a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.
an·swer
ˈansər/
noun
a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.
I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to.
Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when 1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)
"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by
the prior administration, I have no information that supports those
tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"
"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretappingby the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"
I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower
just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.
Not to mention:
Obama did it - no, the President can not order wiretaps
Nothing found - then why is Mueller allegedly threatening Manafort with indictments?
McCarthyigm - add this to the list of complicated things that tRump doesn't understand
All this man-splaining has made me hungry, Im thinking about indicting a "ham sandwich" I'm full up on alt-stupid, if only we could figure out how to power our automobiles on it, anyway "let me sleep" on my assertions and we'll catch up tomrw.
Yes, everyone is stupid but you. Keep thinking that. See if you can find some Jay Carney "truths" to validate your point.
a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.
an·swer
ˈansər/
noun
a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.
I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to.
Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when 1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)
"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by
the prior administration, I have no information that supports those
tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"
"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretappingby the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"
I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower
just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.
Obvious to anyone except those with an agenda to, predictably, muddy up the waters.
a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.
an·swer
ˈansər/
noun
a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.
I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to.
Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when 1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)
"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by
the prior administration, I have no information that supports those
tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"
"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretappingby the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"
I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower
just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.
Not to mention:
Obama did it - no, the President can not order wiretaps
Nothing found - then why is Mueller allegedly threatening Manafort with indictments?
McCarthyigm - add this to the list of complicated things that tRump doesn't understand
All this man-splaining has made me hungry, Im thinking about indicting a "ham sandwich" I'm full up on alt-stupid, if only we could figure out how to power our automobiles on it, anyway "let me sleep" on my assertions and we'll catch up tomrw.
not often I get to reference an article from Cracked.com, much less 2 days in a row - yet here we are
"There's this tone that implies they're smarter than everyone else, that they're dropping profound truth bombs that we're all too dumb or irrational to see. They talk about humanity like they're not part of it, like by saying "The fact that more people use Instagram than Wolfram is proof that #humanityisdoomed #notgettinglaid." They talk like they've evolved beyond us mere mortals and our petty problems, and they only grace us with their presence because they're stuck with us. They should be discussing impenetrably deep concepts with beings of pure light and Mark Twain's disembodied brain. Instead, fate has trapped them in Virginia.
Remember that kid at school who always bragged about how smart he was, but never did any work? They're that kid. They want to acknowledge the problem without doing anything about it, to appear intelligent without being intelligent, because they equate dispassionate cynicism with genius. But what they truly are, almost invariably, are people who are unaffected by whatever news story they're declaring to be proof that Rome has fallen. They are above everyone else, but only in the sense that after pronouncing our species doomed, they can head to Starbucks instead of having to deal with the floodwaters rising around them..."
a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.
an·swer
ˈansər/
noun
a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.
I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to.
Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when 1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)
"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by
the prior administration, I have no information that supports those
tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"
"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretappingby the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"
I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower
just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.
Not to mention:
Obama did it - no, the President can not order wiretaps
Nothing found - then why is Mueller allegedly threatening Manafort with indictments?
McCarthyigm - add this to the list of complicated things that tRump doesn't understand
All this man-splaining has made me hungry, Im thinking about indicting a "ham sandwich" I'm full up on alt-stupid, if only we could figure out how to power our automobiles on it, anyway "let me sleep" on my assertions and we'll catch up tomrw.
Some 3D weak sauce to go with that nothing burger. 3D is exhausted from D'ing. Needs sleep. The sun will rise and shine on the indictments tomorrow. 7Xs.
Rob Reiner The committee's advisory board, which will oversee the progress of the nonprofit organization, includes top influencers from both sides of the aisle including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Max Boot, American Enterprise Institute resident scholar Norman Ornstein and others.
CLAPPER:But I will say that, for the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against– the president elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. I can’t speak for other Title Three authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity.
TODD: Yeah, I was just going to say, if the F.B.I., for instance, had a FISA court order of some sort for a surveillance, would that be information you would know or not know? CLAPPER: Yes. TODD: You would be told this? CLAPPER: I would know that. TODD: If there was a FISA court order– CLAPPER: Yes. TODD: –on something like this. CLAPPER: Something like this, absolutely. TODD: And at this point, you can’t confirm or deny whether that exists? CLAPPER: I can deny it.
Rob Reiner The committee's advisory board, which will oversee the progress of the nonprofit organization, includes top influencers from both sides of the aisle including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Max Boot, American Enterprise Institute resident scholar Norman Ornstein and others.
CLAPPER:But I will say that, for the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against– the president elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. I can’t speak for other Title Three authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity.
TODD: Yeah, I was just going to say, if the F.B.I., for instance, had a FISA court order of some sort for a surveillance, would that be information you would know or not know? CLAPPER: Yes. TODD: You would be told this? CLAPPER: I would know that. TODD: If there was a FISA court order– CLAPPER: Yes. TODD: –on something like this. CLAPPER: Something like this, absolutely. TODD: And at this point, you can’t confirm or deny whether that exists? CLAPPER: I can deny it.
CLAPPER:But I will say that, for the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against– the president elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. I can’t speak for other Title Three authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity.
TODD: Yeah, I was just going to say, if the F.B.I., for instance, had a FISA court order of some sort for a surveillance, would that be information you would know or not know? CLAPPER: Yes. TODD: You would be told this? CLAPPER: I would know that. TODD: If there was a FISA court order– CLAPPER: Yes. TODD: –on something like this. CLAPPER: Something like this, absolutely. TODD: And at this point, you can’t confirm or deny whether that exists? CLAPPER: I can deny it.
