Are social issues nearly as important as issues like biodiversity and climate?

brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,336
Is it possible that If we don't address major ecological/biological and climate related topics like the rapid loss of biodiversity in our world and human induced climate change and continue to see our world filtered through, and skewed by, an Anthropocene viewpoint, will all of the other other things we talk about here will become irrelevant or at least comparatively so in the big picture?

The answer may well be found in Edward O Wilson's 2016 book, Half-Earth. Among the many and varied I've read, it's the best book/summation/proposal I've found regarding our post industrial condition and what we might consider doing to salvage much of what is left that we are quickly losing. I can't recommend it highly enough.

image
image
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

"Try to not spook the horse."
-Neil Young













«134

Comments

  • The social issues are important for different reasons.

    I've begun to think that human life is finite. The earth could never possibly sustain mankind for eternity and even if we did... a massive chunk of rock would eventually slam into is and end things in a more dramatic fashion.

    So... as responsible as I am urge everyone to be... I sometimes feel drastic steps will only have the effect of squeezing out a couple extra generations before the meltdown occurs. If that is the end goal then fair enough, but to compromise way of life to attain that might not be worth it.

    The gift we have been afforded is ultimately a fluke of nature. The next inhabitants of the earth won't think too much about us as they enjoy their ride.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    the planet is important only to people who care about the world as a whole inclusive of all life ... most people do not ... there will be significant suffering as we have already seen but people will continue to ignore the cause ... greed and stupidity ...
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    I believe it's all relative.

    Illegal for a woman to have an abortion may likely be more important in that time vs smog.

    It's just not either / or.

    ...or about greed and stupidity.

    I'm neither greedy nor an idiot for focusing on other issues based on the usual shit that happens in life.

  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,336
    If anyone gets a chance to read Half-Earth, I would love to hear your reaction to it. If I could, I would buy copies for anyone interested and give them away.
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    greed and stupidity is the primary cause of our environmental problems ... it's not people are greedy or stupid because they care about other things ...
  • As time goes by I truly care less and less about that stuff.
    Nothing my small self being at midlife will change or alter the "impact" humans have had.
    So I really don't care.
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,336

    As time goes by I truly care less and less about that stuff.
    Nothing my small self being at midlife will change or alter the "impact" humans have had.
    So I really don't care.

    Not sure if by "that stuff" you mean social issues or ecological/biological and climate related issues but either way, I pretty much agree. I mean, how many of us here have made the kind of impact on the world the way the likes of people like Martin Luther King, Morris Dees, Mother Teresa, or Edward O. Wilson, Edward Abbey or Paul Watson have? None here that I know of. But major movers and shakers need us, the Unknown/Unheralded Many to make changes happen. Nothing wrong with being a small part of a bigger whole. My ego, at least, does not require more than that.
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,993

    As time goes by I truly care less and less about that stuff.
    Nothing my small self being at midlife will change or alter the "impact" humans have had.
    So I really don't care.

    Ugh, that's pathetic.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    edited June 2016
    PJ_Soul said:

    As time goes by I truly care less and less about that stuff.
    Nothing my small self being at midlife will change or alter the "impact" humans have had.
    So I really don't care.

    Ugh, that's pathetic.
    Agreed. But for a resident shit-stirrer? I expect nothing less. Don't you?

    BTW - I have no problems with PJfan. ;)
    Post edited by Free on
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,336
    Free said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    As time goes by I truly care less and less about that stuff.
    Nothing my small self being at midlife will change or alter the "impact" humans have had.
    So I really don't care.

    Ugh, that's pathetic.
    Agreed. But for a resident shit-stirrer? I expect nothing less. Don't you?

    BTW - I have no problems with PJfan. ;)
    Well, someone has to be the "fly in the ointment". :lol:

    Hey, PJF, don't be offended- it's a phrase Edward Abbey used to describe himself. It might be seen as a compliment!
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,336
    But back on topic. Can anyone tell me why they might see social issues as equal or superior in importance to environmental issues? I'd like to understand that kind of thinking because it makes no sense to me. I would equate it to someone worrying about saving their collectibles in a burning house in which the kids are still in a room without windows or doors.
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    I don't consider them as superior, I pretty much view environmental issues a social issue. We do have to live on this planet as one after all.

    But it doesn't matter anyway when you've got establishment politics disregarding all of it anyway. Money and power takes precedence.
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    brianlux said:

    But back on topic. Can anyone tell me why they might see social issues as equal or superior in importance to environmental issues? I'd like to understand that kind of thinking because it makes no sense to me. I would equate it to someone worrying about saving their collectibles in a burning house in which the kids are still in a room without windows or doors.

    I thought what I said up there made sense...to me, anyway. I do get that some put environment above all else and that's great; I simply don't.
  • brianlux said:

    Free said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    As time goes by I truly care less and less about that stuff.
    Nothing my small self being at midlife will change or alter the "impact" humans have had.
    So I really don't care.

    Ugh, that's pathetic.
    Agreed. But for a resident shit-stirrer? I expect nothing less. Don't you?

