunes were the only lawmakers to have seen the intelligence reports.
The intelligence reports at the White House are at the center of two weeks of chaos that led top Democrats to call on Nunes to recuse himself from the House Russia investigation and, later, formed the core of Trump's argument that former national security adviser Susan Rice was responsible for surveillance against him.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/politics/adam-schiff-white-house-documents/index.html
Hey BS, get on the phone and tell your boy Trump to come clean. He's been making scurrilous accusations and has the ability to clear everything up. Come on, prove us all wrong.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Here's the full video/audio/transcript (https://www.democracynow.org/2017/4/4/full_interview_noam_chomsky_on_democracy), but the part that pertains to Russia:
"JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Noam Chomsky, I’d like to ask you about something that’s been in the news a lot lately. Obviously, all the cable channels, that’s all they talk about these days, is the whole situation of Russia’s supposed intervention in American elections. For a country that’s intervened in so many governments and so many elections around the world, that’s kind of a strange topic. But I know you’ve referred to this as a joke. Could you give us your view on what’s happening and why there’s so much emphasis on this particular issue?
NOAM CHOMSKY: It’s a pretty remarkable fact that—first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn’t just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn’t like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in the case of Russia alone—it’s the least of it—the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it’s considered—it’s turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world.
So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trump’s programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That’s—the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just can’t believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, "Sure, that’s just what they ought to be doing."
So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. That’s not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, of course, because the Democrats feel that that’s the reason, somehow, that they lost the election. Interesting that James Comey this week said he is investigating Trump campaign collusion with Russia, when it was Comey himself who could have—might well have been partly responsible for Hillary Clinton’s defeat, when he said that he was investigating her, while, we now have learned, at the same time he was investigating Donald Trump, but never actually said that.
NOAM CHOMSKY: Well, you can understand why the Democratic Party managers want to try to find some blame for the fact—for the way they utterly mishandled the election and blew a perfect opportunity to win, handed it over to the opposition. But that’s hardly a justification for allowing the Trump policies to slide by quietly, many of them not only harmful to the population, but extremely destructive, like the climate change policies, and meanwhile focus on one thing that could become a step forward, if it was adjusted to move towards serious efforts to reduce growing and dangerous tensions right on the Russian border, where they could blow up. NATO maneuvers are taking place hundreds of yards from the Russian border. The Russian jet planes are buzzing American planes. This—something could get out of hand very easily. Both sides, meanwhile, are building up their military forces, adding—the U.S. is—one thing that the Russians are very much concerned about is the so-called anti-ballistic missile installation that the U.S. is establishing near the Russian border, allegedly to protect Europe from nonexistent Iranian missiles. Nobody seriously believes that. This is understood to be a first strike threat. These are serious issues. People like William Perry, who has a distinguished career and is a nuclear strategist and is no alarmist at all, is saying that we’re back to the—this is one of the worst moments of the Cold War, if not worse. That’s really serious. And efforts to try to calm that down would be very welcome. And we should bear in mind it’s the Russian border. It’s not the Mexican border. There’s no Warsaw Pact maneuvers going on in Mexico. And that’s a border that the Russians are quite reasonably sensitive about. They’ve practically been destroyed several times the last century right through that region."
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
https://www.google.com/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/39435786
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
4-2-92
7-29-92
5-4-95 Hovercraft / Cleveland
8-26-98
4-25-03
5-20-06
8-21-08 E.V. Chicago
10-31-09 Philadelphia
5-09-10 Cleveland
5-10-10 Buffalo
6-26-11 E.V. Detroit
10-11-13 Pittsburgh
10-12-13 Buffalo
10-29-13 Charlottesville
4-18-16 Hampton
8-22-16 Chicago
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/politics/trump-associates-russians-meetings/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/devin-nunes-stepping-aside-russia-intelligence-committee/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://impeachdonaldtrumpnow.org/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/04/06/devin-nunes-is-out-and-the-right-is-making-the-russia-scandal-even-bigger/
Tick tock, tick tock, tick tock, tick tock goes the impeachment clock.
Follow the money, in war time, from Russia with love, all the way to impeachment.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
You may as well have said, "The sky is blue. Gonna rain tomorrow."
Why is it going to fail? How is it going to fail?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/07/nigel-farage-right-wing-populists-turn-donald-trump-missile/
That chemical attack was a false flag.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
ha
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/us/trump-russia-cia-john-brennan.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©