There is nothing weird about a WWII buff having some Nazi artifacts in their WWII collection. There IS something very weird about some gun nut buying Nazi crap because he thinks it's awesome (and I think there is probably a large number of people like that). Same goes for Confederate stuff. Context is everything.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
There is nothing weird about a WWII buff having some Nazi artifacts in their WWII collection. There IS something very weird about some gun nut buying Nazi crap because he thinks it's awesome (and I think there is probably a large number of people like that). Same goes for Confederate stuff. Context is everything.
I agree with the first part of your comment. The second is just speculation and labeling. I'm sure there are plenty of non gun nut Nazi lovers and sympathisers.
There is nothing weird about a WWII buff having some Nazi artifacts in their WWII collection. There IS something very weird about some gun nut buying Nazi crap because he thinks it's awesome (and I think there is probably a large number of people like that). Same goes for Confederate stuff. Context is everything.
I agree with the first part of your comment. The second is just speculation and labeling. I'm sure there are plenty of non gun nut Nazi lovers and sympathisers.
My comment doesn't exclude all the non-gun nuts who are Nazi lovers. Of course there are also neo-nazis and sympathizers who aren't gun nuts.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Yes. Many WWII collectors will collect items from USA< England, Russia and even Germany. I see nothing wrong with that if it is being collected as a historical artifact. I personally wouldnt care to own anything connected to Nazi, but if it is for a historical WWII collection I dont see anything wrong with it.
Yeah I have ww2 weapons from Russia, England, Germany and USA. I also have a few bring home items that are German: belt buckles, pins, bayonets and a rifle. Kind of weird knowing that an actually nazi fighting my grandfather held these but i appreciate it because it is a huge piece of world history.
I'm waiting for the NRA to come out in support of weaponized drones. 3-6 shot versions to start with and then high capacity ones after they've convinced everyone it's your second amendment right.
My buddy had a German knife given to him by his grandfather who served. It was an interesting piece. It sparked conversation every time he displayed it to us. He never bragged about it and was the farthest thing from a Nazi as one could be.
It was just a piece of history for him. The knife carried much significance in a few areas. We never felt it was weird or wrong.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
So again, dictating what people can own and totally unamerican. Who are any of you to decide what historical property I can and can not own? Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
So again, dictating what people can own and totally unamerican. Who are any of you to decide what historical property I can and can not own? Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
Whoa - little bit of an over-reaction there.
No one is dictating whether you can own this stuff or not. You claimed that CM was arguing against preserving history, when anyone who claims to be a history buff should know that artifacts are going to be better preserved and displayed for people to actually learn from in a museum, compared to a private collection.
And, unAmerican? Is this another one of those "my ancestors died for freedom of speech but it's unAmerican to actually use it" arguments?
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
So again, dictating what people can own and totally unamerican. Who are any of you to decide what historical property I can and can not own? Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
Don't forget to turn off the light on your lamp with the shade made from human skin. It'll melt overnight.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
So again, dictating what people can own and totally unamerican. Who are any of you to decide what historical property I can and can not own? Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
Don't forget to turn off the light on your lamp with the shade made from human skin. It'll melt overnight.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
So again, dictating what people can own and totally unamerican. Who are any of you to decide what historical property I can and can not own? Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
I suppose it depends on how it was acquired. Family heirloom? Keep it, all yours. Spoils of war? Should be returned.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
So again, dictating what people can own and totally unamerican. Who are any of you to decide what historical property I can and can not own? Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
Don't forget to turn off the light on your lamp with the shade made from human skin. It'll melt overnight.
Holy exaggeration bat man!! Lol howecer i did say I would never keep anything from the ss. They are some sick people.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
So again, dictating what people can own and totally unamerican. Who are any of you to decide what historical property I can and can not own? Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
Don't forget to turn off the light on your lamp with the shade made from human skin. It'll melt overnight.
Holy exaggeration bat man!! Lol howecer i did say I would never keep anything from the ss. They are some sick people.
At least you saw my facisitousness in that post but where does the ethics line get crossed when it comes to this stuff? Hitler's pistol? Scalps? Shrunken heads? Uniforms with bullet holes? Personal items taken from bodies? Where do the gun show crowds draw the line on war memorabilia?
Responsible gun owners until they're not seem to contribute to a large percentage of illegal gun possession that results in gun crime. But yea, don't hold them responsible.
Nazi 'memorabilia' belongs in a museum. Along with confederate statues. Not for display as part of someone's proud collection.
