Kaepernick

Hi!

mrussel1

You're goddam right... Go Brownies!!  

Hi!

Hi!

unsung

my2hands said:

Oh shit, he went there

too soon?

brianlux

tempo_n_groove said:

brianlux said:

Come on man, you could at least consider deleting the post, unsung.  

Making too much of it.

I've moved on.  Steal softly through sunshine, steal softly through snow.

Bentleyspop

unsung said:

To prevent deleting I'm going to quote it and be brief that I worked close enough  to the Pentagon  to feel for and hear the explosion as the plane crashed  into the building and a few minutes later as I evacuated my building to drive by and see the smoke, the flames, the first responders. 
This is not a day for those who live a sad life of fear, hate, and ignorance to put out their unfounded conspiracy  theories. 

F Me In The Brain

Bentleyspop said:

unsung said:

To prevent deleting I'm going to quote it and be brief that I worked close enough  to the Pentagon  to feel for and hear the explosion as the plane crashed  into the building and a few minutes later as I evacuated my building to drive by and see the smoke, the flames, the first responders. 
This is not a day for those who live a sad life of fear, hate, and ignorance to put out their unfounded conspiracy  theories. 

I imagine it to be a very sad life, indeed.

unsung

I wasn't going to delete it.  It's been 17 years, waiting 17 years and a day should not make a difference.  Sure, let's discuss why the official report is BS...tomorrow.  

Meanwhile for everyone else...

brianlux

unsung said:

I wasn't going to delete it.  It's been 17 years, waiting 17 years and a day should not make a difference.  Sure, let's discuss why the official report is BS...tomorrow.  

Meanwhile for everyone else...

I'm sure we must have a mile-long 9/11 conspiracy theory thread somewhere.  In any case, my take is- bad timing (unless you just like pissing people off) and wrong thread.  HTF did we go from taking a knee to... never mind- pointless question. 

AMT business as usual.   I should laugh.

OK, I'll laugh.

unsung

On that note isn't bending the knee considered more subservient than standing?

oftenreading

unsung said:

On that note isn't bending the knee considered more subservient than standing?

Or more respectful, which is why he chose kneeling rather than sitting, to demonstrate he wasn’t  being disrespectful to the flag, the anthem, or the military, but was still protesting police brutality. 

Bentleyspop

oftenreading said:

unsung said:

On that note isn't bending the knee considered more subservient than standing?

Or more respectful, which is why he chose kneeling rather than sitting, to demonstrate he wasn’t  being disrespectful to the flag, the anthem, or the military, but was still protesting police brutality. 

Don't  forget that it was a military veteran who suggested he take a knee.

HughFreakingDillon

Bentleyspop said:

oftenreading said:

unsung said:

On that note isn't bending the knee considered more subservient than standing?

Or more respectful, which is why he chose kneeling rather than sitting, to demonstrate he wasn’t  being disrespectful to the flag, the anthem, or the military, but was still protesting police brutality. 

Don't  forget that it was a military veteran who suggested he take a knee.

you'll never hear a MAGAT admit to this. 

unsung

HughFreakingDillon said:

Bentleyspop said:

oftenreading said:

unsung said:

On that note isn't bending the knee considered more subservient than standing?

Or more respectful, which is why he chose kneeling rather than sitting, to demonstrate he wasn’t  being disrespectful to the flag, the anthem, or the military, but was still protesting police brutality. 

Don't  forget that it was a military veteran who suggested he take a knee.

you'll never hear a MAGAT admit to this. 

Quite an unusual insult.

KC138045

my2hands said:

I actually dont have a problem with it... challenging the status quo causes a conversation, which is a healthy thing in my opinion 

Serious question: nobody has questions about the Pentagon and 9/11? No curiosity? No intrigue? No need to challenge the official narrative? No video? The damage site and lack of debris? 19 assholes with boxcutters supposedly turn the world upside down and nobody is supposed to question it?

No tin foil hat here, just wondering? 

There is a video from a surveillance camera outside the Pentagon.  I saw it on one the 9-11 documentaries I watched last night.

my2hands

KC138045 said:

my2hands said:

I actually dont have a problem with it... challenging the status quo causes a conversation, which is a healthy thing in my opinion 

Serious question: nobody has questions about the Pentagon and 9/11? No curiosity? No intrigue? No need to challenge the official narrative? No video? The damage site and lack of debris? 19 assholes with boxcutters supposedly turn the world upside down and nobody is supposed to question it?