    BTW - I have no problems with PJfan. ;)
    Well, someone has to be the "fly in the ointment". :lol:

    Hey, PJF, don't be offended- it's a phrase Edward Abbey used to describe himself. It might be seen as a compliment!
    I love this place!
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    The way I see it, you sort of have the analogy backward. Worrying about the environment when you can't afford food or can't marry and direct the medical care of the person you love deeply is like worrying about painting the eaves on a house that is burning down around you.
    Social and socioeconomic issues have direct, tangible effects on a person's well-being and happiness. Environmental issues are a distant concern, even with changing climate and desperately shrinking biodiversity, the time has not yet come when those issues will impact us all in painful, unforgettable ways.

    It sucks, we are a short-sighted race of fools.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • PJfanwillneverleave1PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited June 2016
    rgambs said:

    The way I see it, you sort of have the analogy backward. Worrying about the environment when you can't afford food or can't marry and direct the medical care of the person you love deeply is like worrying about painting the eaves on a house that is burning down around you.
    Social and socioeconomic issues have direct, tangible effects on a person's well-being and happiness. Environmental issues are a distant concern, even with changing climate and desperately shrinking biodiversity, the time has not yet come when those issues will impact us all in painful, unforgettable ways.

    It sucks, we are a short-sighted race of fools.

    Yet we care about having environmentally friendly paint.
    Post edited by PJfanwillneverleave1 on
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    rgambs said:

    The way I see it, you sort of have the analogy backward. Worrying about the environment when you can't afford food or can't marry and direct the medical care of the person you love deeply is like worrying about painting the eaves on a house that is burning down around you.
    Social and socioeconomic issues have direct, tangible effects on a person's well-being and happiness. Environmental issues are a distant concern, even with changing climate and desperately shrinking biodiversity, the time has not yet come when those issues will impact us all in painful, unforgettable ways.

    It sucks, we are a short-sighted race of fools.

    Great post, gambo - although the last part doesn't necessarily make us foolish or myopic. We do (and focus on) what we need to at the time.

    It's not tantamount to not caring about other issues, but about them not being as important in the overall, perhaps selfish, scheme of our lives.
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,336
    rgambs said:

    The way I see it, you sort of have the analogy backward. Worrying about the environment when you can't afford food or can't marry and direct the medical care of the person you love deeply is like worrying about painting the eaves on a house that is burning down around you.
    Social and socioeconomic issues have direct, tangible effects on a person's well-being and happiness. Environmental issues are a distant concern, even with changing climate and desperately shrinking biodiversity, the time has not yet come when those issues will impact us all in painful, unforgettable ways.

    It sucks, we are a short-sighted race of fools.

    But about the rest of animal life? Are we the only ones who count? Anthropocentric thinking only sees life, our planet and the universe from a human perspective. Biocentric thinking sees all of it as all encompassing, all valuable and all interconnected. Many people think we are more important or above all other life. The irony is that such a limited viewpoint is actually counter productive to our own well being!

    But don't listen to me, Gambs. I really do encourage you to check out E. O. Wilson's book!
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    I tried, I give up!

    Apologies if my prior input came off as....something unworthy? Guessing not a decent contribution.

    Hope the rest of this conversation continues to be productive and constructive.

    Shall be reading.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    We're here for a good time. Not a long time. So have a good time. The sun can't shine eveyday.
  • hedonist said:

    I tried, I give up!

    Apologies if my prior input came off as....something unworthy? Guessing not a decent contribution.

    Hope the rest of this conversation continues to be productive and constructive.

    Shall be reading.

    Hedo...

    What other animal on the planet carries the burden of the earth on its shoulders? What other animal concerns itself with the fortunes of other animals? We have illusions of greatness sometimes. At the very core of our existence is a need to survive and prosper- we're no different from any other species. Environmentalism is more or less guilt for realizing the impact our activities are having on the earth.

    We should be concerned with our impact, but not at such a degree that we sacrifice any quality of life that makes the gift of life such a great gift.

    We'd be framing if we think we will ever move to local economies and all the other items necessary to reverse course from the critical threshold we will someday meet. All individual efforts amount to drops on the bucket.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • tempo_n_groovetempo_n_groove Posts: 40,491

    hedonist said:

    I tried, I give up!

    Apologies if my prior input came off as....something unworthy? Guessing not a decent contribution.

    Hope the rest of this conversation continues to be productive and constructive.

    Shall be reading.

    Hedo...

    What other animal on the planet carries the burden of the earth on its shoulders? What other animal concerns itself with the fortunes of other animals? We have illusions of greatness sometimes. At the very core of our existence is a need to survive and prosper- we're no different from any other species. Environmentalism is more or less guilt for realizing the impact our activities are having on the earth.

    We should be concerned with our impact, but not at such a degree that we sacrifice any quality of life that makes the gift of life such a great gift.

    We'd be framing if we think we will ever move to local economies and all the other items necessary to reverse course from the critical threshold we will someday meet. All individual efforts amount to drops on the bucket.
    Every drop will eventually fill that bucket. Eventually you will have "buckets". Then it will be common place where people actually care.