This could be one of the most un-American posts I have ever read. Now we are going to dictate what historical items people own? I have a signed bible by Robert E. Lee...should I burn it?
jfc. I didn't say make law mandating as such. Just that it's a more appropriate place for that stuff. Your Bible probably belongs in a museum too.
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
Take off the blinders bud! History is history, don't destroy it, preserve it and make sure it doesn't happen again.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
So again, dictating what people can own and totally unamerican. Who are any of you to decide what historical property I can and can not own? Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
Don't forget to turn off the light on your lamp with the shade made from human skin. It'll melt overnight.
Holy exaggeration bat man!! Lol howecer i did say I would never keep anything from the ss. They are some sick people.
At least you saw my facisitousness in that post but where does the ethics line get crossed when it comes to this stuff? Hitler's pistol? Scalps? Shrunken heads? Uniforms with bullet holes? Personal items taken from bodies? Where do the gun show crowds draw the line on war memorabilia?
Hitler's pistol....I could never afford it but I see no issues with it. Scalps and shrunken heads...no thanks. (do they sell these?!) Personal items taken from bodies and uniforms with bullet holes...no issues with it. I'm sure a few items I own were taken from a dead german soldier.
I've never been to a gun show as they are illegal in new jersey; is the sales of nazi memorabilia a big part of these shows?
Responsible gun owners until they're not seem to contribute to a large percentage of illegal gun possession that results in gun crime. But yea, don't hold them responsible.
Guess this wasn't one of your 10 sources you looked at?
Unclear on what your point is? The title of the article and the opening line compeltely agree with what I've been saying. The article starts with "Lawful gun owners commit less than a fifth of all gun crimes, according to a novel analysis released this week by the University of Pittsburgh." And continues to defend the fact that gun crimes are committed by those who illegally possess guns. Not sure what I was supposed to take from that article, or how it disagrees with what I said? States exactly what I already said. It a nutshell, only 18% of guns used in a crime were used by the person who purchased it. Exactly what I said. And my comment was simply gun laws should target that.
How exactly does your source disagree or disprove anything I've said? It actually agrees with all of it.
I would also add that your article doesn't go further into that 18%, but a portion of that 18% cannot legally own guns (the guns were purchased prior to an offense), or have some other criminal record. So again, target unlawful gun owners, and strict requirements for those with any criminal record.
Thank you for another great resource backing my point.
Comments
It's relevant.
It's tough to argue against them given how much practicality they offer the American average joe.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
My buddy had a German knife given to him by his grandfather who served. It was an interesting piece. It sparked conversation every time he displayed it to us. He never bragged about it and was the farthest thing from a Nazi as one could be.
It was just a piece of history for him. The knife carried much significance in a few areas. We never felt it was weird or wrong.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Or you could burn it, wouldn't matter to me.
And thus, the "museum" suggestion....
Because holding it in private collections does nothing to prevent similar episodes from happening again.
Your beliefs remind me of the propaganda that was spewed in Germany during the 30's.
Whoa - little bit of an over-reaction there.
No one is dictating whether you can own this stuff or not. You claimed that CM was arguing against preserving history, when anyone who claims to be a history buff should know that artifacts are going to be better preserved and displayed for people to actually learn from in a museum, compared to a private collection.
And, unAmerican? Is this another one of those "my ancestors died for freedom of speech but it's unAmerican to actually use it" arguments?
from human skin. It'll melt overnight.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Family heirloom? Keep it, all yours.
Spoils of war? Should be returned.
howecer i did say I would never keep anything from the ss. They are some sick people.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/27/new-evidence-confirms-what-gun-rights-advocates-have-been-saying-for-a-long-time-about-crime
Guess this wasn't one of your 10 sources you looked at?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Scalps and shrunken heads...no thanks. (do they sell these?!)
Personal items taken from bodies and uniforms with bullet holes...no issues with it. I'm sure a few items I own were taken from a dead german soldier.
I've never been to a gun show as they are illegal in new jersey; is the sales of nazi memorabilia a big part of these shows?
Not sure what I was supposed to take from that article, or how it disagrees with what I said? States exactly what I already said.
It a nutshell, only 18% of guns used in a crime were used by the person who purchased it. Exactly what I said. And my comment was simply gun laws should target that.
How exactly does your source disagree or disprove anything I've said? It actually agrees with all of it.
I would also add that your article doesn't go further into that 18%, but a portion of that 18% cannot legally own guns (the guns were purchased prior to an offense), or have some other criminal record. So again, target unlawful gun owners, and strict requirements for those with any criminal record.
Thank you for another great resource backing my point.