Bernie Sanders

1333436383950

Comments

  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    I'll add with all the barriers to entry for an independent run, he prob had no choice but to run as a Dem.
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
    The reason is simple, Bernie is smart enough to know that going 3rd party would have literally guaranteed a Trump Presidency.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
    The reason is simple, Bernie is smart enough to know that going 3rd party would have literally guaranteed a Trump Presidency.
    Logical...3rd parties run so someone else doesn't win. Makes sense.
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,367
    JC29856 said:

    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
    The reason is simple, Bernie is smart enough to know that going 3rd party would have literally guaranteed a Trump Presidency.
    Logical...3rd parties run so someone else doesn't win. Makes sense.
    Unfortunately, when one candidate would be such an unmitigated disaster, and the other somehow still struggles to get votes, yes, being a third party candidate to take votes from Clinton is a morally reprehensible decision. It's equally morally reprehensible in my eyes for the Republicans to have permitted Trump with as much support as they did.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,663
    Voting for a third party candidate (I'm voting for Jill Stein, for example) in a non-swing state makes a lot of sense. It allow some to say "I don't agree with either of those two!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
    The reason is simple, Bernie is smart enough to know that going 3rd party would have literally guaranteed a Trump Presidency.
    Logical...3rd parties run so someone else doesn't win. Makes sense.
    Unfortunately, when one candidate would be such an unmitigated disaster, and the other somehow still struggles to get votes, yes, being a third party candidate to take votes from Clinton is a morally reprehensible decision. It's equally morally reprehensible in my eyes for the Republicans to have permitted Trump with as much support as they did.
    Let the people vote as they wish, is what I say. Everyone deserves to vote who they feel is right, and that goes for all voters and all candidates.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,663
    Free said:

    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
    The reason is simple, Bernie is smart enough to know that going 3rd party would have literally guaranteed a Trump Presidency.
    Logical...3rd parties run so someone else doesn't win. Makes sense.
    Unfortunately, when one candidate would be such an unmitigated disaster, and the other somehow still struggles to get votes, yes, being a third party candidate to take votes from Clinton is a morally reprehensible decision. It's equally morally reprehensible in my eyes for the Republicans to have permitted Trump with as much support as they did.
    Let the people vote as they wish, is what I say. Everyone deserves to vote who they feel is right, and that goes for all voters and all candidates.
    Oh but Free, in some parts you will get fried for that! The arrogance of following your most honest beliefs! You will get castigated viciously for that!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    brianlux said:

    Free said:

    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
    The reason is simple, Bernie is smart enough to know that going 3rd party would have literally guaranteed a Trump Presidency.
    Logical...3rd parties run so someone else doesn't win. Makes sense.
    Unfortunately, when one candidate would be such an unmitigated disaster, and the other somehow still struggles to get votes, yes, being a third party candidate to take votes from Clinton is a morally reprehensible decision. It's equally morally reprehensible in my eyes for the Republicans to have permitted Trump with as much support as they did.
    Let the people vote as they wish, is what I say. Everyone deserves to vote who they feel is right, and that goes for all voters and all candidates.
    Oh but Free, in some parts you will get fried for that! The arrogance of following your most honest beliefs! You will get castigated viciously for that!
    Yep! :lol: Because being truly free to make up our own minds is wrong according to status quo, establishment corporatist America.
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    Ah, but you're also free to give shit to people here who may see things differently than you.

    On a regular basis.

    Accompanied by a :lol: and followed up with ever-endearing "don't attack me".

    *cue Undone*

    Can't wait for election day!

  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited September 2016
    hedonist said:

    Ah, but you're also free to give shit to people here who may see things differently than you.

    On a regular basis.

    Accompanied by a :lol: and followed up with ever-endearing "don't attack me".

    *cue Undone*

    Can't wait for election day!

    Yeah, snarkiness and insisting on dividing and fighting really puts people right where they are.

    And "free to give shit to others" is not following rules.
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Free said:

    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
    The reason is simple, Bernie is smart enough to know that going 3rd party would have literally guaranteed a Trump Presidency.
    Logical...3rd parties run so someone else doesn't win. Makes sense.
    Unfortunately, when one candidate would be such an unmitigated disaster, and the other somehow still struggles to get votes, yes, being a third party candidate to take votes from Clinton is a morally reprehensible decision. It's equally morally reprehensible in my eyes for the Republicans to have permitted Trump with as much support as they did.
    Let the people vote as they wish, is what I say. Everyone deserves to vote who they feel is right, and that goes for all voters and all candidates.
    Hahaha unless they voted for Clinton in the primary...or the general lol
    then you have plenty to say about that!
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited September 2016
    hedonist said:

    Ah, but you're also free to give shit to people here who may see things differently than you.

