Russia's Influence On The American Election
Comments
-
.
idk...just doesn't have the same ring to itPJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I learned libtroll today.CM189191 said:
I learned a new word today: conservatrollPJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
The last minute was like listening to AMT radlibs against the straight talkers.
hadn't heard that one before
Conservatroll
A internet troll who tries to popularize conservative beliefs. Along with his counterpart and nemesis, the libtroll, he is the most poisonous of trolls
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Conservatroll
conservatroll seems to just roll off the tongue
connnnnserrrrrvatroooolllllll
see what I mean? Post edited by CM189191 on0 -
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".0 -
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/19/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-blames-russia-putin-wikileaks-rele/JC29856 said:
Nothing to do with me. I posted government officials agencies that don't agree with it or will not confirm it. You have anyone or agency that does agree with it?dignin said:
When you don't agree with them.PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
JC and others will believe a random meme on the internet before they will believe an article from The Washington Post, NBC or The New York Times. It doesn't fit their viewpoint.
That's how Trumps are elected.
Post it.........
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community0 -
Shits gigs & trigsJC29856 said:
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".
Wow0 -
Okay... so you admit you're just trolling. That is a relief!JC29856 said:
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".
Yes, please stop posting stupid memes. They degrade the conversation. Thanks!
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
How can 17 agencies agree with a WaPo article that sites anonymous sources weeks before the article was published?dignin said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/19/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-blames-russia-putin-wikileaks-rele/JC29856 said:
Nothing to do with me. I posted government officials agencies that don't agree with it or will not confirm it. You have anyone or agency that does agree with it?dignin said:
When you don't agree with them.PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
JC and others will believe a random meme on the internet before they will believe an article from The Washington Post, NBC or The New York Times. It doesn't fit their viewpoint.
That's how Trumps are elected.
Post it.........
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community0 -
JC once added value to the AMT, but here you have it, nothing more than a Troll now.Merkin Baller said:
Shits gigs & trigsJC29856 said:
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".
Wow0 -
I'd say this is a pretty accurate assessment of the fake news spectrum:
...thoughts?0 -
or maybe:
0 -
Is repeatedly posting polling graphics considered trolling and degrading conversation?PJ_Soul said:
Okay... so you admit you're just trolling. That is a relief!JC29856 said:
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".
Yes, please stop posting stupid memes. They degrade the conversation. Thanks!0 -
I like it. I think it is a good representation. I'm sure we could all make little tweaks, but in general this looks good to me.CM189191 said:I'd say this is a pretty accurate assessment of the fake news spectrum:
...thoughts?"I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
No. Showing poll results with a graphic isn't trolling. Just because something is a graphic it doesn't mean it's trolling. It's the content and the frequency of that content and the context that it's posted in that makes it trolling or not trolling. Anyway, you said you'd stop if I asked you to, so I did. Thank you! Much appreciated!JC29856 said:
Is repeatedly posting polling graphics considered trolling and degrading conversation?PJ_Soul said:
Okay... so you admit you're just trolling. That is a relief!JC29856 said:
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".
Yes, please stop posting stupid memes. They degrade the conversation. Thanks! With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I hate when I start reading an article in the Atlantic, and I realize 20 minutes later the article is a small novel and I'm 1/10th of the way through it. Maybe I'm a slow reader, but I don't have time for some of those tomes.jeffbr said:
I like it. I think it is a good representation. I'm sure we could all make little tweaks, but in general this looks good to me.CM189191 said:I'd say this is a pretty accurate assessment of the fake news spectrum:
...thoughts?0 -
Agree, although I think Fox News should be a bit farther over to the right.jeffbr said:
I like it. I think it is a good representation. I'm sure we could all make little tweaks, but in general this looks good to me.CM189191 said:I'd say this is a pretty accurate assessment of the fake news spectrum:
...thoughts?With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I like the Atlantic, it's interesting they have it slightly to the left considering David Frum is a senior editor there. All in all that graphic is fairly accurate. Like jeff said, I would move some stuff around a little.0
-
I try to engage in conversation but then this happens:PJ_Soul said:
No. Showing poll results with a graphic isn't trolling. Just because something is a graphic it doesn't mean it's trolling. It's the content and the frequency of that content and the context that it's posted in that makes it trolling or not trolling. Anyway, you said you'd stop if I asked you to, so I did. Thank you! Much appreciated!JC29856 said:
Is repeatedly posting polling graphics considered trolling and degrading conversation?PJ_Soul said:
Okay... so you admit you're just trolling. That is a relief!JC29856 said:
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".
Yes, please stop posting stupid memes. They degrade the conversation. Thanks!
dignin said:
» show previous quotes
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/19/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-blames-russia-putin-wikileaks-rele/
jc said:
How can 17 agencies agree with a WaPo article that sites anonymous sources weeks before the article was published on Nov 9th, 2016?
Then I feel the need for the triggerous comic relief memes provide... understand?0 -
Would this be classified as conversation degradation?PJ_Soul said:
Okay... so you admit you're just trolling. That is a relief!JC29856 said:
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".
Yes, please stop posting stupid memes. They degrade the conversation. Thanks!
here I thought we were talking about a WaPo article that was talking about Russia Russia Russia undermining democracy by having a hand in the elections, and I get a politifact reference to wikileaks. ignoring that wikileaks has 100% track record and has stated that the leak wasnt a hack from Russia Russia Russia, how did we go from Russia Russia Russia election outcome to wikileaks?
how about this, "Stood at a podium in full of our press corps and begged the Russians to hack our election" in reality, “I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” One is talking about hacking and the other is talking about finding. One is talking about elections the other is talking about deleted emails, you see the conversation degradation?
0 -
One is talking about a candidate in the election asking a foreign power to hack his opponent in the election. How else do you suppose Russia was going to find anything? If you feel that is degrading our conversation I don't know what to tell you.JC29856 said:
Would this be classified as conversation degradation?PJ_Soul said:
Okay... so you admit you're just trolling. That is a relief!JC29856 said:
No to all the above...PJ_Soul said:
Okay, so you assume the anonymous source was lying because they're anonymous? Or at least think any info coming from an anonymous source shouldn't be seriously considered? I mean, you must have posted that bad meme for a reason. Perhaps you think protecting sources is a bad idea? Just trying to get a grasp of how you think when you post your memes.JC29856 said:
I doubt WaPo made up the story, they probably did get anonymous source information from someone(s).PJ_Soul said:
Not sure what your point is. Are you suggesting that the Washington Post made up the info just because they site anonymous sources? Since when were anonymous sources irrelevant?JC29856 said:WaPo quotes anonymous sources, then NYT quotes WaPo and anonymous sources, then NBC quotes WaPo and the NYT.
Anonymous sources aren't irrelevant.
Clear
Already stated why I post stupid memes, shits, giggs and triggs. If you wish that I not post stupid memes, just ask and I'll stop.
I never posted memes, only started posting them when "fake news and memes elected Trump".
Yes, please stop posting stupid memes. They degrade the conversation. Thanks!
here I thought we were talking about a WaPo article that was talking about Russia Russia Russia undermining democracy by having a hand in the elections, and I get a politifact reference to wikileaks. ignoring that wikileaks has 100% track record and has stated that the leak wasnt a hack from Russia Russia Russia, how did we go from Russia Russia Russia election outcome to wikileaks?
how about this, "Stood at a podium in full of our press corps and begged the Russians to hack our election" in reality, “I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” One is talking about hacking and the other is talking about finding. One is talking about elections the other is talking about deleted emails, you see the conversation degradation?___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
oopsWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help