Pedophilia Officially Classified

mickeyrat

aerial wrote:

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

aerial wrote:

In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true!

Well... no. you said it had been "officially classified" and what had actually happened was a misprint.

Not quite the same thing.

And it wasn't "legit at the time."

Many of the right wing nut sites were reporting it as "legit" but it was always known that this was a misprint.

They did not retract till
For Immediate Release:
Eve Herold, 703-907-8640 October 31, 2013

may I ask if you went direct to the source from the article you posted BEFORE you took their word for it?

Cosmo

aerial wrote:

In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true! But will be changed in the next edition. Did I know they made a mistake? No......
Here is a thought....would it have been changed if it was not reported?
The the final, approved DSM-5 was released in May 2013 at APA's Annual Meeting.


http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/13-67-DSM-Correction-103113.pdf

...
Actually... it was your hysterical frenzy that prompted my initial response. You simply reposted an article from Charisma Media (best known for its magazines such as Charisma, Ministry Today and Christian Retailing) and their frenzied hystrical response that was aimed at creating a frenzied hysterics from people they knew would get all hysterical about it.
A simple pause... consideration of the source of the article... and a simple internet search would have lead you to the simple truth of the matter, rather than the spreading of an agenda item looking to lump Gays and Lesbians with pedophiles and sheep fuckers.
Again... a simple rule of thumb... everything you read on the Internet is not true. Look for the truth... before settling on an agreement.

aerial

Cosmo wrote:

aerial wrote:

In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true! But will be changed in the next edition. Did I know they made a mistake? No......
Here is a thought....would it have been changed if it was not reported?
The the final, approved DSM-5 was released in May 2013 at APA's Annual Meeting.


http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/13-67-DSM-Correction-103113.pdf

...
Actually... it was your hysterical frenzy that prompted my initial response. You simply reposted an article from Charisma Media (best known for its magazines such as Charisma, Ministry Today and Christian Retailing) and their frenzied hystrical response that was aimed at creating a frenzied hysterics from people they knew would get all hysterical about it.
A simple pause... consideration of the source of the article... and a simple internet search would have lead you to the simple truth of the matter, rather than the spreading of an agenda item looking to lump Gays and Lesbians with pedophiles and sheep fuckers.
Again... a simple rule of thumb... everything you read on the Internet is not true. Look for the truth... before settling on an agreement.

4:30PM EDT 10/30/2013 story comes out....
so when looking for proof this was fact. You just had to go to the APA’s latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
It was there till....
11/1/13 and is still in the written manual and has been since May.

7:00AM EDT 11/1/2013 Retraction
In response to media calls, including queries from Charisma News, the APA admitted there was an error in the DSM and announced plans to correct its manual to make it clear that it does not classify pedophilia as a sexual orientation.

Charisma News originally reported the AFA’s shocking revelation that the APA’s latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) now classifies pedophilia as a sexual orientation or preference instead of a disorder.

Our investigation into the report and statement reveals that the AFA and its American Family Radio network talk show host Sandy Rios were not fear-mongering. Text associated with the DSM did indeed use the words sexual orientation.


So quit bashing and get over your Christianophobia.....and maybe the rest of you should do some research yourselves :roll:

http://www.charismanews.com/us/41605-pedophilia-described-as-sexual-orientation-but-apa-claims-it-was-their-error

PJ_Soul

Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

chadwick

PJ_Soul wrote:

Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

but you can beat their ass. it should happen just because of principle. people should feel dirty for not busting asses.

Pingfah

PJ_Soul wrote:

Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

I think you should read the whole thread, the whole thing is a load of nonsense pushed by a right wing nutjob website.

Pingfah

chadwick wrote:

but you can beat their ass. it should happen just because of principle. people should feel dirty for not busting asses.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/0 ... 09497.html

This is where your attitude leads Chadwick. This fear mongering and promoting of vigilantism that people like you do leads only to one place.

Desperately sad, this poor man did nothing, but ended up being burned to death by people who think just like you.

badbrains

Pingfah wrote:

chadwick wrote:

but you can beat their ass. it should happen just because of principle. people should feel dirty for not busting asses.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/0 ... 09497.html

This is where your attitude leads Chadwick. This fear mongering and promoting of vigilantism that people like you do leads only to one place.

