America's Gun Violence

Options
1…317318320322323…903

Comments

  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,597
    I've already had one buddy tell me there was a second shooter while pointing to fake news sites as evidence.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,597
    Which isn't to say there COULDN'T be a second shooter. Just that the Alex Jones wing of the media shouldn't be trusted when it claims there was.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,111
    JimmyV said:
    I've already had one buddy tell me there was a second shooter while pointing to fake news sites as evidence.
    Yeah I hope I am wrong. Shocking that a fake news site said that lol. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
  • riley540
    riley540 Denver Colorado Posts: 1,132
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    He modified a gun to be fully automatic. Any rational person, gun owner or not, will understand that you can flatten a lot of people that way 
  • riley540
    riley540 Denver Colorado Posts: 1,132
    I’m in favor of making it so guns have no way to be converted from their semi-automatic nature. 
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    59 is nothing given the arsenal he had.  
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    riley540 said:
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    He modified a gun to be fully automatic. Any rational person, gun owner or not, will understand that you can flatten a lot of people that way 
    Well yeah, any rational person. Gun nuts don't fall into that category....more likely the paranoid category.
  • riley540
    riley540 Denver Colorado Posts: 1,132
    dignin said:
    riley540 said:
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    He modified a gun to be fully automatic. Any rational person, gun owner or not, will understand that you can flatten a lot of people that way 
    Well yeah, any rational person. Gun nuts don't fall into that category....more likely the paranoid category.
    I know a lot of gun owners. Most of them are very educated on fire arms and fire arm safety and wouldn’t refute any of the evidence presented. 
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,597
    One guy with that kind of firepower shooting into a penned in crowd from an elevated position. He wouldn't even need to be a good shot. Just spray the crowd back and forth. Yet the conspiracy theories will still come. Just like after Newtown.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,111
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    So having a theory on a massacre makes me a gun nut? I never or did anyone on this forum  believe that this could not have been done by only one person. 
    What would prove if there was only one shooter as opposed to two? Again just a theory on a case that isn't 48 hours old. 

    I just find it hard to believe that this man snuck in all those guns and ammo, surveyed the area for who knows how long and no one knew anything about it. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    mcgruff10 said:
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    So having a theory on a massacre makes me a gun nut? I never or did anyone on this forum  believe that this could not have been done by only one person. 
    What would prove if there was only one shooter as opposed to two? Again just a theory on a case that isn't 48 hours old. 

    I just find it hard to believe that this man snuck in all those guns and ammo, surveyed the area for who knows how long and no one knew anything about it. 
    It's a hotel, he was there for 4 days, bring up 2 or 3 suitcases every day and who's going to notice?
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,111
    rgambs said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    So having a theory on a massacre makes me a gun nut? I never or did anyone on this forum  believe that this could not have been done by only one person. 
    What would prove if there was only one shooter as opposed to two? Again just a theory on a case that isn't 48 hours old. 

    I just find it hard to believe that this man snuck in all those guns and ammo, surveyed the area for who knows how long and no one knew anything about it. 
    It's a hotel, he was there for 4 days, bring up 2 or 3 suitcases every day and who's going to notice?
    Like I said, I hope I am wrong.  I just can't believe he didn't tell one person about it. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • riley540
    riley540 Denver Colorado Posts: 1,132
    rgambs said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    So having a theory on a massacre makes me a gun nut? I never or did anyone on this forum  believe that this could not have been done by only one person. 
    What would prove if there was only one shooter as opposed to two? Again just a theory on a case that isn't 48 hours old. 

    I just find it hard to believe that this man snuck in all those guns and ammo, surveyed the area for who knows how long and no one knew anything about it. 
    It's a hotel, he was there for 4 days, bring up 2 or 3 suitcases every day and who's going to notice?
    It’s like Andy with his prison wall in Shawshank redemption. Little bit every day 
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    Here is a good read from 538.
    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/mass-shootings-are-a-bad-way-to-understand-gun-violence/
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,824
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    Where are all these foil hat gun nuts? All I've seen is one person state "I wonder if there was more than one shooter" who I'm not ever sure what side of gun control he stands on, and that qualifies as all the gun nuts coming out to defend guns?
    Did I miss something?
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    mcgruff10 said:
    rgambs said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    So having a theory on a massacre makes me a gun nut? I never or did anyone on this forum  believe that this could not have been done by only one person. 
    What would prove if there was only one shooter as opposed to two? Again just a theory on a case that isn't 48 hours old. 

    I just find it hard to believe that this man snuck in all those guns and ammo, surveyed the area for who knows how long and no one knew anything about it. 
    It's a hotel, he was there for 4 days, bring up 2 or 3 suitcases every day and who's going to notice?
    Like I said, I hope I am wrong.  I just can't believe he didn't tell one person about it. 
    You went from "second shooter" to "telling someone about it".
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    mace1229 said:
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    Where are all these foil hat gun nuts? All I've seen is one person state "I wonder if there was more than one shooter" who I'm not ever sure what side of gun control he stands on, and that qualifies as all the gun nuts coming out to defend guns?
    Did I miss something?
    You're missing a lot.
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478

    Sorry, this is a political column about the massacre in Las Vegas: Neil Macdonald

    In Nevada, the next gambler walking into the casino might be angry and carrying a machine-gun. Legally

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/massacre-las-vegas-1.4316852
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,111
    dignin said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    rgambs said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    dignin said:
    Time to throw on the tin foil hats guys. Gun nuts couldn't possibly believe that one man could cause that much carnage. It doesn't fit the BS they have been spewing from their mouths for years.
    So having a theory on a massacre makes me a gun nut? I never or did anyone on this forum  believe that this could not have been done by only one person. 
    What would prove if there was only one shooter as opposed to two? Again just a theory on a case that isn't 48 hours old. 

    I just find it hard to believe that this man snuck in all those guns and ammo, surveyed the area for who knows how long and no one knew anything about it. 
    It's a hotel, he was there for 4 days, bring up 2 or 3 suitcases every day and who's going to notice?
    Like I said, I hope I am wrong.  I just can't believe he didn't tell one person about it. 
    You went from "second shooter" to "telling someone about it".
    Thanks capt
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
This discussion has been closed.

Categories