Hillary Clinton's email-SCANDAL!!!

WhatYouTaughtMe

rgambs said:

Free said:

I think the transcripts issue should not be overlooked just because of this email issue...
I wonder if that's what they're trying to do here.

No, the email issue is the real issue.

Yes it is. If someone accepted immunity, they were advised to by a lawyer. That usually means they have someone bigger to give up.

JimmyV

WhatYouTaughtMe said:

rgambs said:

Free said:

I think the transcripts issue should not be overlooked just because of this email issue...
I wonder if that's what they're trying to do here.

No, the email issue is the real issue.

Yes it is. If someone accepted immunity, they were advised to by a lawyer. That usually means they have someone bigger to give up.

Exactly.

HughFreakingDillon

what the fuck happens if she gets the nom and then gets indicted???

WhatYouTaughtMe

HughFreakingDillon said:

what the fuck happens if she gets the nom and then gets indicted???

A shit show, that's for sure.

JimmyV

HughFreakingDillon said:

what the fuck happens if she gets the nom and then gets indicted???

The Democrats lose the election. There should not be any doubt. Democrats who believe otherwise are fooling themselves. This is a real problem and a real possibility.

Gern Blansten

WhatYouTaughtMe said:

rgambs said:

Free said:

I think the transcripts issue should not be overlooked just because of this email issue...
I wonder if that's what they're trying to do here.

No, the email issue is the real issue.

Yes it is. If someone accepted immunity, they were advised to by a lawyer. That usually means they have someone bigger to give up.

No it doesn't. Any lawyer would advise someone to request immunity in this situation. Why agree to testify if there is any chance that the psycho GOP circus would prosecute him?

Clinton's campaign is delighted that he has immunity, now he can say that he doesn't know of any impropriety.

JimmyV

Gern Blansten said:

WhatYouTaughtMe said:

rgambs said:

Free said:

I think the transcripts issue should not be overlooked just because of this email issue...
I wonder if that's what they're trying to do here.

No, the email issue is the real issue.

Yes it is. If someone accepted immunity, they were advised to by a lawyer. That usually means they have someone bigger to give up.

No it doesn't. Any lawyer would advise someone to request immunity in this situation. Why agree to testify if there is any chance that the psycho GOP circus would prosecute him?

Clinton's campaign is delighted that he has immunity, now he can say that he doesn't know of any impropriety.

The psycho GOP circus isn't who is questioning him and isn't who would be in charge of a prosecution. This is the Justice Department, under the control of Democratic appointees.

Gern Blansten

I agree with Colin Powell....nothing here

chadwick

Last-12-Exit said:

It occured to me yesterday when I was hearing about this on the news how little I give a fuck about Hillary Clinton's email server.

JimmyV

chadwick said:

Last-12-Exit said:

It occured to me yesterday when I was hearing about this on the news how little I give a fuck about Hillary Clinton's email server.

I miss Last 12.

rgambs

JimmyV said:

chadwick said:

Last-12-Exit said:

It occured to me yesterday when I was hearing about this on the news how little I give a fuck about Hillary Clinton's email server.

I miss Last 12.

Definitely, he's still active on FB, but I am not lol

Dirtie_Frank

Gern Blansten said:

Colin Powell did the same thing...no outrage from conservatives there

I thought about this. When Colin Powell was the SoS iPods, thumb drives and other forms of communications were allowed in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). Times have changed and new rules are in place. Colin Powell also did not set up an email server in his bathroom either.

JimmyV

Whether or not there is illegality here is one question...but is it the most important question?

When you are serving as Secretary of State and you take the extraordinary step of setting up a private email server in your basement...not just a personal email account but a private email server...when you are fully aware that the very nature of your job will require the transmission of sensitive information...doesn't that call into question her judgement?

I say yes it does. And her judgment, more than anything else, is why I voted against her and why I do not want to see her secure the nomination.

This shouldn't be a Democrat vs Republican issue. This should be a common sense issue. Many Democrats giving her a pass on this issue would be hopping mad if the presumptive Republican frontrunner had not only done this but was also under federal investigation for it. The party loyalty in this cycle is blinding.

JC29856

JimmyV said:

Whether or not there is illegality here is one question...but is it the most important question?

When you are serving as Secretary of State and you take the extraordinary step of setting up a private email server in your basement...not just a personal email account but a private email server...when you are fully aware that the very nature of your job will require the transmission of sensitive information...doesn't that call into question her judgement?

I say yes it does. And her judgment, more than anything else, is why I voted against her and why I do not want to see her secure the nomination.

This shouldn't be a Democrat vs Republican issue. This should be a common sense issue. Many Democrats giving her a pass on this issue would be hopping mad if the presumptive Republican frontrunner had not only done this but was also under federal investigation for it. The party loyalty in this cycle is blinding.

BOOM goes the dynamite!

Give her the manning sentences, traitor, she risked American lives, she compromised national security.

http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/2016/01/remember-bradley-manning-hillary-clinton-probably-does-these-days.html/
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2015/08/13/chelsea-manning-and-hillary-clinton-a-case-of-double-standards/
https://theintercept.com/2015/08/12/hillary-clinton-sanctity-protecting-classified-information/
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/flashback-when-hillary-clinton-worried-about-protecting-government-secrets

rgambs

JimmyV said:

Whether or not there is illegality here is one question...but is it the most important question?

