The Pearl Jam 2016 Poster Experience!

Suziemay

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I don't like it either, but I bet it looks really good in person, Ken's posters always has great details. My favourites are 1) Faile 2) Klausen 3) Feldman

Uncle Snuffy

To me it looks like the bat goes right through the eagle's body. ????

- Uncle Snuffy

derbydave

Suziemay said:

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I don't like it either, but I bet it looks really good in person, Ken's posters always has great details. My favourites are 1) Faile 2) Klausen 3) Feldman

The metallic inks look GREAT!!

Suziemay

derbydave said:

Suziemay said:

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I don't like it either, but I bet it looks really good in person, Ken's posters always has great details. My favourites are 1) Faile 2) Klausen 3) Feldman

The metallic inks look GREAT!!

PLEASE DON'T TALK ME INTO BLOWING MORE MONEY ON POSTERS

derbydave

Red Lukin said:

EM194007 said:

KEN TAYLOR GO UP FOR SALE TOMORROW
(WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 31st)
at 2pm CENTRAL TIME!!!

http://postersandtoys.com/


Pearl Jam (Wrigley Field)
12" x 36" Screenprint, AP Edition of 300, $50:




Pearl Jam (Wrigley Field) Variant
12" x 36" Screenprint, AP Variant Edition of 100, $120:

Anyone know if these are signed or numbered?

Just numbered...
Ken lives in Australia and the posters are printed in the US.
To have the posters shipped over for him to sign...
and then returned to the US would make them pretty expensive!

PP193448

Can't get on the postersandtoys site at work... Blocked. Maybe they think it's adult toys or something.
Guess I've gotta try on my damn phone.

derbydave

Suziemay said:

derbydave said:

Suziemay said:

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I don't like it either, but I bet it looks really good in person, Ken's posters always has great details. My favourites are 1) Faile 2) Klausen 3) Feldman

The metallic inks look GREAT!!

PLEASE DON'T TALK ME INTO BLOWING MORE MONEY ON POSTERS

My bad!!

Stoj

derbydave
Just numbered...
Ken lives in Australia and the posters are printed in the US.
To have the posters shipped over for him to sign...
and then returned to the US would make them pretty expensive!

Signature stickers like they do on some baseball cards?

derbydave

Stoj said:

Signature stickers like they do on some baseball cards?

Or even an embossed signature stamp would be cool!!

Red Lukin

Stoj said:

Numbered only, I believe.

Cool thanks

HesCalledDyer

3days said:

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I figured PJ's last shows before the election might have been Taylor's inspiration. Or maybe it's just a play on America's pasttime. Eagle and baseball do say America.

I think it's a really sharp poster

That's a good point.
And as derbydave mentioned, I actually hadn't noticed the baseball diamond.

I guess my thing is, in Wrigley '13 & Fenway '16 all the posters were baseball or city themed. Then we have Wrigley '16 where we have a giant eagle and plague doctors. I just think those two could be interchangeable with any PJ show, nothing really makes them special to the Wrigley shows.

pjpjpaul

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

EM194007

pjpjpaul said:

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

Yes, there was a variant. Until someone receives one, this is the best your going to get.

http://shop.invisibleindustries.com/collections/limited-editions?mc_cid=8deeeef7bd&mc_eid=57b040c972

andyfarrimond

pjpjpaul said:

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

Yes, there was a variant, but the only difference on the variant is the use of gold ink. I received mine a couple of days ago and the difference is not obvious - but then I don't have a show version to do a side by side.

EM194007

andyfarrimond said:

pjpjpaul said:

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

Yes, there was a variant, but the only difference on the variant is the use of gold ink. I received mine a couple of days ago and the difference is not obvious - but then I don't have a show version to do a side by side.

Can you post a pic of it up please, would love to see the difference between them.

pjpjpaul

Yes pics please!

nycmale

andyfarrimond said:

pjpjpaul said:

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

Yes, there was a variant, but the only difference on the variant is the use of gold ink. I received mine a couple of days ago and the difference is not obvious - but then I don't have a show version to do a side by side.

Mine didn't even ship yet. Anyone else receive theirs?

scurtis

andyfarrimond said:

pjpjpaul said:

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

Yes, there was a variant, but the only difference on the variant is the use of gold ink. I received mine a couple of days ago and the difference is not obvious - but then I don't have a show version to do a side by side.

That bugs me, was worried about that.

Stoj

nycmale said:

andyfarrimond said:

pjpjpaul said:

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

Yes, there was a variant, but the only difference on the variant is the use of gold ink. I received mine a couple of days ago and the difference is not obvious - but then I don't have a show version to do a side by side.

Mine didn't even ship yet. Anyone else receive theirs?

Got mine a few days ago.

andyfarrimond

EM194007 said:

andyfarrimond said:

pjpjpaul said:

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

Yes, there was a variant, but the only difference on the variant is the use of gold ink. I received mine a couple of days ago and the difference is not obvious - but then I don't have a show version to do a side by side.

Can you post a pic of it up please, would love to see the difference between them.

I will take pics this evening when I get home from work.

scurtis

Thought the variants were going to be $100?

demetrios

Pearl Jam's Ken Taylor Wrigley Field prints are on sale now over @ http://postersandtoys.com/collections/new-stuff?sort_by=created-descending

andyfarrimond

scurtis said:

Thought the variants were going to be $100?

$120 was the price I saw before and when I just checked out

EM194007

Original version.



Variant

Stoj

Couldn't help myself. Bought the Taylor.

EM194007

andyfarrimond said:

EM194007 said:

andyfarrimond said:

pjpjpaul said:

Was there a Cliver variant? If so, can someone please post a pic of the original and variant? Thanks!

Yes, there was a variant, but the only difference on the variant is the use of gold ink. I received mine a couple of days ago and the difference is not obvious - but then I don't have a show version to do a side by side.

Can you post a pic of it up please, would love to see the difference between them.

I will take pics this evening when I get home from work.

Cool, there are already a few up on evilbay.

scurtis

andyfarrimond said:

scurtis said:

Thought the variants were going to be $100?

$120 was the price I saw before and when I just checked out

Yeah my bad, I remembered it wrong.

scurtis

EM194007 said:

Original version.



Variant

This is disappointing to me, I might sell my variant now. Love this print, but got one at the show was hoping the variant would be more than slightly different.

TA243471

I'm flattening my Cliver right now, but I almost think the gold ink is what he used to sign with

Dr. Delight

scurtis said:

EM194007 said:

Original version.



Variant

This is disappointing to me, I might sell my variant now. Love this print, but got one at the show was hoping the variant would be more than slightly different.

Agree, that is an extremely subtle difference.