Hillary won more votes for President

mrussel1

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

Can anyone guess what I'm being for Halloween?

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/09/08/dnc-cuts-ties-with-donald-ducks/

Vladimir Lenin?

No, funny thou I was reading some posts about me and Leninist Leninism and I remembered the mods reminding the board that posts shouldn't be about individuals, I think you were referenced actually, but i could me mistaken...anyway what's funny is one of my aliasses is Vladimir Joykoff

I didn't attack you. I asked you what you believe in or what you advocate for. You can ignore it, but it just seems like a Leninist approach to just tear down. I'm very curious as to how you want the country to look politically.

Where did I say or remotely elude to you attacking me? This is an example of why I rarely reply to you. Plus you reference we and us without me having any idea who you speak on behalf of. Not sure if your a mod so I try not to engage or risk more warnings or possible suspension.

You didn't, but to be frank, I was drawing the distinction between what I wrote asking you about your beliefs, and the situation in which you were gently reprimanded. Whatever you said was modded out before I saw it so I don't know exactly what it was, but it drew a censure.

I'm not sure about your reference to "we and us"... perhaps I wrote that on the other page? But like I said in this one, I'm curious for me, what you believe in. I assume you aren't going to share so I'll let it go.

JC29856

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

Can anyone guess what I'm being for Halloween?

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/09/08/dnc-cuts-ties-with-donald-ducks/

Vladimir Lenin?

No, funny thou I was reading some posts about me and Leninist Leninism and I remembered the mods reminding the board that posts shouldn't be about individuals, I think you were referenced actually, but i could me mistaken...anyway what's funny is one of my aliasses is Vladimir Joykoff

I didn't attack you. I asked you what you believe in or what you advocate for. You can ignore it, but it just seems like a Leninist approach to just tear down. I'm very curious as to how you want the country to look politically.

Where did I say or remotely elude to you attacking me? This is an example of why I rarely reply to you. Plus you reference we and us without me having any idea who you speak on behalf of. Not sure if your a mod so I try not to engage or risk more warnings or possible suspension.

You didn't, but to be frank, I was drawing the distinction between what I wrote asking you about your beliefs, and the situation in which you were gently reprimanded. Whatever you said was modded out before I saw it so I don't know exactly what it was, but it drew a censure.

I'm not sure about your reference to "we and us"... perhaps I wrote that on the other page? But like I said in this one, I'm curious for me, what you believe in. I assume you aren't going to share so I'll let it go.

Cool... Like I said it's not about any one person or me.

JC29856

Here the Clinton campaign response to bird dogging trump supporters inciting violence dressed as Donald Duck.

Come on, how could anyone be incited by Donald the Duck.

brianlux

The duck thing is purely juvenile, not presidential. Not sure how any could deny this.

JC29856

proof pudding

http://ijr.com/2016/10/718604-before-gen-petraeus-was-busted-for-classified-info-violations-hillary-gave-him-some-email-advice/

These new emails show the truth that the separate email system was never a matter of ‘convenience’ for Mrs. Clinton. She wanted to hide her emails from the American people.

It’s now clear why she deleted or withheld so many and why Mrs. Clinton didn’t recall or declined to answer questions about her email security. And her request to Petraeus while he was the Commander of the United States Central Command to communicate with her solely at her unsecure email address shows Hillary Clinton’s willful negligence in handling national defense information.

brianlux

JC29856 said:

proof pudding

http://ijr.com/2016/10/718604-before-gen-petraeus-was-busted-for-classified-info-violations-hillary-gave-him-some-email-advice/

These new emails show the truth that the separate email system was never a matter of ‘convenience’ for Mrs. Clinton. She wanted to hide her emails from the American people.

It’s now clear why she deleted or withheld so many and why Mrs. Clinton didn’t recall or declined to answer questions about her email security. And her request to Petraeus while he was the Commander of the United States Central Command to communicate with her solely at her unsecure email address shows Hillary Clinton’s willful negligence in handling national defense information.

"Blackberry Blues". Must be a form of Duck Depression.

lukin2006

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

brianlux

lukin2006 said:

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

Would probably take about 4 years to prosecute. But that won't happen. Deep pockets.

lukin2006

brianlux said:

lukin2006 said:

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

Would probably take about 4 years to prosecute. But that won't happen. Deep pockets.

I was wondering if the GOP would start impeachment hearings, especially if it clearly shows what the anti clinton camp speculates, just curious...

I think the deep pockets has definitely benefited her to this point...

JC29856

lukin2006 said:

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

If I had to guess, somebody has them. I don't think releasing them before or after the election will matter.

