Dem Party

1444547495068

Comments

  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478

    I Don't Think the Moral High Ground Exists Anymore

    Some thoughts on Al Franken's departure.


    http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a14381583/al-franken-resign-moral-high-ground/?src=nl&mag=esq&list=nl_enl_news&date=120817
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    JC29856 said:
    CM189191 said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.theroot.com/a-racist-flyer-might-cost-doug-jones-the-election-becau-1821065764

    The democrats and their incompetence somehow fucked up this 2 car funeral of an election! Next week they and their schills will blame Alabama voters instead of themselves.


    what a stupid thing to say

    Elections are not sports contests.  They are not determined by the players on the pitch, but rather the audience in the stands.
    any update from Beverly Nelson? 

     she had added "notes" to an inscription the disgraced judge wrote in her yearbook

    so she wrote in her own yearbook?  devastating bombshell.

    we get it, you support a pedophile for Congress.  congratulations
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Now the question is: was this Beverly Nelsons "landing under and running for cover from sniper fire" moment? Do Alabamaniacs not believe her at all or believe her just a little bit? 
    In the end I do believe more votes will be cast FOR Moore than AGAINST him.
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    JC29856 said:
    Now the question is: was this Beverly Nelsons "landing under and running for cover from sniper fire" moment? Do Alabamaniacs not believe her at all or believe her just a little bit? 
    In the end I do believe more votes will be cast FOR Moore than AGAINST him.
    Never forget, don't underestimate the stupidity of the average person.   And you continue to remind us each day.  

    we get it, you support a pedophile for Congress.  congratulations
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    CM189191 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Now the question is: was this Beverly Nelsons "landing under and running for cover from sniper fire" moment? Do Alabamaniacs not believe her at all or believe her just a little bit? 
    In the end I do believe more votes will be cast FOR Moore than AGAINST him.
    Never forget, don't underestimate the stupidity of the average person.   And you continue to remind us each day.  

    we get it, you support a pedophile for Congress.  congratulations
    He supports whomever his hero Bannon supports.  It's not like those people are actually capable of formulating an independent opinion.  
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    mrussel1 said:
    JC29856 said:
    truly progressive..."unity events" and corporate candidates!

    https://tytnetwork.com/2017/12/05/leaked-memo-democratic-campaign-committee-demands-unity-of-2018-candidates/

    advertising!

    ...by Democratic leadership to insulate themselves from political and legal liability, more than a serious effort to curtail sexual misconduct. “The policy is a way for [the] DCCC to advertise that they don’t tolerate sexual abuse without holding any candidates to account,” the strategist said, noting that the policy provides for “no actual recourse from a higher authority.”
    This is quite damaging, I have to admit.  The DCCC wants to codify that they won't tolerate sexual abuse, yet there is no high authority (like God for example) to hold them accountable.  Never mind that Conyers and Franken are gone, empirical evidence of what happens in this situation.  
    I guess I'll have to vote Republican, considering the RNC just reinstated funding for the Roy Moore campaign.  They have shown the type of moral compass and leadership that Dems can only dream about.  

    Great post, chock full of intellectual integrity, as usual.  


    Pills!


  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Yes..so secretive that C-span was there.  
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    mrussel1 said:
    Yes..so secretive that C-span was there.  
    secrets and lies.
    Tom Perez head of the DNC. 

    I'm proud of the work of the Unity Reform Commission. Their recommendations would reduce superdelegates by nearly 60%, make primaries & caucuses more accessible, and bring transparency to our party. We haven't seen these types of sweeping reforms in over 30 years.
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,597
    JC29856 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Yes..so secretive that C-span was there.  
    secrets and lies.
    Tom Perez head of the DNC. 

    I'm proud of the work of the Unity Reform Commission. Their recommendations would reduce superdelegates by nearly 60%, make primaries & caucuses more accessible, and bring transparency to our party. We haven't seen these types of sweeping reforms in over 30 years.
    Don’t worry your boy and latest caddy for orange bafoon the one & only senator Graham is coming to your emotional rescue I’d say HRC indictments by Valentine’s Day no what says you ? It sures pays off to golf with POTUS on a weekly basis ..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    fresh ideas from progressives are not allowed only corporate centrist incumbents

    https://www.wired.com/story/justice-democrats-denied-access-party-voter-data/amp


    The rules and bylaws dictating access are hardly new, and several state Democratic parties allow full access to VoteBuilder for all candidates. But the 2016 election created a groundswell of energy among first-time progressive candidates, looking to challenge sitting members of Congress not only in red districts, but in blue ones they believe need shaking up. For many Democrats mounting a primary challenge, the process of merely gaining access to the party's voter data is emblematic of the entrenched system they’re running against.

    “The machine protects incumbents,” says Clark, who is running against representative Danny Davis, who has held his seat for 20 years. “What’s one more way you can stack the deck against me? Deny me access to valuable information and data.”


  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    The DNC pays consultants? I'm shocked. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    The DNC pays consultants? I'm shocked. 
    I get a sense of dejavu when reading your reply, for some strange reason, I feel like I've read that somewhere else before.

    you're shocked and I'm aroused!

    any opinions on the local races having a $3,000 budget?
    what about the loss of 1200 seats comment?
    how about the part where she says the budget committee is "fu(king corrupt"?
    how about who she blames for women seeking abortions in Arizona?

    Like it or not this is a glimpse into the future of the Democratic party!
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    JC29856 said:
    The DNC pays consultants? I'm shocked. 
    I get a sense of dejavu when reading your reply, for some strange reason, I feel like I've read that somewhere else before.

    you're shocked and I'm aroused!

    any opinions on the local races having a $3,000 budget?
    what about the loss of 1200 seats comment?
    how about the part where she says the budget committee is "fu(king corrupt"?
    how about who she blames for women seeking abortions in Arizona?

    Like it or not this is a glimpse into the future of the Democratic party!
    I didn't watch it. Some links I don't click on. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    The DNC pays consultants? I'm shocked. 
    I get a sense of dejavu when reading your reply, for some strange reason, I feel like I've read that somewhere else before.

    you're shocked and I'm aroused!

    any opinions on the local races having a $3,000 budget?
    what about the loss of 1200 seats comment?
    how about the part where she says the budget committee is "fu(king corrupt"?
    how about who she blames for women seeking abortions in Arizona?

    Like it or not this is a glimpse into the future of the Democratic party!
    I didn't watch it. Some links I don't click on. 
    lol...Twitter!
    dejavu all over again 
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    It's not Twitter I have an issue with. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Here is what democrats are actually doing to fight racism against non-whites.

    https://www.yahoo.com/gma/sen-cory-booker-introduce-bill-remove-confederate-statues-052404285--abc-news-topstories.html

    Sen. Cory Booker says he plans to introduce bill to remove Confederate statues from Capitol

    Because there just might be enough votes to pass it and dare Trump to veto it.
    CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING 101
    https://www.njtvonline.org/news/video/sen-booker-co-sponsoring-bernie-sanders-medicare-bill/

    hmmm?...deja vu California dreaming


    Booker is not the only high-profile Democratic senator to announce his support for the plan. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and California Sen. Kamala Harris have already announced they are co-sponsoring Sanders’ bill. Warren, Harris and Booker are widely considered to be top contenders for the 2020 democratic presidential nomination.
    Advertising 101
     
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/12/kirsten-gillibrand-backs-bernie-sanders-bill-single-payer-health-care/657285001/
    Free presidential campaign advertising!
    look it up Google "Gillibrand"


  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    please read this...
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/08/the-year-of-the-headless-liberal-chicken/

    if your scared to click Google "the year of the headless liberal chicken" search result #1