Pedophilia Officially Classified

2

Comments

  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    Maybe if we all start ignoring this posters posts, eventually that poster will go away. I'm gonna do my fucken hardest to ignore whatever that person posts again. :fp: :nono:
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    People shouldn't beat themselves up because of some story, old wive's tale, legend, myth, misinformation, half-truth or outright lie told to them by someone else. Basic Rule of Thumb #2... 'Consider the Source'. Take into account the possibility/probability of the story being a description founded in fact and/or truth... or the twisting of truths or a total fabrication to fit and support an underlying agenda or belief system.
    For example, A person with intense hatred of something will only find those things that support their hatred, regardless of those feelings/opinions not being based in fact or truth... and usually founded in emotion. And it's not just hate... love can also have the same affect.
    ...
    Anyways, go with the the attitude that if it sounds kinda kooky... like stories that sounds like things you'd hear Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann or Glenn Beck say... it's probably something you'd want to avoid taking at face value.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • Cosmo wrote:
    People shouldn't beat themselves up because of some story, old wive's tale, legend, myth, misinformation, half-truth or outright lie told to them by someone else. Basic Rule of Thumb #2... 'Consider the Source'. Take into account the possibility/probability of the story being a description founded in fact and/or truth... or the twisting of truths or a total fabrication to fit and support an underlying agenda or belief system.
    For example, A person with intense hatred of something will only find those things that support their hatred, regardless of those feelings/opinions not being based in fact or truth... and usually founded in emotion. And it's not just hate... love can also have the same affect.
    ...
    Anyways, go with the the attitude that if it sounds kinda kooky... like stories that sounds like things you'd hear Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann or Glenn Beck say... it's probably something you'd want to avoid taking at face value.

    I was exaggerating, but there is an element of truth to what I was saying.

    And I'm wondering why nobody picked up on me stammering away like GW did in one of his many ridiculous moments?

    You can't get fooled again. :lol:
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • I seem to remember a few months ago someone posting the same bullshit and saying that marriage equality would lead to people fucking their kids.

    I think I said something along the lines of "go fuck yourself."

    And hilarity ensued. I was so disgusted that the mods here would leave such a false, inflammatory and downright slanderous thing up that I stopped posting here for months.

    I've seen that while a small minority of Christians aren't discoid able liars, most of the hardcore ones will spend their time spreading made up, vile bullshit like this because their numbers are shrinking along with their donations, and they're getting desperate.

    People.... If you read some totally inflammatory, shocking and baffling thing - especially from someone like the one who posted this with a history of posting totally asinine, bogus, made-up, bonkers, Batshitcrazy, paranoid, delusional and downright dumbass shit... Assume that the opposite is true. Because you're going to be right 100.01% of the time. It's over 100% because the bullshit is kinda supersaturated at this point.
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    APA Statement on DSM-5 Text Error
    Pedophilic disorder text error to be corrected

    The American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
    Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) has recently been published after a comprehensive multi-year
    research and review of all of its diagnostic categories.

    In the case of pedophilic disorder, the diagnostic criteria essentially remained the same as in
    DSM-IV-TR. Only the disorder name was changed from “pedophilia” to “pedophilic disorder” to
    maintain consistency with the chapter’s other disorder listings.

    “Sexual orientation” is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its
    use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read “sexual interest.”
    In fact, APA
    considers pedophilic disorder a “paraphilia,” not a “sexual orientation.” This error will be
    corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual.

    APA stands firmly behind efforts to criminally prosecute those who sexually abuse and exploit
    children and adolescents. We also support continued efforts to develop treatments for those
    with pedophilic disorder with the goal of preventing future acts of abuse.


    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true! But will be changed in the next edition. Did I know they made a mistake? No......
    Here is a thought....would it have been changed if it was not reported?
    The the final, approved DSM-5 was released in May 2013 at APA's Annual Meeting.


    http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/13-67-DSM-Correction-103113.pdf
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,051
    aerial wrote:
    APA Statement on DSM-5 Text Error
    Pedophilic disorder text error to be corrected

    The American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
    Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) has recently been published after a comprehensive multi-year
    research and review of all of its diagnostic categories.

