The Donald for President

callen

muskydan said:

mrussel1 said:

muskydan said:

Keep on stroking each other off here boys....
Perhaps some of you will actually leave this once great country if The Don Gets the nomination and Wins like some celebrities have said they would... boy if it were that simple to get rid of Libbies:)

You still have yet to offer an argument of substance. I have no problems with conservatives that are thoughtful. You have yet to qualify.

I have given up arguing on here a long time ago Pal. I am just a sniper now who chimes in here and there. Some people call it trolling since I always seem to support the wrong team in these very entertaining circle jerk sessions.

So you employ same strategy as Trump. Offensive sound bites with no substance.

bootlegger10

You have to hand it to the guy when he is one of the few if any persons that has successfully taken on Fox News. He is making Roger Ailes look like an amateur. I don't think that is luck. Say what you will about his politics but he is by the front runner in the field and makes it look simple.

rgambs

bootlegger10 said:

You have to hand it to the guy when he is one of the few if any persons that has successfully taken on Fox News. He is making Roger Ailes look like an amateur. I don't think that is luck. Say what you will about his politics but he is by the front runner in the field and makes it look simple.

I think you mean he makes America look simple.

eddiec

bootlegger10 said:

You have to hand it to the guy when he is one of the few if any persons that has successfully taken on Fox News. He is making Roger Ailes look like an amateur. I don't think that is luck. Say what you will about his politics but he is by the front runner in the field and makes it look simple.

That's because he's not a politician. This isn't his profession and while his ego wants to win it really doesn't matter career wise if he doesn't. He can act abrasive and ignorant and in doing so he appeals to the abrasive and ignorant voters. The way he is behaving would be political suicide for a politician. But as billionaire he will continue to offend people and act as some savior to the uneducated masses until the runaway train comes to a halt.

hedonist

I'm not a Trump supporter, but since when did the public servant position of "politician" become a profession? That's kind of fucked up in itself.

(and I think ego plays a part in most running for office)

HughFreakingDillon

usamamasan1 said:

It just doesn't get eddie vedder than this...

Rudy Giuliani: Between Trump and Cruz, ‘I’d Vote for Trump’

"what's your hair secret?"

muskydan

So you employ same strategy as Trump. Offensive sound bites with no substance.



I guess you can say that... However the substance I read from you guys often reminds me of the stains left on toilet papar...flush, someone light a match:)

brianlux

bootlegger10 said:

You have to hand it to the guy when he is one of the few if any persons that has successfully taken on Fox News. He is making Roger Ailes look like an amateur. I don't think that is luck. Say what you will about his politics but he is by the front runner in the field and makes it look simple.

The problem is, that particular field is beginning to look like this:

mrussel1

muskydan said:

So you employ same strategy as Trump. Offensive sound bites with no substance.

I guess you can say that... However the substance I read from you guys often reminds me of the stains left on toilet papar...flush, someone light a match:)

So you mean like the Cornell data that I provided you that completely refuted your assertion about the education level of Obama assertions. That type of shit?

rgambs

mrussel1 said:

muskydan said:

So you employ same strategy as Trump. Offensive sound bites with no substance.

I guess you can say that... However the substance I read from you guys often reminds me of the stains left on toilet papar...flush, someone light a match:)

So you mean like the Cornell data that I provided you that completely refuted your assertion about the education level of Obama assertions. That type of shit?

Muskydan has told us before, he doesn't care about facts, only his gut.

rr165892

hedonist said:

I'm not a Trump supporter, but since when did the public servant position of "politician" become a profession? That's kind of fucked up in itself.

(and I think ego plays a part in most running for office)

Bingo!!

rr165892

Mrussel,Don't you think ones financial standing and job status have more relevance?

bootlegger10

I have always found it interesting that some liberals show such disdain for people that support Donald Trump. Using words like ignorant, abrasive, uneducated (these are the nice terms used). I would think that liberals would be kinder to these people because they don't have access to education and thus apparently cannot determine who is a good candidate and a bad candidate. This is the bread and butter for who liberals fight for: the poor person who doesn't get the proper education. Instead though, that person is ridiculed.

It is the same way that some liberals make fun of people that shop at Wal-Mart. They profess to be for the common man/woman. Guess what? The common man/woman shops at Wal-Mart.

muskydan

mrussel1 said:

muskydan said:

So you employ same strategy as Trump. Offensive sound bites with no substance.

I guess you can say that... However the substance I read from you guys often reminds me of the stains left on toilet papar...flush, someone light a match:)

So you mean like the Cornell data that I provided you that completely refuted your assertion about the education level of Obama assertions. That type of shit?

