Should police pursue in a high speed chase?

The day before yesterday while working at the book store on Main Street, I heard a small engine winding out loudly (which turned out to be a motorcycle) and looked out the front window to see the flash of a police car (might have been a CHP) fly by in a blur. As is usually the case in most small towns, our Main St. is relatively narrow and it's a fairly busy place with lots of people out walking. The whole scene felt very dangerous, especially because my wife had just left to walk down to check out out mid-week farmer's market (she was not harmed) which meant things were very busy downtown that day.

I briefly thought, "That idiot! I hope they catch him!" but then I thought, "Wait, who is wrong here? If the cop weren't pursuing so fast, no danger would have occurred in this situation."

Another person pointed out that many innocent people are killed as a result of high speed chases (below is the first article I came up with at random that talks about that).

Thoughts?


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/07/30/police-pursuits-fatal-injuries/30187827/
“The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













«13

Comments

  • I would say, unless the person is on a rampage killing people or an immediate danger to others, catch him later. With the technology and cameras everywhere, it has become easier to track people down.
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    There are so many that happen out here, and for the most part, the sheriffs, police, CHP, etc. are pretty good at hanging back when warranted (especially since there's typically a helicopter overhead).

    Guess I'm torn between them wanting to get some dangerous asshole off the road - sometimes they drive erratically even without the string of cars behind them - and concern for the innocents just living their lives.
  • Should they?
    At times yes.
    Wouldn't want that serial killer to get away.
    Other times no.
    Either way whatever happens from a high speed chase would be criticized from the general 10c public.
    So maybe the cops should do nothing instead.
    That'll learn em.
  • Tough call we have to leave to their judgement that you hope they will exercise wisely.

    The getaway can't be as simple as racing away from the cop's knowing they won't chase you.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    No it doesn't, B...that looks like a disaster waiting to happen.
  • brianlux said:

    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image

    No.

    But evading law enforcement where the officer stops pursuing because of speed concerns should carry HEAVY penalties.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • brianlux said:

    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image

    They chose to pursue so I would assume that they should at least be entitled to the same medium of the pursued.
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038

    brianlux said:

    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image

    No.

    But evading law enforcement where the officer stops pursuing because of speed concerns should carry HEAVY penalties.
    Definitely, but if they stop pursuit how do they catch them? With all the technology out there, there has to be a better way.

    I wonder how much of this kind of thing is an adrenaline fix for the pursuing cops. How often is it necessary and how often is it just a big thrill kind of thing. I really don't know.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • brianlux said:

    brianlux said:

    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image

    No.

    But evading law enforcement where the officer stops pursuing because of speed concerns should carry HEAVY penalties.
    Definitely, but if they stop pursuit how do they catch them? With all the technology out there, there has to be a better way.

    I wonder how much of this kind of thing is an adrenaline fix for the pursuing cops. How often is it necessary and how often is it just a big thrill kind of thing. I really don't know.
    I'm pretty sure the overwhelming majority of officers would prefer easy peasy detainments and arrests. I don't think cops are looking forward to high speed chases and gun rights.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038

    brianlux said:

    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image

    They chose to pursue so I would assume that they should at least be entitled to the same medium of the pursued.
    Not sure what you mean PJF.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • brianlux said:

    brianlux said:

    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image

    They chose to pursue so I would assume that they should at least be entitled to the same medium of the pursued.
    Not sure what you mean PJF.
    Equal footing.
    Footchase vs footchase
    car vs car
    whatever medium the suspect choses the police should at least be given the right to match it
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524

    brianlux said:

    brianlux said:

    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image

    They chose to pursue so I would assume that they should at least be entitled to the same medium of the pursued.
    Not sure what you mean PJF.
    Equal footing.
    Footchase vs footchase
    car vs car
    whatever medium the suspect choses the police should at least be given the right to match it
    I would pay to see a segway vs segway chase.

    (and now I'm thinking of the George-on-scooter chase from Seinfeld)

    Sorry, Brian. No more derailing on my part =)
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    hedonist said:

    brianlux said:

    brianlux said:

    Yes (to both above) but the more I look into this the more I read about innocent bystanders who have been injured or killed. What I (mostly) heard and (sort of) saw Wednesday was frightening.

    Here are two views of Main St. , Placerville (the first one looking east, the second one looking west). A few years ago another high speed chase was clocked on this street at almost 100 MPH. The one I saw Wednesday was probably between 65 and 75 MPH. Does that kind of chase on this kind of street make sense?

    image

    image

    They chose to pursue so I would assume that they should at least be entitled to the same medium of the pursued.
    Not sure what you mean PJF.
    Equal footing.
    Footchase vs footchase
    car vs car
    whatever medium the suspect choses the police should at least be given the right to match it
    I would pay to see a segway vs segway chase.