When you are serving as Secretary of State and you take the extraordinary step of setting up a private email server in your basement...not just a personal email account but a private email server...when you are fully aware that the very nature of your job will require the transmission of sensitive information...doesn't that call into question her judgement?

I say yes it does. And her judgment, more than anything else, is why I voted against her and why I do not want to see her secure the nomination.

This shouldn't be a Democrat vs Republican issue. This should be a common sense issue. Many Democrats giving her a pass on this issue would be hopping mad if the presumptive Republican frontrunner had not only done this but was also under federal investigation for it. The party loyalty in this cycle is blinding.

I agree, but if she gets the nomination I will vote for her. She may make mistakes from poor judgement, everything about the current GOP is born of the worst judgement.

JimmyV

rgambs said:

JimmyV said:

Whether or not there is illegality here is one question...but is it the most important question?

When you are serving as Secretary of State and you take the extraordinary step of setting up a private email server in your basement...not just a personal email account but a private email server...when you are fully aware that the very nature of your job will require the transmission of sensitive information...doesn't that call into question her judgement?

I say yes it does. And her judgment, more than anything else, is why I voted against her and why I do not want to see her secure the nomination.

This shouldn't be a Democrat vs Republican issue. This should be a common sense issue. Many Democrats giving her a pass on this issue would be hopping mad if the presumptive Republican frontrunner had not only done this but was also under federal investigation for it. The party loyalty in this cycle is blinding.

I agree, but if she gets the nomination I will vote for her. She may make mistakes from poor judgement, everything about the current GOP is born of the worst judgement.

Unfortunately if I was living in a swing state I would have to think long and hard about it, too.

ckravitz

JimmyV said:

Whether or not there is illegality here is one question...but is it the most important question?

When you are serving as Secretary of State and you take the extraordinary step of setting up a private email server in your basement...not just a personal email account but a private email server...when you are fully aware that the very nature of your job will require the transmission of sensitive information...doesn't that call into question her judgement?

I say yes it does. And her judgment, more than anything else, is why I voted against her and why I do not want to see her secure the nomination.

This shouldn't be a Democrat vs Republican issue. This should be a common sense issue. Many Democrats giving her a pass on this issue would be hopping mad if the presumptive Republican frontrunner had not only done this but was also under federal investigation for it. The party loyalty in this cycle is blinding.

Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy. This is politics, there is no room for such thoughtful comments pertaining to introspection. You have to violently agree with everything in your party or else! Disregard that it's rare, if not impossible, to fully agree with friends and family. You should sheepily follow people you don't even know and that always have at least some motivations that are not aligned with your own. It's exactly as they want it.

And this applies to the entire left-right continuum btw. (not all people, but people from all parts of the political spectrum that is).

rgambs

rgambs said:

JimmyV said:

Whether or not there is illegality here is one question...but is it the most important question?

When you are serving as Secretary of State and you take the extraordinary step of setting up a private email server in your basement...not just a personal email account but a private email server...when you are fully aware that the very nature of your job will require the transmission of sensitive information...doesn't that call into question her judgement?

I say yes it does. And her judgment, more than anything else, is why I voted against her and why I do not want to see her secure the nomination.

This shouldn't be a Democrat vs Republican issue. This should be a common sense issue. Many Democrats giving her a pass on this issue would be hopping mad if the presumptive Republican frontrunner had not only done this but was also under federal investigation for it. The party loyalty in this cycle is blinding.

I agree, but if she gets the nomination I will vote for her. She may make mistakes from poor judgement, everything about the current GOP is born of the worst judgement.

I live in Ohio, but in a Red county.

JimmyV

ckravitz said:

JimmyV said:

Whether or not there is illegality here is one question...but is it the most important question?

When you are serving as Secretary of State and you take the extraordinary step of setting up a private email server in your basement...not just a personal email account but a private email server...when you are fully aware that the very nature of your job will require the transmission of sensitive information...doesn't that call into question her judgement?

I say yes it does. And her judgment, more than anything else, is why I voted against her and why I do not want to see her secure the nomination.

This shouldn't be a Democrat vs Republican issue. This should be a common sense issue. Many Democrats giving her a pass on this issue would be hopping mad if the presumptive Republican frontrunner had not only done this but was also under federal investigation for it. The party loyalty in this cycle is blinding.

Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy. This is politics, there is no room for such thoughtful comments pertaining to introspection. You have to violently agree with everything in your party or else! Disregard that it's rare, if not impossible, to fully agree with friends and family. You should sheepily follow people you don't even know and that always have at least some motivations that are not aligned with your own. It's exactly as they want it.

And this applies to the entire left-right continuum btw. (not all people, but people from all parts of the political spectrum that is).

Unfortunate and sad...but true.

PJfanwillneverleave1

It really is a non-issue.
I am glad that there was some place left for her to get work done without prying eyes.
Kind of like this forum.