No tin foil hat here, just wondering? 

There is a video from a surveillance camera outside the Pentagon.  I saw it on one the 9-11 documentaries I watched last night.

I've seen it, you could see a plane on that? I couldnt make anything out. That video is actually part of my problem, that's the best they've got? Washington DC, one of the more important and secure buildings in the world, and we dont have any video of this better than that?

mrussel1

my2hands said:

KC138045 said:

my2hands said:

I actually dont have a problem with it... challenging the status quo causes a conversation, which is a healthy thing in my opinion 

Serious question: nobody has questions about the Pentagon and 9/11? No curiosity? No intrigue? No need to challenge the official narrative? No video? The damage site and lack of debris? 19 assholes with boxcutters supposedly turn the world upside down and nobody is supposed to question it?

No tin foil hat here, just wondering? 

There is a video from a surveillance camera outside the Pentagon.  I saw it on one the 9-11 documentaries I watched last night.

I've seen it, you could see a plane on that? I couldnt make anything out. That video is actually part of my problem, that's the best they've got? Washington DC, one of the more important and secure buildings in the world, and we dont have any video of this better than that?

What do you think happened?  Someone mistakenly dropped a grenade in their foot locker on 9/11 and the Pentagon found terrorism as a useful excuse?

my2hands

mrussel1 said:

my2hands said:

KC138045 said:

my2hands said:

I actually dont have a problem with it... challenging the status quo causes a conversation, which is a healthy thing in my opinion 

Serious question: nobody has questions about the Pentagon and 9/11? No curiosity? No intrigue? No need to challenge the official narrative? No video? The damage site and lack of debris? 19 assholes with boxcutters supposedly turn the world upside down and nobody is supposed to question it?

No tin foil hat here, just wondering? 

There is a video from a surveillance camera outside the Pentagon.  I saw it on one the 9-11 documentaries I watched last night.

I've seen it, you could see a plane on that? I couldnt make anything out. That video is actually part of my problem, that's the best they've got? Washington DC, one of the more important and secure buildings in the world, and we dont have any video of this better than that?

What do you think happened?  Someone mistakenly dropped a grenade in their foot locker on 9/11 and the Pentagon found terrorism as a useful excuse?

No, I dont think that happened lol. 

The Pentagon and Shanksville just never looked like the result of a plane crash to me,  you?. That doesnt mean i'm saying it was an inside job, I'm just saying I think there are some head scratchers still

Pentagon crash site, Shanksville, and WTC7 still have some issues that tickle the mind, that's all. Oh, and NORAD running simulated drills that day involving hijacked airliners, interesting coincidence. (Same coincidence happened with the London tube bombings of 2005)

People assume there aren't people evil enough on our side to do something like that, I do not make the same assumption. It is widely assumed in the West, by myself included, that Putin oversaw the apartment bombings in September 1999 as a false flag attack to strengthen his leadership and drum up support for war. Why should we assume there aren't dark forces within the halls of power and influence in the USA willing to do the same? How much dark money is spent by "intelligence" agencies and the military? Seems foolish to dismiss people that may not buy the official narrative as gospel. When has the official narrative ever been the accurate narrative? 

Google Operation Northwoods if you dont think dark forces exist in powerful positions in this country. The Joint Chiefs signed off on a false flag and presented it to Kennedy, who rightfully refused to move forward with it. BUT, it made it to the desk of the POTUS with full approval by the top military leadership of this country. This we know, is a fact. Now what DON'T we know? 

mrussel1

I suppose anything is possible, but I lived near DC at the time and I saw the damage at the Pentagon.  You couldn't really see it from 395, you had to get off at Pentagon City and loop around to get a look.  It was bad. Plus, there were two people that lived on my street, who I knew well, that were in the Pentagon that day.  One was a Lt. Colonel.  Sure he could have been in on the whole thing, if you want to take it that far, but he described it to me in pretty graphic detail.  
No offense, but the false flag here is as likely as Sandy Hook being a false flag as well.