If I had to guess something like the DNC or Hilliary campaign being involved in a murder is about the only thing that would matter.

PJ_Soul

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

Side not: what's this duck thing about? Given the profile pic I've used for years and JC now has a rubber ducky in his too, I'm curious about this, lol. I don't know what it's supposed to mean.

Hilliary is very proud of herself for brainstorming the idea of using a duck (Donald) and 1000s of rubber duckies to shame trump for not releasing his tax returns. Donald duck, trump ducking releasing his taxes, get it?
Me I'm just having alittle fun with it.

Oh I see. Lol, that's silly (not on your part). Even now, I don't even come close to thinking about Donald Duck when I hear the name Donald Trump, because Trump is a household name himself. Donald Duck doesn't trump Trump in adult pop culture IMO. Ha.

Agree, if you seen any of the Podesta emails about her character and temperament you get clued into how unhuman Hilliary is, explains how unfunny and unpopular she and her duck thing are.
Totally unbecoming of the future POTUS, yet she wonders why aren't I ahead 50 points.

Lol. No, I don't agree with your assessment of Clinton at all, the silly Donald Duck thing aside, and I have read plenty of the emails.

mrussel1

JC29856 said:

lukin2006 said:

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

If I had to guess, somebody has them. I don't think releasing them before or after the election will matter.

If I had to guess something like the DNC or Hilliary campaign being involved in a murder is about the only thing that would matter.

Well we know that you think she had JFK jr. murdered, so I'm assuming that one will come out shortly.

JC29856

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

lukin2006 said:

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

If I had to guess, somebody has them. I don't think releasing them before or after the election will matter.

If I had to guess something like the DNC or Hilliary campaign being involved in a murder is about the only thing that would matter.

Well we know that you think she had JFK jr. murdered, so I'm assuming that one will come out shortly.

OOoooowww!!! Podesta duck-man burn!!!!
Go easy I was made in china of Polyvinyl chloride.

mrussel1

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

lukin2006 said:

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

If I had to guess, somebody has them. I don't think releasing them before or after the election will matter.

If I had to guess something like the DNC or Hilliary campaign being involved in a murder is about the only thing that would matter.

Well we know that you think she had JFK jr. murdered, so I'm assuming that one will come out shortly.

OOoooowww!!! Podesta duck-man burn!!!!
Go easy I was made in china of Polyvinyl chloride.

If that's your starting point for truth, the rest is suspect.

ledvedderman

I fear that JC is almost to the breaking point mentally.
An electoral ass kicking in a couple of weeks might be the nail in the coffin.

JC29856

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

lukin2006 said:

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

If I had to guess, somebody has them. I don't think releasing them before or after the election will matter.

If I had to guess something like the DNC or Hilliary campaign being involved in a murder is about the only thing that would matter.

Well we know that you think she had JFK jr. murdered, so I'm assuming that one will come out shortly.

OOoooowww!!! Podesta duck-man burn!!!!
Go easy I was made in china of Polyvinyl chloride.

If that's your starting point for truth, the rest is suspect.

I finally replied to your numerous JFK trolling, I would ask you to find my post about JFK but I know it is against the rules to call someone out on an earlier post. I wouldn't want to see either of us suspended or banned. You want to risk it?

mrussel1

ledvedderman said:

I fear that JC is almost to the breaking point mentally.
An electoral ass kicking in a couple of weeks might be the nail in the coffin.

BTW - that's an unbelievably cute kid in the picture. How old now?

pjhawks

JC29856 said:

lukin2006 said:

What if somebody has these emails (real possibility) and releases them after the election and it shows what most of the anti-clinton crowd suspect?

If I had to guess, somebody has them. I don't think releasing them before or after the election will matter.

If I had to guess something like the DNC or Hilliary campaign being involved in a murder is about the only thing that would matter.

well we know even admitting sexual assault hasn't stopped some from supporting Trump so at this point who really knows what the jumping off point is for these candidates.

ledvedderman

mrussel1 said:

ledvedderman said:

I fear that JC is almost to the breaking point mentally.
An electoral ass kicking in a couple of weeks might be the nail in the coffin.

BTW - that's an unbelievably cute kid in the picture. How old now?

Thanks man. He's much, much older now. He just turned 8. Loves Pearl Jam and hates Donald Trump. Smart kid.

rssesq

a 12 million shakedown from a Muzzy Moroccan king was mine
http://nypost.com/2016/10/21/does-hillary-clinton-still-owe-the-king-of-morocco-a-12-million-favor/
does he get half and half for 12 million from her