Are social issues nearly as important as issues like biodiversity and climate?
brianlux
Posts: 42,033
Is it possible that If we don't address major ecological/biological and climate related topics like the rapid loss of biodiversity in our world and human induced climate change and continue to see our world filtered through, and skewed by, an Anthropocene viewpoint, will all of the other other things we talk about here will become irrelevant or at least comparatively so in the big picture?
The answer may well be found in Edward O Wilson's 2016 book, Half-Earth. Among the many and varied I've read, it's the best book/summation/proposal I've found regarding our post industrial condition and what we might consider doing to salvage much of what is left that we are quickly losing. I can't recommend it highly enough.
The answer may well be found in Edward O Wilson's 2016 book, Half-Earth. Among the many and varied I've read, it's the best book/summation/proposal I've found regarding our post industrial condition and what we might consider doing to salvage much of what is left that we are quickly losing. I can't recommend it highly enough.
“The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.
0
Comments
I've begun to think that human life is finite. The earth could never possibly sustain mankind for eternity and even if we did... a massive chunk of rock would eventually slam into is and end things in a more dramatic fashion.
So... as responsible as I am urge everyone to be... I sometimes feel drastic steps will only have the effect of squeezing out a couple extra generations before the meltdown occurs. If that is the end goal then fair enough, but to compromise way of life to attain that might not be worth it.
The gift we have been afforded is ultimately a fluke of nature. The next inhabitants of the earth won't think too much about us as they enjoy their ride.
Illegal for a woman to have an abortion may likely be more important in that time vs smog.
It's just not either / or.
...or about greed and stupidity.
I'm neither greedy nor an idiot for focusing on other issues based on the usual shit that happens in life.
Nothing my small self being at midlife will change or alter the "impact" humans have had.
So I really don't care.
BTW - I have no problems with PJfan.
Hey, PJF, don't be offended- it's a phrase Edward Abbey used to describe himself. It might be seen as a compliment!
But it doesn't matter anyway when you've got establishment politics disregarding all of it anyway. Money and power takes precedence.
Social and socioeconomic issues have direct, tangible effects on a person's well-being and happiness. Environmental issues are a distant concern, even with changing climate and desperately shrinking biodiversity, the time has not yet come when those issues will impact us all in painful, unforgettable ways.
It sucks, we are a short-sighted race of fools.
It's not tantamount to not caring about other issues, but about them not being as important in the overall, perhaps selfish, scheme of our lives.
But don't listen to me, Gambs. I really do encourage you to check out E. O. Wilson's book!
Apologies if my prior input came off as....something unworthy? Guessing not a decent contribution.
Hope the rest of this conversation continues to be productive and constructive.
Shall be reading.
What other animal on the planet carries the burden of the earth on its shoulders? What other animal concerns itself with the fortunes of other animals? We have illusions of greatness sometimes. At the very core of our existence is a need to survive and prosper- we're no different from any other species. Environmentalism is more or less guilt for realizing the impact our activities are having on the earth.
We should be concerned with our impact, but not at such a degree that we sacrifice any quality of life that makes the gift of life such a great gift.
We'd be framing if we think we will ever move to local economies and all the other items necessary to reverse course from the critical threshold we will someday meet. All individual efforts amount to drops on the bucket.
I am worried though of the pendulum swinging again.
Conservatism is coming in a big way and all the environmentalism will be cast aside.
Sometimes life's circumstances put what's more important to others in the back lane, in our own realm. We have to.
He's also the guy who once wrote:
In the moment everything is relative. If my hair is on fire, I'm going to be more concerned about that than the loss of another species. What I'm suggesting is that in the big picture, if there are no mega fauna anymore there are no people and if there are no people there are no social issues and so, therefor, in the big picture, environmental issues are more important than social issues. Seems logical doesn't it? I'm always a bit surprised to see resistance to this premise.
Why, just look at these AMT forums. What gets talked about the most? War, firearms, racism, killings, riots, politics, etc. All very important issues, to be sure! But no more people means no more war, firearms, racism, killings, riots, politics, etc. Maybe we want to end those things by ending ourselves. If so, something's pretty fucked up in our collective psyche. But I think we can do better than that.
http://nypost.com/2016/06/29/why-the-sun-going-blank-means-a-game-of-thrones-like-winter-is-coming/
And there is not much anyone on here can do about it.
There's awareness on many things but this subject is just not hammered enough
Or at least people don't take it seriously enough but I don't mean all people but many