    (and now I'm thinking of the George-on-scooter chase from Seinfeld)

    Sorry, Brian. No more derailing on my part =)
    Ohhhh yeah, ah hu... :lol:
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,594
    edited September 2015
    law of averages says it will happen. thats why THIS particular jusrisdiction ( my county) says when its unreasonable risk to public or deputy to break off. Means shit when the deputy ignores this. wasn't even the primary persuer
    The street this happened on is in a pretty densely populated section of town with a lot of side streets and alleys and is fairly narrow commpared to newer neighborhoods. kids on foot and bikes, moms and dads pushing strollers etc......

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/30/columbus-ohio-video-shows-franklin-co.-deputy-was-driving-over-100-mph-during-deadly-crash.html
    Post edited by mickeyrat on
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat said:

    law of averages says it will happen. thats why THIS particular jusrisdiction ( my county) says when its unreasonable risk to public or deputy to break off. Means shit when the deputy ignores this. wasn't even the primary persuer
    The street this happened on is in a pretty densely populated section of town with a lot of side streets and alleys and is fairly narrow commpared to newer neighborhoods. kids on foot and bikes, moms and dads pushing strollers etc......

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/30/columbus-ohio-video-shows-franklin-co.-deputy-was-driving-over-100-mph-during-deadly-crash.html

    I'm sorry. You're not going to like what I'm going to say:

    F**king stupid people.

    Number 1 stupid person: the idiot in the left lane that almost reluctantly pulls over to the right lane (let alone the curb as you are required to do).

    Number 2 stupid person: the driver of the van. I say this reluctantly because I fear this is the victim. But... why are you pulling out trying to 'beat the police car in pursuit of something'?

    Number 3 stupid person: the cop... 'if' the pursuit was something petty and not even remotely close to being necessary.

    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,594
    edited September 2015

    mickeyrat said:

    law of averages says it will happen. thats why THIS particular jusrisdiction ( my county) says when its unreasonable risk to public or deputy to break off. Means shit when the deputy ignores this. wasn't even the primary persuer
    The street this happened on is in a pretty densely populated section of town with a lot of side streets and alleys and is fairly narrow commpared to newer neighborhoods. kids on foot and bikes, moms and dads pushing strollers etc......

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/30/columbus-ohio-video-shows-franklin-co.-deputy-was-driving-over-100-mph-during-deadly-crash.html

    I'm sorry. You're not going to like what I'm going to say:

    F**king stupid people.

    Number 1 stupid person: the idiot in the left lane that almost reluctantly pulls over to the right lane (let alone the curb as you are required to do).

    Number 2 stupid person: the driver of the van. I say this reluctantly because I fear this is the victim. But... why are you pulling out trying to 'beat the police car in pursuit of something'?

    Number 3 stupid person: the cop... 'if' the pursuit was something petty and not even remotely close to being necessary.

    the suspect had bailed from his vehicle and it had become a foot pursuit. He was driving that fast for a FOOT PURSUIT!!!!!!!!! This deputy had ZERO reason to be traveling at such a rate of speed in this area given the nature of the call at that time he was joining in coming to aid of the arresting deputy.

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/13/columbus-ohio-franklin-county-deputy-responding-to-pursuit-slams-into-van-killing-driver.html
    Post edited by mickeyrat on
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat said:

    mickeyrat said:

    law of averages says it will happen. thats why THIS particular jusrisdiction ( my county) says when its unreasonable risk to public or deputy to break off. Means shit when the deputy ignores this. wasn't even the primary persuer
    The street this happened on is in a pretty densely populated section of town with a lot of side streets and alleys and is fairly narrow commpared to newer neighborhoods. kids on foot and bikes, moms and dads pushing strollers etc......

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/30/columbus-ohio-video-shows-franklin-co.-deputy-was-driving-over-100-mph-during-deadly-crash.html

    I'm sorry. You're not going to like what I'm going to say:

    F**king stupid people.

    Number 1 stupid person: the idiot in the left lane that almost reluctantly pulls over to the right lane (let alone the curb as you are required to do).

    Number 2 stupid person: the driver of the van. I say this reluctantly because I fear this is the victim. But... why are you pulling out trying to 'beat the police car in pursuit of something'?

    Number 3 stupid person: the cop... 'if' the pursuit was something petty and not even remotely close to being necessary.

    the suspect had bailed from his vehicle and it had become a foot pursuit. He was driving that fast for a FOOT PURSUIT!!!!!!!!! This deputy had ZERO reason to be traveling at such a rate of speed in this area given the nature of the call at that time he was joining in coming to aid of the arresting deputy.

    .
    So the cop is definitively Number 3 stupid person and arguably Number 1 stupid person.

    The other drivers I referenced don't get a pass for ignoring basic and essential rules of the road: we know, through hindsight, that this high speed pursuit was unnecessary, but if it was a different scenario where lives were in danger... these drivers couldn't have discerned- they made themselves hazards for an emergency vehicle.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • chadwickchadwick Posts: 21,157
    mickeyrat said:

    law of averages says it will happen. thats why THIS particular jusrisdiction ( my county) says when its unreasonable risk to public or deputy to break off. Means shit when the deputy ignores this. wasn't even the primary persuer
    The street this happened on is in a pretty densely populated section of town with a lot of side streets and alleys and is fairly narrow commpared to newer neighborhoods. kids on foot and bikes, moms and dads pushing strollers etc......

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/30/columbus-ohio-video-shows-franklin-co.-deputy-was-driving-over-100-mph-during-deadly-crash.html

    that is terrible. a bit much coming from the cop. dude thinks he's a marvel superhero or something
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."

    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,594

    mickeyrat said:

    mickeyrat said:

    law of averages says it will happen. thats why THIS particular jusrisdiction ( my county) says when its unreasonable risk to public or deputy to break off. Means shit when the deputy ignores this. wasn't even the primary persuer
    The street this happened on is in a pretty densely populated section of town with a lot of side streets and alleys and is fairly narrow commpared to newer neighborhoods. kids on foot and bikes, moms and dads pushing strollers etc......

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/30/columbus-ohio-video-shows-franklin-co.-deputy-was-driving-over-100-mph-during-deadly-crash.html

    I'm sorry. You're not going to like what I'm going to say:

    F**king stupid people.

    Number 1 stupid person: the idiot in the left lane that almost reluctantly pulls over to the right lane (let alone the curb as you are required to do).

    Number 2 stupid person: the driver of the van. I say this reluctantly because I fear this is the victim. But... why are you pulling out trying to 'beat the police car in pursuit of something'?

    Number 3 stupid person: the cop... 'if' the pursuit was something petty and not even remotely close to being necessary.

    the suspect had bailed from his vehicle and it had become a foot pursuit. He was driving that fast for a FOOT PURSUIT!!!!!!!!! This deputy had ZERO reason to be traveling at such a rate of speed in this area given the nature of the call at that time he was joining in coming to aid of the arresting deputy.

    .
    So the cop is definitively Number 3 stupid person and arguably Number 1 stupid person.

    The other drivers I referenced don't get a pass for ignoring basic and essential rules of the road: we know, through hindsight, that this high speed pursuit was unnecessary, but if it was a different scenario where lives were in danger... these drivers couldn't have discerned- they made themselves hazards for an emergency vehicle.
    From this post I take it you could adequately figure rate of speed and get out of the way in time? Kinda doubt many could really.

    Any number of legal and otherwise distractions behind the wheel gets in the way of full sight and sound attention not to mention human thought is probably the biggest.

    NO reason for that rate of speed EVER in a 35 mph area.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat said:

    mickeyrat said:

    mickeyrat said:

    law of averages says it will happen. thats why THIS particular jusrisdiction ( my county) says when its unreasonable risk to public or deputy to break off. Means shit when the deputy ignores this. wasn't even the primary persuer
    The street this happened on is in a pretty densely populated section of town with a lot of side streets and alleys and is fairly narrow commpared to newer neighborhoods. kids on foot and bikes, moms and dads pushing strollers etc......

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/30/columbus-ohio-video-shows-franklin-co.-deputy-was-driving-over-100-mph-during-deadly-crash.html

    I'm sorry. You're not going to like what I'm going to say:

    F**king stupid people.

    Number 1 stupid person: the idiot in the left lane that almost reluctantly pulls over to the right lane (let alone the curb as you are required to do).

    Number 2 stupid person: the driver of the van. I say this reluctantly because I fear this is the victim. But... why are you pulling out trying to 'beat the police car in pursuit of something'?

    Number 3 stupid person: the cop... 'if' the pursuit was something petty and not even remotely close to being necessary.

    the suspect had bailed from his vehicle and it had become a foot pursuit. He was driving that fast for a FOOT PURSUIT!!!!!!!!! This deputy had ZERO reason to be traveling at such a rate of speed in this area given the nature of the call at that time he was joining in coming to aid of the arresting deputy.