    In the case of pedophilic disorder, the diagnostic criteria essentially remained the same as in
    DSM-IV-TR. Only the disorder name was changed from “pedophilia” to “pedophilic disorder” to
    maintain consistency with the chapter’s other disorder listings.

    “Sexual orientation” is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its
    use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read “sexual interest.”
    In fact, APA
    considers pedophilic disorder a “paraphilia,” not a “sexual orientation.” This error will be
    corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual.

    APA stands firmly behind efforts to criminally prosecute those who sexually abuse and exploit
    children and adolescents. We also support continued efforts to develop treatments for those
    with pedophilic disorder with the goal of preventing future acts of abuse.


    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true! But will be changed in the next edition. Did I know they made a mistake? No......
    Here is a thought....would it have been changed if it was not reported?
    The the final, approved DSM-5 was released in May 2013 at APA's Annual Meeting.


    http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/13-67-DSM-Correction-103113.pdf

    Oh dang! And I thought we had a real issue going on here. :lol:
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • aerial wrote:
    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true!


    Well... no. you said it had been "officially classified" and what had actually happened was a misprint.

    Not quite the same thing.

    And it wasn't "legit at the time."

    Many of the right wing nut sites were reporting it as "legit" but it was always known that this was a misprint.
  • BentleyspopBentleyspop Posts: 10,769
    aerial wrote:
    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true!


    Well... no. you said it had been "officially classified" and what had actually happened was a misprint.

    Not quite the same thing.

    And it wasn't "legit at the time."

    Many of the right wing nut sites were reporting it as "legit" but it was always known that this was a misprint.

    We also know that the right wing nut sited will NEVER print or post a retraction or correction.
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    aerial wrote:
    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true!


    Well... no. you said it had been "officially classified" and what had actually happened was a misprint.

    Not quite the same thing.

    And it wasn't "legit at the time."

    Many of the right wing nut sites were reporting it as "legit" but it was always known that this was a misprint.

    We also know that the right wing nut sited will NEVER print or post a retraction or correction.

    I guess you missed that post.
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    aerial wrote:
    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true!


    Well... no. you said it had been "officially classified" and what had actually happened was a misprint.

    Not quite the same thing.

    And it wasn't "legit at the time."

    Many of the right wing nut sites were reporting it as "legit" but it was always known that this was a misprint.

    They did not retract till
    For Immediate Release:
    Eve Herold, 703-907-8640 October 31, 2013
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,605
    aerial wrote:
    aerial wrote:
    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true!


    Well... no. you said it had been "officially classified" and what had actually happened was a misprint.

    Not quite the same thing.

    And it wasn't "legit at the time."

    Many of the right wing nut sites were reporting it as "legit" but it was always known that this was a misprint.

    They did not retract till
    For Immediate Release:
    Eve Herold, 703-907-8640 October 31, 2013
    may I ask if you went direct to the source from the article you posted BEFORE you took their word for it?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    aerial wrote:
    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true! But will be changed in the next edition. Did I know they made a mistake? No......
    Here is a thought....would it have been changed if it was not reported?
    The the final, approved DSM-5 was released in May 2013 at APA's Annual Meeting.


    http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/13-67-DSM-Correction-103113.pdf
    ...
    Actually... it was your hysterical frenzy that prompted my initial response. You simply reposted an article from Charisma Media (best known for its magazines such as Charisma, Ministry Today and Christian Retailing) and their frenzied hystrical response that was aimed at creating a frenzied hysterics from people they knew would get all hysterical about it.
    A simple pause... consideration of the source of the article... and a simple internet search would have lead you to the simple truth of the matter, rather than the spreading of an agenda item looking to lump Gays and Lesbians with pedophiles and sheep fuckers.
    Again... a simple rule of thumb... everything you read on the Internet is not true. Look for the truth... before settling on an agreement.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    Cosmo wrote:
    aerial wrote:
    In other words, folks who are *so* quick to condemn should not condemn me for posting what was legit at the time. It was true! But will be changed in the next edition. Did I know they made a mistake? No......
    Here is a thought....would it have been changed if it was not reported?
    The the final, approved DSM-5 was released in May 2013 at APA's Annual Meeting.