    On a regular basis.

    Accompanied by a :lol: and followed up with ever-endearing "don't attack me".

    *cue Undone*

    Can't wait for election day!

    And NOWHERE in my post warranted this response.
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited September 2016
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    Free said:

    hedonist said:

    Ah, but you're also free to give shit to people here who may see things differently than you.

    On a regular basis.

    Accompanied by a :lol: and followed up with ever-endearing "don't attack me".

    *cue Undone*

    Can't wait for election day!

    And NOWHERE in my post warranted this response.
    Pretty sure if you look through your history of posts and how you've treated/spoken down to/laughed at many people in this forum, you might see where this was coming from.

    If not, not.

    image
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited September 2016
    Pretty. Esp, the taunting part.


    Back to Bernie.

    Sanders Brought The Real Talk During The First Presidential Debate

    http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57e9abede4b024a52d29e702
    Post edited by Free on
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    All Bernie had to do was accept the green party and stein invitation to replace her on the ticket and we would have seen him in the debates tonight as I'm certain he would have garnered 15% support. He could have continued his revolution but instead he endorses Hilliary. What more could the guy ask for after getting cheated in Dem primary?

    You don't wonder if he was pressured to endorse her? An ultimatum placed? He did a 180 on his supporters. It doesn't make sense.
    I don't wonder and I don't call it pressured, I would say threatened. Not necessarily physical harm which I wouldn't rule out but threatened politically and his career. I'm sure he will get some figure head position in Hillary's administration after she wins
    He prob did agree in advance, as a condition to being allowed to run as a Dem, to take his beating and go home but all agreements are off when they cheated him.
    Look Bernie knew full well what he was getting himself into, he chose to run as a Dem, which is understandable given how uneven the playing field is, although I think that was his first mistake, if he truly sought the presidency.
    The reason is simple, Bernie is smart enough to know that going 3rd party would have literally guaranteed a Trump Presidency.
    Logical...3rd parties run so someone else doesn't win. Makes sense.
    Unfortunately, when one candidate would be such an unmitigated disaster, and the other somehow still struggles to get votes, yes, being a third party candidate to take votes from Clinton is a morally reprehensible decision. It's equally morally reprehensible in my eyes for the Republicans to have permitted Trump with as much support as they did.
    fear politics!?

    people do not know what they do not know ... a trump presidency can be hypothesized but no one really knows what it would look like ... continuing to run with establishment candidates that perpetuate the will of corporations is the crux of the problem ... I don't know if trump will serve that same establishment, probably but at the end of the day - there is nothing to say he would be any more of a disaster than say rob ford was in toronto ...

    like colin kaepernick said ... voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for an evil ...
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,674
    edited September 2016
    Lowering corporate taxes by 35% is a big part of the definition of perpetuating the will of corporations, no?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    PJ_Soul said:

    Lowering corporate taxes by 35% is a big part of the definition of perpetuating the will of corporations, no?

    i believe he wants to lower it 20% from 35% to 15% ... either way - that's why I said he probably will serve the establishment ... in any case - ultimately, one has to ask if the status quo is acceptable ... my values dictate that answer is a firm no ... so, really - the only way to contribute to real change is to not continue this cycle of voting for the lesser of evils ...
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,674
    edited September 2016
    polaris_x said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    Lowering corporate taxes by 35% is a big part of the definition of perpetuating the will of corporations, no?

    i believe he wants to lower it 20% from 35% to 15% ... either way - that's why I said he probably will serve the establishment ... in any case - ultimately, one has to ask if the status quo is acceptable ... my values dictate that answer is a firm no ... so, really - the only way to contribute to real change is to not continue this cycle of voting for the lesser of evils ...
    Ah yes, thank you. I thought it was said a 35% lowering during the debate (which of course shocked the hell out of me, lol), but yeah, looks like he wants to lower it from over 39% to 25%. There is no economic plan/theory that I disagree with less than trickle-down. I can't believe that there are people who think the guy is going to 'fight for regular people'.
    Well any way, this is the Bernie thread.... I miss Bernie.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata