Nothing is really 100%. I'm bothered by that as much as I am of the opinion of a leftist scientist propagandist.
leftist scientist propagandist
do you buy your tinfoil in bulk?
when I read that, it sounded in my head like it was being said by Sylverster the cat. "well, sssssufferin' sssssuccotash....it'sssss a leftisssssssst scientisssssssst propagandisssssst".
That's not necessarily true. There are lots of things that we know with 100% accuracy. I don't think you can argue the earth orbiting the sun, gravity, lunar and solar tides, human destruction, pollution, etc. Our history and origins; however, do not have 100% knowledge basis.
@unsung What's the difference between a white nationalist and a white supremacist?
I thought this was an interesting article from the NYT addressing this question. I don't see the distinction as clearly as Professor Kaufmann, but at least it is a reasonable attempt to answer the question:
"Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony."
Ultimately, though, this is what makes them both beyond distasteful to me: "White supremacists and white nationalists both believe that racial discrimination should be incorporated into law and policy."
"I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
@unsung What's the difference between a white nationalist and a white supremacist?
I thought this was an interesting article from the NYT addressing this question. I don't see the distinction as clearly as Professor Kaufmann, but at least it is a reasonable attempt to answer the question:
"Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony."
Ultimately, though, this is what makes them both beyond distasteful to me: "White supremacists and white nationalists both believe that racial discrimination should be incorporated into law and policy."
So, what your saying is: White supremacists feel they are superior. Whereas white nationalists have a plan to prove it Some might say, a final solution.
At least white supremacists have the balls to admit their racists; instead of hiding behind parsed words, split hairs and semantics.
@unsung What's the difference between a white nationalist and a white supremacist?
I thought this was an interesting article from the NYT addressing this question. I don't see the distinction as clearly as Professor Kaufmann, but at least it is a reasonable attempt to answer the question:
"Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony."
Ultimately, though, this is what makes them both beyond distasteful to me: "White supremacists and white nationalists both believe that racial discrimination should be incorporated into law and policy."
So, what your saying is: White supremacists feel they are superior. Whereas white nationalists have a plan to prove it Some might say, a final solution.
At least white supremacists have the balls to admit their racists; instead of hiding behind parsed words, split hairs and semantics.
White nationalists are media savvy enough to market themselves differently. So much so that one made it into the White House staff and there wasn't much fuss.
@unsung What's the difference between a white nationalist and a white supremacist?
I thought this was an interesting article from the NYT addressing this question. I don't see the distinction as clearly as Professor Kaufmann, but at least it is a reasonable attempt to answer the question:
"Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony."
Ultimately, though, this is what makes them both beyond distasteful to me: "White supremacists and white nationalists both believe that racial discrimination should be incorporated into law and policy."
So, what your saying is: White supremacists feel they are superior. Whereas white nationalists have a plan to prove it Some might say, a final solution.
At least white supremacists have the balls to admit their racists; instead of hiding behind parsed words, split hairs and semantics.
White nationalists are media savvy enough to market themselves differently. So much so that one made it into the White House staff and there wasn't much fuss.
Yep it's just white supremacy with a PR department.
@unsung What's the difference between a white nationalist and a white supremacist?
I thought this was an interesting article from the NYT addressing this question. I don't see the distinction as clearly as Professor Kaufmann, but at least it is a reasonable attempt to answer the question:
"Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony."
Ultimately, though, this is what makes them both beyond distasteful to me: "White supremacists and white nationalists both believe that racial discrimination should be incorporated into law and policy."
So, what your saying is: White supremacists feel they are superior. Whereas white nationalists have a plan to prove it Some might say, a final solution.
At least white supremacists have the balls to admit their racists; instead of hiding behind parsed words, split hairs and semantics.
White nationalists are media savvy enough to market themselves differently. So much so that one made it into the White House staff and there wasn't much fuss.
@unsung What's the difference between a white nationalist and a white supremacist?
I thought this was an interesting article from the NYT addressing this question. I don't see the distinction as clearly as Professor Kaufmann, but at least it is a reasonable attempt to answer the question:
"Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony."
Ultimately, though, this is what makes them both beyond distasteful to me: "White supremacists and white nationalists both believe that racial discrimination should be incorporated into law and policy."
So, what your saying is: White supremacists feel they are superior. Whereas white nationalists have a plan to prove it Some might say, a final solution.
At least white supremacists have the balls to admit their racists; instead of hiding behind parsed words, split hairs and semantics.
White nationalists are media savvy enough to market themselves differently. So much so that one made it into the White House staff and there wasn't much fuss.
It's not lack of savvy. It's lack of shame.
Exactly, which is why I'd actually say they have no balls or dignity. They're nothing. It doesn't take balls or courage to be a worthless human being.
They may not know it, but for kids under the age of 5, the day the United States became a minority-majority nation has already arrived.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2014 there were more than 20 million children under 5 years old living in the U.S., and 50.2 percent of them were minorities.
They may not know it, but for kids under the age of 5, the day the United States became a minority-majority nation has already arrived.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2014 there were more than 20 million children under 5 years old living in the U.S., and 50.2 percent of them were minorities.
The NYT had a commentary pointing out the flaws in the census bureau's report. It was an interesting read. I'll post a link when I have time but it's much more about the right fear mongering for votes as opposed to actual demographics.
100% of white supremacists, white nationalists, and alt-right people believe themselves to be superior to all other races, cultures, and nationalities.
Comments
do you buy your tinfoil in bulk?
www.headstonesband.com
‘White Nationalism,’ Explained
"Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony."Ultimately, though, this is what makes them both beyond distasteful to me: "White supremacists and white nationalists both believe that racial discrimination should be incorporated into law and policy."
White supremacists feel they are superior.
Whereas white nationalists have a plan to prove it
Some might say, a final solution.
At least white supremacists have the balls to admit their racists; instead of hiding behind parsed words, split hairs and semantics.
It's lack of shame.
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/07/06/its-official-the-us-is-becoming-a-minority-majority-nation
They may not know it, but for kids under the age of 5, the day the United States became a minority-majority nation has already arrived.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2014 there were more than 20 million children under 5 years old living in the U.S., and 50.2 percent of them were minorities.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
100% of white supremacists, white nationalists, and alt-right people believe themselves to be superior to all other races, cultures, and nationalities.
Study: US Interracial Marriage Rising, Honolulu Tops List.
http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIw-c2c9TQ
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
SNOWFLAKE
Impeach him. Get Pence. Then Ryan. Impeach all of government. Maybe we can get somewhere then.
I am out. Cornell's death has me down. See you guys next week sometime. Have a good weekend. Shut off the internet. Disconnect. Go outside.
www.headstonesband.com
yeah I'm still pretty bummed about it too. enjoy your weekend man.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©