    .
    So the cop is definitively Number 3 stupid person and arguably Number 1 stupid person.

    The other drivers I referenced don't get a pass for ignoring basic and essential rules of the road: we know, through hindsight, that this high speed pursuit was unnecessary, but if it was a different scenario where lives were in danger... these drivers couldn't have discerned- they made themselves hazards for an emergency vehicle.
    From this post I take it you could adequately figure rate of speed and get out of the way in time? Kinda doubt many could really.

    Any number of legal and otherwise distractions behind the wheel gets in the way of full sight and sound attention not to mention human thought is probably the biggest.

    NO reason for that rate of speed EVER in a 35 mph area.
    You're making excuses for drivers.

    There is a need for speed at times. If an armed gunman is making his way through a public place shooting people, we expect law enforcement to get there as fast as possible- at least the people under fire and their families do. We don't want them peacefully meandering towards the crime scene- stopping at every light and respecting posted speed limits set for 'everyday' life. I could offer a 1000 other scenarios as well.

    The video showed a road that was straight and wide- easy to see, easy to navigate at high speeds, and not at all like those two photos earlier in the thread which you made it sound like.

    The responsibility is on the driver to be aware of emergency service vehicles when their lights and sirens are blaring and they are travelling at high speeds. Refusing to pull over until the last second or pulling out in front of them is shitty driving. Period. In my city... all cars on both sides of the street pull over to the curb and stop until the emergency vehicle is gone. Most times, the cars wait for a few seconds because there's usually another rushing vehicle or two as well. But... most of us play with half a brain at least. Maybe in Ohio this isn't the case? Maybe the idea of leaving the roadway to the emergency vehicles is a concept that is simply beyond your guys' capacity for thought?

    In my earlier post, I classified the officer as 'stupid'. Before I officially slap that label on him... could you be so kind as to let me know exactly what the rush was? Who were they pursuing? What was the fleeing person on foot running from (what crime did they commit) if you don't mind me asking?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    Knew a cop and hanging out drinking some suds told me they live for the chase. Houston has a policy on pursuits but doesn't stop them. Hard to let the competition get away.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,594

    mickeyrat said:

    mickeyrat said:

    mickeyrat said:

    law of averages says it will happen. thats why THIS particular jusrisdiction ( my county) says when its unreasonable risk to public or deputy to break off. Means shit when the deputy ignores this. wasn't even the primary persuer
    The street this happened on is in a pretty densely populated section of town with a lot of side streets and alleys and is fairly narrow commpared to newer neighborhoods. kids on foot and bikes, moms and dads pushing strollers etc......

    http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2015/07/30/columbus-ohio-video-shows-franklin-co.-deputy-was-driving-over-100-mph-during-deadly-crash.html

    I'm sorry. You're not going to like what I'm going to say:

    F**king stupid people.

    Number 1 stupid person: the idiot in the left lane that almost reluctantly pulls over to the right lane (let alone the curb as you are required to do).

    Number 2 stupid person: the driver of the van. I say this reluctantly because I fear this is the victim. But... why are you pulling out trying to 'beat the police car in pursuit of something'?

    Number 3 stupid person: the cop... 'if' the pursuit was something petty and not even remotely close to being necessary.

    the suspect had bailed from his vehicle and it had become a foot pursuit. He was driving that fast for a FOOT PURSUIT!!!!!!!!! This deputy had ZERO reason to be traveling at such a rate of speed in this area given the nature of the call at that time he was joining in coming to aid of the arresting deputy.

    .
    So the cop is definitively Number 3 stupid person and arguably Number 1 stupid person.

    The other drivers I referenced don't get a pass for ignoring basic and essential rules of the road: we know, through hindsight, that this high speed pursuit was unnecessary, but if it was a different scenario where lives were in danger... these drivers couldn't have discerned- they made themselves hazards for an emergency vehicle.
    From this post I take it you could adequately figure rate of speed and get out of the way in time? Kinda doubt many could really.

    Any number of legal and otherwise distractions behind the wheel gets in the way of full sight and sound attention not to mention human thought is probably the biggest.

    NO reason for that rate of speed EVER in a 35 mph area.
    You're making excuses for drivers.

    There is a need for speed at times. If an armed gunman is making his way through a public place shooting people, we expect law enforcement to get there as fast as possible- at least the people under fire and their families do. We don't want them peacefully meandering towards the crime scene- stopping at every light and respecting posted speed limits set for 'everyday' life. I could offer a 1000 other scenarios as well.

