must be big news dropping today. bots always get fired up when another shoe is about to drop. topic du jour is curious, too. emails? really, we're gonna talk about emails?
Things aren't looking good for Trump so 3D fires up the D'ing machine. I'm sure the republican congress will begin hearings and Trump can lead the chant of "lock her up" at the next rally to be held in Las Vegas?
Where's 3D, d'ing? And all that breathless Podesta email about pizza too. Dayum, seems Manafort and Jared dear boy will be going to jail. Oh yea, how many Obama Administration officials did time? Hmmmmm, 3D want to remind me?
44% of total ad impressions (number of times ads were displayed) were before the US election on November 8, 2016; 56% were after the election.
Roughly 25% of the ads were never shown to anyone. That’s because advertising auctions are designed so that ads reach people based on relevance, and certain ads may not reach anyone as a result.
Exclusive: Russian-linked Facebook ads targeted Michigan and Wisconsin
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
44% of total ad impressions (number of times ads were displayed) were before the US election on November 8, 2016; 56% were after the election.
Roughly 25% of the ads were never shown to anyone. That’s because advertising auctions are designed so that ads reach people based on relevance, and certain ads may not reach anyone as a result.
Exclusive: Russian-linked Facebook ads targeted Michigan and Wisconsin
44% of total ad impressions (number of times ads were displayed) were before the US election on November 8, 2016; 56% were after the election.
Roughly 25% of the ads were never shown to anyone. That’s because advertising auctions are designed so that ads reach people based on relevance, and certain ads may not reach anyone as a result.
Exclusive: Russian-linked Facebook ads targeted Michigan and Wisconsin
Steele is like WTF people, at this point you dont realize I had no sources? that most of the "dossier" was made up? jeeez, I was trying to sell the damn thing, not prove its authenticity! now you want me to answer for it?
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
Speaking of being informed, Em for full disclosure, I want to see the Facebook and twitter ads, what the NSA has on the DNC hack/leak and the Senate Intel report the Dems don't want released in full. Lets see it all.
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so? Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
^ At this point, if you have to ask those questions in bold above, you're either not paying attention or choosing to be ignorant on this subject.
Country over party. Be better than this. Please.
I'll ask you, what is so easy to see that Russia preferred Trump over Hillary? What have they gained or what did they expect to gain with Trump in office, not including war with US over Syrian airspace? Hillary would have been "tougher" (no more knock it offs!) on Putin? I admit I prefer Gilbert Godfrey as pres then anyone else who threatens war with a nuclear power over Syrian airspace. If I had to go to war with a nation, I would choose NK before I would think about choosing Russia Russia Russia.
Where was the Trump suggestion? To FIND the 33,000 emails Hillary deleted as part of the coverup? I actually thought that was pretty brilliant on Trumps part, every Brock bot and Hill bot claimed that Trump told Putin/Russia to hack (hack = find) Hillarys emails. Nothing like you're own CREW pointing out that you purposefully and willfully deleted emails after records retention requesta and a subpoena (no intent!).
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so? Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so? Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so? Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so? Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so? Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
I'm not saying they are. I am saying that the nothingburger Russia stuff always exists and is becoming more prevalent due to recent events.
You know the expression “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”? I know you take the stance of “where there’s smoke, there’s smoke”, but please call the fire department if you see smoke in a building on behalf of the logical ones.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
I'm not saying they are. I am saying that the nothingburger Russia stuff always exists and is becoming more prevalent due to recent events.
You know the expression “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”? I know you take the stance of “where there’s smoke, there’s smoke”, but please call the fire department if you see smoke in a building on behalf of the logical ones.
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so? Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
Apparently Putin shared many of the same feelings about Hilliary as the more than 4 million voters that make a conscience decision not to vote for such a terrible corrupt weeble wobble of a candidate. I was under the impression that Putin was hacking our democracy over something more than a personal vendetta against Hill. I thought there was something more for Putin/Russia to gain. Maybe the gains at this point are unrealized, we'll see.
25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
Who said you're supposed to believe that? The statement is crystal clear: "To protect the public, American people deserve to see @facebook ads, and how Russian intel services used social media to divide our country." Where do you see Trump's name, or even an insinuation (veiled or not) that Trump was responsible?
