Hillary Clinton's email-SCANDAL!!!

Gern Blansten

mace1229 said:

I don't think the existence of classified material is as big of a deal as it has turned out to be. Others have used private emails before. What I don't get is why Clinton, or anyone else using her server, would think no classified information ever came through that server if it was used on a regular basis for work, whether it was classified at the time or later, you have to assumed it contained some.
What I think is a serious matter that deserves serious judgments is her destruction of evidence. I've mentioned it before and some seem bothered by it, but most seem to think it is okay for someone under investigation to destroy evidence after receiving a subpoena to hand it over, The fact she did it says she thinks she is above the law, and the fact she has gotten away with it shows she was right to think so.

Because truly classified material only gets sent through a special system....it can't cross over to regular email unless it is copied and retyped or scanned.

That's why Hillary was so confident in saying that "no material MARKED classified" was sent on her server. It would be impossible.

Of course there were some emails that had classified markings (in the body of the emails) but they obviously weren't sent under the secure system.

CM189191

Rey Tariche, head of the FBI Agents Association (FBIAA), which represents 13,000 former and current agents, resigned on Monday.

Giuliani’s former law firm, then called Bracewell Giuliani, has long been general counsel to the FBI Agents Association (FBIAA),

Rey Tariche's statement referenced the Clinton email scandal, saying: "we find our work-our integrity questioned" because of it, adding "we will not be used for political gains."

JC29856

Error

PJ_Soul

Gern Blansten said:

mace1229 said:

I don't think the existence of classified material is as big of a deal as it has turned out to be. Others have used private emails before. What I don't get is why Clinton, or anyone else using her server, would think no classified information ever came through that server if it was used on a regular basis for work, whether it was classified at the time or later, you have to assumed it contained some.
What I think is a serious matter that deserves serious judgments is her destruction of evidence. I've mentioned it before and some seem bothered by it, but most seem to think it is okay for someone under investigation to destroy evidence after receiving a subpoena to hand it over, The fact she did it says she thinks she is above the law, and the fact she has gotten away with it shows she was right to think so.

Because truly classified material only gets sent through a special system....it can't cross over to regular email unless it is copied and retyped or scanned.

That's why Hillary was so confident in saying that "no material MARKED classified" was sent on her server. It would be impossible.

Of course there were some emails that had classified markings (in the body of the emails) but they obviously weren't sent under the secure system.

Classified markings in the body of the emails? How's that work?