Exactly..... Please Waste more time researching meaningless data, I need more toilet paper.

mrussel1

rr165892 said:

Mrussel,Don't you think ones financial standing and job status have more relevance?

There's certainly an argument for income, for sure. I would not dispute that. Sex seems to have been just as predictive with Obama winning the woman vote 55-45 and Romney, the opposite. My irritation is that Muskydan made a statement about the education level of Obama voters, which isn't supported by the data.

mrussel1

bootlegger10 said:

I have always found it interesting that some liberals show such disdain for people that support Donald Trump. Using words like ignorant, abrasive, uneducated (these are the nice terms used). I would think that liberals would be kinder to these people because they don't have access to education and thus apparently cannot determine who is a good candidate and a bad candidate. This is the bread and butter for who liberals fight for: the poor person who doesn't get the proper education. Instead though, that person is ridiculed.

It is the same way that some liberals make fun of people that shop at Wal-Mart. They profess to be for the common man/woman. Guess what? The common man/woman shops at Wal-Mart.

I think we show disdain for Trump, but are perplexed by people who support Trump. Regarding the Wal-mart statement, I'm not sure where this comes from. Who makes fun of Wal Mart shoppers? I don't shop there myself, but mostly because I don't shop. I do go to Sam's Club. Does that count?

mrussel1

muskydan said:

mrussel1 said:

muskydan said:

So you employ same strategy as Trump. Offensive sound bites with no substance.

I guess you can say that... However the substance I read from you guys often reminds me of the stains left on toilet papar...flush, someone light a match:)

So you mean like the Cornell data that I provided you that completely refuted your assertion about the education level of Obama assertions. That type of shit?

Exactly..... Please Waste more time researching meaningless data, I need more toilet paper.

Yeah, don't let facts get in the way of your un-grounded opinions.

HughFreakingDillon

bootlegger10 said:

I have always found it interesting that some liberals show such disdain for people that support Donald Trump. Using words like ignorant, abrasive, uneducated (these are the nice terms used). I would think that liberals would be kinder to these people because they don't have access to education and thus apparently cannot determine who is a good candidate and a bad candidate. This is the bread and butter for who liberals fight for: the poor person who doesn't get the proper education. Instead though, that person is ridiculed.

It is the same way that some liberals make fun of people that shop at Wal-Mart. They profess to be for the common man/woman. Guess what? The common man/woman shops at Wal-Mart.

I find that just as many conservatives use similar language when talking about liberals. it goes both ways.

what I presented was simple fact based on survey results, not insulting. technically speaking, I'm uneducated. beyond high school, I have one year of university and one diploma from a speedy college. but I have chosen to educate myself, mostly through this forum. But I'm still uneducated, and I don't take that as an insult. same goes for ignorant. ignorant doesn't mean stupid, it simply implies "doesn't know the facts".

bootlegger10

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

I have always found it interesting that some liberals show such disdain for people that support Donald Trump. Using words like ignorant, abrasive, uneducated (these are the nice terms used). I would think that liberals would be kinder to these people because they don't have access to education and thus apparently cannot determine who is a good candidate and a bad candidate. This is the bread and butter for who liberals fight for: the poor person who doesn't get the proper education. Instead though, that person is ridiculed.

It is the same way that some liberals make fun of people that shop at Wal-Mart. They profess to be for the common man/woman. Guess what? The common man/woman shops at Wal-Mart.

I find that just as many conservatives use similar language when talking about liberals. it goes both ways.

what I presented was simple fact based on survey results, not insulting. technically speaking, I'm uneducated. beyond high school, I have one year of university and one diploma from a speedy college. but I have chosen to educate myself, mostly through this forum. But I'm still uneducated, and I don't take that as an insult. same goes for ignorant. ignorant doesn't mean stupid, it simply implies "doesn't know the facts".

Republicans are already painted as having a brand that does not care about the poor and uneducated. Liberals do not get painted in that light but they only care so much until politically it doesn't help them.

I'm not arguing that uneducated isn't untrue or anything. That is why I said those are the nice terms. There are plenty of instances on this board where there is clear disdain for Trump and people who support Trump (even though most people point to them supporting Trump because of lack of education which would not be their fault per se).

HughFreakingDillon

true, but republicans often insult liberals as being "sheep" and "being fed the kool aid", "hopey changey wimps", in other words, also being stupid. not to mention "unamerican", "traitor", etc. I can go on.