Somewhere in the US, this group is heading off to go hunting...lol
Remember you can only use one at a time.
I’m willing to bet there’s a picture of some “responsible” gun owner shooting more than one or two firearms at a time floating around YouTube and/or the interwebs, maybe even three or four.
I've managed to use two but they were both pistols. No images available...
I ve never tried it. I assume There is zero way to be accurate.
Somewhere in the US, this group is heading off to go hunting...lol
Remember you can only use one at a time.
I’m willing to bet there’s a picture of some “responsible” gun owner shooting more than one or two firearms at a time floating around YouTube and/or the interwebs, maybe even three or four.
I've managed to use two but they were both pistols. No images available...
I ve never tried it. I assume There is zero way to be accurate.
Depends on what you are trying to accomplish.
At the time I had to practice shooting left handed so I could hit targets but not very good groupings.
Somewhere in the US, this group is heading off to go hunting...lol
Remember you can only use one at a time.
I’m willing to bet there’s a picture of some “responsible” gun owner shooting more than one or two firearms at a time floating around YouTube and/or the interwebs, maybe even three or four.
Explain to me how someone could fire three of four separate firearms at that same time.
Fingers and toes, fingers and toes.
And while I didn’t qualify it, I suppose you could use 20 vice grips in perfect alignment, triggers set to the lowest pull rate, tread a dowel through the trigger guard and pull both ends simultaneously, maybe even using equal lengths of twine held in the center. Maybe Myth Busters could play around?
Somewhere in the US, this group is heading off to go hunting...lol
Remember you can only use one at a time.
I’m willing to bet there’s a picture of some “responsible” gun owner shooting more than one or two firearms at a time floating around YouTube and/or the interwebs, maybe even three or four.
Explain to me how someone could fire three of four separate firearms at that same time.
Fingers and toes, fingers and toes.
And while I didn’t qualify it, I suppose you could use 20 vice grips in perfect alignment, triggers set to the lowest pull rate, tread a dowel through the trigger guard and pull both ends simultaneously, maybe even using equal lengths of twine held in the center. Maybe Myth Busters could play around?
You really have quite the imagination.
Pittsburgh 2013 Cincinnati 2014 Greenville 2016 (Raleigh 2016) Columbia 2016
Somewhere in the US, this group is heading off to go hunting...lol
Remember you can only use one at a time.
I’m willing to bet there’s a picture of some “responsible” gun owner shooting more than one or two firearms at a time floating around YouTube and/or the interwebs, maybe even three or four.
Explain to me how someone could fire three of four separate firearms at that same time.
Fingers and toes, fingers and toes.
And while I didn’t qualify it, I suppose you could use 20 vice grips in perfect alignment, triggers set to the lowest pull rate, tread a dowel through the trigger guard and pull both ends simultaneously, maybe even using equal lengths of twine held in the center. Maybe Myth Busters could play around?
You really have quite the imagination.
There are known knowns, there are unknown knowns and there are unknown unknowns.
I’m surprised his bail was as low as it was. NRA going to provide gratis defense?
How is a person dealing in illegal activities responsible? That seems to be your catchphrase for this page as you appear to attach one to each thread you do, yes you have a pattern.
Why would the NRA defend this person? That just doesn't make sense...
I was told by an NRA card carrying member that every legal gun buyer starts out “responsible” and every gun begins as a legal one. The NRA doesn’t believe there should be limits to the number or types of firearms an individual can possess. They shill for the firearms industry, not “responsibility.”
This guy broke the law and the NRA won't defend that.
Every driver starts out a "responsible" driver until they are not.
Every parent starts off as a "responsible" parent until they aren't.
You can argue the case that someone is responsible until they aren't for just about anything.
Again, since you missed it, the person was committing felonies. There is nothing responsible about that and you put all the actual responsible gun owners in one spot.
Every republican must be a racist and every democrat must want to give away free things, eh?
To your last sentence, until they do or expose themselves as such. Car drivers and parents of kids generally are held accountable and there’s been a whole industry of legislation and changes that have taken place, and continue to do so, in an effort to protect the innocents. With guns, not so much.
So you’re okay with an individual amassing 1,000 guns, eh?
Where’s the NRA on gun printing? Because that’ll make us safer. Think of the convenience! Why go to a gun store when you can go to the ritzy part of LA, nice neighborhood and buy from the “responsible” gun owner?
ooooohhhhhh, that presents quite the conundrum. a good portion of the board is gun manufacturers, so I wonder what their individual stance would be on that and how it might affect any decisions the NRA would make behind printing......
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
You can have guns and solid gun control. It does not need to be 1 or the other. It should be both. But, even if the US made sweeping changes to gun control, you will still have millions of illegal guns out there and a porous southern border in which guns flow just like drugs do...
I'll take a stab that the magazine leans a little left?
I guess these guys and gals lean a little left too?