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President...how so? Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
Trump's suggestion was actually publicly stated: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing". It is also somewhere between highly likely and certain based on the throngs of undisclosed connections to Russian-connected personnel which keep surfacing - but I know you only participate in the game of connect-the-dots when it's to do with the DNC (a party you say you don't even belong to but exclusively criticize).
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
Apparently Putin shared many of the same feelings about Hilliary as the more than 4 million voters that make a conscience decision not to vote for such a terrible corrupt weeble wobble of a candidate. I was under the impression that Putin was hacking our democracy over something more than a personal vendetta against Hill. I thought there was something more for Putin/Russia to gain. Maybe the gains at this point are unrealized, we'll see.
Wait so all the investigations are done can you please post the results from all of them , thanks in advance since you are in the know how please enlighten us with the findings ...
Comments
Did Manafort Use Trump to Curry Favor With a Putin Ally?
drip drip drip
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
New Manafort emails offer stronger evidence of a quid pro quo with a Russian oligarch
http://www.businessinsider.com/manafort-emails-during-trump-campaign-about-russian-oleg-deripaska-2017-10
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/10/hard-questions-russian-ads-delivered-to-congress/
Exclusive: Russian-linked Facebook ads targeted Michigan and Wisconsin
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/03/politics/russian-facebook-ads-michigan-wisconsin/index.html25% of of the 3000 ads were not geo-targeted
large number of ads were run in areas of the country that were not heavily contested
Im supposed to believe that Trump was behind the Russia linked operatives that ran approximately 750 facebook ads in Michigan and Wisconsin and those ads swung those states to Trump?
https://www.facebook.com/BarrierBreakers2016/
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
It's very easy to see that the optimal election outcome for Russia was with Trump as President. Whether Russia decided to intervene on their own or on Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was), doesn't make an ounce of a difference. As I've said here before, Russia played smart by virtually interfering with this election (just as America does in typically more abrasive ways). It's not their fault that so many American people choose being proven right over being informed.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
That last line is well said.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/27/mystery-death-ex-kgb-chief-linked-mi6-spys-dossier-donald-trump/
Steele is like WTF people, at this point you dont realize I had no sources? that most of the "dossier" was made up? jeeez, I was trying to sell the damn thing, not prove its authenticity! now you want me to answer for it?
Trump's instruction (or suggestion, as it likely was)... how so?
At this point, if you have to ask those questions in bold above, you're either not paying attention or choosing to be ignorant on this subject.
Country over party. Be better than this. Please.
I admit I prefer Gilbert Godfrey as pres then anyone else who threatens war with a nuclear power over Syrian airspace. If I had to go to war with a nation, I would choose NK before I would think about choosing Russia Russia Russia.
Where was the Trump suggestion? To FIND the 33,000 emails Hillary deleted as part of the coverup? I actually thought that was pretty brilliant on Trumps part, every Brock bot and Hill bot claimed that Trump told Putin/Russia to hack (hack = find) Hillarys emails.
Nothing like you're own CREW pointing out that you purposefully and willfully deleted emails after records retention requesta and a subpoena (no intent!).
In terms of the talking points, Trump was overwhelmingly pro-Russian in his campaign. There are also documented financial dealings between Russia and Trump, his subsidiary organization, members of his administration his subsidiary organizations. Clinton has also been visibly at odds with Russian policy, and at personal odds with Putin.
You have a bewildering way of ignoring inconvenient information.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8qbbdx/why-putin-hates-clinton-and-helped-trump-win
http://time.com/4949414/hillary-clinton-vladimir-putin-manspreading/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/from-reset-to-pause-the-real-story-behind-hillary-clintons-feud-with-vladimir-putin/2016/11/03/f575f9fa-a116-11e6-8832-23a007c77bb4_story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/sep/19/hillary-clinton-on-trump-putin-i-ran-against-both-of-them-video
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hillary-clinton-and-vladimir-putin-the-mistrust-is-mutual-1475055001
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/world/europe/putin-accuses-clinton-of-instigating-russian-protests.html
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Deflect, deflect, deflect and ignore questions that have been answered countless times over the past 12 months.
But.....COMET PIZZA!
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
I'm not saying they are. I am saying that the nothingburger Russia stuff always exists and is becoming more prevalent due to recent events.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
www.headstonesband.com
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I was under the impression that Putin was hacking our democracy over something more than a personal vendetta against Hill. I thought there was something more for Putin/Russia to gain. Maybe the gains at this point are unrealized, we'll see.