    The video showed a road that was straight and wide- easy to see, easy to navigate at high speeds, and not at all like those two photos earlier in the thread which you made it sound like.

    The responsibility is on the driver to be aware of emergency service vehicles when their lights and sirens are blaring and they are travelling at high speeds. Refusing to pull over until the last second or pulling out in front of them is shitty driving. Period. In my city... all cars on both sides of the street pull over to the curb and stop until the emergency vehicle is gone. Most times, the cars wait for a few seconds because there's usually another rushing vehicle or two as well. But... most of us play with half a brain at least. Maybe in Ohio this isn't the case? Maybe the idea of leaving the roadway to the emergency vehicles is a concept that is simply beyond your guys' capacity for thought?

    In my earlier post, I classified the officer as 'stupid'. Before I officially slap that label on him... could you be so kind as to let me know exactly what the rush was? Who were they pursuing? What was the fleeing person on foot running from (what crime did they commit) if you don't mind me asking?
    Read the second link I posted.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Responding to the aid and request of another officer.

    This might be a scenario that requires excessive speed.

    Did the dispatcher call for assistance... but temper it with a 'but just chill 'cause everything is cool'? Or was the call for help left to interpretation?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    edited September 2015
    callen said:

    Knew a cop and hanging out drinking some suds told me they live for the chase. Houston has a policy on pursuits but doesn't stop them. Hard to let the competition get away.

    That's basically one-sided legal street racing. I'd much rather see a traffic violator possibly (if they photo the plates first thing they can apprehend later) get away with one than some innocent bystander killed in because of the chase.

    More examples of innocent people killed due to high speed chase:

    http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2015/07/31/arizona-police-chases-fatal-bystanders/30919875/

    http://jobs.aol.com/videos/what-its-like/father-and-daughter-innocent-bystanders-killed-in-high-speed-case/518184872/
    Post edited by brianlux on
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    We happened on a local pursuit just last night on the news - surprise, surprise. The guy was all over the place, speeding like a bat out of hell, ended up clipping one car then a header with another. Even without the police behind him, there was still the chopper. I'm not sure if not being chased would've made a difference.

    Just let some dangerous fucker pull that?

    I don't know. Different circumstances and neighborhoods, different actions required.
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,954
    edited September 2015
    It usually seems too dangerous. I'm sure in a few extreme cases it's worth it, like of the criminal is a greater immediate threat to public safety than a high speed car chase is, but generally I think they should be avoided in populated areas. Police drones wouod be a GREAT replacement here. I din't know why they aren't already using them for stalking criminals. Such an effective way to chase them....I suppose they aren't because the laws are so fucking slow catching up to technology (and I don't want cops abusing power or ruining criminal cases through the unlawful use of drones... are there drones that go as fast as cars btw??), but I wish the laws would catch up. Meanwhile, police helicopters are also better than car chases, though those cause the criminal to try and evade in a car too, so still dangerous.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • rr165892rr165892 Posts: 5,697
    The county just north of me(Where the Movie Porkys was based on) still has chase Posse with deputies in pick ups and a sarge with a handle bar mustache and six shooters on his hip.I shit you not.They are like a time warp out of the 60s.
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,594

    Responding to the aid and request of another officer.

    This might be a scenario that requires excessive speed.

    Did the dispatcher call for assistance... but temper it with a 'but just chill 'cause everything is cool'? Or was the call for help left to interpretation?

    I dont know those details but unless there was imminent threat to officer or bystanders such as perp had a gun etc, 106 mph in a mixed use residential /with some businees storefronts at 35mph is completely unnecessary.

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat said:

    Responding to the aid and request of another officer.

    This might be a scenario that requires excessive speed.

    Did the dispatcher call for assistance... but temper it with a 'but just chill 'cause everything is cool'? Or was the call for help left to interpretation?

    I dont know those details but unless there was imminent threat to officer or bystanders such as perp had a gun etc, 106 mph in a mixed use residential /with some businees storefronts at 35mph is completely unnecessary.

    I don't know those details either so I'm going to assume the cop felt he needed to respond with a sense of urgency more than simply popping an erection and gunning it- seizing the moment for one sided legally sanctioned street racing (or whatever it was called earlier).

    Do you still feel that drivers are inherently prone to gross errors in judgement and therefore share little responsibility in these motor vehicle accidents where an emergency vehicle is involved? I ask because this was implicit in one of your previous posts.

    From my perspective, the van should have been waiting at the intersection for the cop to pass- not scooting through to save six seconds of driving time.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
Sign In or Register to comment.