30 Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense
Is this a "whataboutism"? I asked about the magazine.
Sure, the magazine leans a little left but the information presented came from the organization cited.
Cmon then. You can pull any piece of info you want and correlate it into your own agenda, we all know this. Hell that's what we use google for now right?
I'll take a stab that the magazine leans a little left?
I guess these guys and gals lean a little left too?
30 Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense
Is this a "whataboutism"? I asked about the magazine.
Sure, the magazine leans a little left but the information presented came from the organization cited.
Cmon then. You can pull any piece of info you want and correlate it into your own agenda, we all know this. Hell that's what we use google for now right?
What’s your point then? Are you disputing the claim posted or not?
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
I'll take a stab that the magazine leans a little left?
I guess these guys and gals lean a little left too?
30 Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense
Is this a "whataboutism"? I asked about the magazine.
Sure, the magazine leans a little left but the information presented came from the organization cited.
Cmon then. You can pull any piece of info you want and correlate it into your own agenda, we all know this. Hell that's what we use google for now right?
What’s your point then? Are you disputing the claim posted or not?
I believe my point was, but maybe mistaken, that the publication was very left leaning, the comment after is a "whataboutism" and that pieces of info plucked from certain places can be used for their own agenda.
I think that was my point(s)? Not sure.
You tell me what they were.
Disputing wasn't on my list of points though. That much I'm sure of.
I'll take a stab that the magazine leans a little left?
I guess these guys and gals lean a little left too?
30 Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense
Is this a "whataboutism"? I asked about the magazine.
Sure, the magazine leans a little left but the information presented came from the organization cited.
Cmon then. You can pull any piece of info you want and correlate it into your own agenda, we all know this. Hell that's what we use google for now right?
Harpers Index is vetted and uses reputable sources of data with the source cited. Whether it’s in a magazine that leans a little left is irrelevant. They also will retract and print a correction if they get called out on their data. Further, Harpers Magazine has been published weekly since 1850, a real failure. I know, facts don’t matter.
I'll take a stab that the magazine leans a little left?
I guess these guys and gals lean a little left too?
30 Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense
Is this a "whataboutism"? I asked about the magazine.
Sure, the magazine leans a little left but the information presented came from the organization cited.
Cmon then. You can pull any piece of info you want and correlate it into your own agenda, we all know this. Hell that's what we use google for now right?
Harpers Index is vetted and uses reputable sources of data with the source cited. Whether it’s in a magazine that leans a little left is irrelevant. They also will retract and print a correction if they get called out on their data. Further, Harpers Magazine has been published weekly since 1850, a real failure. I know, facts don’t matter.
I'll take a stab that the magazine leans a little left?
I guess these guys and gals lean a little left too?
30 Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense
Is this a "whataboutism"? I asked about the magazine.
Sure, the magazine leans a little left but the information presented came from the organization cited.
Cmon then. You can pull any piece of info you want and correlate it into your own agenda, we all know this. Hell that's what we use google for now right?
What’s your point then? Are you disputing the claim posted or not?
I believe my point was, but maybe mistaken, that the publication was very left leaning, the comment after is a "whataboutism" and that pieces of info plucked from certain places can be used for their own agenda.
I think that was my point(s)? Not sure.
You tell me what they were.
Disputing wasn't on my list of points though. That much I'm sure of.
It's up to you to articulate your point, not me.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
I'll take a stab that the magazine leans a little left?
I guess these guys and gals lean a little left too?
30 Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense
Is this a "whataboutism"? I asked about the magazine.
Sure, the magazine leans a little left but the information presented came from the organization cited.
Cmon then. You can pull any piece of info you want and correlate it into your own agenda, we all know this. Hell that's what we use google for now right?
What’s your point then? Are you disputing the claim posted or not?
I believe my point was, but maybe mistaken, that the publication was very left leaning, the comment after is a "whataboutism" and that pieces of info plucked from certain places can be used for their own agenda.
I think that was my point(s)? Not sure.
You tell me what they were.
Disputing wasn't on my list of points though. That much I'm sure of.
Comments
Actually, that was the dude who got busted in LA...he was officially charged today.
At the time I had to practice shooting left handed so I could hit targets but not very good groupings.
And while I didn’t qualify it, I suppose you could use 20 vice grips in perfect alignment, triggers set to the lowest pull rate, tread a dowel through the trigger guard and pull both ends simultaneously, maybe even using equal lengths of twine held in the center. Maybe Myth Busters could play around?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
you in?
Cincinnati 2014
Greenville 2016
(Raleigh 2016)
Columbia 2016
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://harpers.org/archive/2019/08/harpers-index-august-2019/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
30 Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I think that was my point(s)? Not sure.
You tell me what they were.
Disputing wasn't on my list of points though. That much I'm sure of.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
That would have been a better fit perhaps?
That's a fact, yes?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
It's up to you to articulate your point, not me.
Oh never mind...