    http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/13-67-DSM-Correction-103113.pdf
    ...
    Actually... it was your hysterical frenzy that prompted my initial response. You simply reposted an article from Charisma Media (best known for its magazines such as Charisma, Ministry Today and Christian Retailing) and their frenzied hystrical response that was aimed at creating a frenzied hysterics from people they knew would get all hysterical about it.
    A simple pause... consideration of the source of the article... and a simple internet search would have lead you to the simple truth of the matter, rather than the spreading of an agenda item looking to lump Gays and Lesbians with pedophiles and sheep fuckers.
    Again... a simple rule of thumb... everything you read on the Internet is not true. Look for the truth... before settling on an agreement.


    4:30PM EDT 10/30/2013 story comes out....
    so when looking for proof this was fact. You just had to go to the APA’s latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
    It was there till....
    11/1/13 and is still in the written manual and has been since May.

    7:00AM EDT 11/1/2013 Retraction
    In response to media calls, including queries from Charisma News, the APA admitted there was an error in the DSM and announced plans to correct its manual to make it clear that it does not classify pedophilia as a sexual orientation.

    Charisma News originally reported the AFA’s shocking revelation that the APA’s latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) now classifies pedophilia as a sexual orientation or preference instead of a disorder.

    Our investigation into the report and statement reveals that the AFA and its American Family Radio network talk show host Sandy Rios were not fear-mongering. Text associated with the DSM did indeed use the words sexual orientation.


    So quit bashing and get over your Christianophobia.....and maybe the rest of you should do some research yourselves :roll:

    http://www.charismanews.com/us/41605-pedophilia-described-as-sexual-orientation-but-apa-claims-it-was-their-error
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,958
    Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

    Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • chadwickchadwick Posts: 21,157
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

    Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??
    but you can beat their ass. it should happen just because of principle. people should feel dirty for not busting asses.
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."

    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • PingfahPingfah Posts: 350
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

    Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

    I think you should read the whole thread, the whole thing is a load of nonsense pushed by a right wing nutjob website.
  • PingfahPingfah Posts: 350
    chadwick wrote:
    but you can beat their ass. it should happen just because of principle. people should feel dirty for not busting asses.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/0 ... 09497.html

    This is where your attitude leads Chadwick. This fear mongering and promoting of vigilantism that people like you do leads only to one place.

    Desperately sad, this poor man did nothing, but ended up being burned to death by people who think just like you.
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    Pingfah wrote:
    chadwick wrote:
    but you can beat their ass. it should happen just because of principle. people should feel dirty for not busting asses.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/0 ... 09497.html

    This is where your attitude leads Chadwick. This fear mongering and promoting of vigilantism that people like you do leads only to one place.

    Desperately sad, this poor man did nothing, but ended up being burned to death by people who think just like you.

    Wow, that's fucked up. Burn an innocent man to death and the cops are taking blame for it to. That wouldn't happen here. Humanity at its best! :cry:
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    Pingfah wrote:
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

    Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

    I think you should read the whole thread, the whole thing is a load of nonsense pushed by a right wing nutjob website.


    That is BS! The first post is fact....and you can still find it (they will detract it in the manual as soon as the new one comes out) in APA’s latest printed edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). They never retracted till it became public knowledge, 6 months later.

    Who are the haters and liasr here? I must say you guys are persistent.."If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it", Hitler's right hand man...
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

    Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

    Not yet, but they are working on it.
    Maybe it was fully intended to be in the manual ....Only time will tell.....Who knows if there would have been a retraction if they had not been called out..
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • PingfahPingfah Posts: 350
    aerial wrote:
    Pingfah wrote:
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

    Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

    I think you should read the whole thread, the whole thing is a load of nonsense pushed by a right wing nutjob website.