    I am worried though of the pendulum swinging again.

    Conservatism is coming in a big way and all the environmentalism will be cast aside.
  • The pendulum swings....
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524

    hedonist said:

    I tried, I give up!

    Apologies if my prior input came off as....something unworthy? Guessing not a decent contribution.

    Hope the rest of this conversation continues to be productive and constructive.

    Shall be reading.

    Hedo...

    What other animal on the planet carries the burden of the earth on its shoulders? What other animal concerns itself with the fortunes of other animals? We have illusions of greatness sometimes. At the very core of our existence is a need to survive and prosper- we're no different from any other species. Environmentalism is more or less guilt for realizing the impact our activities are having on the earth.

    We should be concerned with our impact, but not at such a degree that we sacrifice any quality of life that makes the gift of life such a great gift.

    We'd be framing if we think we will ever move to local economies and all the other items necessary to reverse course from the critical threshold we will someday meet. All individual efforts amount to drops on the bucket.
    You're a good man, Thirty.

    Sometimes life's circumstances put what's more important to others in the back lane, in our own realm. We have to.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    hedonist said:

    I tried, I give up!

    Apologies if my prior input came off as....something unworthy? Guessing not a decent contribution.

    Hope the rest of this conversation continues to be productive and constructive.

    Shall be reading.

    Hedo...

    What other animal on the planet carries the burden of the earth on its shoulders? What other animal concerns itself with the fortunes of other animals? We have illusions of greatness sometimes. At the very core of our existence is a need to survive and prosper- we're no different from any other species. Environmentalism is more or less guilt for realizing the impact our activities are having on the earth.

    We should be concerned with our impact, but not at such a degree that we sacrifice any quality of life that makes the gift of life such a great gift.

    We'd be framing if we think we will ever move to local economies and all the other items necessary to reverse course from the critical threshold we will someday meet. All individual efforts amount to drops on the bucket.
    Every drop will eventually fill that bucket. Eventually you will have "buckets". Then it will be common place where people actually care.

    I am worried though of the pendulum swinging again.

    Conservatism is coming in a big way and all the environmentalism will be cast aside.
    This makes the incorrect assumption that conservatives don't care about the environment. We care a lot. We just don't think it makes sense to pass ineffective economy damaging bills based on nothing more then emotion.
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,336
    BS44325 said:

    We're here for a good time. Not a long time. So have a good time. The sun can't shine eveyday.

    Reminds me of something Kurt Vonnegut Jr once said: "We're here to fart around."

    He's also the guy who once wrote:

    image
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,336
    hedonist said:

    I tried, I give up!

    Apologies if my prior input came off as....something unworthy? Guessing not a decent contribution.

    Hope the rest of this conversation continues to be productive and constructive.

    Shall be reading.

    We're all worthy, just missed your post is all. Sorry.

    hedonist said:

    I believe it's all relative.

    Illegal for a woman to have an abortion may likely be more important in that time vs smog.

    It's just not either / or.

    ...or about greed and stupidity.

    I'm neither greedy nor an idiot for focusing on other issues based on the usual shit that happens in life.

    In the moment everything is relative. If my hair is on fire, I'm going to be more concerned about that than the loss of another species. What I'm suggesting is that in the big picture, if there are no mega fauna anymore there are no people and if there are no people there are no social issues and so, therefor, in the big picture, environmental issues are more important than social issues. Seems logical doesn't it? I'm always a bit surprised to see resistance to this premise.

    Why, just look at these AMT forums. What gets talked about the most? War, firearms, racism, killings, riots, politics, etc. All very important issues, to be sure! But no more people means no more war, firearms, racism, killings, riots, politics, etc. Maybe we want to end those things by ending ourselves. If so, something's pretty fucked up in our collective psyche. But I think we can do better than that.

    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    brianlux said:

    BS44325 said:

    We're here for a good time. Not a long time. So have a good time. The sun can't shine eveyday.

    Reminds me of something Kurt Vonnegut Jr once said: "We're here to fart around."

    He's also the guy who once wrote:

    image
    Saved the earth from what?
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    A solar minimus is likely upon us

    http://nypost.com/2016/06/29/why-the-sun-going-blank-means-a-game-of-thrones-like-winter-is-coming/

    And there is not much anyone on here can do about it.
  • JWPearlJWPearl Posts: 19,893
    brianlux said:

    Is it possible that If we don't address major ecological/biological and climate related topics like the rapid loss of biodiversity in our world and human induced climate change and continue to see our world filtered through, and skewed by, an Anthropocene viewpoint, will all of the other other things we talk about here will become irrelevant or at least comparatively so in the big picture?

    The answer may well be found in Edward O Wilson's 2016 book, Half-Earth. Among the many and varied I've read, it's the best book/summation/proposal I've found regarding our post industrial condition and what we might consider doing to salvage much of what is left that we are quickly losing. I can't recommend it highly enough.

    image
    image

    Good post
    There's awareness on many things but this subject is just not hammered enough
    Or at least people don't take it seriously enough but I don't mean all people but many
Sign In or Register to comment.