CLAPPER:But I will say that, for the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against– the president elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. I can’t speak for other Title Three authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity.
TODD: Yeah, I was just going to say, if the F.B.I., for instance, had a FISA court order of some sort for a surveillance, would that be information you would know or not know? CLAPPER: Yes. TODD: You would be told this? CLAPPER: I would know that. TODD: If there was a FISA court order– CLAPPER: Yes. TODD: –on something like this. CLAPPER: Something like this, absolutely. TODD: And at this point, you can’t confirm or deny whether that exists? CLAPPER: I can deny it.
Nope, none, zero, nada, nyet, zilch evidence of collusion here. Good thing those brilliant headlines are brilliantly disappearing into the brilliant abyss of brilliance.
Nope, none, zero, nada, nyet, zilch evidence of collusion here. Good thing those brilliant headlines are brilliantly disappearing into the brilliant abyss of brilliance.
"Investigators believe that key passages refer to Deripaska. The billionaire is referenced in some places by his initials, “OVD,” and one email invokes an expensive Russian delicacy in what investigators believe is a veiled reference to Manafort’s past work with Deripaska."
Using food...as a code? Where have I heard that before?
Nope, none, zero, nada, nyet, zilch evidence of collusion here. Good thing those brilliant headlines are brilliantly disappearing into the brilliant abyss of brilliance.
"Investigators believe that key passages refer to Deripaska. The billionaire is referenced in some places by his initials, “OVD,” and one email invokes an expensive Russian delicacy in what investigators believe is a veiled reference to Manafort’s past work with Deripaska."
Using food...as a code? Where have I heard that before?
Manafort and Trump members of Comet Pizza frequent buyers club? Oh my!
Nope, none, zero, nada, nyet, zilch evidence of collusion here. Good thing those brilliant headlines are brilliantly disappearing into the brilliant abyss of brilliance.
"Investigators believe that key passages refer to Deripaska. The billionaire is referenced in some places by his initials, “OVD,” and one email invokes an expensive Russian delicacy in what investigators believe is a veiled reference to Manafort’s past work with Deripaska."
Using food...as a code? Where have I heard that before?
Facebook to give Congress copies of 3,000 political ads bought through Russian accounts, reversing previous decision
By Washington Post Staff September 21 at 3:26 PM
The
company had previously shown some of the ads to Capitol Hill
investigators but took back copies before they could be studied
carefully, citing concerns over user privacy at the time. Facebook has
reversed that position amid rising complaints from Capitol Hill that the
company was not cooperating fully with its investigation.
Chief
Executive Mark Zuckerberg was to announce the decision on Facebook Live
at 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time, citing “an extensive legal and policy review”
that concluded that it was “vitally important” to cooperate fully with
Congress and that the company could do so in a way that didn’t endanger
user privacy, according to a blog post by Facebook General Counsel Colin
Stretch.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/19/politics/jon-huntsman-russia-election-interference/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
committee to investigate Russia
Rob Reiner
The committee's advisory board, which will oversee the progress of the nonprofit organization, includes top influencers from both sides of the aisle including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Max Boot, American Enterprise Institute resident scholar Norman Ornstein and others.
CLAPPER:But I will say that, for the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against– the president elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. I can’t speak for other Title Three authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity.
TODD: Yeah, I was just going to say, if the F.B.I., for instance, had a FISA court order of some sort for a surveillance, would that be information you would know or not know?
CLAPPER: Yes.
TODD: You would be told this?
CLAPPER: I would know that.
TODD: If there was a FISA court order–
CLAPPER: Yes.
TODD: –on something like this.
CLAPPER: Something like this, absolutely.
TODD: And at this point, you can’t confirm or deny whether that exists?
CLAPPER: I can deny it.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://investigaterussia.org
Russias mass spying apparatus
He can deny it
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mueller-seeks-white-house-documents-related-to-trump’s-actions-as-president/ar-AAsgYAA
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/manafort-offered-to-give-russian-billionaire-private-briefings-on-2016-campaign/2017/09/20/399bba1a-9d48-11e7-8ea1-ed975285475e_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_manafort-520pm:homepage/story
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"Investigators believe that key passages refer to Deripaska. The billionaire is referenced in some places by his initials, “OVD,” and one email invokes an expensive Russian delicacy in what investigators believe is a veiled reference to Manafort’s past work with Deripaska."
Using food...as a code? Where have I heard that before?
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
BOSCO!!
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
zing
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/09/21/facebook-to-give-congress-copies-of-3000-political-ads-bought-through-russian-accounts-reversing-previous-decision/?utm_term=.e7c3a73dc932
Facebook to give Congress copies of 3,000 political ads bought through Russian accounts, reversing previous decision
The company had previously shown some of the ads to Capitol Hill investigators but took back copies before they could be studied carefully, citing concerns over user privacy at the time. Facebook has reversed that position amid rising complaints from Capitol Hill that the company was not cooperating fully with its investigation.
Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg was to announce the decision on Facebook Live at 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time, citing “an extensive legal and policy review” that concluded that it was “vitally important” to cooperate fully with Congress and that the company could do so in a way that didn’t endanger user privacy, according to a blog post by Facebook General Counsel Colin Stretch.