Desperately sad, this poor man did nothing, but ended up being burned to death by people who think just like you.

Wow, that's fucked up. Burn an innocent man to death and the cops are taking blame for it to. That wouldn't happen here. Humanity at its best!

aerial

Pingfah wrote:

PJ_Soul wrote:

Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

I think you should read the whole thread, the whole thing is a load of nonsense pushed by a right wing nutjob website.

That is BS! The first post is fact....and you can still find it (they will detract it in the manual as soon as the new one comes out) in APA’s latest printed edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). They never retracted till it became public knowledge, 6 months later.

Who are the haters and liasr here? I must say you guys are persistent.."If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it", Hitler's right hand man...

aerial

PJ_Soul wrote:

Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

Not yet, but they are working on it.
Maybe it was fully intended to be in the manual ....Only time will tell.....Who knows if there would have been a retraction if they had not been called out..

Pingfah

aerial wrote:

Pingfah wrote:

PJ_Soul wrote:

Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

I think you should read the whole thread, the whole thing is a load of nonsense pushed by a right wing nutjob website.

That is BS! The first post is fact....and you can still find it (they will detract it in the manual as soon as the new one comes out) in APA’s latest printed edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). They never retracted till it became public knowledge, 6 months later.

Who are the haters and liasr here? I must say you guys are persistent.."If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it", Hitler's right hand man...

No, it wasn't true that the mistake had anything to do with pedophilia activists, or that they "officially classified" pedophilia as an orientation, which were the two main points being made. In fact the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder did not even change between the previous and current edition, it's nothing more than an error in a text discussion about the diagnostic criteria.

I am not in the least bit surprised you can quote Goebbels at will though.

Pingfah

badbrains wrote:

Pingfah wrote:

chadwick wrote:

but you can beat their ass. it should happen just because of principle. people should feel dirty for not busting asses.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/0 ... 09497.html

This is where your attitude leads Chadwick. This fear mongering and promoting of vigilantism that people like you do leads only to one place.

Desperately sad, this poor man did nothing, but ended up being burned to death by people who think just like you.

Wow, that's fucked up. Burn an innocent man to death and the cops are taking blame for it to. That wouldn't happen here. Humanity at its best!

People are incredibly stupid, combine that with anger issues and this is what you get. This is what Chadwick is advocating for every time he comes out with one of these foolish emotional outbursts.

A few years back in Wales some poor doctor came home one day to find PEDO spray painted across her front door. Why? Because she was a Pediatrician, and somebody got confused. Never underestimate the idiocy of those around you.

PJ_Soul

aerial wrote:

PJ_Soul wrote:

Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

Not yet, but they are working on it.
Maybe it was fully intended to be in the manual ....Only time will tell.....Who knows if there would have been a retraction if they had not been called out..

You lost me. There is no way you're convincing me that the APA is "working" on making pedophilia acceptable. There is a big difference between identifying objective medical facts to fit them into the bigger picture of what remains criminal and unacceptable behaviour, and being a proponent for normalizing said criminal behaviours within the justice system. The technicalities of labelling pedophilia as a sexual orientation (although sounds like they are withdrawing this notion?? Or like the notion doesn't exist at all and reactionaries simply can't understand how studies are carried out and relayed?) are concerning because of what they could mean during criminal or civil trials given the right lawyer, but I don't think for a second that there is some kind of pro-pedophilia agenda here, as you seem to think. That is utterly ridiculous.

chadwick

nice job, pingfah

Pingfah

FYI Chadwick, I do not believe that you would want to see innocent people hurt, you don't seem like that sort of person at all. But nonetheless, what I posted is the face of vigilantism. It's a dangerous mindset to allow yourself to fall into and a very good example of why we have due process.

chadwick

please allow me a moment of your time

all people far & wide deserve to be able to protect themselves. this crime here in this topic is very much so a, 'ultimate evil ass violation beyond all that is good'

please allow battlefield nightwear
folks who harm messin around w/ kids should know the punishments are truly horrible for their health

Pingfah

Can anybody here translate nutter?

ajedigecko

Simple translation.

Commit evil against children, die

Even the most wretched, locked up murders, understand this.

Nutter?

Pingfah

Oh right, sorry I thought he might be adding something constructive to the conversation. Silly me.

ajedigecko

Consistency is highly constructive.