    That is BS! The first post is fact....and you can still find it (they will detract it in the manual as soon as the new one comes out) in APA’s latest printed edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). They never retracted till it became public knowledge, 6 months later.

    Who are the haters and liasr here? I must say you guys are persistent.."If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it", Hitler's right hand man...

    No, it wasn't true that the mistake had anything to do with pedophilia activists, or that they "officially classified" pedophilia as an orientation, which were the two main points being made. In fact the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder did not even change between the previous and current edition, it's nothing more than an error in a text discussion about the diagnostic criteria.

    I am not in the least bit surprised you can quote Goebbels at will though.
  • PingfahPingfah Posts: 350
    badbrains wrote:
    Pingfah wrote:
    chadwick wrote:
    but you can beat their ass. it should happen just because of principle. people should feel dirty for not busting asses.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/0 ... 09497.html

    This is where your attitude leads Chadwick. This fear mongering and promoting of vigilantism that people like you do leads only to one place.

    Desperately sad, this poor man did nothing, but ended up being burned to death by people who think just like you.

    Wow, that's fucked up. Burn an innocent man to death and the cops are taking blame for it to. That wouldn't happen here. Humanity at its best! :cry:

    People are incredibly stupid, combine that with anger issues and this is what you get. This is what Chadwick is advocating for every time he comes out with one of these foolish emotional outbursts.

    A few years back in Wales some poor doctor came home one day to find PEDO spray painted across her front door. Why? Because she was a Pediatrician, and somebody got confused. :lol: Never underestimate the idiocy of those around you.
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,958
    aerial wrote:
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    Have they classified horse fuckers yet?

    Wtf is this? So they are protected under all the laws that come with sexual equality? I.e., you can't fire someone because he or she is a convicted pedophile??

    Not yet, but they are working on it.
    Maybe it was fully intended to be in the manual ....Only time will tell.....Who knows if there would have been a retraction if they had not been called out..
    You lost me. There is no way you're convincing me that the APA is "working" on making pedophilia acceptable. There is a big difference between identifying objective medical facts to fit them into the bigger picture of what remains criminal and unacceptable behaviour, and being a proponent for normalizing said criminal behaviours within the justice system. The technicalities of labelling pedophilia as a sexual orientation (although sounds like they are withdrawing this notion?? Or like the notion doesn't exist at all and reactionaries simply can't understand how studies are carried out and relayed?) are concerning because of what they could mean during criminal or civil trials given the right lawyer, but I don't think for a second that there is some kind of pro-pedophilia agenda here, as you seem to think. That is utterly ridiculous.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • chadwickchadwick Posts: 21,157
    nice job, pingfah
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."

    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • PingfahPingfah Posts: 350
    FYI Chadwick, I do not believe that you would want to see innocent people hurt, you don't seem like that sort of person at all. But nonetheless, what I posted is the face of vigilantism. It's a dangerous mindset to allow yourself to fall into and a very good example of why we have due process.
  • chadwickchadwick Posts: 21,157
    please allow me a moment of your time

    all people far & wide deserve to be able to protect themselves. this crime here in this topic is very much so a, 'ultimate evil ass violation beyond all that is good'

    please allow battlefield nightwear
    folks who harm messin around w/ kids should know the punishments are truly horrible for their health
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."

    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • PingfahPingfah Posts: 350
    Can anybody here translate nutter?
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko Posts: 2,430
    Simple translation.

    Commit evil against children, die

    Even the most wretched, locked up murders, understand this.

    Nutter?
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • PingfahPingfah Posts: 350
    Oh right, sorry I thought he might be adding something constructive to the conversation. Silly me.
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko Posts: 2,430
    Consistency is highly constructive.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
Sign In or Register to comment.